The invention relates to a catalyst and a catalytic preparation of bimodal molecular weight distribution polymers and copolymers of ethylene, in one reactor. A make-up catalyst and a bimetallic catalyst are used simultaneously to control the proportion of different weight fractions in broad or bimodal molecular weight distribution polyolefin resin product. The invention relates to a catalyst system comprising (A) a bimetallic catalyst and (B) a make-up catalyst. The catalyst system comprises greater than 50 -weight per cent of the bimetallic catalyst. It is important to have the bimetallic catalyst as the primary catalyst supply to minimize gel formation. The bimetallic catalyst contains two transition metals or two different transition metal compounds, each having different hydrogen response characteristics. Because of the different hydrogen response of each of the two sources of transition metal in the bimetallic catalyst, each will produce a different molecular weight component under identical olefin polymerization conditions. In preferred embodiments below, the LMW component is produced by the Zr site while the HMW component is produced by the Ti site.

The bimetallic catalyst produces broad or bimodal molecular weight distribution polyolefin resin whose composition depends on the ratio of the concentration of the two transition metal catalyst components producing the HMW/LMW components. Thus the product of olefin polymerization in the presence of such a catalyst will comprise at least two fractions each of different molecular weight, and one having a relatively high molecular weight (hereinafter HMW) relative to a second fraction of relatively lower molecular weight (LMW) .

In that product, the weight fraction of the HMW/LMW components in the final product is fixed by the relative

concentration of the two metal species in the bimetallic catalyst. The make-up catalyst (B) consists of a single metal component of the two components constituting the bimetallic catalyst; it is added in proportion necessary to increase either the amount of the HMW or the LMW component. The identity of the transition metal in the make-up catalyst added depends on whether increase of the HMW or of the LMW component produced by the bimetallic catalyst is sought. The make-up catalyst (B) is added, for example, as a make-up stream of the pure catalyst components such that the desired composition of the HMW/LMW components is achieved. In preferred embodiments below, a pure Ti catalyst can be co-fed if the HMW component weight fraction needs to be increased. In preferred embodiments below, a zirconium based (zirconocene) catalyst is co-fed to increase the LMW component weight fraction.

The figure is a gel permeation chromatogra of polyethylene produced with sample which is a plot of weight fraction vs. molecular weight; the unbroken line is a graph of a bimodal molecular weight polymer produced with a bimetallic catalyst in the absence of a make-up catalyst of the invention. The broken line is a graph of the bimodal molecular weight distribution product produced with the bimetallic catalyst plus a make-up catalyst. For broad or bimodal molecular weight distribution polyethylene resins, the weight fraction of the HMW component should be in the range of 0.10 to 0.90. Another measurable property of the bimodal products is flow index, (FI or I ₂₁ , measured at 190°C in accordance with ASTM D- 1238, Condition F.) The FI of the bimodal molecular weight distribution product is in the range of 2 to 100. MFR of products are preferably in the range of 30 to 250. MFR is defined herein as the ratio of the high load melt index (HLMI or I ₂₁ ) divided by the melt index, i.e.,

MFR =

J-2.16

Smaller MFR values indicate relatively narrow molecular weight distribution polymers.

The major component (A) of the catalyst system comprises a carrier and two different sources of transition metal (zirconium, hafnium, titanium and vanadium) , and may be referred to as a bimetallic catalyst. The major component is alone effective to polymerize ethylene, under ethylene polymerization conditions, to produce bimodal molecular weight distribution resin. This major component is more than 50 weight percent of the catalyst system of this invention. Because of the different hydrogen response of each of the two sources of transition metal in the bimetallic catalyst, each will produce a different molecular weight component under identical olefin polymerization conditions. In embodiments below, the metal of highest hydroσen response will be present in the catalyst in amounts of 0.2 to 0.6 weight percent preferably 0.3 to 0.5 of the bimetallic catalyst; in preferred embodiments below that metal is zirconium. The metal of lowest hydrogen response will be present in amounts in the catalyst of 0.5 to 3.0 preferably 0.8 to 2.0 weight percent; in preferred embodiments below that metal is titanium. This major component catalyst of the catalyst system of the invention is catalytically effective to produce bimodal molecular weight distribution product containing 0.35 to 0.75 weight percent of the high molecular weight component, HMW.

Catalyst component (A) contains at least two transition metals. Preferably, one is in the form of a metallocene and one transition metal in the form of a non- etallocene, have an activity of at least 1000 g polymer/g catalyst or 50 kg polymer/g of each transition metal.

The catalyst component (A) requires a cocatalyst comprising an aluminum alkyl compound, such as a trialkyl aluminum, free of alumoxane and free of water, or oxygen- containing oligomers and polymers of the aluminum alkyl compound, and a catalyst precursor comprising a carrier, an alumoxane and at least one metallocene; in one embodiment the catalysts further include a non-metallocene transition metal source.

The carrier material is a solid, particulate, porous, preferably inorganic material, such as an oxide of silicon and/or of aluminum. The carrier material is used in the form of a dry powder having an average particle size of from 1 micron to 500 microns, preferably from 10 microns to 250 microns. The surface area of the carrier is at least 3 square meters per gram (m ² /g) » and preferably at least 50 m ² /g up to 350 m ² /g. The carrier material should be dry, that is, free of absorbed water. Drying of the carrier material can be effected by heating at 100°C to 1000*C, preferably at 600'C. When the carrier is silica, it is heated to at least 200'C, preferably 200 ^β C to 850°C and most preferably at 600*C. The carrier material must have at least some active hydroxyl (OH) groups to produce the catalyst composition of this invention.

In the most preferred embodiment, the carrier is silica which, prior to the use thereof in the first catalyst synthesis step, has been dehydrated by fluidizing it with nitrogen and heating at 600*C for 16 hours to achieve a surface hydroxyl group concentration of 0.7 millimoles per gram (mmols/g) . The silica of the most preferred embodiment is a high surface area, amorphous silica (surface area = 300 m ² /g; pore volume of 1.65 cm ³ /g) . and it is a material marketed under the tradenames of Davison 952 or Davison 955 by the Davison Chemical Division of W.R. Grace and Company. The silica is in the form of spherical particles, e.g., as obtained by a spray-drying

process. As procured, these silicas are not calcined; and this must be dehydrated, as indicated above.

The catalyst synthesis thereof is undertaken under inert conditions, in the absence of water and of oxygen. The carrier is dispersed in solvent to form a slurry. The carrier material, having said (OH) groups, is slurried in a non-polar solvent and the resulting slurry is contacted with at least one organomagnesium compound having the empirical formula below. The slurry of the carrier material in the solvent is prepared by introducing the carrier into the solvent, preferably while stirring, and heating the mixture to 25 to 70*C, preferably to 40 to 60"C. Temperatures here are critical with respect to the non-metallocene transition metal which is subsequently added; that is temperatures in this slurry of 90°C or higher may result in deactivation of the transition metal added subsequently. Accordingly, all catalyst precursor synthesis steps are conducted below 90*C. The slurry is then contacted with the aforementioned organomagnesium compound, while the heating is continued as indicated.

The organomagnesium compound has the empirical formula * Mg R' _n where R and R' are the same or different C ₂ -C ₁₂ alkyl groups, preferably C ₄ -C _αo alkyl groups, more preferably C ₄ -C ₈ alkyl groups, and most preferably both R and R' are mostly butyl groups, and m and n are each 0, 1 or 2, providing that m + n is equal to the valence of Mg.

Suitable non-polar solvents are materials in which all of the reactants used herein, i.e., the organomagnesium compound, and the transition metal compound, are at least partially soluble and which are liquid under suitable reaction conditions. Preferred non-polar solvents are alkanes, such as isopentane, isohexane, n-hexane, n- heptane, octane, nonane, and decane, although a variety of other materials including cycloalkanes, such as cyclohexane, aromatics, such as benzene, toluene and

ethylbenzene, may also be employed. The most preferred non-polar solvent is isopentane. Prior to use, the non- polar solvent should be purified, such as by percolation through silica gel and/or molecular sieves, to remove traces of water, oxygen, polar compounds, and other materials capable of adversely affecting catalyst activity.

In the most preferred embodiment of the synthesis of catalyst component A it is important to add only such an amount of the organomagnesium compound that will be deposited - physically or chemically - onto the support since any excess of the organomagnesium compound in the solution may react with other synthesis chemicals and precipitate outside of the support. The carrier drying temperature affects the number of sites on the carrier available for the organomagnesium compound - the higher the drying temperature the lower the number of sites. Thus, the exact molar ratio of the organomagnesium compound to the hydroxyl groups will vary and must be determined on a case-by-case basis to assure that only so much of the organomagnesium compound is added to the solution as will be deposited onto the support without leaving any excess of the organomagnesium compound in the solution. Furthermore, it is believed that the molar amount of the organomagnesium compound deposited onto the support is greater than the molar content of the hydroxyl groups on the support. Thus, the molar ratios given below are intended only as an approximate guideline and the exact amount of the organomagnesium compound in this embodiment must be controlled by the functional limitation discussed above, i.e., it must not be greater than that which can be deposited onto the support. If greater than that amount is added to the solvent, the excess may react with the non- metallocene transition metal compound, thereby forming a precipitate outside of the support which is detrimental in the synthesis of our catalyst and must be avoided. The amount of the organomagnesium compound which is not greater

than that deposited onto the support can be determined in any conventional manner, e.g., by adding the organomagnesium compound to the slurry of the carrier in the solvent, while stirring the slurry, until the organomagnesium compound is detected as a solution in the solven .

For example, for the silica carrier heated at 600°C, the amount of the organomagnesium compound added to the slurry is such that the molar ratio of Mg to the hydroxyl groups (OH) on the solid carrier is 0.5:1 to 4:1, preferably 0.8:1 to 3:1, more preferably 0.9:1 to 2:1 and most preferably 1:1. The organomagnesium compound dissolves in the non-polar solvent to form a solution from which the organomagnesium compound is deposited onto the carrier.

It is also possible to add such an amount of the organomagesium compound which is in excess of that which will be deposited onto the support, and then remove, e.g., by filtration and washing, any excess of the organomagnesium compound. However, this alternative is less desirable than the most preferred embodiment described above.

The organomagnesium treated support is contacted with an organic alcohol reagent (ROH) containing RO- groups which are reactive or capable of displacing alkyl groups on the magnesium. The amount of this organic alcohol reagent is effective to provide a ROH:Mg ratio of 0.5 to 2.0, preferably 0.8 to 1.5.

Contact of the silica supported magnesium compound, with the organic alcohol reagent is undertaken in the slurry. Contact is undertaken at a temperature ranging from 25 ^β C to 80 ^β C, preferably 40°C to 60°C.

The alkyl group in the organic alcohol reagent can contain 2 to 12 carbon atoms, preferably 2 to 8; in the embodiments below, it is an alkyl containing 2 to 4 carbon atoms, particularly of 4 carbon atoms (butyl) . The

inclusion of the alcohol reagent step in the catalyst synthesis of the invention produces a catalyst which, relative to the absence of this step, is much more active, requires much less non-metallocene transition metal (e.g. titanium) , and is much more active with respect to the final catalyst composition produced by the addition of the metallocene-transition metal component.

After the addition of the organic alcohol reagent to the slurry is completed, the slurry is contacted with a non-metallocene transition metal compound, free of substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl groups. The slurry temperature must be maintained at 25 to 70*C, preferably to 40 to 60*C. As noted above, temperatures in this slurry of 90 ° C or greater may result in deactivation of the non-metallocene transition metal. Suitable non- metallocene transition metal compounds used herein are compounds of metals of Groups 4, and 5, of the Periodic Chart of the Elements, as published by Chemical and Engineering News, 63(5), 27, 1985, providing that such compounds are soluble in the non-polar solvents. Non- limiting examples of such compounds are titanium and vanadium halides, e.g., titanium tetrachloride, TiCl ₄ , vanadium tetrachloride, VC1 ₄ , vanadium oxytrichloride, V0C1 ₃ , titanium and vanadium alkoxides, wherein the alkoxide moiety has a branched or unbranched alkyl radical of 1 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably 1 to 6 carbon atoms. The preferred transition metal compounds are titanium compounds, preferably tetravalent titanium compounds. The most preferred titanium compound is titanium tetrachloride. The amount of titanium or vanadium, in non-metallocene form ranges from a Ti/Mg molar ratio of 0.3 to 1.0, preferably from 0.50 to 0.80.

Mixtures of such non-metallocene transition metal compounds may also be used and generally no restrictions are imposed on the transition metal compounds which may be included. Any transition metal compound that may be used

alone may also be used in conjunction with other transition metal compounds.

After the addition of the non-metallocene transition metal compound is complete, the slurry solvent is removed by evaporation or filtering to obtain a free-flowing powder. Next, incorporation of a metallocene can be undertaken. The metallocene is activated with an alumoxane.

Metallocene compound(s) has the formula Cp _x MA _y B _z in which Cp is an unsubstituted or substituted cyclopentadienyl group, M is zirconium or hafnium or titanium and A and B belong to the group including a halogen atom, hydrogen or an alkyl group. In the above formula of the metallocene compound, the preferred transition metal atom M is zirconium. In the above formula of the metallocene compound, the Cp group is an unsubstituted, a mono- or a polysubstituted cyclopentadienyl group: and x is at least 1. The substituents on the cyclopentadienyl group can be preferably straight-chain Cj-C ₆ alkyl groups. The cyclopentadienyl group can be also a part of a bicyclic or a tricyclic moiety such as indenyl, tetrahydroindenyl, fluorenyl or a partially hydrogenated fluorenyl group, as well as a part of a substituted bicyclic or tricyclic moiety. In the case when x in the above formula of the metallocene compound is equal to 2, the cyclopentadienyl groups can be also bridged by polymethylene or dialkylsilane groups, such as -CH ₂ -, -CH--CH--, -CR'R"- and -CR'R"-CR'R"- where R' and R" are short alkyl groups or hydrogen, -Si(CH ₃ ) ₂ -, Si(CH ₃ ) ₂ -CH--CH ₂ -Si(CH ₃ ) ₂ - and similar bridge groups. If the A and B substituents in the above formula of the metallocene compound are halogen atoms, they belong to the group of fluorine, chlorine, bromine or iodine; and y + z is 3 or less, provided that x + y + z equals the valence of M. If the substituents A and B in the above formula of the metallocene compound are alkyl

groups, they are preferably straight-chain or branched C--C ₈ alkyl groups, such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, n-pentyl, n-hexyl or n-octyl. Suitable metallocene compounds include bis(cyclopentadienyl)metal dihalides, bis(cyclopentadienyl)metal hydridohalides, bis(cyclopentadienyl)metal monoalkyl monohalides, bis(cyclopentadienyl)metal dialkyls and bis(indenyl)metal dihalides wherein the metal is zirconium or hafnium, halide groups are preferably chlorine and the alkyl groups are C-- C ₆ alkyls. Illustrative, but non-limiting examples of metallocenes include bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride, bis(cyclopentadienyl)hafnium dichloride, bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, bis(cyclopentadienyl) afnium dimethyl, bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium hydridochloride, bis(cyclopentadienyl)hafnium hydridochloride, bis(n- butylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride, bis(n- butylcyclopentadienyl)hafnium dichloride, bis(n- butylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, bis(n- butylcyclopentadienyl)hafnium dimethyl, bis(n- butylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium hydridochloride, bis(n- butylcyclopentadienyl)hafnium hydridochloride, bis(diroethylcyclopentadienyl) zirconium dichloride, bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride, bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)hafnium dichloride, cyclopentadienyl-zirconium trichloride, bis(indenyl)zirconium dichloride, bis(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-l- indenyl)zirconium dichloride, and ethylene-[bis(4,5,6,7- tetrahydro-1-indenyl) ] zirconium dichloride. The metallocene compounds utilized within the embodiment of this art can be used as crystalline solids, as solutions in aromatic hydrocarbons or in a supported form.

The alumoxane can be impregnated into the carrier at any stage of the process of catalyst preparation. In this embodiment, the amount of Al, provided by alumoxane, is

sufficient to provide an Al:transition metal (provided by metallocene) mole ratio ranging from 50 to 500, preferably 75 to 300.

The class of alumoxanes comprises oligomeric linear and/or cyclic alkylalumoxanes represented by the formula: R-(Al(R)-0) _n -AlR ₂ for oligomeric, linear alumoxanes and (-Al(R)-0-) _B for oligomeric cyclic alumoxane wherein n is 1-40, preferably 10-20, m is 3-40, preferably 3-20 and R is a Cj-Cj alkyl group and preferably methyl, methyl alumoxane (MAO) . MAO is a mixture of oligomers with a very wide distribution of molecular weights and usually with an average molecular weight of 1200. MAO is typically kept in solution in toluene.

Incorporation of the activated metallocene component onto the carrier can be accomplished in various ways. Incorporation of either or both the alumoxane and metallocene compound can be into the slurry resulting from the addition, i.e. after the addition, of the non- metallocene transition metal. Alternatively, and in accordance with the unique method of infusion of alumoxane into the pores of the carrier, the carrier slurry can be stripped of solvent, after the addition of the non-metallocene transition metal compound, to form a free-flowing powder. The free flowing powder can then be impregnated by determining the pore volume of the carrier and providing an alumoxane (or metallocene-alumoxane) solution in a volume equal to or less than the total pore volume of the carrier, and recovering a dry catalyst precursor. The resulting free- flowing powder, referred to herein as a catalyst precursor, is combined with an activator (sometimes referred as a cocatalyst) .

The volume of the solution comprising a solid alumoxane and a solvent therefore can vary. In a preferred embodiment, of alumoxane incorporation into the carrier, one of the controlling factors in the alumoxane

incorporation into the carrier material is the pore volume of the silica. In this preferred embodiment, the process of impregnating the carrier material is by infusion of the alumoxane solution, without forming a slurry of the carrier material, such as silica, in the alumoxane solution. The volume of the solution of the alumoxane is sufficient to fill the pores of the carrier material without forming a slurry in which the volume of the solution exceeds the pore volume of the silica; accordingly and preferably, the maximum volume of the alumoxane solution is, does not exceed, the total pore volume of the carrier material sample. That maximum volume of the alumoxane solution insures that no slurry of silica is formed. Accordingly, if the pore volume of the carrier material is 1.65cm ³ /g;. then the volume of alumoxane will be equal to or less than 1.65 cmVgram of carrier material. As a result of this proviso, the impregnated carrier material will appear dry immediatedly following impregnation although the pores of the carrier will be filled with inter alia solvent. Solvent may be removed from the alumoxane impregnated pores of the carrier material by heating and/or under a positive pressure induced by an inert gas, such as nitrogen. If employed, the conditions in this step are controlled to reduce, if not to eliminate, agglomeration of impregnated carrier particles and/or crosslinking of the alumoxane. In this step, solvent can be removed by evaporation effected at relatively low elevated temperatures of above 40°C and below 50"C to obviate agglomeration of catalyst particles and crosslinking of the alumoxane. Although solvent can be removed by evaporation at relatively higher temperatures than that defined by the range above 40°C and below 50°C, very short heating times must be employed to obviate agglomeration of catalyst particles and crosslinking of the alumoxane. In a preferred embodiment, the metallocene is added to the solution of the alumoxane prior to impregnating the

carrier with the solution. Again, as noted above, the maximum volume of the alumoxane solution also including the metallocene is the total pore volume of the carrier material sample. The mole ratio of alumoxane provided aluminum, expressed as Al, to metallocene metal expressed as M (e.g. Zr) , ranges from 50 to 500, preferably 75 to 300, and most preferably 90 to 200. An added advantage of the present invention is that this Al:Zr ratio can be directly controlled. In a preferred embodiment the alumoxane and metallocene compound are mixed together at a temperature of 20 to 80"C, for 0.1 to 6.0 hours, prior to use in the infusion step. The solvent for the metallocene and alumoxane can be appropriate solvents, such as aromatic hydrocarbons, halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons, ethers, cyclic ethers or esters, preferably it is toluene.

The catalyst component formed from the organomagnesium compound, the non-metallocene transition metal and the activated metallocene, is activated with a cocatalyst, which is an alkyl aluminum compound, free of water and free of oxygen-containing oligomers.

The cocatalyst can be a trialkylaluminum, free of an alumoxane. Preferably, trimethylaluminum (TMA) is the cocatalyst or activator. The amount of the TMA activator is sufficient to give an Al:Ti molar ratio of 10:1 to 1000:1, preferably 15:1 to 300:1, and most preferably 20:1 to 100:1.

Moreover, in accordance with the invention, the cocatalyst or activator is fed to e.g. , a fluid bed reactor for polymerizations and copolymerizations of ethylene in the absence of alumoxane solution.

The make-up component of the catalyst system of the invention comprises one of those two different sources of transition metal, which are contained in the major component of the catalyst system; it is effective to increase the amount of one of the two molecular weight components, HMW or LMW; and to alter the overall polymer FI

and MFR. In embodiments below, it is effective to increase FI and MFR. The make-up component of the catalyst system comprises only 1.0% to 50%, preferably 15% to 30% of the catalyst system. It produces a monomodal molecular weight polymer component. The make-up catalyst will provide monomodal polymer component in amount comprising 1 to 30 weight percent of the ultimate resin product. Catalyst Composition

The make-up catalyst (B) of the invention comprises a carrier, an alumoxane and at least one metallocene. It is free-flowing and particulate in form comprising dry powder particles having a particle size of from 1 micron to 250 microns, preferably from 10 microns to 150 microns. The catalyst which contains only one transition metal in the form of a metallocene has an activity of at least 200 kg polymer/g of transition metal. The alumoxane and metallocene loading on the carrier is such that the amount of aluminum, (elemental basis) provided by the alumoxane, on the carrier ranges from 1 to 40 weight percent, preferably from 5 to 30 weight percent, and most preferably from 5 to 15 weight percent. The optimum MAO loading (Al) is in the range of 3 to 15 mmoles (Al) per gram of silica carrier;»if a silica carrier is overloaded with MAO, the catalyst activity is lower and the catalyst particles agglomerate with attendant problems of transferring the catalyst.

In the make-up catalyst the amount of metallocene on the carrier ranges, on a transition metal elemental basis, from 0.001 to 10 weight percent, preferably from 0.05 to 0.5, and most preferably from 0.10 to 0.3 weight percent. Accordingly the ratio of Al:Zr (on an elemental basis) in the catalyst can range from 25 to 10,000, usually within the range of from 70 to 980 but preferably from 70 to 350 or 100 to 350, and most preferably from 100 to 200. Both the carrier material and the metallocene of the make-up catalyst (B) can be and usually is identical to

those corresponding components in the major component (A) referred as the bimetallic catalyst. Accordingly, the carrier and the metallocenes, as well as the aluminoxane, described above, are those which can be used to produce the make-up catalyst. Moreover, the process of impregnating the carrier with alumoxane activated metallocene may be the preferred process described above in which the activated metallocene is in a solution, the volume of which corresponds to the total bore volume of the carrier sample; in this way no slurry is formed. However, wet techniques with slurry formation may be employed to form the make-up catalyst.

Alpha-olefins are polymerized with the catalyst system of the present invention by any suitable process. Such processes include polymerizations carried out in suspension, in solution or in the gas phase. Gas phase polymerization reactions are preferred, e.g. , those taking place in stirred bed reactors and, especially, fluidized bed reactors. The polymerization is carried out at relatively low temperatures, e.g., from 30 to 105°C.

Preferably, polymerization pressures are less than 10,000 psi, preferably less than 1000 psi, and most preferably in the range of 100 to 350 psi.

A particularly desirable method for producing polyethylene polymers according to the present invention is in a fluid bed reactor. Such a reactor and means for operating it are described by Nowlin et al, U.S. Patent 4,481,301, the entire contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference. The polymer produced in such a reactor contains the catalyst particles because the catalyst is not separated from the polymer.

The molecular weight of the polymer may be controlled in a known manner, e.g., by using hydrogen. With the catalysts produced according to the present invention, molecular weight may be suitably controlled with hydrogen when the polymerization is carried out at relatively low

temperatures, e.g., from 30 to 105*C. This control of molecular weight may be evidenced by measurable positive change in melt index (I ₂ ) of the polymer produced.

When a fluid bed reactor is employed, the catalyst system of the invention can be introduced, separately, via two catalyst feeders or a mixture thereof can be fed to the reactor.

The polyolefin resin products of the invention can be low density products of densities of less than 0.94 g/cc. Preferably, the products are high density products with densities of greater than 0.94. The products are broad or bimodal molecular weight distribution products which contain 0.10 to 0.90, preferably 0.30 to 0.70 most preferably 0.50 to 0.65 weight percent of the high molecular weight component.

The film products exhibit excellent Dart Drop Impact (DDI) as measured by ASTM D 1709. The products exhibit Dart Drop Impact (DDI) in the range of 150 to 800g, preferably from 300 to 800 g and most preferably from 400 to 800 g for a nominal 1 mil gauge film.

The resins resulting from the process of the invention exhibit FI of 2 to 100, depending upon product application. The FI is a measure of a resin's viscosity which relates to its processability. Increase in resin FI means lower viscosity which improves processability. However, there is generally a trade-off with properties. Typically, as FI increases, properties deteriorate. For most product applications, there is an optimum FI for maximized processability and properties, which also depends upon MWD. Ethylene polymers, as well as copolymers of ethylene with one or more C ₃ -C ₁₀ alpha-olefins, can be produced in accordance with the invention. Thus, copolymers having two monomeric units are possible as well as terpolymers having three monomeric units. Particular examples of such

polymers include ethylene/1-butene copolymers, ethylene/1- hexene copolymers and ethylene/4-methyl-l-pentene copolymers.

EXAMPLES Catalysts

Catalyst Example 1

(A) Titanium Catalyst Component Preparation. 541 grams of Davison grade 955(600*C calcination temperature) silica was weighed into a two-gallon stainless steel autoclave containing a stirring paddle. Next, ca. 4.8 liters of dry isopentane was added to the autoclave and the stirring rate was set at 100 rpm. The temperature of the silica/isopentane slurry was 54-58*C. Next, 546 mis of dibutylmagnesium (0.713 mmol/ml) was added to the slurry. The contents of the autoclave were stirred for 60 minutes. Then, 42.8 mis of neat 1-butanol were added and stirring was continued for one hour. Finally, 21.4 mis of titanium tetrachloride was added to the autoclave and stirring continued for 60 minutes. After this time, all solvents were removed by evaporation under a nitrogen purge. Catalyst yield was 496 grams of a white free-flowing powder. Ti found 1.45 wt.%; Mg found 1.41 wt.%. Catalyst Example 2

Preparation of Bimetallic Catalyst Solution B: 15.97 grams of (BuCp) ₂ ZrCl ₂ was transferred to a one-liter bottle and 846 ml of a 4.67 Molar (13.7 wt.% Al) solution of methylalumoxane were added. The bottle was shaken for one minute to form a yellow solution which was transferred into a 1.5 liter stainless steel hoke bomb and used immediately as described below.

Under an inert atmosphere, 465 grams of the titanium- containing catalyst described above in Example 1 was added to a 2-gallon, glass-reactor vessel containing a helical stirrer to agitate the catalyst powder and a temperature jacket which was set at 30'C. The stirrer was set at 125 rpm. Then, the contents of the hoke bomb (solution B) was

added to the titanium-containing catalyst in approximately 5-10 ml aliquots every 30-60 seconds over a 45 minute period. The total volume of solution (B) used was such that the titanium containing catalyst always appeared "dry" during the entire addition time. However, during this addition time, the white titanium-containing catalyst turned a dark brown color. After the addition of solution (B) was complete, the jacket temperature was set at 45°C and the residual toluene was removed with a nitrogen purge for 5 hrs. After this time the catalyst was a dark brown free-flowing powder. Analytical results: Mg, 0.86 wt.%; Ti, 0.91 wt.%; Al, 13.0 wt.% and Zr, 0.45 wt.%. Example 3 Make-Up Catalyst Preparation: 493g of silica (Davison 955) , dehydrated at 250 ° C, was reacted with a solution of 6.986 g of (n-butylCp) ₂ ZrCl ₂ dissolved in 670 grams of MAO in toluene as described in Example 2. The MAO solution contained 13.7 wt.% Al. The Al/Zr ratio was 200:1. The catalyst was dried under flowing N ₂ at 45°C for 5 hours, and was sieved to remove any particles larger than 150 microns. The catalyst contained 9.2 wt.% Al and 0.17 wt.% Zr. Example 4 This example illustrates the effect of cofeeding a bimetallic catalyst product in Example 2 with and without a cofeed of the catalyst produced in Example 3. The polymerization was conducted in the fluid bed reactor under the following conditions: reactor temperature of 95°C, ethylene partial pressure of 190-195 psig, H ₂ /C ₂ ratio of .009-.011, C ₆ =/C ₂ = =.013, and TMA level of 240-245 ppm. The results of Example 4 are summarized in Table I.

The increase in FI and MFR in Resin B of Table I is a direct result of the increase in the weight fraction of the LMW component produced by cofeeding both the catalysts of Examples 2 and 3. The attached GPC figure also shows this

increase. In addition, the resultant increase in the LMW weight fraction is accomplished without creating excessive fines (<6%) in the reactor.

TABLE I - Results of Example 4

Catalyst Feed

Resin Example 2 Example 3 Density FI MFR % Fines

A 100% 0% .947 10.0 85 .7 B 78% 22% .950 26.4 121 4.2

Example 5

This example illustrates the effect of cofeeding a bimetallic catalyst product in Example 2 with and without a cofeed of the catalyst produced in Example 3. The polymerization conditions were similar to Example 4, except for the presence of isopentane. The fluid bed reactor conditions are as follows: reactor temperature of 95*C, ethylene partial pressure of 190-195 psig, H2/C2 ratio of

0.009-0.011, C6"/C2" = 0.013, isopentane/C2" = 0.16, and TMA level of 150-200 ppm. The results of Example 5 are summarized in Table II.

The increase in FI and MFR in Resin C of Table II is a direct result of the increase in the weight fraction of the LMW component produced by cofeeding both the catalysts of Examples 2 and 3. Comparing the catalyst feed rates of the catalyst of Example 3 for Resin D (Table II) and Resin B (Table I) shows that the activity of the catalyst is higher in the presence of isopentane. In addition, the resin fines level is lower in the presence of isopentane.

TABLE II - Results of Example 5

Catalyst Feed

Resin Example 2 Example 3 Density FI MFR % Fines

C 100% 0% .947 8 80 0.5

D 95% 5% .950 19.2 113 1.2