INTERNATIONALSEARCHREPORT ImationalapplicationNo. PCT/USOO/03523 BoxIObservationswherecertainclaimswerefoundunsearchable(Cont
inuationofItem1offirstsheet) Thisinternationalreporthasnotbeenestablishedinrespectofcerta
inclaimsunderArticle17(2)(a)forthefollowingreasons: 1.ClaimNos.: becausetheyrelatetosubjectmatternotrequiredtobesearchedbythi
sAuthority,namely: 2.zClaimNos.: becausetheyrelatetopartsoftheinternationalapplicationthatdon
otcomplywiththeprescribedrequirements osuch anextentthatnomeaningfulinternationalsearchcanbecarriedout,s
pecifically: PleaseSeeContinuationSheet 3.0 ClaimNos.: becausetheyaredependentclaimsandarenotdraftedinaccordancewit
hthesecondandthirdsentencesofRule6.4(a). BoxIIObservationswhereunityofinventionislacking(Continuation
ofItem2offirstsheet) ThisInternationalSearchingAuthorityfoundmultipleinventionsin
thisinternationalapplication,asfollows: PleaseSeeContinuationSheet 1.2 Asallrequiredadditionalsearchfeesweretimelypaidbytheapplican
t,thisinternationalsearchreportcoversall searchableclaims. 2.Asallsearchableclaimscouldbesearchedwithouteffortjustifyin
ganadditionalfee,thisAuthoritydidnotinvite paymentofanyadditionalfee. 3.F-IAsonlysomeoftherequiredadditionalsearchfeesweretimelypa
idbytheapplicant,thisinternationalsearchreport coversonlythoseclaimsforwhichfeeswerepaid,specificallyclaims
Nos.: 4.ENorequiredadditionalsearchfeesweretimelypaidbytheapplican
t.Consequently,thisinternationalsearchreportis restrictedtotheinventionfirstmentionedintheclaims; itiscoveredbyclaimsNos.:2,4,and8-10 RemarkonProtestF-Theadditionalsearchfeeswereaccompaniedbythe
applicant'sprotest. No protest accompaniedthepaymentofadditionalsearchfees. INTERNATIONALSEARCHREPORT IníernationalapplicationNo. PCT/US00103523 Continuation of Box I Reason 2: Cl-., ms 1.5,6, and 7 are unsearchable because we are offered no structural definition of any part of the compounds, as to what constitutes a reactant isomer or a separating isomer.
Claim 14 is unsearchable because the"compound"used is not structurally described in any way.
BOX Il. OBSERVATIONS WHERE UNITY OF INVENTION IS LACKING This application contains the following inventions or groups of inventions which are not so linked as to form a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1. In order for all inventions to be examined, the appropriate additional examination fees must be paid.
Group 1, claim (s) 2,4,8-10, drawn to cis olefins.
Group II, claim (s) 3, drawn to phenyl compounds linked by an isomerizable group.
Group III, claim (s) 11-13,15 and 16, drawn to a method of separation.
Group IV, claim (s) 17-22, drawn to a method of synthesis.
The inventions listed as Groups I-IV do not relate to a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1 because, under PCT Rule 13.2, they lack the same or corresponding special technical features for the following reasons: The technical feature of Group 11 appears to be the two substituted benzene rings joined by a linker. The special technical feature of Group III is a method of separating a reaction product by using any reactive isomerizable molecule. The special technical feature of Group IV is a method of performing chemical synthesis using a precipiton.
The technical feature of Group I can not be a special technical feature because examples of claimed compounds are known.
Pentachlorostilbene JP 09219310 A2 (Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.). (1997.08.19) meets the limitation of this claim. Claim 8 reads on 4- (2- [1, 1'-biphenyl]-4-ylethenyl)-phenol, which was reported in WO 2000021368. Claim 9 read on 2-methoxy-6- [2-2- (2- naphthalenyl) ethenyll-naphthalene which was reported by LIN, Y. ET AL Photoasymmetric synthesis of helicenes in liquid crystals Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Sci. Technol., Sect. A, 1997 Vol. 301 pages 267-282.
This isomerizable linker of Group 11 would include chiral sulfoxides or an asymmetric carbon atom molecules not seen in group 1.
The compounds of Group I are not required to be present in Groups III and IV. Thus, the technical feature present in Group I is not present in Groups Il-IV.
Claims 1,5,6, and 7 are unsearchable because we are offered no structural definition of any part of the compounds, as to what constitutes a reactant isomer or a separating isomer.
Claim 14 is unsearchable because the"compound"used is not structurally described in any way.