Background Art Traction drives use frictional force to transmit torque and power.

Because the power is transmitted between two smooth surfaces, often through a thin layer of lubricant, a traction drive possesses unique characteristics that are not readily attainable by gear drives. These characteristics include quietness, high-efficiency, high rotational accuracy, and zero-backlash.

Generating adequate normal force at the contact is essential for traction drives. Various loading mechanisms have been proposed. These mechanisms have lead to a host of designs. A common practice is to use tapered surfaces along the axial direction. By moving these surfaces axially, a radial displacement and thus normal force are generated. Examples of such designs are disclosed in U. S. Patent Numbers 3,475, 993 and 3,375, 739.

Since the envelopes of the tapered surfaces in most designs do not necessarily converge to a common point, this results in a so-called spin motion at contacting surfaces. The spin motion not only offsets the high-efficiency otherwise provided by the traction drive, but also causes component wear and high break away torque.

Recently, a design of zero-spin planetary traction drive has been proposed by Ai as disclosed in the U. S. Patent Number 6,095, 940. This design employs the on-apex concept similar to that of tapered roller bearings. Two rows of planetary rollers are used to balance the internal axial force on the planetary rollers. Although this design offers torque actuated loading mechanism and greater torque capability, it is somewhat complex in construction.

The cylindrical planetary traction drive is also able to achieve zero-spin motion. However, generating sufficient normal force at the contacts has been a

challenge. Designs proposed in the past have offered various means to pre-load the drive either by mechanically deforming the outer rings or by thermal assembling the drive. The pre-load generated by such means, in general, can not be adjusted during operation. For partial load application, traction drives are unnecessarily overloaded. This has negative impacts on transmission efficiency and service life.

Perhaps the simplest means to generate torque responsive load is using eccentric planetary drives as was disclosed by Dieterich U. S. Patent Number 1,093, 922 in 1914. Over the years, various improvements have been proposed.

See for example, U. S. Patent Numbers 3,945, 270,4, 481, 842, 4,555, 963, and foreign patent numbers JP10-311398, EP 0,856, 462 A2. They all have multiple planetary rollers, and each planetary roller requires a supporting shaft.

While multiple planets help to balance the load, virtually reducing bearing loads, they require bearings and supporting shafts. This makes such drives less attractive in some applications where torque demand is not high, and cost of manufacturing is a major concern. In addition, most of the eccentric wedge loading arrangements in prior art were based on a specified friction coefficient, assuming it did not change as torque load changes. As a consequence the loading mechanism was either over conservative or inadequate throughout the whole torque load spectrum.

Therefore, it is desirable to provide a simple and low cost design that allows for improved adaptive, torque responsive loading mechanism.

Summary of the Invention This patent application relates to a planetary traction drive transmission, and, more particularly, to a planetary traction drive transmission having a single planetary roller or ring.

Brief Description of Drawings FIG. 1 is a front view of the eccentric planetary traction drive.

FIG. 2 is a generally longitudinal sectional view of the eccentric planetary traction drive.

FIG. 3 is a generally transverse sectional view of the eccentric planetary traction drive.

FIG. 4 is an exploded view of the eccentric planetary traction drive.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the mathematical relationship between some of the components of the eccentric planetary traction drive.

FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the contact load and the geometry/traction coefficient of the present invention.

Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.

Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention Referring now to Figures 1 and 2, one embodiment of the cylindrical planetary traction drive A comprises an outer ring member 1, a sun roller member 2, a planetary roller 3, a carrier member 4. The outer ring member 1 further comprises a cylindrical raceway 5 surrounding the axis of rotation, and two fixed flanges 6 and 7. The sun roller member 2 includes a cylindrical raceway 8, two fixed flanges 9 and 10, and a shaft 11. The planetary roller 3, having an outer cylindrical raceway 12, is placed between and in contact with cylindrical raceways 5 and 8. The carrier 4 contains a cylindrical outer surface 13 and an inner cylindrical surface 14. The outer surface 13 is set to be eccentric to the inner surface 14. Carrier 4 further contains a cavity (a slot) 15 (FIG. 3) for receiving the planetary roller 3. The cylindrical raceway 5 (FIG. 2) on outer ring member 1 is co-centric with the outer surface 13 of the carrier 4.

In fact, the outer ring member 1 is supported on the outer surface 13 by two bearings 16 and 17. The cylindrical raceway 8 on the sun member 2 is co- centric with the inner surface 14 of the carrier 4. The sun member is supported in the inner surface 12 by two bearings 18 and 19 (FIG. 4).

As one can see, the raceway 5 (FIG. 2) on the outer ring member 1 is eccentric to the raceway 8 on the sun member 2. The space between the two raceways forms a wedge gap 20 (FIG. 5). Referring to FIG. 5, the planetary roller 3 is assembled between the wedged-space at an azimuth angle between a2=-90 to 90 degrees, preferably in vicinity of a2 = 0, with the outer surface 12 in contact with the raceway 8 and the raceway 5. Planetary roller 3 is sufficiently flexible in the radial direction. When squeezed, its diameter changes in the corresponding direction.

Since the sun roller 2 and the outer ring 1 are not concentric, the drive is preferred to operate with the carrier being stationary. During operation, the traction force tangent to the outer surface 12 of planetary roller 3 always pushes the planetary roller 3, depending on torque direction, into a convergent wedge.

Roller 3 is thus squeezed generating substantial contacting force normal to the contact surfaces. If the eccentricity e in relationship to the geometry of the planetary train is favorable, a balance is achieved where the maximum available traction force is equal to or greater than the operating traction force. This condition is called frictional self-loading. The relationship for ensuring such fictional self-loading is set forth by tan#/2#µT (1a) where d is the wedge angle and is determined by 2 2 J=arccos----'---'-,-- (2) 2 (+-) The variable Rl is the radius of the sun roller raceway 8 and the variable R2 is the radius of the outer ring raceway 5. The variable r is the radius of the self- loading planetary roller 3. The variable e represents the eccentricity between the raceways of the sun roller and the outer ring. The variable, uT is the maximum possible friction coefficient at the contacts. The wedge angle d represents a contact geometry. The equation, uG = tan (d/2) is referred to as geometry coefficient. As one can see,, ccG changes as the diameter 2r of the planetary roller changes.

For optimal efficiency and service life of the drive, it is always desirable to have geometry coefficient, uG close to, but slightly smaller than, the maximum available traction coefficient AT under various load conditions. That is AG (lob) During operation, planetary roller 3 is entrained into a convergent wedge and squeezed. Consequently, the diameter reduces. Planetary roller 3 thus moves to a new azimuth position establishing a new balance.

The diametrical reduction of the planetary roller 3 can be estimated by (3) where W is the contact load; E is the Young's elastic modulus and I is the area moment of inertia of ring cross section for the flexible planetary roller 3.

Accordingly, the geometry coefficient, yG changes to 1 Rl + RZ + e-2d2 + Rl + Rz-e + 2dt2-4e2 PG = tan-Arc cos 2 1 2 (RI + R2 + e-2drXRI + R2-e + 2dr) jJ (4) For planetary roller assembled initially between a2 =-90 to +90, the geometry coefficient, uG increases as the roller diameter reduces or as the contact load increases. Figure 6 shows the variation of uG with contact load W for planetary rollers with different cross section moment of inertia I.

On the other hand, research results (Tevaarwerk, NASA CR-1652267 1981) showed that the maximum available traction coefficient AT also increases with contact load or pressure as shown in Figure 6.

The flexible, floating planetary roller design of the current invention provides an opportunity for an adoptive frictional self-loading mechanism. By choosing a flexible planetary roller with adequate cross section moment of inertia I, it is possible to match or compensate for the change of the maximum available traction coefficient due to the change of the contact load. For example, the second curve with I= 13 mm4 as shown in Figure 6 demonstrates such a design principle.

The reaction force on the sun roller 2 (FIG. 4) as the result of frictional self-loading is supported by the two bearings 18 and 19, through which the force is passed on to the carrier 4. Similarly, the reaction force on the outer ring 1 of frictional self-loading is supported by bearings 16 and 17 (FIG. 2) and passed on to carrier 4. The two reaction forces form a reaction moment that will be balanced by the structure to which the carrier is mounted. Alternatively, the change in geometry coefficient, uG under load can be introduced by deformation

of supporting bearings 16,17, 18, and 19, and deflections of sun shaft 2 and outer ring 1. In these cases, yG is changes through change of eccentricity e.

While the above description describes various embodiments of the present invention, it will be clear that the present invention may be otherwise easily adapted to fit any configuration where a eccentric planetary traction drive may be utilized.

As various changes could be made in the above constructions without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.