FIXED SECURITY BARRIER BACKGROUND

Harbors and other waterfront and off-shore structures are vulnerable to attack by small watercraft, i.e., vehicles, vessels or crafts that move across or through water, such as a speedboat. These watercraft are common in the water and are used for many purposes such as for pleasure, recreation, physical exercise, commerce, transport of people, and goods. It is difficult to distinguish recreational watercraft from a hostile watercraft, such as, a watercraft loaded with explosives that is designed to detonate and cause harm to people, structures, and other watercraft. A small hostile watercraft can potentially slip into a harbor or other waterfront structure unnoticed or otherwise undeterred and cause severe damage to people and property.

Near shore, port, and off-shore barriers are known. Examples of such barriers are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,135,467, 6,681,709, and 6,843,197. These barriers consist of low freeboard float lines or log booms that mark a restricted area, or higher freeboard barriers fabricated of molded plastic or inflated rubber tubes. A port security barrier (PSB) comprised of continuous modular, floating barrier that is installed in lengths ranging from a few hundred feet to over a mile is also known. Each PSB module of the PSB system includes a capture net fabricated from nylon or other synthetic line and net support structure which operates to stop the waterborne craft and prevent entry into the port. However, these barriers suffer from one or more of the disadvantages of being ineffective against higher speed watercraft, are floating and subject to below water level threats such as swimmers, divers, and torpedoes, have unsuitable damage from the impact of a watercraft, have high maintenance costs, and/or are unreliable in the wind, waves, currents, storms and other harsh environmental conditions at sea. Therefore, there is a need for a barrier system that is effective against high speed watercraft, can provide protection from subsurface threats, is resistant to environmental energies and damage from attacking watercraft, and has lower maintenance costs.

SUMMARY In one embodiment of the invention, a barrier comprising bottom founded supports and a system of ropes, energy absorbing devices, and a net is provided. The invention satisfies the above-identified needs in that the barrier can effectively stop a high speed watercraft in a short distance, with minimal damage to the barrier and watercraft. The barrier also may be extended to the bottom of the sea floor or other body of water which provides protection from

subsurface threats such as swimmers, divers, and torpedoes. The barrier, being grounded to the base of a water body is resistant to environmental energies, such as high wind, waves, currents, and storms, and has lower maintenance costs.

In one embodiment, the barrier comprises a first end support, a second end support, a top rope connected to the first end support and the second end support, a first upper rope connected to the first end support and the second end support, and a second upper rope connected to the first end support and the second end support. The supports may be single supports, or preferably, one or both of the first end support and the second end support comprise a set of first and second vertical support members which are coupled together. A plurality of hanger ropes connect the top rope to the first upper rope and the second upper rope, and a plurality of energy absorption devices, which dissipate residual energy out of the net, are connected to one or both of the first upper rope and the second upper rope. The barrier also has first and second bottom ropes which are connected to the first and second end supports, and a plurality of energy absorption devices, which dissipate residual energy out of the net, connected to one or both of the first bottom rope and the second bottom rope. A net having a top, a bottom, a first side, and a second side is connected to the ropes. The top of the net is connected to the first upper rope and the second upper rope and the bottom of the net is connected to the first bottom rope and the second bottom rope, such that the first side of the net is proximate to the first end support and the second side of the net is proximate to the second end support. Preferably, the first and second supports are driven into the base of a body of water and the bottom of the net extends to the base of the water body, such as the sea floor. The barrier also has first and second vertical ropes, which are connected to the first side of the net and the second side of the net, respectively. The net may be formed from a series of net segments comprised of first and second net segments which are connected to each other to form a larger net, which is then connected to the ropes and supports as described above.

In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the energy absorption devices is a braking device. More preferably, at least one braking device is connected to the first upper rope at a position proximate to the first end support, and at least one braking device is connected to the second upper rope at a position proximate to the second end support, at least one braking device is connected to the first bottom rope at a position proximate to the first end support, and at least one braking device is connected to the second bottom rope at a position proximate to the second end support. Most preferably, the barrier has eight braking devices attached to the first and second upper ropes, four on each end proximate to the end supports, and eight braking

devices attached to the first and second bottom ropes, four on each end proximate to the end supports.

In a preferred embodiment, the net is comprised of nylon, steel or another alloy. More preferably, the net is comprises a diamond- shaped mesh pattern, and/or a rectangular mesh pattern, and/or a plurality of interconnecting rings.

In another embodiment of the invention, the barrier is a system comprising a plurality of contiguous barrier units that form a perimeter. At least one barrier unit is a barrier according to the present invention, at least one barrier unit operates as an access gate. The barrier system may also have electronic surveillance, electronic tracking for monitoring the approach of an aqueous vehicle. In one embodiment of the barrier system, the contiguous barrier units form a substantially circular perimeter around an off shore structure. In another embodiment, the access gate is a floating barrier gate, and/or a vertical action gate, which may be remotely operated.

In another embodiment, the invention is a method for stopping a high speed watercraft in a body of water. According to this method, a comprising a net assembled between at least two vertical supports with a system of ropes and energy absorbing devices is provided. The vertical supports are in a stationary position and are substantially perpendicular to the body of water. A watercraft is then moved at a high rate of speed in a direction substantially perpendicular to the barrier, thereby generating a kinetic energy. The net is then contacted with the watercraft, which dissipates at least some of the kinetic energy into the net. Then, the watercraft is vertically pitched, in relation to the body of water, thereby converting at least some of the kinetic energy. The watercraft is then stopped by the barrier, and may slide back into the water where it may at least partially be submerged in the body of water. According to the present invention, the barrier and the watercraft are substantially undeformed, and the vertical supports are substantially unmoved from the stationary position after contact from the oncoming watercraft.

FIGURES

These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood from the following description, appended claims, and accompanying figures where:

Figure 1 is a front side illustration of a barrier according to one embodiment of the invention;

Figure 2 is a front side illustration of a barrier according to another embodiment of the

invention;

Figure 3 is a top side illustration of the barrier illustrated in Figure 2;

Figures 4a, 4b, and 4c, are front view illustrations of various embodiments of energy absorbing devices according to the invention; Figure 4d is a side perspective view of a barrier, showing a plurality of energy absorbing devices according to the invention;

Figure 4e is a front perspective view of a barrier, showing a plurality of energy absorbing devices and a net according to the invention;

Figures 5a-5f, are front view illustrations of various embodiments of a net according to the invention;

Figure 6 is top side perspective illustration of a barrier system according to one embodiment of the invention; and

Figures 7a-7f, are side perspective illustrations of a watercraft approaching, contacting, and being stopped, respectively, by a barrier according to the invention. DESCRIPTION

According to one embodiment of the present invention, a barrier for stopping unwanted watercraft and subsurface intruders from entering into a port or off-shore structure is provided. The barrier comprises a vertical net structure supported from the floor of a body of water, such as a sea floor, or the floor of a lake, dam, large river, or other bodies of water that are navigable by a small watercraft. The net structure is a substantially vertical structure, and is comprised of vertical supports and a net assembled between the vertical supports with a system of ropes and energy absorbing devices. The structural components of the barrier are designed and configured in a manner as to absorb and displace the kinetic energy generated by an explosive laden small watercraft traveling at a high rate of speed. The barrier according to the present invention prevents small watercraft carrying explosives or the like from damaging such valuable assets as oil pumping platforms, commercial ports, harbors and offshore drilling facilities. In the past port security barriers have primarily consisted of a flotation device that supports the net system. These flotation devices are subject to environmental energies which create high maintenance costs, and are unreliable. The barrier according to the present invention has bottom founded components (i.e., grounded to the floor of a body of water), which significantly reduces environmental energies and maintenance costs. Additional protection is created by the barrier according to the present invention by having a net that extends to the floor of the body of water (e.g., the sea floor), thereby providing protection from

subsurface threats such as swimmers, divers, and torpedoes.

Referring now to Figures 1 and 2, a barrier 10 according to the present invention is shown. The barrier 10 comprises a first end support 12 and a second end support 14, which are structures that are grounded in a stationary position, substantially perpendicular to a body of water, e.g., a sea floor. A net 22 is assembled between the end supports 12 and 14 with a system of ropes 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, and 34 and one or more energy absorbing devices 36 and 38.

The end supports 12 and 14 are bottom, e.g., sea floor founded, and may be a steel piling, concrete piling, or spar arrangements of suitable size as to withstand applicable environmental energies. Accordingly, the supports are substantially stable such that they remain vertical and in a stationary position in adverse weather conditions and upon impact of the barrier with a vehicle. Preferably, the end supports are driven to a depth of about thirty- five feet below the floor of the body of water and rise about thirty feet above the water level. In one embodiment of the invention, one or both of the first end support 12 and the second end support 14 comprise a set of two pilings that are coupled together, i.e., first vertical supports 16a and 16b and second vertical supports 18a and 18b. Preferably, the first vertical supports 16a and 16b are coupled to the second vertical supports 18a and 18b with a set of coupling wires 20a, 20b, 20c, and 2Od in an "X" formation, as shown in Figure 2. The wires may be coupled to the end supports using turn buckles that are joined to pad eyes which are welded to the end supports. However, the end supports 12 and 14 may be designed in a variety of configurations, such as one piling, which may have additional support tethers, or multiple pilings, coupled together by various methods as will be understood by those of skill in the art by reference to this disclosure.

Referring again to Figures 1 and 2, in one embodiment of the invention, a top rope 24, a first upper rope 26, and a second upper rope 28, are connected to the vertical supports 18a and 18b. The top rope 24 is installed with sufficient tension as to carry the weight of the net 22 in a horizontal orientation. A plurality of hanger ropes 30 connect the top rope 24 to the first upper rope 26 and the second upper rope 28. A first bottom rope 32 and a second bottom rope 34 are connected to the second vertical supports 18a and 18b in a position below the first upper rope 26 and the second upper rope 28.

Preferably, the top rope 24 is attached to the support at an elevation of about twenty- five feet above the water line, and the first upper rope 26 and the second upper rope 28 are attached to the supports about nineteen feet above sea level. However, this positioning may be

varied according to the different heights of end supports and net used, and the different applications of the barrier, as will be understood by those of skill in the art by reference to this disclosure.

The barrier 10, may have a plurality of energy absorbing devices 36 connected to one or more of the ropes 26, 28, 32, and 34. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, in a preferred embodiment, a plurality of energy absorption devices 36 are connected to the first upper rope 26 and the second upper rope 28, and a plurality of energy absorption devices 38 are connected to the first bottom rope 32 and the second bottom rope 34. More preferably, at least one energy absorption device 36 is connected to the first upper rope 24 at a position proximate to the first end support 12, and at least one energy absorption device 36 is connected to the second upper rope 24 at a position proximate to the second end support 14. Also more preferably, at least one energy absorption device 38 is connected to the first bottom rope 32 at a position proximate to the first end support 12, and at least one energy absorption device 38 is connected to the second bottom rope 32 at a position proximate to the second end support 14. Referring now to Figure 4a, 4b, and 4c, various embodiments of energy absorption devices 38 according to the present invention are shown. The energy absorption device 38 is a device that dissipates residual energy out of the net. Examples of suitable energy absorption devices 38 include, but are not exclusive to a brake ring, commercially available from Geobrugg Protection Systems, Romanshorn, Switzerland and/or a brake element manufactured by Rotec International, Santa Fe, NM. However, other suitable energy absorption devices may be used in the invention, as will be understood by those of skill in the art by reference to this disclosure.

Referring again to Figure 4a, 4b, 4c, in one embodiment, the energy absorption devices 36 and 38 are braking devices 40. The braking device 40 shown in Figure 4a is a double loop braking element, having a rope 41 that is double looped a guide 42. The braking device 40 shown in Figure 4b is a single loop breaking element, having a rope 41 that is looped through a guide 42. The braking device 40 shown in Figure 4c is a brake ring that is formed by guiding a bearing rope through a pipe 43 bent into a loop and held by a compression sleeve 44. Figure 4d is a side perspective view of a barrier 10, showing a plurality of the braking devices 40 that are shown in Figure 4c. Figure 4e is a front perspective view of a barrier 10, showing a plurality of the braking devices 40 that are shown in Figure 4c. The energy absorption devices shown in Figures 4a, 4b, and 4c, function as a braking device in a larger impact event when the brake ring contracts to dissipate residual energy out of the net 22, without damaging the ropes.

The rope's breaking load is not diminished by activation of the brake ring 40. Preferably, one or more braking devices 40 is placed proximate to an end support, on each of the upper and bottom ropes. This arrangement gives strength to each of the ropes in a large impact event. Referring again to Figures 1 and 2, the barrier 10 is comprised of a net 22 stretched between multiple vertical supports 12 and 14. These elements create an enclosure around a port or off-shore facility to be protected. The vertical support elements are designed to support the net system which extends to a height above high tide by at least fifteen feet and extends below the water surface by a distance defined or determined by environmental conditions and/or the level of underwater protection desired, and may extend to the floor of the water body, e.g., the sea floor. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, a net having a top 46, a bottom 48, a first side 50, and a second side 52 is connected to the first upper rope 26 and the second upper rope 28, and the bottom of the net 48 is connected to the first bottom rope 32 and the second bottom rope 34, such that the first side 50 is proximate to the first end support 12 and the second side 52 is proximate to the second end support 14. According to the present invention, the net 22 may comprise a series of net segments which are connected as shown in Figure 1. According to this embodiment, the net 22 comprises a first net segment 22a and a second net segment 22b, where the first net segment 22a is connected to the second net segment 22b, and each net segment comprises a top 46a and 46b, a bottom 48a and 48b, a first side 50a and 50b, and a second side 52a and 52b, and wherein the top of each net segment 46a and 46b is connected to the first upper rope 26 and the second upper rope 28, the bottom of each net segment 48a and 48b is connected to the first bottom rope 32 and the second bottom rope 34, such that the first side 50a of the first net segment 22a is proximate to the first end support 12 and the second side 52a of the first net segment 22a is proximate to the first side 50b of the second net segment 22b and the second side 52b of the second net segment 22b is proximate to the second end support 14, and wherein the first net segment 22a is connected to the second net segment 22b at the second side 52a of the first net segment 22a and at the first side 52b of the second net segment 22b.

The net 22 may be comprised of various materials such as nylon, stainless steel, or various alloys. Examples of suitable nets include nylon nets commercially available from Net Systems, or metal netting commercially available from Rotec International, Maccaferri, and Geobrugg. The net 22 is preferably comprised of stainless steel having compliant elastic deformation. This promotes the consistent and regular transmission of dissipated energy throughout the net system. The net 22 first dissipates kinetic energy over the sum of the

deformation and of all of the net sections. The energy forces are uniformly transferred into the net and/or into the whole system, without placing extreme stress on the supports. Referring now to Figures 5a-5f, a net 22 according to various embodiments of the present invention is shown. As shown in Figure 5a, the net 22 is a diamond- shaped mesh pattern. As shown in Figure 5b, the net 22 is a diamond- shaped pattern having a double twist in the pattern. As shown in Figure 5c, the net 22 is a rope net comprising a plurality of interconnecting rings. As shown in Figure 5d, the net 22, is a rectangular mesh pattern. As shown in Figures 5e and 5f, the net 22 may have a mesh 23, which may be fastened to the net 22 with a clip 25. However, the embodiments of the net 22 shown in Figures 5a-5f, are shown as examples, and other suitable nets may be used in the invention, as will be understood by those of skill in the art by reference to this disclosure.

According to the present invention, the barrier 10 may also comprise a first vertical rope 54 and a second vertical rope 56, wherein the first vertical rope 54 is connected to the first side 50 of the net 22 and the second vertical rope 56 is connected to the second side 52 of the net 22. When multiple net sections are joined together to form the net 22, the first vertical rope 54 is connected to the first side 50a of the first net segment 22a and the second vertical rope 56 is connected to the second side 52bof the second net segment 22b.

Referring now to Figure 6, a barrier system 60 according to the invention is shown. The barrier system 60 comprises a plurality of contiguous barrier units 62 that form a perimeter fence. At least one barrier unit 62 is a barrier 10 according to the invention described herein, and at least one barrier unit 62 operates as an access gate 64 (not shown). The barrier system 60 may also be equipped with electronic surveillance, such as cameras 68a and 68b at multiple points on the perimeter fence, and may also be equipped with electronic tracking 66 for monitoring the approach of an aqueous vehicle. In one embodiment of the present invention, the barrier system 60 is a series of contiguous barrier units 62 that form a substantially circular perimeter around an off-shore structure. According to another embodiment of the present invention, the access gate 64 is a floating barrier gate, and according to another embodiment, the access gate 64 is a vertical action gate. Preferably, the access gate 64 is remotely operated. Referring now to Figure 7, according to another embodiment of the present invention, a method for stopping a high speed watercraft 70 in a body of water 72 is also provided. The method comprises providing a barrier 10 having a net 22 assembled between at least two vertical supports 12 and 14 with a system of ropes 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, and 34 and energy absorbing devices 36 and 38. The vertical supports 12 and 14 positioned in a substantially

stationary position that is substantially perpendicular to the body of water 72. As shown in Figure 7a, the watercraft 70 is moved through the body of water 72 at a high rate of speed in a direction substantially perpendicular to the barrier 10, thereby generating a kinetic energy. As shown in Figure 7b and 7c, the net 22 is contacted by the watercraft 70, and at least some of the kinetic energy is dissipated into the net 22. As shown in Figures 7d and 7e, the net structure vertically pitches the watercraft 70 in relation to the body of water, thereby converting at least some of the kinetic energy. The watercraft 70 is stopped, as shown in Figure If, when the watercraft 70 drops backward into the body of water 72 where it may take on water. After these series of steps the barrier 10 and the watercraft 70 are substantially undeformed, and the vertical supports 12 and 14 are substantially unmoved from their stationary vertical position.

EXAMPLES I. GENERAL BARRIER CONFIGURATIONS FOR BARRIER TESTS.

The barriers described below were installed offshore in Pascagoula, MS according to the description below. The following examples discuss the invention in considerable detail with reference to certain embodiments. However, other embodiments are possible. The scope of the invention should not be limited to the following examples and description of embodiments contained therein. End Supports. Referring again to Figures 1 and 2, and referring now to Figure 3, a top side illustration of the barrier 10 is shown. The first vertical supports 16a and 16b and the second vertical supports 18a and 18b, which were each twenty-four inch diameter, forty by sixty-five ft (40 x 65 ft) long pilings, (A53 grade "B", (42 KSI)), purchased from Skyline Steel, Mandeville LA, were driven to an embedment depth of -35 ft below the sea floor utilizing a V-30 MKT vibratory hammer. The supports were hoisted in the air using a 100 ton American 7260 crawler crane. Referring again to Figure 3, for the purpose of the barrier tests described herein, the barrier 10 was designated as the transverse centerline 74 of the test range, and the direction of the oncoming watercraft 70, with respect to the transverse centerline 74 of the barrier 10, was designated as a longitudinal centerline 76 of the barrier test range. The direction of the oncoming watercraft 70, with respect to the transverse centerline 74 of the barrier 10, was designated as the "uphill" direction 78, and the direction away from the barrier 10 was designated as the "downhill" direction 80. The vertical supports 16a, 16b, 18a, and 18b, were arranged in two sets of two, two to the left of the longitudinal centerline 16a and 18a, and two

to the right of the longitudinal centerline 16b and 18b. The vertical supports 18a and 18b were driven fifty feet offset in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal centerline in each direction, one support 18a was driven to the left and one support 18b was driven to the right. The two remaining supports 16a and 16b, were driven sixty feet offset in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal centerline and ten feet offset in a direction transverse and uphill. Pad eyes 82 obtained from EDCO, Mount Vernon, WA were welded in the appropriate orientation and elevation on each vertical support 16a, 16b, 18a, and 18b. On each vertical support, upper pad eyes 82 were welded one foot down from the top of the pilings at an elevation of +25 feet and lower pad eyes 82 were welded six feet below the upper pad eyes 82 at an elevation +19 feet. As shown in Figure 3, the pad eyes 82 were oriented by looking down onto the tops of the piling and orientating the pad eye locations according to clock positions as follows: (i) on the left side of the longitudinal centerline, on the vertical support 18a, pad eyes 82 were installed at a 7:30 clock position; (ii) on the left side of the longitudinal centerline, on the vertical support 16a, pad eyes were installed at a 1:30 clock position, the 7:30 clock positioned pad eyes looking in the direction of the 1:30 clock positioned pad eyes; (iii) on the right side of the longitudinal centerline, on the vertical support 18b, pad eyes were installed at a 4:30 clock position; and (iv) on the right side of the longitudinal centerline, on the vertical support 16b, pad eyes were installed at a 10:30 clock position, the 4:30 clock positioned pad eyes looking in the direction of the 10:30 clock positioned pad eyes. Each set of two supports, i.e., 16a and 18b, and 16b and 18b, were coupled to together by a 3/4" wire rope 20a, 20b, 20c, and 2Od, obtained from Washington Chain and Supply, Seattle WA, turn buckles obtained from Washington Chain and Supply, Seattle WA, and shackles, obtained from Washington Chain and Supply, Seattle WA in an "X" formation at the upper elevation of the supports. To couple the pilings, a one inch 6 x 19 IPS section of the wire rope was cut to the correct length, measured diagonally from the upper welded pad eye down to the opposing lower pad eye located on the adjacent pile. The length of an opened turn buckle and shackle were subtracted from the length measured. Eyes were spliced into the wire rope. This process was repeated three more times. The wire rope was installed with one inch shackles and turnbuckles. Slack was taken out of the coupling devices by tightening the turn buckles.

Rope System.

Upon completion of the support installation, the rope system was then installed. Referring again to Figures 1 and 2, the top rope 24 (catenary rope) was installed with sufficient

slack as to carry the weight of the net sections in a horizontal or plumb orientation. The top rope 24 was connected to the vertical supports 18a and 18b using standard 1" screw pin shackles. Hanger ropes 30, i.e., break-away ropes, were then connected to the top rope 24 using standard twenty-two millimeter (22 mm) cable clips Washington Chain and Supply, Seattle WA. Two upper support ropes, i.e., the first upper rope 26 and the second upper rope 28, were then connected to the vertical supports 18a and 18b at an elevation of +19 ft. Each of the two support ropes were terminated at piling pad eyes 82. On the right side of the first upper support rope 26, four energy absorbing devices 36 i.e., braking devices, were installed in line with the second upper support rope 28. On the left side the first upper support rope 26, four each energy absorbing devices 36 were installed in line with second upper support rope 28. This process was repeated for the bottom ropes 32 and 34, installing four energy absorbing devices 38 on each side of the bottom ropes 32 and 34, for a total of eight devices 38, proximate to the supports 18a and 18b. Between the piling pad eye and the hard eye of each first upper support rope 26 a load cell was installed to record peak loads during the impact event.

The upper support ropes 26 and 28 were terminated at a welded pad eye on the supports 18a and 18b. Slack was removed from the upper support ropes 26 and 28 with the use of com - a - long and cable grips. The bitter end of the support rope was passed through a one and a half inch shackle, two cable grips were used this point, one for a purchase point on the stationary end of the com - a - long, and the other cable grip was utilized for the hoisting end of the com - a - long. The second cable grip was installed on the dead end of the upper support ropes. Once the slack was removed, standard 22 mm cable clamps were installed to hold the upper support ropes in tension. After installation of the upper support ropes the lower support rope were installed in the same manner as the upper support ropes. Net Installation.

Next, the net 22 was installed in the barrier 10. Two net segment panels 22a and 22b, were shackled to both upper support ropes 26 and 28 using three-quarter inch shackles. After two net segments were hung from the upper support ropes 26 and 28, each net segment was then shackled to the adjoining net segment with five-eighth inch (5/8") shackles. This process was continued until all the net segments were hung and joined to their adjacent net segments. Then, the joined net segments were pulled to either the left or right support 18a or 18b, and connected to the vertical end ropes 54 and 56 with three-quarter inch ( ³ A") shackles. Once the left or right side of the net 22 is connected to a vertical end ropes, then the opposite side may

be shackled to a vertical end rope. The last step in preparing the net for testing was to secure the net segments 22 to both bottom ropes 32 and 34. Each of the net openings was shackled into the bottom ropes 32 and 34with %" shackles. Data Recording. The load cell, obtained from Naval Facilities Engineering Command Center (NFESC),

Port Hueneme CA was installed to record peak loads during the impact event. A tensiometer, obtained from Naval Facilities Engineering Command Center (NFESC), Port Hueneme CA was also installed. The load cells and tensiometers were checked by having the test boat push on the net 22. The signal was sent to data recorders and confirmation was made that the load cells and tensiometers were functioning properly.

Testing.

The test boats were outfitted with remote control devices which enabled the operator in a chase boat to follow at a safe distance behind the test boat. Several passes were made to ensure that all systems were functioning correctly. Once all systems checked out, the test boat was positioned uphill away from the barrier approximately one -half mile. All personnel were cleared from the area. The chase boat was positioned 500ft behind the test boat. The test boat was brought up to speed (42 mph) and run into the net section of the barrier. After impact, all data recorders were switched to off and the test boat was removed from the test range. II. BARRIER TESTS 1 & 2.

A barrier according to the general barrier configurations described above was constructed using a chain link fence, obtained from Geobrugg Protection Systems, FATZER AG, Geobrugg Protection Systems, Romanshorn, Switzerland, as the net structure. The net was a system of 3 x 4.7 mm wires interwoven in a diamond pattern of approximately 280 x 445 mm. In this test, a 4 meter high by 30.48 meter long test section of the net was tested. A boat named "Lake of the Ozarks", a 7,450 pound (3380kg), 600 horse power (Hp) boat was used as the test boat. Two tests, Test 1 and Test 2, were completed and recorded according to the testing procedure described above with the chain link net barrier and the "Lake of the Ozarks" boat impacting the net on each test. Selected details of these tests are shown in Table 1 below. III. BARRIER TEST 3.

A barrier according to the general barrier configurations described above was constructed using a wire ring fence, obtained from Geobrugg Protection Systems, FATZER AG, Geobrugg Protection Systems, Romanshorn, Switzerland, as the net structure. The wire ring fence was a system of 12 strands of 3 mm wire clamped into 300 mm diameter rings. In

this test, a 4 meter high by 30.48 meter long test section of the net was tested. A boat named "Palm Bay", an 8,000 pound (3630 kg), 660 horse power (Hp) boat was used as the test boat. One test, Test 3 was completed and recorded according to the testing procedure described above with the wire ring net barrier and the "Palm Bay" boat impacting the net on the test. Selected details of this test are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1

IV. TEST RESULTS.

Two full-scale boat crash tests were conducted with the chain link barrier, Tests 1 and 2, and one full-scale boat crash test was conducted with the wire ring net barrier. Figure 7 is an illustration of the results of the boat crash tests. As shown in Figure 7, the boat is directed to the barrier and contacts the net. Some of the kinetic energy of the boat is dissipated by the barrier. As the boat proceeds into the net, the bow pitches vertically upward and converting some of kinetic energy. Then, the boat stops and slowly drops backward into the water, taking on some water. The two tests conducted on the chain link barrier, Tests 1 and 2, were conducted on the same segment of the net. The same barrier stopped both oncoming boats in less than one boat length (0.55 boat length for 209,000 ft*lbf of oncoming kinetic energy and 0.68 boat lengths for 309,000 ft*lbf of oncoming kinetic energy). There was no significant structural damage to the barrier, except for localized deformation to the net. The test boats were not structurally damaged, except for taking on some water.

The wire ring barrier test, Test 3, had over twice the kinetic energy of Test 1, and 43% higher energy than Test 2. At this higher energy, and with the boat engines on, the boat became almost vertical after stopping and drifting backwards. There was effectively no damage to the net in Test 3, except for some minor localized deformation. The boat was not damaged, except for taking on water.

The experimental results described above highlight the effectiveness of the invention in multiple ways. First, by supporting the net elements from a bottom founded structure the barrier remains stable in areas of open or in locations where environmental effects are too severe to allow the installation of a prior art floating system. By reducing the movement of the

system, friction is eliminated and maintenance costs are reduced. Also, by eliminating the flotation devices e.g., pontoons, used in prior art systems, the system is not subjected to the same environmental effects of wind, waves, and currents. As shown in the above tests, the barrier according to the present invention can remain intact and structurally sound after multiple boat attacked. In contrast, tests of a prior art floating system after an impact event have shown that the net is displaced from the flotation structure rendering the system ineffective against additional or multiple attacks.

Although the present invention has been discussed in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments are possible. Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of preferred embodiments contained herein.