IMAGE MODIFYING METHOD AND DEVICE

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to sharpening of digital images and video for presentation on a display.

BACKGROUND ART

The resolution of a typical liquid crystal display is approximately 720 x 480 which is on the order of standard definition television. The resolution of a typical very high resolution diagonal display is 4096 x 2 160 and typically has viewing distances that are less than 2 picture heights. In order to display an image on a display in a aesthetically pleasing manner sharpening of the image is typically performed. The lack of sharpness typically results from imperfections in the captures process and/ or loss of details due to image compression. However, sharpening of the image tends to result in annoying artifacts.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The traditional approaches to sharpening, such as using an unsharp mask, generally result in the introduction of visible degradation into the image being sharpened . The visual degradation is primarily due to enhancing the high frequency components and noise that often dominates the high frequency bands of an image . To moderate the enhancement of the visible degradation of the image, the amount of sharpening performed is controlled.

It is desirable to increase the sharpness of the image content while at the same time suppressing the noise in the resulting image.

In order to achieve the aforementioned obj ect, a method for modifying an image from a first sharpness to a different sharpness is provided. The method comprises of the following steps:

(a) receiving said image having said first sharpness;

(b) filtering said image with an image filter to result in the creation of a first channel and a second channel, wherein said first channel includes primarily texture information and said second channel includes primarily edge and flat region information;

(c) filtering said first channel to attenuate higher frequency content of said image in said first channel;

(d) filtering said second channel to sharpen said image in said second channel;

(e) combining said first channel and said second channel to form a modified image having said different sharpness. The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram for image sharpening without resolution change. FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram for image sharpening with resolution change .

FIG. 3 illustrates another block diagram for image sharpening with resolution change .

FIG. 4 illustrates another block diagram for image sharpening with resolution change .

FIG. 5 illustrates another block diagram for image sharpening with resolution change .

FIG. 6 illustrates another block diagram for image sharpening with resolution change . FIG . 7 illustrates a bilateral filter with pre-filtering.

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram for comfort noise/ texture equalization for noise suppression.

FIG. 9 illustrates another block diagram for image sharpening with resolution change . REFERENCE NUMERALS

100 EDGE ADAPTIVE SMOOTHING FILTER 106 SHARPENING 108 NOISE SUPRESSION 200,210,220,230,240,250, SCALING

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Image sharpening techniques are designed to enhance the high frequency aspects of the image . High frequency aspects, such as edges around major features of the image , are particularly desirable to sharpen in order to improve the visual appearance of the image to the viewer. However sharpening high frequency aspects, such as noise in the texture regions of the image, are not desirable because it degrades the visual appearance of the image to the viewer.

These tradeoffs are generally contradictory to one another, while on the one hand a desire to enhance the high frequency aspects of portions of the image, while on the other hand a desire not to enhance the high frequency aspects of other portions of the image.

Attempting to develop a universal sharpening filter has proved to be elusive. It has been determined that sharpening an image is best done using multiple different filters or otherwise a filter applied to only a portion of the image . Each of the different filters should filter the image in a different manner so that the beneficial aspects of each of the filters may be taken advantage of. It is to be understood that any filter maybe used, such as those that sharpen the image .

Referring to FIG. 1 , it was determined that the system may preprocess the incoming image with a non-linear edge- adaptive smoothing filter 100 (image filter) that is used to separate the image into multiple "channels". It is noted that these "channels" need not be frequency bands, or directly related to the frequency domain. The filter may be referred to as an edge-adaptive smoothing filter or any other suitable filter. One channel 102 (second channel) may contain the edge content and slowly varying "flat" regions of the image where edges (which generally contain high spatial frequencies) are retained and remain generally sharp, but textures (which also contain high spatial frequencies) are generally filtered out. The other channel 104 (first channel) may contain the textures of the image minus edges. A linear filter is not especially suitable for such selective filtering.

These two channels, namely, texture information 104 (T) and edge + flat regions 102 (E) , can be used in a number of ways to produce a high quality sharpened image. One approach is to use a sharpening technique 106 on the edge + flat regions 102 to enhance the image . The edge + flat regions 102 is generally noise free so the enhancement of that channel does not substantially increase the resulting noise in the final image . A noise suppression technique 108 on the texture channel 104 reduces the noise that is contained in that channel. Thereafter, the two channels T 104 (texture channel) and E 102 (cartoon channel) are recombined 1 10 into the final output 1 12. Accordingly, those edge aspects of the image that are desirable to sharpen are suitably enhanced without substantial enhancement of the noise, while the other aspects of the image that are not desirable to sharpen are suitably attenuated in a manner to reduce the noise. When the input resolution and the desired output resolutions are different, one or more scaling operations may be included to re-scale the image. Referring to FIG. 2 , one technique for scaling the image is to include an image scaling operation 200 at the output thereof. In this manner, the image processing pipeline may process the image at a first input resolution then use a high quality scaling operation 200 to achieve the desired output results. This manner of processing maintains the image processing pipeline with relatively low complexity Referring to FIG. 3 , another technique for scaling the image is to include an image scaling operation 210 at the input thereof. In this manner, the image processing pipeline may be designed to process images at a single image resolution that is the same as the scale provided at the output of the input image scaling operation, which decreases the complexity of the image processing pipeline. The image processing pipeline may be optimized for a single image scale.

Referring to FIG. 4, another technique for scaling the image is to include an image scaling operation 220 after the noise suppression in the texture channel (T) . The texture channel has particular image characteristics and the scaling filter may be designed to accommodate the particular image characteristics. The combination of the scaling operation and noise suppression may be such that improved image characteristics are achieved. An image scaling operation 240 is also included after the sharpening in the flat images + edges channel (E) . The channel E has particular image characteristics and the scaling filter may be designed to accommodate the particular image characteristics. The combination of the scaling operation and sharpening may be such that improved image characteristics are achieved.

Referring to FIG. 5, another technique for scaling the image is to include an image scaling operation 230 before the noise suppression in the texture channel (T) . The scaling may be designed to accommodate the added noise in the channel, that is thereafter suppressed by the noise suppression. The combination of the scaling operation and noise suppression may be such that improved image characteristics are achieved. An image scaling operation 250 is also included before the sharpening in the flat images + edge channel (E) . The scaling may be designed to accommodate the reduced noise in the channel. The combination of the scaling operation and sharpening may be such that improved image characteristics are achieved. Referring to FIG. 6 , depending on the particular implementation requirements, one or more of the scaling operations may be included together with the system. The combination of the different scaling operations achieves a robust design that is readily adaptable to different images and system requirements. It is to be understood that each of the scaling operations may be the same or different. By way of example, the scaling 230 may be a bilinear upscaling operation whereas scaling operation 250 may be a non-linear scaling operation More specifically, the edge adaptive smoothing filter 100 applies signal dependent processing to separate strong object edges from fine texture and noises. As one specific example, the system may use bi-lateral filters. One such bilateral filter may be formulated as ∑W[k,n]x[k-n] ( 1 )

OT = ² ^

∑W[k,n] n=~N

which consists of a weight calculation step and a weighted averaging step. For notational simplicity one may assume a one- dimensional filter but there is no loss of generality in doing that. Here ^x is the input signal and ^x is the filtered signal and the filter kernel ^w consists of a spatial kernel ^s and a range kernel ^w * : W[k,n\ = W _s [k,n] - W _R [k,n\ _{(2 )} Boxcar, gaussian and triangular kernels may likewise be used for kernels.

Other techniques, such as anisotropic diffusion and adaptive smoothing may likewise be used. In general, any filter that tends to preserve edge features while reducing noise may be used. The kernel calculation in bilateral filters is signal dependent and serves to differentiate strong object edges from texture / noise / artifact. This is achieved by assigning lower weights to pixels in the filter window whose intensity values are far from the center pixel intensity. Preferably, a pre- filtering step * ^(χ ' before the weight calculation is incorporated to achieve better noise and artifact robustness. By reducing the noises and artifacts, the system may improve the weight calculation, which in turn improves the filtered outcome. This is illustrated as a block diagram in FIG. 7. Several choices of J may be used, including for example, linear low pass filters and median filters. Other nonlinear smoothing filters can also be applied.

It is desirable to suppress noise in the texture channel. Since the texture channel primarily contains all the noise and artifacts, attenuating the texture channel will suppress the amount of noise and artifacts in the final output. This can be achieved by applying a weight ^ω to the texture channel, and the weighting can be either spatially invariant or spatially variant. In the case of spatially variant texture channel weighting, the information from the bilateral filter can be leveraged to determine the amount of suppression. More specifically an edge measure can be derived from the bilateral filter, with higher E values indicating that the current pixel is closer to an edge . Subsequently the texture channel weights can be derived by ω[k] = (\ -E[k])* a + β ( ₄ ) _{H ere} a,β _are i _ntro duced to control the range and mean for the texture channel weighing. It is desirable to suppress coding artifacts in the texture channel. Most of the displayed contents are compressed one way or another, and inevitably contain various compression artifacts. Among those the most visually objectionable is the blocking artifacts due to the non-overlapping block transforms used in most existing compression algorithms.

The blocking artifact manifest itself as small square blocks all over the decompressed images, and most noticeably in flat regions . A deblocking filter may be applied on the texture channel to suppress blocking artifacts . The main difference between the texture channel deblocking and a conventional deblocking is that the texture channel is very noisy and the real obj ect edges are not present or not as strong. One may apply the following steps for the deblocking of the texture channel:

First, calculate an edge measure for each pixel by using

WW[[kk,,00)]

£[*] = ^■ (3)

∑W[k,n] n=-N and an edge measure for a block by summing up the per-pixel measure . Second, in the texture channel deblocking process, control the amount of filtering per blocking edge using the edge measure calculated in the previous step. The smaller the edge measure , the stronger the filter is.

It is desirable to modify the image to provide a sufficient amount of high frequency content so as to have a pleasing appearance . Attenuating the texture channel reduces the noise at the expense of also removing fine detail. This may reduce the perceived sharpness to a human observer, as the resulting output image has less high frequency information than expected. To overcome this issue , texture synthesis may be added to the image to mask structured, coding noise artifacts without reducing high frequency information. A block diagram for the comfort noise is shown in FIG. 8. To be clear, FIG. 8 provides a more detailed description of the noise suppression block shown in FIG . 1 . As can be seen from FIG. 8, the noise suppression process takes the texture channel as input. The texture data is then analyzed by an image analysis process . In one embodiment, the image analyzer extracts the variance and correlation of image regions within the texture channel. Of course, other statistics may be extracted . For example , the location of edges may be identified. By way of example, the mean value of the image region may be extracted.

Outputs from the image analyzer block are used to control filtering and multiplication operations. For example, the correlation estimate controls the linear filter, which is fed random noise by a random noise generator as shown in FIG 8. Additionally, the noise power estimate controls the multiplication operator that follows the linear filter output. Furthermore, the mean and edge information is used to control both the multiplication following the linear filter as well as the multiplication of the input data. Finally, the scaled input texture channel and the modified random noise are added and provided as output of the noise suppression component.

In many cases, the non-linear splitting filter will not exactly separate the edges from the textures. Accordingly, some information will leak into each channel from the other channel. Consequently, the adding back together of the two channels may be based upon sensed image characteristics to achieve the final image .

Referring to FIG. 9 , a more generalized framework may be used for an improved scaling technique . The technique includes a multi-channel spatial decomposition, which may decompose the image into any suitable set of channels. The decomposition may be linear or non-linear. In addition, the spatial decomposition may be more than two channels, if desired. The channels may include characteristics, such as for example, graphics versus natural, text versus non-text, face versus non-face, texture , and edges + flat region, scrolling text, film grain noise . Depending on the particular implementation, the input image for one or more channels may not be filtered but rather scaled in any manner. The channel specific scaling may use any suitable set of filters or omitted. The channel specific noise reduction may use any suitable set of filters or omitted. If desired, the filters may also include temporal information of a video when scaling a particular image . Blending together of the separate channels may be done using any suitable technique. The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same way may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.