MAKE-UP REMOVAL COMPOSITION WHICH PROVIDES GOOD FOAM

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to makeup removal compositions which also provide good foam

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Make-up remover is typically applied to skin as a liquid oil composition and has little or no foam It would be advantageous to find a make-up composition which uses less oil and rinses off more easily, but retains some make-up removing efficiency.

By utilizing specific foaming anionic surfactant, applicants can provide foaming make-up remover which uses less oil (e.g., hydrogenated polyisobutene) and rinses off more readily To ensure the efficiency of make-up removal and stability of such composition, a specific combination of amphoteric (hydroxysultaine), nonionic and Cio- CH ester oil are also needed. It has been found that certain levels of specific nonionics, including at least 0.1 % alkyi glycoside, are required to maintain the overall efficiency and stability

Three references which display genera! knowledge, but not the specific combinations of the invention are.

(1) JP 2005-200640 to NOF Corporation,

(2) JP H09-175936 to Kao, and

(3) JP H06-G16524 to Kao

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

More specifically, the present invention comprises a foaming, easier to rinse make-up removing composition comprising:

(1 ) 1 to 10%, preferably 1.5 to 5% by wt. salt of N-alkoyl (N-acyi) amino acid, e.g., N-acyl glycinate; especially preferred are Cio-Cie alkali metal glycinate, e g , acyl potassium glycinate,

(2) 1 to 10%, preferably 2 to 4% by wt. of an amphoteric surfactant comprising alkyl hydroxy sultaine,

(3) 0, 1 to 10%, preferably 3 to 5% by wt. hydrogenated polyisobutene

(4) 0.1 to 10% by wt. nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of alkyl glucoside and alkoxylated glyceryl, except that there is at least 0.1 , preferably at (east 0 4% by wt. alkyl glucoside; (5) 0.1 to 5%, preferably 1 to 3% by wt. Ci ₀ -Ci ₄ ester, preferably laurate ester wherein preferably the ester {e.g., laurate ester) is free of hydroxy! functional group, and (6) balance water.

Compositions of the invention are preferably dispensed in a manner that volume is about 5-20 times greater when dispensed relative to prior to dispensing This is preferably accomplished using, for example a pump foamer dispenser package Such package is beneficial, for example, for applying composition onto the face without dripping

These and other aspects, features and advantages will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from a reading of the following detailed description and the appended claims For the avoidance of doubt, any feature of one aspect of the present invention may be utilized in any other aspect of the invention it is noted that the examples given in the description below are intended to clarify the invention and are not intended to limit the invention to those examples per se Other than in the experimental examples, or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients or reaction conditions used herein are to be understood as modified in ail instances by the term "about" Similarly, all percentages are weight/weight percentages of the total composition unless otherwise indicated. Numerical ranges expressed in the format "from x to y" are understood to include x and y When for a specific feature multiple preferred ranges are described in the format "from x to y", it is understood that all ranges combining the different endpoints are also contemplated. Where the term "comprising" is used in the specification or claims, it is not intended to exclude any terms, steps or features not specifically recited. All temperatures are in degrees Celsius ( ⁰ C) unless specified otherwise All measurements are in SI units unless specified otherwise AU documents cited are ~ in relevant part ~ incorporated herein by reference.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides compositions that achieve make-up removal efficiency (MUR efficiency), while also providing good foaming (which actually helps with make-up removal efficiency), while using less oil. Moreover, all this is done while maintaining good stability of the compositions. This is accomplished through specific selection of compounds which interact with one another to maintain the delicately defined balance.

More specifically, good make-up removal efficiency is obtained using combination of hydrogenated polyisobutene (oil) and aikyl hydroxy sultaine Use of the hydroxysultaine permits the polyisobutene to be used at relatively low levels of 3 to 5% by wt- Less oil is also used because of use of salts of N-alkoyl amino acid (e.g. , N-alkyl glycinate) as foaming anionic, Nevertheless, such systems are not stable unless there is also used, as a type of stabilization system, about 3 to 8% nonionic surfactant, where at least 1 % of composition comprises alkyl glucoside, in combination with 1 to 3% by wt of a Cio C i ₄ ester oil, preferably laurate,

The composition is described in greater detail below.

Compositions of the invention comprise 1 to 10%, preferably 1 5 to 5% by wt. salts of N-alkoyl (N-acyl) amino acid represented by the following formula:

R'CONH{CH ₂ )nCOOM

wherein ROO is a straight chain acyl of C ₈ to C ₂₀ , preferably Cio to CIB carbons

n = 1 or 2, and

_" • O -

M is alkali metal (e.g., sodium, potassium) or trialkanolamine

An especially preferred compound is Cio-Ci ₆ alkali metal giyciπates, e.g , acyl potassium glycinate

The anionic is important because, in combination with hydroxysuttaine, it allows less oil (e g,, polyisobutene) to be used while stil! retaining good foaming. Stability of the oil, as discussed below, is further ensured through use of non ionic and ester oil stabilization systerα

A second required component of the subject invention is amphoteric surfactant wherein said amphoteric comprises alkyl hydroxysultaine (e,g., lauryl hydroxysultaine) It is believed that the amphoteric helps with cleanser efficiency while also helping with overall stability, principally provided by nonionic and ester combination.

The amphoteric is typically used in an amount of 1 to 10%, preferably 2 to 4% by wt of the composition.

A third component of the compositions of the invention is hydrogenated polybutene The hydrogenated polybutene oil, typically a good make-up remover, can be used in amounts of 0.1 to 5%, preferably 3 to 5% by wt. Higher amounts are not needed because, as noted, efficacy as provided by good foaming (as provided by N- acy! amino acid and hydroxysuitaine) and combination of other ingredients. This permits also that the compositions have less greasy/oily feel than might be otherwise expected (e.g , according to consumer in-use testing)

Aithough less oil is used, stability is further provided through a combination of nonioπic surfactant (which must comprise alkyl glucoside and/or alkoxylated glyceryl, except that there must be at least 0,1 , preferably at least 0 4% alkyl gl ^y coside), and Cio- Ci ₄ ester. The amphoteric also helps with stability

Specifically, the compositions comprise 0.1 to 10% noπionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of alkyl glucoside and alkoxylated glyceryl except that at least 0 1% wt aikyl glycoside must be present.

In addition, the composition must comprise 0.1 to 5%, preferably 1 to 3% by wt, CIO-CH ester, preferably a laurate ester. Preferably the ester (e g , laurate ester) is free of hydroxyl functional groups.

The balance of the composition comprises water

Compositions of the invention also may comprise other ingredients that may be used in make-up remover compositions These include oils (e.g , ester oils, mineral oils and plant oils), silicone, fatty acids, alcohols, polyols, colorants, preservatives, perfumes, powders, scrubs, chelating agents, gelling agents and other ingredients such as may be well known to those skilled in the art of make-up removal formulations

EXAMPLES

Protocol

Stability of compositions was measured by observing phase stability at ambient temperature (e g., 20-25 ⁰ C) after 24 hours. Compositions which did not phase separate were considered stable.

Make-up removal efficiency was defined by placing a dab of lipstick (about 0.008 g) on the arm (e g , preferably the forearm). This is followed by applying the formula from a pump foamed package using a single push from the dispenser (dispensing about 12 cm ³ formulation) and rubbing for about 60 seconds. The skin is then rinsed for about 30 seconds in water and a 5 point scale of visual assessment was used to determine removal.

Foam is measured by observing amount of foam released from pump foamer and grading based on 5 point visual scale,

Examples

The table below with Examples 1 and Comparatives A-M show how each element of the invention is needed to provide idea! combination of MUR efficiency, foam, and phase stability. When some parameter or other is not met, there is typically some issue as noted in the description of the Comparatives.

Table 1

00

Separates (i.e., phase separation) T = Transparent

Betame used as amphoteric at 2,7% by wt. O = Opaque lsotndecyi isononanoate was used as oil at 1.5% by wt. S = Semitraπsparent

What Comparatives Demonstrate.

A Shows you need oil (for foam formation),

B Shows you need hydroxysultaine for MUR efficiency,

C Shows you need ester for phase stability,

D Shows you also need nonionic (lauryl glucoside) for stability,

E Similar to Example 1 , but with only 1% polybutene, there is less optimal MUR efficiency,

F With no salt of N Acyl amino acid, there is big drop in both MUR efficiency and foam,

G Shows that, without minimal sultaine, MUR efficiency is compromised,

H Shows that, w/o minimum nonionic, there is phase instability, I Shows that ester oil is also required for stability,

J Again shows minimum nonionic needed for stability;

K Suggests that a certain amount of polyo! is required for optimal WIUR efficiencies,

L With different amphoteric, less MUR efficiency; M With different oil, you get separation-