Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
MEDICAL DEVICE, PARTICULARLY FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION TO AVOID THE PTOSIS AFTER PROSTHESYS IMPLANT
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2017/183055
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
The present invention relates to a medical device for breast reconstruction that helps to prevent the ptosis of tissues due the yielding of the tissue under the weight of a breast implant.

Inventors:
BERTOLI GIOVANNI (IT)
Application Number:
PCT/IT2017/000082
Publication Date:
October 26, 2017
Filing Date:
April 21, 2017
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
DECO MED SRL (IT)
International Classes:
A61F2/12; A61F2/00
Domestic Patent References:
WO2014041577A12014-03-20
WO2006117622A12006-11-09
WO2006117622A12006-11-09
Foreign References:
US20150351891A12015-12-10
US20140088700A12014-03-27
US20120053690A12012-03-01
ITTV20120038U2012-09-17
US20150351891A12015-12-10
US20140088700A12014-03-27
US20120005690A12012-01-05
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS

1) medical device, particularly for breast reconstruction, consists of a flat element (H), in bioactive biomaterial (ECM), said flat element (H) having an inner surface (E) and being said flat element (H) divided into more septa (C), said septa (C) defining a flat central area (D) with a base and made so that they can be folded by combining the respective adjacent first sides which, once united for example with points of suture, define a box structure for a breast prosthesis (F), forming a box element (G) adapted to contain, containing or integrant, a breast implant (F), said box element, being interposable between the skin and the pectoraiis major muscle and being suturabile to the latter, characterized in that the said flat element (H) is, in the frontal surface (E), united to a biopassive-synthetic mesh (A) constituting the flat element (H) and the biopassive mesh (A) a assembled inextensible device.

2) Device as in claim 2 characterized in that the bioactive mesh is collagenous biomaterial .

3) Device according to the preceding claims characterized in that the biopassive mesh (A) is made in inert syntethic biomaterial with low mechanical elastic properties.

4) Device according to the preceding claims characterized in that the biopassive mesh can be applied to the bioactive mesh for overlap.

5) Device according to the preceding claims characterized in that the biopassive mesh can be interconnected to the bioactive mesh.

6) Device according to the preceding claims which is characterized by the fact that the biopassive mesh is made of polypropylene, polyethylene or non-absorbable material.

7) Device according to the preceding claims which is characterized by the fact that the biopassive mesh has a loose net structure in the center, while along the peripheral sides, for a variable side of about 5 cm, is more tight to allow a better internal framing, maintaining intact the interweaving weft-warp.

Description:
TITLE : "MEDICAL DEVICE, PARTICULARLY FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION TO AVOID THE PTOSIS AFTER PROSTHESYS IMPLANT"

The present invention relates to a medical device for breast reconstruction 5that helps to prevent the ptosis of tissues due to sagging under the weight of a breast implant.

Nowadays it is known the need to provide for a breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

The current surgical techniques of breast reconstruction after mastectomy lOis divided into two techniques: one in two times and one in a single time. The technique in two stages provides that, completed the mastectomy, the surgeon prepares a submuscular pocket creating a space between the chest wall and the pectoralis major muscle, which is low-cut and etched down to the superficial fascia to its lower pole and medial until the fourth 15space intercostal .

Laterally it then proceeds to the incision of the serratus muscle fascia. Then it places a specific tissue expander and closes the pocket in such a way that it includes, at its inside all the coverage.

In the following days there shall be a progressive inflation until obtaining 20the desired expansion.

Then the expander is removed, not before 4/6 months, with a second operation that will include the removal of the expander and the placement of the final prosthesis.

In the technique in a single time, the reconstruction involves the 5placement, after mastectomy, of a breast implant in a under-muscular pocket, created with the technique described previously. The breast implant, subsequently inserted into the under-muscle cavity, is covered at its lower pole with a mesh of biomaterial, thereby avoiding the need for a muscle expansion.

The results of the two techniques are similar for small and medium sized Sbreasts.

The large breasts currently represent an indication for reconstruction in two stages.

The results of the two techniques are similar from a physiological point of view, because, in any case, there is the resection and the dissection of the lOpectoralis major muscle that entails, its dislocation and therefore a substantial loss of functionality.

In relation to the physiology of the pectoralis major muscle, in fact, it can be stated that in case of disconnection of it, the movements that may be deficient, are the anteposition and flexion of the arm, the internal rotation 15and adduction.

In addition, considering the functionality of the shoulder and upper limb, it is necessary to assess the synergistic action of the modulated various muscle groups; also the weakening of quantitatively modest part can alter the shoulder-joint and affect the normal course of activities of daily living. 20In fact, the pectoralis major muscle is located on the chest, anteriorly, between the medial part of the clavicle, sternum, cartilages of the first 6/7 coasts, the external oblique aponeurosis (medially) and the crest under the greater tuberosity of the humerus (sideways).

It is divided into two parts: the head and clavicular head sternocostal, 25which differ in their effects on motility of the shoulder and upper limb. The clavicular head flexes the arm, it alleges toward the contralateral shoulder and rotates it internally. The sternocostal head depresses the shoulder, adducts the arm towards the contralateral iliac crest and rotates internally.

These movements are combined in various ways, each other and with the movements generated by many other muscles acting on the shoulder, in Sgiving life to normal gestures.

The shoulder, both anatomically and functionally, is an extremely complex mechanism that has a very wide motor ability.

This entails the need to dispose of activation synergies, adjustment and balancing of different muscular components in relation to the control of lOmultiple engine parameters (direction, distance, strength, speed, endurance) to produce a qualitatively "normal movement", that is accurate, fluid, suitable for the motor task requested.

The movements which may result insufficient, in case of partial lesion of the pectoralis major, are the anteposition and flexion of the arm, the 15internal rotation and adduction, in more or less evident manner, in relation to the position and to the extent of the injury .

In addition, in relation to the functionality of the shoulder and upper limb, we must consider that the synergistic action of the modulated various muscle groups, also the weakening of a part quantitatively modest, can 0alter the sholder-joint with repercussions on the normal course of everyday life.

In the state of the art the advantages described have been overcome with the invention of patent IT278047.

The object of the patent application IT278047 is constituted by a flat 5element, divided into several partitions, which define a central planar area with first bases slightly arched. The baffles are made so that they can be folded by combining the respective first sides adjacent which, once joined together by, for example, sutures, define a containment structure for a breast implant, forming a box-like element adapted to contain, containing or integral a breast implant, said box-like element, being interposed between the skin and the pectoralis major muscle and being suturabile to the latter.

5In relation to the above-mentioned patent, it should be noted how the geometric figure, object of the invention, allows a complete winding of a mammary endoprosthesis in order to allow a better acceptance from the body, because the bio-active biological matrix (patent n. IT278047) is interposed between the silicon (biomaterial inert) and vital tissues.

lOSaid solution enables the breast reconstruction on the supra-pectoral muscle without the need to detach the pectoralis major muscle because the biomaterial bio-active of which is made the device (n.IT278047 patent), interferes with the onset of capsular fibrosis, even if the prosthetic implant is positioned on the subcutaneous plan inside the

15human body.

Said patent becomes, in fact, autologous tissue that isolates the silicone implant from the context of tissue and, in fact, makes it better accepted from the body.

This neo-autologous tissue has been evaluated clinically as a thin layer of 0neo-well vascularized fascia. From the histological point of view, is constituted by typical cells of the fascial tissue (fibroblasts, myofibroblasts).

After implantation in the human body, the silicone implants wrapped by such neo-tissue (derived from the surgical implant of the device of patent 5IT278047 patent) weighs down on the lower pole of the breast, because the neo-tissue which envelopes the prosthesis, behaves like all human tissues: under a weight, it yields. Such subsidence of breast skin mantle, is defined ptosis and it is measured through a scale where with PAR 1 is defined as the subsidence of 1 cm with respect to the furrow under-breast, with PAR 2 two cm with respect to the furrow under-breast and PAR 3 three cm with respect to the Sfurrow under-breast.

The invention, object of the patent cited above, today's state of the art, it is already an overrun of devices referred to state of the art. These devices, in fact, do not allow the full winding of the prosthesis and thus the breast implant placement on the floor under-cutaneous (or supra- lOmuscular), and so there is the risk of capsular fibrosis.

Nevertheless said patent, like all the other devices of the state of the art (in breast reconstruction with implants), it does not solve the problem of control of breast ptosis.

As said, the ptosis is due to the subsidence of breast skin - mantle, due to 15loss of elasticity of the skin mainly at the inferior pole of the breast under the weight of the mammary gland.

The physiological wiught on the lower pole is not equal to the weight of the mammary gland as an anatomic piece, but is lower and it is how allowed from the anatomical structure of the breast. The gland is integral

20with the pectoralis major-muscle wall thanks to the suspensory ligament of the breast and with the subcutis thanks to the suspensory ligaments of Cooper. These ligaments discharge the weight of the gland on the said structures and allow the transfer only in part, of the weight of the the mammary gland overall, in the inferior pole.

25The weight of an anatomical, glandular part, normally varies between 100 and 800 grams, corresponding to a first or sixth bra size or more.

The weight exerted on the lower pole of the breast in the anatomical- physiological normal conditions (non-mastectomy patient), however, is not of the weight of the anatomical part. As said, anatomically the gland is integral with the muscular wall and the sub-cutaneous tissue using the suspensory ligaments that subtract weight to the lower pole. In anatomo- normal physiological conditions, the inferior pole of the breast is burdened 5with a less weight than the weight of the mammary gland considered as anatomical part.

The implantation of a breast implant of weight comparable to an anatomical part, missing the suspensory ligaments because of mastectomy, alters the physiological weight on the lower pole of the lObreast, burdening it of an abnormal weight.

The patient's proprioceptive perception, will be different than before the implant, because she feels a weight at the lower pole that was not there before.

On the other side the breast implants for reconstruction post-mastectomy 15are constituted by silicone envelope, containing cohesive silicone gel . Most of Companies codify silicone implants for volume (cubic centimeters) that corresponds, more or less, to a weight of equal grams, increased by ten percent.

The choice of size of the breast implant to be implanted depends on the 20surgeon that normally evaluete the subtracted quantity(ill gland) to restore it with a silicone implant of equal volume.

If the surgeon, however, chooses for a breast implant size such as to restore the physiological weight on the lower pole of the breast, should implant a volume-size inferior than a size useful to harmonize with the 25contralateral breast. If the surgeon did it, should reconstruct a disharmonious breast (in relation to the volume) compared to the contralateral breast which is healthy. Therefore, the surgeon usually choose for a prosthesis volume equal to the glandular explanted with the eye to the harmonic symmetry with the volume of the contralateral breast.

The mammary prosthesis choosen, will exercise on the inferior pole of the breast an abnormal weight compared to the physiological weight, which is 5yielded from the gland holded to the tissue by suspensory ligaments.

The "dead"-weight of the prosthesis, deprived of the suspensory ligaments, will weigh on tissues, including the neo-tissue (the aforementioned patent) of the lower pole, favoring in time the development of ptosis (PAR).

lOIt is believed, in summary, that the invention of the aforementioned patent, does not allow the control of ptosis because, after being transformed into a thin vascularized tissue, can yield under "dead"- weight of a breast implant that is not anchored to muscular wall and at the subcutis like it was the gland, thanks to the suspensory ligaments.

15In the state of the art there are other patents which, however, claiming different methods and procedures.

The patent no. US2015 / 351891 refers to a system for mastopexy which is formed in a different way by the invention . In fact it presents two elements : "suspension strut" that the invention does not claim, and that

20which acts as "attachment" to the second pole of the lower support element. This second element is shaped in canoeing, different from the invention. Also, the material is different. In par.62 In fact, the patent US 2015/351891 speaks about synthetic material which can be used alone or "in blends" with another biomaterial . Our invention, however, the synthetic 5biopassiva mesh, must always be used with the organic matrix bioactive; then they are not mixed but rather joined (the first plus the second).

Patent US2014 / 088700 is a method to use a silk scaffold. This patent is different from our invention for: - the shape. In fact, the patent US2014 / 088 700 is presented as a trapezoid form or canoe; our invention has a well-defined and unique shape; - the material. In fact, the patent US2014 / 088 700 claims a silk device. Our invention is in Sbiological matrix (ECM) bioactive added to a biocompatible synthetic material biopassive; -surgical tecnique in which you have to use. The patent US2014 / 088 700 is used in breast reconstruction "two steps"procedure with expander. Our invention is used in reconstructive procedure "one step" without the use of expander.

lOThe patent US2012/05690 claims a different device by our invention. In fact, the patent US2012/05690 has a different shape compared to the invention. It presents itself as a structure that doesn't cover all the prosthesis but it is only a support in the lower pole. In addition, the patent is positioned under the muscle while the invention is placed over the

ISpectoralis major muscle. Finally, the patent US2012/ 05690 refers in par.

55 to the synthetic network is covered with a biological matrix. Our invention has a synthetic mesh covered with a matrix but the two materials are interconnected as best seen from Table 2 Figs. 3-4. In fact, the invention may have a hole that allows the passage from the front to

20the rear (interconnection).

Finally The patent WO2006/117622 claims a device made exclusively of synthetic material, P4HB. The invention, however, is a combination/union of two materials: a bioactive matrix (ECM) and a synthetic mesh that intersect in the center. The patent WO2006 / 117622, also does not have

25a specific shape and defined like our invention.

Purpose of the invention object of this patent application is to solve the problem of the relationship between suitable volume of a breast prosthesis and its weight to the inferior pole of the breast in order to control the ptosis due to tissue failure over time and not to alter the patient's proprioceptive perception.

Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the detailed description of a particular but not exclusive Sembodiment, illustrated only by way of non-limitative example in the accompanying drawings, in which :

Table 1 - Fig. 1 - Fig. 2

Exemplification of a first embodiment mode;

Fig. 1 - Front view internal

lOFig. 2 - Exterior Rear View

Table 2 - Fig. 3 - Fig. 4

Exemplification of a second embodiment mode;

Fig. 3 - Internal Front view

Fig. 4 - Exterior Rear View

15Table 3 - Fig. 5 - Fig. 6

Exemplification of a third embodiment mode;

Fig. 5 - Internal Front view

Fig. 6 - Exterior Rear View

Table 4 -Fig. 7

0Exemplification of the positioning of the prosthesis on the second embodiment mode of the invention

Table 5 -Fig. 8 - Fig. 9

Exemplification of the invention in the second embodiment mode wrapped on the prosthesis

5Fig 8 - found on the prosthesis assembled rear view

Fig 9 - found on the prosthesis assembled front view

Table 6- Fig. 10- Fig.11.- Fig.12- Fig. 13

Fig. 10 and 11 The bioactice matrix (ECM) front and back view Fig. 12 the biopassive mesh (syntetic)

Fig. 13 medical device made of bioactive matrix plus biopassive mesh. In relation to any one of the represented embodiments, the invention disclosed in the present patent application, is constituted by a bio-passive 5mesh (A) in little elastic inert biomaterial applied to overlapping or interconnected to the inner surface (E) of a flat element (H) said flat element (H) being made of collagenous biomaterial and being divided into multiple partitions (C) which define a central planar area with a base (D). The baffles (C) are made so that they can be folded by combining the lOrespective first sides adjacent which, once joined together by, for example, sutures, define a containment structure for a breast implant (F), forming a box- element (G) adapted to contain, containing or integrant a breast implant(F), said box-element (G), being interposed between the skin and the pectoralis major muscle and being suturabile to the latter,

15forming with it a bi-phasic device in collagenous biomaterial in which is composed the flat element (H) plus bio-passive biomaterial which is composed the mesh(A), realizing a "anti-capsule pouch", but inextensible, adapted to prevent the incongruous weight-transfer to the inferior pole of the breast given from the dead weight of the mammary prosthesis.

0The system realized according to what has been described replaces the function of suspensory ligaments that in the normal anatomical- physiological conditions (not subject to mastectomy patient) maintain high the mammary gland.

The function of the collagen material (flat element (H) with the inner 5surface (E) and outer surface (E)) is to isolate from the tissue-context the bio-passive materials (silicone implants and synthetic mesh) and then prevent capsular fibrosis. The function of the invention object of the present patent application, constituted of bio-passive element, synthetic mesh (A) applied to overlapping or interconnected to the inner surface (E) of the flat element (H) in collagenous material, is to absorb most part of the weight due to 5the dead -weight of a breast implant replacing the function of the suspensory ligaments.

The biomaterial of the mesh (A) is bio-inert passive type because it must not be reabsorbed by the body over time, exercising his sospensoria function.

lOBiomaterial may be of polypropylene, polyethylene, ultra high molecular density, material Gore-tex type r, polypropylene type, Titanium and in any other non-resorbable biomaterial .

The shape of the mesh (A) (Table 1, 2, 3, 6) can change, being complementary to the flat element (H) in collagenous material, having to

ISconstitute with it a single bi-phasic structure, capable of coating a breast implant, limiting the risk of capsular fibrosis and at the same time avoiding an incongruous weight to the inferior pole of the breast.

The measurement of the lattice of the mesh (A), will preferably but not exclusively "large" to decrease the risk of constituting pabulum for

20bacteria and in order to achieve a deformability such as to fit the shape of the primary device in collagen . Along the peripheral edges, for a variable band around 5 or more or less cm., will be constituted by a tighter mesh to be able to be shaped with scissors, together with the primary device, keeping intact the interweaving weft-warp, and then the its mechanical-

25sospensoria function .

From the biological point of view, the neo-capsule will be constituted by a thin vascularized layer with presence of fibroblast cells, fibrocytes, myo ¬ fibroblasts, typical of the fascial tissue, but interconnected with synthetic structure fibro- reticular, non-resorbable, configuring an enveloping, suspensory element of the prosthesis mammary.

In any case, the materials used and the dimensions constituting the invention, may be more pertinent according to specific requirements.