Remediating Drilling Mud and Treating Drilling Cuttings

Continuation History

This application is a continuation-in-part of Provisional U.S. Application No. 62/462,393, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Background of the Invention

Field of the Invention: The invention relates to drilling mud remediation in general and to the separation and treatment of solids from used drilling mud in particular.

Prior Art: Drilling mud is a multi-purpose fluid. During drilling, it is pumped down through a drill stem to and through the mud motor, to which the drill bit is attached. The force of the drilling fluid being pumped through the mud motor drives the motor and thus the bit. In this respect the drilling mud functions as an hydraulic fluid.

Of course, drilling mud is necessary for rotary drilling as well. The mud will not serve as the driving force for the bit - rotation of the drill string will accomplish that. However, the following functions of drilling mud are equally applicable to top drive rotary drilling and downhole mud motors.

As the bit turns, it will create cuttings - small pieces of the geologic formation through which the bit is drilling. These may be pieces of rock, shale, clay, sand, granite, etc. - essentially any substrata of the earth. These cuttings must be removed from the well-bore. As the drilling mud is pumped back to the surface, the mud entrains the cuttings and carries them with it. Thus, the mud serves as a liquid conveyor for the cuttings.

The drill bit is necessarily larger in diameter than the mud motor and the drill stem. This allows the drill bit to cut a well-bore that is larger in diameter than the mud motor or the drill stem. Thus, there is an annulus between the drill stem and the walls of the well-bore. The annulus forms a passage for the drilling mud and the material entrained in it to return the surface. The drilling mud is forced back to the surface, via the annulus, by the new mud exiting the mud motor or drill stem.

The well-bore must remain open. If it collapses upon the drill stem, the drill stem may become stuck. The drilling mud serves to hold up the walls of the well-bore. The drilling mud also needs to seal the walls of the well-bore. Otherwise, the drilling mud maybe lost to the formation via pores in the walls of the well-bore. The drilling mud is expensive, and its loss is to be minimized. Once the drilling mud reaches the surface, the cuttings must be separated from the drilling mud. Rock- filled drilling mud cannot be pumped through the mud motor or other production line equipment (pumps, pipe, valves, jets, etc.) without doing serious damage to the equipment. Even when the cutting content of the mud is not so great as to damage the equipment, high solids content in the drilling mud will slow the mud motor and ultimately, the rate of penetration. Removal of the cuttings is necessary for the drilling mud to be reused.

Smaller cuttings are more difficult to remove than larger cuttings. Thus, it is desirable that the cuttings be removed as quickly as possible and with a minimum of handling of the drilling mud. Each time the cuttings are pumped, shearing will occur, which will introduce smaller pieces of the cuttings to the mud. Minimizing - or eliminating - pumping prior to cuttings removal is desirable in order to minimize shearing and facilitate cuttings removal.

Once the cuttings are removed, they pose a disposal problem. The drilling mud frequently contains hydrocarbons. It may be an oil based mud, in which case the mud will be predominantly hydrocarbon. However, even water based muds will frequently contain hydrocarbons when they return to the surface. Petroleum wells are intentionally drilled into petroleum bearing geologic formations. That is, literally, their point. Petroleum from the formation will enter the drilling mud.

These oils will coat the cuttings. Additionally, many of the cuttings are porous. Petroleum will enter the pores of the cuttings, filling and coating them. In some formations, such as shale formations, petroleum is often in the cuttings from the outset. When the cuttings are removed from the drilling mud, the petroleum and other oils must be removed from the cuttings before the cuttings can be disposed.

When the cuttings are produced in an on-shore well, they are typically shipped to an off-site location for treatment. Shipping oil coated rocks via truck is no small expense, nor is off-site treatment. When cuttings are created offshore, the cuttings must either be shipped to shore, at an even greater expense than trucking, and then treated and disposed or they may treated on the rig. If the cuttings can be treated on the rig, they may be dumped in the sea, at considerable savings. Accordingly, a device and system for removing cuttings from used drilling mud and for removing drilling mud from separated cuttings meeting the following objectives is desired. Objects of the Invention

It is an object of the invention to remove cuttings from drilling fluid.

It is another object of the invention to remove cuttings from drilling fluid with as little handling of the cuttings prior to removal as possible.

It is still another object of the invention to minimize the loss of drilling fluid during separation.

It is yet another object of the invention to facilitate interchange of filter belts in the liquid solid separation device.

It is still another object of the invention to remove substantially all oils and other liquids from the cuttings.

It is yet another object of the invention to render the cuttings suitable for disposal in open water.

It is still another object of the invention to render the cuttings suitable for disposal in landfills or for use in aggregate.

It is yet another object of the invention to facilitate movement of the cuttings through an induction furnace.

It is still another object of the invention to pelletize the cuttings.

It is yet another object of the invention to remove solids from drilling mud, pelletize the solids, and remove substantially all liquids from the solids in a single processing unit.

It is still another object of the invention to minimize the footprint required to remove solids from drilling mud, pelletize the solids, and remove substantially all liquids from the solids.

It is yet another object of the invention to minimize the weight of the equipment required to remove solids from drilling mud, pelletize the solids, and remove substantially all liquids from the solids.

It is still another object of the invention to minimize the energy required to remove solids from drilling mud, pelletize the solids, and remove substantially all liquids from the solids. Summary of the Invention

A drilling mud remediation and drilling cuttings treatment device and method are disclosed. There are three main components: a vacuum liquid solid separator; a pelletizer; and an induction furnace. The liquid solid separator has a seamless filter belt configured to carry a mixture of liquids and solids over a vacuum. A slurry comprised of drilling mud and cuttings is deposited on the filter belt. An applicator ensures that the slurry is deposited evenly across the entire filter belt at a uniform thickness. The vacuum removes most of the liquids for further treatment and reuse. The solids are then transferred to a pelletizer which compacts them into relatively uniform pellets while removing much residual liquid. The pelletized cuttings are finally passed through an induction furnace, which vaporizes the residual liquid, rendering the solids safe for disposal.

Brief Description of the Figures

Figure 1 is side cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of the liquid solid separator, pelletizer, and induction furnace.

Figure 1A is a top, partial cut-away view illustrating the relationship of a preferred embodiment of the applicator in a separator having two filter lines.

Figure 2 is side view of a preferred embodiment of an applicator shown in proximity to a portion of the filter belt.

Figure 3 is a top view of a preferred embodiment of the applicator shown over and a segment of a filter belt.

Figure 4 is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the roller assembly on which the drive belt and the filter belts turn.

Figure 5 is the view of figure 4 with the drive belt in place.

Figure 6 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the filter belt in place on the rollers.

Figure 7 is the view of figure 4 with the drive and filter belts in place.

Figure 8 A is a side cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of a roller with a bladder shown in the inflated position.

Figure 8B is a side cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of a roller with a bladder shown in a deflated position.

Figure 9 is a side, cut-away perspective view illustrating a preferred embodiment of a roller configured to apply a vacuum to the filter belt.

Figure 10 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a seamless filter belt.

Figure 11 is a top view of a preferred embodiment of a vacuum table.

Figure 11 A is a side view of a preferred embodiment of a drive belt shown in place on a drive wheel and rollers.

Figure 1 IB is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a drive belt link.

Figure 12 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a pelletizer.

Figure 13 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a mated pair of pelletizer wheels. Figure 13 A is an end view of a preferred embodiment of mated pair of pelletizer wheels and a star valve.

Figure 13B is a cut-away view showing the mating connection of a pair of pelletizer wheels. Figure 14 is a side, partial cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of an induction furnace. Figure 15A is a side, cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of an induction furnace.

Figure 15B is a side, cut-away view of a section of a preferred embodiment of an induction furnace.

Figure 16 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a vacuum table.

Disclosure of the Best Mode

A system of separating cuttings from drilling mud and treating the cuttings is disclosed. Drilling mud exits the well-bore laden with cuttings generated during the drilling process. The mixed cuttings and drilling mud will be a slurry. As discussed above, the cuttings must be removed from the drilling mud before the mud can be reused. The mud and cuttings slurry flows into a tank 1, known in the industry as a possum belly. Tank 1 is a deep bellied tank which holds the drilling mud when it exits the well-bore. As tank 1 fills, it serves as a source of the slurry, though an inflow line may be the slurry source if tank 1 is omitted. The drilling mud and cuttings slurry will overflow into a liquid solid vacuum separator 2. In the preferred embodiment, a magnetic filter 101, preferably a strong corrosion resistant electromagnet, is positioned between separator 2 and tank 1 to remove metallic debris in the drilling mud.

Vacuum based liquid solid separators 2 are well known in the art. Examples include U.S. Patent 4,750,920, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Generally, they include a continuous, porous, endless filter belt 3 (i.e., a loop) which runs conveyor-like over a vacuum source 4. The mud and cuttings slurry is deposited onto filter belt 3 which pulls the slurry over vacuum 4. Vacuum 4 pulls the fluid off the cuttings and belt 3 carries the cuttings on for further treatment.

One problem with prior art separators 2 is that the slurry is not evenly distributed on filter belt 3. This results in uneven piles of cuttings on filter 3. As these piles of cuttings pass over vacuum 4, the cuttings at the bottom of each mound will partially shield the cuttings at the top from vacuum 4. Fluid pulled from the cuttings on the top of the mounds will also re-wet the cuttings on the bottom.

The uneven distribution of the slurry also results in open spots on filter belt 3. When open spots pass over vacuum source 4, more of the air will pass through the openings rather than through the piles of cuttings, reducing the effectiveness of vacuum 4.

The inventor addresses the foregoing issues with an applicator 5. Applicator 5 applies an even layer of slurry to filter belt 3. The deposited layer will preferably be one to two layers of cuttings thick. It will also preferably extend evenly across all of belt 3, so that the entire surface of belt 3 is coated, minimizing - and preferably eliminating - any open spaces on belt 3. When the evenly spread slurry of mud and cuttings pass over vacuum 4, the effectiveness of vacuum 4 will be enhanced significantly. More of the mud will be pulled off by vacuum 4 and less will be left on the cuttings.

In the preferred embodiment, applicator 5 comprises two elongated cylinders 6. Cylinders 6 are preferably made of Inconel or other similar hard, durable material. Cylinders 6 are positioned proximate to filter belt 3, preferably an adjustable 2 to 4 inches above belt 3. Cylinders 6 are preferably about 8 inches in diameter and extend the full width of the belt (as used herein, unless otherwise indicated, "about" means plus or minus 10 percent). Cylinders 6 are configured to rotate in opposite directions, so that they rotate toward each other when viewed from above - that is, above cylinders 6 and belt 3 relative to gravity. Cylinders 6 preferably have a gap 7 between them. Gap 7 is preferably an adjustable 1/4 to 3/4 inches wide, and will preferably not exceed about 1 inch. Cylinders 6 are preferably powered to rotate at an adjustable 25 to 50 rotations per minute (rpm's). One or more motors 5M may be provided to power cylinders 6.

Cylinders 6 are positioned in a discharge aperture 8 though which the mud/cuttings slurry must pass to reach filter belt 3. The direction of rotation of cylinders 6 prevents the slurry from passing through discharge aperture 8 without passing between the cylinders 6.

The rate of discharge from applicator 5 will depend upon the rate of rotation of cylinders 6, the size of gap 7, the viscosity of the slurry, and the size and number of cuttings in the slurry. However, by varying the rate of rotation of cylinders 6 and the width of gap 7 between cylinders 6 and synchronizing those conditions with the rate of travel of filter belt 3, a uniform layer of slurry may be deposited across filter belt 3. The piles of cuttings common in the prior art are eliminated as are the unfilled spaces on filter belt 3. When the slurry reaches vacuum 4, the individual cuttings are subjected to a uniform vacuum force. Because the cuttings will be deposited in a layer one to two cuttings thick, the cuttings will not be shielded from vacuum 4 by other cuttings. Similarly, drilling mud pulled from one cutting will be pulled through filter 3, rather than onto other cuttings. Likewise, because applicator 5 will uniformly cover filter 3 with slurry, there will be few and preferably no open spaces on filter belt 3, which will maximize the effect of vacuum 4 on the slurry. Once the vacuum is applied, most of the fluid will be removed from the cuttings in a fraction of a second.

As noted above, there are a variety of factors that will determine the rate of rotation of cylinders 6. However, for a slurry comprising about 30 percent cuttings by weight, with each cutting having an average circumference of about 0.39 to 0.45 inches, and with filter belt 3 traveling at a rate of about 4 feet per second, and with applicator cylinders 6 positioned about 3/4 inches apart, a rate of rotation of about 50 rpm's for each 8 inch diameter cylinder 6 is expected to yield acceptable results.

Filter belt 3 will convey the evenly applied slurry over a vacuum table 4A. Vacuum tables come in many forms. They are commonly panels with multiple holes to allow a vacuum to be applied to the surface. In the preferred embodiment, the inventor contemplates using a frame 180 of non- porous material having a low coefficient of friction to form vacuum table 4A. Frame 180 is positioned below filter belt 3, relative to gravity and applicator 5. Highly porous drive belt 11 (discussed below) is positioned within frame 180 and below filter belt 3. Drive belt 11 serves the role of the perforated panel in the prior art. A pair of sealing rollers 9B is preferably contained within frame 180. Sealing rollers 9B are positioned to transition belt 3 onto drive belt 11 and to transition belt 3 away from drive belt 11. Together, frame 180, drive belt 11, and sealing rollers 9B form the preferred vacuum table 4A. Applicator 5 is positioned to apply the mud and cuttings slurry to filter belt 3 within vacuum table 4 A or just before vacuum table 4 A, relative to the direction of motion of filter belt 3.

Vacuum 4 will be applied to filter 3 and the slurry at table 4A. Vacuum 4 will draw the drilling fluid out of the slurry, and through filter 3, leaving the cuttings on filter 3. The cuttings, while not completely fluid free, will contain much less residual fluid than would be the case if the slurry were applied to filter belt 3 in a non-uniform fashion. Suitable sources of vacuum 4 are known in the art.

Belt 3 will convey the cuttings off vacuum separator 2 for further treatment. In the preferred embodiment, belt 3 is seamless. The ends of prior art endless belts are commonly connected in a releasable fashion, such as with hook and loop (Velcro) fasteners. Industrial zippers are used as well. Such prior art mechanisms facilitate the installation and removal of belts. However, prior art connection mechanisms create a dam, against which fluid will build up. Instead of being pulled through filter 3, some of the fluid that builds against the connection mechanism will be flung off belt 3 with each revolution of the connection mechanism. This results in the loss of valuable drilling fluid, runs the risk of discharging oils into the environment, and generally makes a mess. The use of a seamless belt 3 avoids this issue. There is no barrier to act as a dam. The fluid in the slurry remains evenly distributed across filter belt 3. More of the fluid gets pulled through filter 3 by vacuum 4, and little, if any, is discharged on each rotation.

In one preferred embodiment, seamless filter belt 3 is a woven belt made of fibers. By weaving belt 3 on a circular loom, similar to the way a sock is woven, belt 3 can be produced with no seam, or at least no transverse seam. Longitudinal seams may be provided at the edges of belt 3. This will help prevent any unraveling of woven belt 3 and can also form a border to help prevent any of the slurry from running off the edge of belt 3.

During different stages in drilling, different configurations of belt 3 may be desired. Well- bores generally decrease in diameter the closer the bore gets to the bottom of the well. Thus, the used mud will typically have higher volumes of cuttings closer to the top of the well. The size of the cuttings will also tend to be smaller nearer the top, as strata near the surface tends to include more sands and clays while deeper strata tends to include more rock. In the early stages of drilling, the cuttings will often be smaller and a finer meshed filter belt 3 may be desirable.

As the well-bore gets deeper, the length of the column of drilling mud increases. This results in greater pressure being applied to the mud at the bottom of the well-bore. That increased pressure can force the drilling mud into the formation, resulting in potential loss of mud. It can also imperil the well-bore. One way drilling engineers address this issue is by adding barite (barium sulfate, BaS0 ₄ ) to drilling mud. Barite can help seal pores in the formation, preventing the loss of mud. Barite is expensive, and it is desirable that any filter belt 3 leave the barite in the mud. Barite has a diameter of less than 74 microns. Thus, when barite is present in the mud, filter belt 3 should have openings at least large enough to pass barite particles. Accordingly, operators may find it advantageous to change belts 3 one or more times during drilling operations.

The introduction of barite to the drilling fluid makes it important to remove finer solids as soon as possible. As noted above, the presence of barite in the mud will make it difficult to remove particles finer than 74 microns without also removing the barite. Because fines are most common in the upper portion of most wells and barite is often not needed until the lower portions are reached, screening for fines early in the drilling process is important to effectively remediate drilling mud. Once barite is added, other processing equipment - degasssers, hydro-cyclone desilters, and centrifuges, to name a few - can be used to remove the fines. However, transfer of the mud to these devices requires pumping. Pumping the cuttings invariably leads to shearing, creating smaller cuttings and making them more difficult to remove. Thus, removal of fines before barite is added is highly desirable.

In one preferred embodiment filter belt 3 is woven. In a preferred embodiment belt 3 is made of fine, high strength fibers such as Kevlar. The fiber should have a very low absorption rate, low porosity, and a smooth external surface. The finished belt 3 will have a low coefficient of friction - preferably about .03 - and will be at least about 37 percent open. Suitable woven belts 3 may be obtained from Textum, Inc. (DBA Tubular Fabrics) of Belmont, North Carolina.

In another preferred embodiment, filter belts 3 are metal. Metal belts 3 can be cast or extruded. However, they should preferably be seamless. When a sheet of metal is welded to itself to form belt 3, seamlessness can be achieved using electron beam welding and keeping weld width below about 0.031 inches. In the preferred embodiment, metal filter belts 3 are preferably made of stainless steel, Monel, composite materials such as stainless steel and sintered metal, or nitinol, a roughly 50/50 alloy of nickel and titanium. Use of Monel belts can be particularly advantageous when the formation has imparted hydrogen sulfide gas to the drilling mud. Nitinol can be especially useful when high tension (150,000+ psi) applications are needed. Metal belts 3 will preferably be between about 0.30 and .125 inches thick and should be very smooth - about 10 micro inches. Any filter belt 3 must be porous. When metal belts 3 are used, lasers may be used to create precision opening patterns in the belts. In one preferred embodiment, a pattern of diamond shaped openings is provided. Opening sizes will differ depending upon application.

Multiple parallel belts 3 may be utilized if desired. Having multiple belts can be advantageous for continuity of operation purposes. When drilling mud is being processed for reuse, remediating the drill mud quickly can be advantageous. The quicker the mud can be readied for reuse, the less new mud must be made. However, vacuum separator 2 will need to be shut down occasionally - for service, or cleaning, to change belt 3, etc. If separator 2 is provided with multiple parallel belts 3, one can be stopped and a second started while the first is serviced without losing any time separating solids from the mud. Also, thinner belts are generally easier to operate than wide belts. If it were necessary to maximize the amount of mud processed at any one time, multiple lines could be used simultaneously, which offers operational advantages over operating a single belt 3 that was twice as wide.

Using a seamless belt 3 poses installation issues. Belt filter 3 rides on a plurality of rollers 9. Rollers 9 should preferably have a diameter of at least about 60 inches. Larger rollers 9 will impart a larger bending radius to belt 3, which will reduce stress on belt 3.

In the prior art, rollers 9 are typically mounted on an axle 10 supported on each end. Installing seamless belt 3 over rollers 9 supported from both ends would require rollers 9 to be dismounted. Otherwise, the supports would prevent belt 3 from being installed. This is one reason most prior art belts 3 have a separable seam.

In the preferred embodiment, rollers 9 are mounted on an axle 10 supported from one end only. This allows seamless belts 3 to be installed on and removed from rollers 9 on their unsupported or free side. By orienting rollers 9 so that their free sides are all on the same side, belt 3 may be installed and removed without dismounting rollers 9.

Filter belt 3 may be driven by one or more powered drive wheels. However, in one preferred embodiment, vacuum separator 2 is provided with a drive belt 11. Drive belt 11 is preferably made of a high strength material with a relatively high co-efficient of friction, such as rubber. It should be highly porous - generally more than fifty percent open so that it will not impede vacuum 4 or the fluids flowing through filter belt 3. In a preferred embodiment, drive belt 11 is comprised of a plurality of links 120. Drive belt 11 is positioned within filter belt 3. Drive belt 11 should be positioned around a plurality of rollers 9A, including at least one powered drive wheel 12. Drive belt 11 is positioned to be in close contact with filter belt 3 within vacuum table 4A, where filter belt 3 supports the slurry. The rotation of drive belt 11 will effect rotation of filter belt 3, thereby lessening the strain on, and increasing the life of, filter belt 3.

It will be appreciated that to install and remove filter belt 3, tension must be removed from rollers 9 on which belt 3 travels. The inventor contemplates achieving this by fitting at least one of rollers 9 with an inflatable bladder 13. Bladder 13 fits around an underlying wheel 14, like a tire on a bicycle wheel, which in turn rotates on an axle 10. When bladder 13 is inflated, the path of filter belt 3 is longer than it is when bladder 13 is deflated. Bladder(s) 13 are sized such that filter belt 3 is loose enough to slide on and off rollers 9 when bladder(s) 13 are deflated and tight when bladder(s) 13 are inflated.

One or more of rollers 9 may be provided with a plurality of apertures 30. By applying a vacuum 4B to roller 9, any excess fluid contained in belt 3 may be extracted. See, Figure 9.

Solids will tend to build up in belt 3. When belt 3 is a fabric, the inventor contemplates passing belt 3 though an ultra-sonic bath 102. This will allow belt 3 to be cleaned without removing it from separator 2. When belt 3 is a metal, briefly heating a localized portion of belt 3 will cause the openings to expand, causing debris entrained in belt 3 to be dislodged. Once cleaning is complete, a water mist will cause openings to contract to their original size.

After the slurry has passed over vacuum 4, the majority of the drilling mud and other fluids will have been removed and collected. These fluids will be transferred for further treatment and eventual reuse and/or disposal.

The cuttings will be carried by filter belt 3 to a discharge point 103. In one preferred embodiment, filter belt 3 will discharge the cuttings into a hopper 15 lined with low coefficient of friction material, such as ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Hopper 15 will direct the cuttings into pelletizer 16.

Upon exiting vacuum separator 2, the cuttings will typically have some oils on and especially in them. Oil content will commonly be between 3 and 6 percent, by weight. The cuttings will also be irregular in shape. Pelletizer 16 will reduce the oil and water content and regularize the size of the cuttings.

Pelletizer 16 comprises a pair of wheels 17 each containing a plurality of cavities 18. Cavities

18 have dimensions that match the desired shape of the cuttings. In the preferred embodiment cuttings will be generally cylindrical and about 3/4 of an inch long and about 1/4 of an inch in diameter. Each cavity 18 will be the same length and about ½ the thickness of the desired cuttings. As wheels 17 turn into each other, loose cuttings are forced into cavities 18. Cuttings that are too large to fit in cavities 18 are compacted or sheared off. Cuttings that are too small to fill a cavity 18 are compacted with other cuttings pieces. The pressure applied to the cuttings will squeeze oils and waters from the cuttings, in part by crushing the internal cavities contained within the cuttings and in part by applying pressure to the clays and other cutting components that can absorb liquids. In the preferred embodiment, a channel 140 extends from each cavity 18 into the interior of wheel 17. A vacuum 4C is applied to each channel 140. Fluid extracted from the cuttings as they are pelletized will be collected by vacuum 4C, via channels 140, and routed for reuse or disposal. Wheels 17 are preferably powered by one of more motors 16M . Wheels 17 may be provided with a seal 130 to force any fluids to pass between wheels 17.

When the cuttings exit pelletizer 16, they will be substantially uniform in size. Pellets will be the size of cavities 18 or smaller. Oil content will be 3 percent, by weight, or less.

Once the cuttings have been pelletized, the cuttings may be stored for later treatment, if desired. However, in a preferred embodiment, the pelletized cuttings are transferred into an induction furnace 20.

Induction furnace 20 comprises a scroll 21 that rotates to move the pellets through the furnace 20 and a housing 22 containing scroll 21. Both are contained within a series of electrical coils 23. Coils 23 induce a magnetic field in scroll 21 and, in some embodiments, housing 22. The direction of the current in coils 23 alternates rapidly. This causes the magnetic field in scroll 21 and/or housing 22 to change polarity as well. The constant inversion of the magnetic field induces magnetic hysteresis heating in scroll 21 and/or housing 22. The internal temperature of furnace 20 will reach about 1800 degrees F, sufficient to eliminate essentially all oils and waters from the cuttings.

In a preferred embodiment, housing 22 is ceramic or other non-magnetic material. This will prevent hysteresis from occurring in housing 22. Scroll 21 will still be heated, but housing 22 will not. Preventing housing 22 from being heated is an important safety feature. Gas leaks are a serious risk in any petroleum production unit. Thus, flashpoints are to be avoided. Heating the interior of furnace 20 without heating housing 22 reduces the risk that furnace 20 will constitute an exposed flashpoint. This will allow the furnace to be used in hazardous areas near the well center, diminishing the need to pump drilling mud.

In a preferred embodiment, housing 22 rotates as well as scroll 21. Preferably, housing 22 will rotate in the opposite direction from scroll 21. This will help prevent the pelletized cuttings from clumping within furnace 20 or becoming lodged therein. It also facilitates the exposure of the cuttings to the heated surface of scroll 21. Rotation of scroll 21 and housing 22 is preferably powered by one or more furnace motors 20M. In a preferred embodiment, a vacuum is applied to furnace 20. Furnace 20 will have an ingress point 24, where pelletized cuttings enter furnace 20, and an egress point 25 where treated cuttings exit. Ingress and egress points 24, 25 will preferably be separated by the majority of the length of furnace 20. Ingress point 24 and egress point 25 are preferably each star valves 105. Star valves 105 allow incremental amounts of pellets to be added to and extracted from furnace 20 at a regular rate. Star valves 105 can also be sealed to furnace 20, so that the vacuum may be maintained within furnace 20. Preferably, the vacuum in furnace 20 will operate at about 26 inches of mercury.

By applying a vacuum to furnace 20, the vaporization of liquids on the pelletized cuttings will be enhanced. Oils in the pelletized cuttings may be vaporized at a lower temperature due to the vacuum, which reduces energy requirements . Vaporizing the oils at a lower temperature also reduces the risk that the chemicals being vaporized will react with other material in the cuttings or furnace 20.

A wizzard 106 is preferably provided proximate egress point 25. As the oils and waters vaporize furnace 20, the resultant gases must be removed to maintain the desired vacuum. Wizzard 106 is placed in the vacuum stream to remove any small solid particles that become entrained in the vapor stream exiting furnace 20. After removal, the vapor stream is condensed for further treatment, recycling, or disposal

Induction furnaces are known in the prior art. Examples include U.S. Patent 8,220, 178, which is hereby incorporated by reference. One problem that arises when using such prior art devices is movement of the cuttings through furnace 20. Scroll 21 is supposed to move the solids through furnace 20 in much the same way that an augur moves grain. If the solids have a substantial amount of fluid present, the material can behave more like a slurry, which will cause scroll 21 to act like a screw pump instead of an augur. This can create much higher pressures and generally lead to issues moving the material, damage to furnace 20, or both.

Pelletizing the cuttings addresses many of the issues associated with the use of scroll 21 to move material through furnace 20. The size and shape of the cuttings are regularized, and excess fluids are removed. This makes it much easier to move the pelletized cuttings through furnace 20.

Use of pellets also allows heating in furnace 20 to be more constant. The size and fluid content of the material being treated in furnace 20 will be relatively constant when the material entering furnace 20 has been pelletized. Thus, the heat needed to treat the pelletized cuttings will also be predictable and uniform. This can be contrasted with the prior art in which higher and more variable fluid content in the cuttings entering a furnace would lead to variable energy demands.

During treatment, the pelletized cuttings will be heated to about 300 degrees F under vacuum and will preferably be discharged at no less than about 260 degrees F.

Upon exiting furnace 20, the fully treated cuttings will have virtually no detectable liquids - neither oils nor waters. The final product will be an inert powder suitable for discharge at sea or on land without any further treatment.

A control panel 107 is preferrably provided. From control panel 107, an operator can control all of the aspects of separator 2, pelletizer 16, and furnace 20. Rate of rotation of pelletizer wheels 6, size of gap 7, speed of filter belt 3, rate of rotation of pelletizer wheels 17, temperature of furnace 20, rate of rotation of scroll 21 and housing 22, and rate of operation of star valve 105 can all be controlled from control panel 107. Cameras 109 may be provided at various locations to allow operators to monitor process conditions. A cat walk 110 may be provided to give operators access to various components of the device.

These and other improvements to the remediation of drilling mud and deoiling/dewatering of drilling cuttings will be apparent to those of skill in the art from the foregoing disclosure and drawings and are intended to be encompassed by the scope and spirit of the following claims.