EFFICACY

Cross-Reference to Related Applications

[1] Tins application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No.

63/053,800, filed on July 20, 2020, claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/061,784, filed on August 5, 2020, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No, 63/138,636, filed on January 18, 2021, the entirety of which are incorporated herein by reference.

Technical Field

[2] The present disclosure pertains to microbiology'. More particularly, the present disclosure pertains to methods and articles for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample/substance (e.g., a disinfectant or a sanitizer) against microorganisms and virions attached to an inanimate surface.

Background

[3] Pathogenic microorganisms can have economic, health, and safety impacts.

Summary

[4] Disclosed herein are methods of evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test substance (e.g., a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer) that include: providing a test substance suspected of antimicrobial efficacy, providing a preserved antimicrobial test article, removing the preserved antimicrobial test article from a sealed container, contacting the preserved antimicrobial test article with a predetermined amount of the test substance without rehydrating the preserved microbial article and without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test substance, maintaining contact between the antimicrobial test article and the test substance for a predetermined test contact time, contacting the antimicrobial test article and the test substance with a neutralizer after the test contact time, agitating the antimicrobial test article and observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy, where: the preserved antimicrobiaJ test article comprises a non-water soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, where: the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material that has a loss of viability ofless than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, where: the article is sealed in a container, and where the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of the test substance (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test substance. In some embodiments of these methods, the viable microbial material includes bacterial cells. In some embodiments, the bacterial cells include Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC® 15442™ or Staphylococcus aureus ATCC® 6538™. In some examples of these methods, the viable microbial material includes fungal cells. In some examples of these methods, the viable microbial material includes virions.

[5] in some embodiments, the non-water soluble substrate is a disc, a rectangle, or a cylinder. In some embodiments, the substrate has a flat side with a surface area between 10 mnr to 10,000 mm ^z . In some embodiments, the thin microbial layer is attached to the flat side of the substrate. In some embodiments, the non -water soluble substrate comprises a porous or a non-porous material. In some examples, the non-water soluble substrate comprises anon-porous material selected from the following group: metal, steel, glass, and plastic. In some examples, the non-water soluble substrate comprises a porous material selected from the following group: ceramic or wood. In some embodiments of these methods, the non-water soluble substrate is a stainless steel disc with a diameter between about 3 mm to about 25 mm and a thickness between about 1 mm and about 10 mm. In some embodiments of these methods, the non-water soluble substrate is a borosilicate glass disc with a diameter between about 3 mm to about 25 mm. In some embodiments of these methods, the non-water soluble substrate is a borosilicate glass rectangle with a length between about 5 mm to about 100 mm, a width between about 5 mm to about 100 mm, and a thickness between about 1 mm to about 5 mm.

[61 In some examples of these methods, the stabilizing mixture includes a sugar. In some examples, the sugar is a non-reducing sugar. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture includes sucrose. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture includes an antioxidant. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture includes ascorbic acid. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture includes a buffer. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture includes Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture includes a growth nutrient. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture includes synthetic broth. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises between 5.0% to 15% of a sugar, between 2.0% to 10% of an antioxidant, and synthetic broth. In some examples, the thin microbial layer further comprises a soil load. In some examples, the soil load is between 1% to 15% by weight. In some examples, the soil load comprises an organic salt. In some examples, the soil load comprises bovine serum, in some examples, the thin microbial layer has a residual water content of less than 4% by weight, in some examples, the thin microbial layer has a residual water content of less than 3% by weight. In some examples, the thin microbial layer has a residual water content of less than 2% by weight.

[7] In some examples, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 30 days at a temperature of 4 ^J C. In some examples, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 90 days at a temperature of 4 ( ^' In some examples, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 180 days at a temperature of 4°C. in some examples, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 365 days at a temperature of 4°C. In some examples, the viable microbial material has aloss of viability of less than about 0.3 log over aperiod of 90 days at a temperature of 4°C. In some examples, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.1 log over a period of 90 days at a temperature of 4°C. In some embodiments of these methods, the article is disposed within a primary container and the primary container is sealed within a secondary container that has low permeability to moisture and oxygen. In some embodiments, the primary container, the secondary container, or both are impermeable to at least one of moisture and oxygen. In some embodiments, a desiccant is disposed within the secondary container. In some embodiments, an oxygen scavenger is disposed within the secondary container.

[8] in some embodiments of these methods, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes quantitative assessment. In some embodiments, quantitative assessment includes determining a loss of viable cells. In some embodiments, quantitative assessment includes utilizing a stain or a dye. in some embodiments, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes qualitative assessment. In some embodiments, the test substance includes a surface disinfectant or a sanitizer. In some embodiments, the test contact time is between 30 seconds to 10 minutes.

[9] Also provided herein are preserved antimicrobial test articles for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test substance (e.g., a surface disinfectant or sanitizer) that include: a non-water soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer atached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, wherein the thin microbial layer comprises between 3.0 log to 9.0 log of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4 ^' C, wherein the article is sealed in a container, wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test substance.

[10] Also provided are methods of manufacturing a preserved antimicrobial test article for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer that include: suspending a pellet of viable microbial material in a predetermined amount of a solution comprising a stabilizing mixture to create a suspension with a predetermined amount of viable microbial material per volume, agitating the suspension until the viable microbial material and stabilizing mixture are homogenously dispersed throughout the suspension, depositing a predetermined amount of the suspension onto anon-water soluble substrate to create an antimicrobial test article comprising a thin layer of the homogenous suspension attached to the article, sealing the antimicrobial test article in a container, where: the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, where: the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test substance. In some embodiments, the article is disposed within a primary container and the primary container is sealed within a secondary' container that has low permeability to moisture and oxygen. In some embodiments, the primary container, the secondary container, or both are impermeable to moisture and oxygen. In some embodiments, a desiccant is disposed within the secondary container. In some embodiments, an oxygen scavenger is disposed within the secondary container. In some embodiments, the concentrated pellet is prepared by centrifuging a suspension of viable microbial cells with a concentration between 1.0 x 10 ⁴ and 1 x IQ ⁹ per ml,. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises a sugar, in some embodiments, the sugar is a non-reducing sugar. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture further comprises an antioxidant. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises a growth nutrient. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises a buffer. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises between 1% and 15% of a sugar, between 1% and 15% of an antioxidant, and one or both of a growth nutrient and a buffer. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises between 5% and 15% of a sugar, between 2% and 10% of an antioxidant, and one or both of a growth nutrient and a buffer. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture further comprises a soil load. In some embodiments, the soil load is between 1% to 15% by weight. In some embodiments, the soil load comprises an organic salt. In some embodiments, the soil load comprises bovine serum. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of between 6.4 and 8.4. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of between 6.9 and 7.9. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of between 7.2 and 7.6. In some embodiments, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of 7.4. in some embodiments, after resuspension the viable microbial material has a concentration between 1.0 x It) ⁴ and 1 x 10 ⁹ CPU per ml,. In some embodiments, after resuspension the viable microbial material has been concentrated by a factor of between 2 and 10. In some embodiments, after resuspension the viable microbial material has been concentrated by a factor of between 4 and 10. In some embodiments, after resuspension the viable microbial material has been concentrated by a factor of between 4 and 6. In some embodiments, a volume of between 5 uL and 30 uL of the suspension is deposited onto the non-water soluble substrate to create the thin microbial layer. In some embodiments, the method further comprises freezing and lyophilizing the antimicrobial test article. 111] A method of evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer is disclosed. The method comprises: providing, a test substance suspected of antimicrobial efficacy; a preserved antimicrobial test article comprising: a non-water soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, wherein the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, wherein the article is sealed in a container, wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (li) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test substance; removing the preserved antimicrobial test article from the sealed container; contacting the preserved antimicrobial test article with a predetermined amount of the test substance without rehydrating the preserved microbial article and without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test substance; maintaining contact between the antimicrobial test article and the test substance for a predetermined test contact time; contacting the antimicrobial test article and the test substance with a neutralizer after the test contact time; agitating the antimicrobial test article; and observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy.

[12] A method of evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer is disclosed. The method comprises: removing a preserved antimicrobial test article from a sealed container, the preserved antimicrobial test article comprising: a nonwater soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, wherein the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability' of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, and wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test substance; contacting the preserved antimicrobial test article with a predetermined amount of the test substance without rehydrating the preserved microbial article and without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test substance; maintaining contact between the antimicrobial test article and the test substance for a predetermined test contact time; contacting the antimicrobial test article and the test substance with a neutralizer after the test contact time; agitating the antimicrobial test article; and observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy.

[13] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material includes bacterial cells, fungal cells, or virions.

[14] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the bacterial cells include Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC® 15442™ or Staphylococcus aureus ATCC® 6538™.

[15] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate is a disc, a rectangle, or a cylinder.

[16] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodimen ts above, the substrate has a flat side with a surface area between 10 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² .

[17] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the thin microbial layer is attached to the flat side of the substrate.

[18] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate comprises a porous or a non-porous material.

[19] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate comprises a non-porous material selected from the following group: metal, steel, glass, and plastic.

[20] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate comprises a porous material selected from the following group: ceramic or wood.

[21] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate is a stainless steel disc with a diameter between about 3 mm to about 25 mm and a thickness between about 1 mm and about 10 mm.

[22] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate is a borosilicate glass disc with a diameter between about 3 mm to about 25 mm. [23] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate is a borosilieate glass rectangle with a length between about 5 nun to about 100 mm, a width between about 5 mm to about 100 mm, and a thickness between about 1 mm to about 5 mm.

[24] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes a sugar,

[25] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the sugar is a non-reducing sugar.

[26] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes sucrose.

[27] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes an antioxidant.

[28] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes ascorbic acid.

[29] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes a buffer.

[30] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes Tris(hydroxyniethyi)aminomethane.

[31] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes a growth nutrient.

[32] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes synthetic broth.

[33] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture comprises between 5,0% to 15% of a sugar, between 2.0% to 10% of an antioxidant, and synthetic broth.

[34] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the thin microbial layer further comprises a soil load.

[35] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the soil load is between l% to 15% by weight.

[36] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the soil load comprises an organic salt. [37] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the soil load comprises bovine serum.

[38] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the thin microbial layer has a residual water content of less than 4% by weight.

[39] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the thin microbial layer has a residual water content of less than 3% by weight.

[40] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the thin microbial layer has a residual water content of less than 2% by weight.

[41] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 30 days at a temperature of 4°C.

[42] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 90 days at a temperature of 4 ^' C.

[43] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability ⁷ of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 180 days at a temperature of 4°C.

[44] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability ⁷ of less than about 0.5 log over a period of 365 days at a temperature of 4 ^c C.

[45] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material has aloss of viability of less than about 0.3 log over aperiod of 90 days at a temperature of 4°C.

[46] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than about 0.1 log over a period of 90 days at a temperature of 4 ^J C.

[47] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the article is disposed within a primary ⁷ container and the primary container is sealed within a secondary ⁷ container that has low permeability to moisture and oxygen. [48] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the primary' container, the secondary container, or both are impermeable to at least one of moisture and oxygen.

[49] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, a desiccant is disposed within the secondary container.

[50] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, an oxygen scavenger is disposed within the secondary ⁷ container.

[51] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes quantitative assessment.

[52] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, quantitative assessment includes determining a loss of viable cells.

[53] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, quantitative assessment includes utilizing a stain or a dye.

[54] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes qualitati ve assessment,

[55] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the test substance includes a hard surface disinfectant or a sanitizer.

[56] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the test contact time is between 30 seconds to 10 minutes.

[57] A method of evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer is disclosed. The method comprises: removing a preserved antimicrobial test article from a sealed container, the preserved antimicrobial test article comprising: anon- water soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, wherein the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability ⁷ of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, and wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test substance; contacting the preserved antimicrobial test article with a predetermined amount of the test substance without rehydrating the preserved microbial article and without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test substance; maintaining contact between the antimicrobial test article and the test substance for a predetermined test contact time; contacting the antimicrobial test article and the test substance with a neutralizer after the test contact time; agitating the antimicrobial test article; and observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy.

[58] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes quantitative assessment.

[59] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, quantitative assessment includes determining a loss of viable cells.

[60] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, quantitative assessment includes utilizing a stain or a dye.

[61] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes qualitati ve assessment,

[62] A test article is disclosed. The test article comprises: a container; a preserved antimicrobial test article sealed within the container, the preserved antimicrobial test article comprising: a non-wvater soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%), wherein the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, and wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the presewed state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test substance.

[63] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material includes bacterial cells, fungal cells, or virions.

[64] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate is a disc, a rectangle, or a cylinder.

[65] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the substrate has a flat side with a surface area between 10 mnr ^’ to 10,000 mnr ^’ . [66] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the thin microbial layer is attached to the flat side of the substrate.

[67] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate comprises a porous or anon-porous material.

[68] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes a sugar,

[69] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes an antioxidant.

[70] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes a growth nutrient.

[71] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the article is disposed within a primary container and the primary _' · container is sealed within a secondary- container that has low permeability' to moisture and oxygen.

[72] A method of evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a surface disinfectant or sanitizer is disclosed. The method comprises: removing a preserved antimicrobial test article from a sealed container, the preserved antimicrobial test article comprising: a nonwater soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, wherein the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, and wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (li) without detaching tire layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test sample; contacting the preserved antimicrobial test article with the test sample without rehydrating the preserved microbial article and without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test sample; maintaining contact between the antimicrobial test article and the test sample for a predetermined test contact time; and observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy.

[73] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes quantitative assessment. [74] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, quantitative assessment includes determining a loss of viable cells.

[75] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, quantitative assessment includes utilizing a stain or a dye.

[76] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy includes qualitative assessment.

[77] A test article is disclosed. The test article comprises: a container; a preserved antimicrobial test article sealed within the container, the preserved antimicrobial test article comprising: a non-water soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, wherein the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, and wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (li) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test sample.

[78] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the viable microbial material includes bacterial cells, fungal cells, or virions.

[79] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate is a disc, a rectangle, or a cylinder.

[80] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the substrate has a flat side with a surface area between 10 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² .

[81] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the thin microbial layer is attached to the fiat side of the substrate.

[82] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the non-water soluble substrate comprises a porous or a non-porous material.

[83] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes a sugar.

[84] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes an antioxidant. [85] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the stabilizing mixture includes a growth nutrient.

[86] Alternatively or additionally to any of the embodiments above, the article is disposed within a primary container and the primary container is sealed within a secondary container that has low permeability to moisture and oxygen.

[87] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. Methods and materials are described herein for use in the present disclosure; other, suitable methods and materials can also be used. The materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.

[88] All publications, patent applications, patents, sequences, database entries, journal articles, and other references mentioned herein are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.

[89] The above summary' of some embodiments is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every' implementation of the present disclosure. The Figures, and Detailed Description, which follow, more particularly exemplify these embodiments.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[90] The disclosure may be more completely understood m consideration of the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[91] FIG. 1 schematically depicts an example substrate.

[92] FIG. 2 schematically depicts an example substrate with a layer of microbial material disposed thereon.

[93] FIG. 3 schematically depicts an example substrate with a layer of microbial material disposed thereon disposed in a container.

[94] FIG. 4 schematically depicts an example substrate with a layer of microbial material disposed thereon disposed in a primary _' container and a secondary container.

[95] FIG. 5 is a chart of the positive controls for Example 4. [96] FIGS. 6-7 depict test data for Example 4.

[97] While the disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

Detailed Description

[98] Tins disclosure provides methods and articles for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample (e.g.. a test substance or other item that is to he tested for antimicrobial efficacy) against a layer of viable microbial material secured to a hard surface. The articles described herein provide a preserved antimicrobial test article that comprises a layer of preserved, viable microbial material secured to a non-water soluble surface and is capable of immediate use in disinfectant efficacy testing.

[99] The current standard methods for evaluating disinfectant performance require testing antimicrobial efficacy of the disinfectant formulation against microbes attached to a hard, inanimate surface. Currently, preparation of inoculated test articles for disinfectant testing is time-consuming, resource-intensive, and prone to error and variability issues. Furthermore, the current state of the art requires that inoculated test articles be used within a short time frame (e.g., less than two hours) before degradation of microbial viability'. These issues contribute to standardization problems and hinder the development of disinfectants.

[100] it is accordingly an object of the present disclosure to provide methods and articles that can significantly reduce the complexities and difficulties m evaluating antimicrobial efficacy of disinfectants against a layer of viable microbial material attached to an inanimate surface, and also provide for surface-associated test articles with extensive stability' and preservation of integrity' and function upon testing. It is another object of the present disclosure to provide methods of manufacturing preserved antimicrobial test articles for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample/substance that are rapid and require a minimal amount of time to produce preserved test articles with the required properties for use.

[101] Still further objects and advantages will become apparent from consideration of the ensuing description.

[102] As can be appreciated in the art. the various aspects described below can be used in combination without limitation.

[103] Preserved Antimicrobial Test Articles

[104] Provided herein are preserved antimicrobial test articles for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample/substance, in some instances, the preserved antimicrobial test articles are used for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of hard surface antimicrobial agents (e.g., a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer). Tire preserved antimicrobial test articles provided herein comprise a non-water soluble substrate and a thin layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material. For example, FIG. 1 depicts an example substrate 10 and FIG. 2 depicts the substrate with a layer of microbial material 12 disposed thereon. In some examples, the thin layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material further comprises a stabilizing mixture. In some examples, the preserved antimicrobial test article comprises a residual water content or residual moisture content. In any of the preserved antimicrobial test articles provided herein, the article retains a required minimum quantity of viable microbial material over a significant period of time. In some examples, the preserved antimicrobial test article is used to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample/substance (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (li) without detaching the layer comprising viable microbial from the substrate prior to contact with the test sample/substance.

[105] In some examples, the preserved antimicrobial test articles provided herein can comprise a non-water soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content (e.g., a residual water content of less than 10.0%), wherein the thin microbial layer comprises between 3.0 log to 9.0 log of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4 ^U C, wherein the article is sealed in a container, and wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample/substance (e.g., a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer) (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (n) without detaching the layer comprising viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test sample/substance.

[106] The non-water soluble substrate can be made of a porous or non-porous material. Non-limited examples of substrates that can be included in any of the methods or articles herein are described below. The viable microbial material in any of the methods or articles described herein can include bacterial cells, fungal cells, or virions. Non-limiting examples of viable microbial material that can be included in any of the methods or articles herein are described below. The stabilizing mixture can comprise one or more stabilizing agents. Non-limiting examples of stabilizing agents that can be included in any of the methods or articles herein are described below'. The thin microbial layer in any of the methods or articles described herein can include a residual water content. Non-limiting examples of the water content that can be included in any of the methods or articles provided herein are described below. Non-limiting examples of the stability that can he included in any of the methods or articles provided herein are described below.

[107] The thin microbial layer included in any of the methods or articles provided herein can be further characterized by its dimensions, surface area, and attachment strength.

[108] in any of the methods or articles provided herein, the preserved antimicrobial test article retains a required minimum quantity of viable microbial material for a minimum period of time after the article’s date of manufacture. In some examples, the preserved antimicrobial test article retains at least 3 logs (e.g., at least 3.1 logs, at least 3.2 logs, at least 3.3 logs, at least 3.4 logs, at least 3.5 logs, at least 3.6 logs, at least 3.7 logs, at least 3.8 logs, at least 3.9 logs, at least 4.0 logs, at least 4.1 logs, at least 4.2 logs, at least 4.3 logs, at least 4.4 logs, at least 4.5 logs, at least 4,6 logs, at least 4.7 logs, at least 4.8 logs, at least 4.9 logs, at least 5.0 logs, at least 5.1 logs, at least 5.2 logs, at least 5.3 logs, at least 5.4 logs, at least 5.5 logs, at least 5.6 logs, at least 5.7 logs, at least 5.8 logs, at least 5.9 logs, at least 6.0 logs, at least 6.1 logs, at least 6.2 logs, at least 6.3 logs, at least 6.4 logs, at least 6.5 logs, at least 6.6 logs, at least 6.7 logs, at least 6.8 logs, at least 6.9 logs, at least 7.0 logs, at least 7.1 logs, at least 7.2 logs, at least 7.3 logs, at least 7.4 logs, at least 7.5 logs, at least 7.6 logs, at least 7.7 logs, at least 7.8 logs, at least 7.9 logs, at least 8.0 logs, at least 8.1 logs, at least 8.2 logs, at least 8.3 logs, at least 8.4 logs, at least 8.5 logs, at least 8.6 logs, at least 8.7 logs, at least 8.8 logs, at least 8.9 logs, at least 9.0 logs, at least 9.1 logs, at least 9.2 logs, at least 9.3 logs, at least 9.4 logs, or at least 9.5 logs) of viable microbial material for a minimum period of time after the article’s date of manufacture. In some examples, the minimum period of time after the article’s date of manufacture is at least 7 days, 8 days, 9 days, 10 days, 11 days, 12 days, 13 days, 14 days, 15 days, 16 days,

17 days, 18 days, 19 days, 20 days, 21 days, 22 days, 23 days, 24 days, 25 days, 26 days,

27 days, 28 days, 29 days, 30 days, 35 days, 40 days, 45 days, 50 days, 55 days, 60 days,

65 days, 70 days, 75 days, 80 days, 85 days, 90 days, 120 days, 150 days, 180 days, 210 days, 240 days, 270 days, 300 days, 330 days, 360 days, or 365 days. In some examples, the minimum period of time after the article’s date of manufacture is greater than 365 days.

[109] The substrate 10 having the layer of microbial material 12 disposed thereon may be disposed in a container or package 14 as shown in FIG. 3. In some instances, the substrate 10 having the layer of microbial material 12 in a primary' package or container 14 and a second package or container 16 FIG. 4.

[110] Viable Microbial Material

[111] In any of the methods or articles provided herein, the viable microbial material can be a prokaryotic organism, a eukaryotic organism, a virus, or a virion. Non-limiting examples of the types of microbial material that can be included in any of the methods or articles provided herein include: bacteria, fungi, algae, protist, diatom, arehaea, cyanobacteria, virus, and virion, in some embodiments, the viable microbial material can comprise a single type of microbial material, at least two types of microbial material, at least three types of microbial material, at least four types of microbial material, at least live types of microbial material, or more than five types of microbial material.

[112] In some embodiments of the methods or articles provided herein, the viable microbial material can comprise a homogenous population of identical cells or virions. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material can comprise a heterogeneous population of microbial cells or virions. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material m any of the methods or articles provided herein can comprise one organism, at least two different organisms, at least three different organisms, at least four different organisms, at least five different organisms, at least six different organisms, at least seven different organisms, at least eight different organisms, at least nine different organisms, at least ten different organisms, at least twenty different organisms, at least thirty different organisms, or more than thirty different organisms.

[113] In some embodiments, the viable microbial material can comprise one species, at least two species, at least three species, at least four species, at least five species, at least six species, at least seven species, at least eight species, at least nine species, at least ten species, or more than ten species of microorganisms or virions. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material can comprise one strain, at least two strains, at least three strains, at least four strains, at least five strains, at least six strains, at least seven strains, at least eight strains, at least nine strains, at least ten strains, at least fifteen strains, at least twenty strains, at least twenty-five strains, at least thirty strains, at least thirty-five strains, at least forty strains, at least forty-five strains, at least fifty strains, or more than fifty strains of microorganisms or virions. In some examples, the viable microbial material is a grampositive bacteria or a gram-negative bacteria, in some examples, the viable microbial material is a fungi (e.g. , a yeast). In some examples, the viable microbial material is a spore. In some some examples, the viable microbial material is a virion. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material is a microbe selected from the group of: Acetobacter spp., Acetonema spp., Acidithiobadllus spp., Acinetobacter spp., Actinomyces spp., Agrobacterium spp., Alkalibacillus spp., Ammoniphilus spp., Amphibacillus spp., Anaerobacter spp., Anaerospora spp., Anaplasma spp., Aneunnibacillus spp., Anoxybacillus spp., Arihrobacter spp., Aspergillus spp., Aureobasidium spp., Azorhizobium spp., Azotobacter spp., Bacillus spp., Bacteroides spp., Bartonella spp., Beggiatoa spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Brevibacterium spp., Brevibacillus spp., Bordetella spp,, Borrelia spp., Brucella spp. , Burkholderia spp., Caldanaerobacier spp., Caloramator spp., Calymmatobacterium spp., Caminicella spp., Campylobacter spp., Candida spp., Cerasibacillus spp., Chlamydia spp., Chlamydophila spp., Cladosporiwn spp., Clostridium spp., Clostridiisalibacter spp., Cohnella spp., Corynebacterium spp., Coxiella spp., Cronobacter spp., Cryptococcus spp., Dendrosporobacter spp., Desulfoiomaculum spp., Desulfosporomusa spp., Desulfosporosinus spp., Desulfovibno spp., Desulfovirgula spp., Desulfunispora spp., Desulfur ispora spp.. Ehrlichia spp., Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus spp., Escherichia spp., Ferrobacil ins spp., Filifactor spp., Filobacillus spp., Francisella spp., Fusarium spp., Fusobacterium spp., Gallionella spp., Gardnerella spp., Gelria spp., Geobacillus spp., Geosporobacter spp., Gracilibacillus spp., Haemophilus spp., Halobacillus spp., Halonatronum spp., Helicobacter spp., Heliobacterium spp., Heliophilum spp., Hormoconis spp., Klebsiella spp., Laceyella spp., Lactobacillus spp., Lactococcus spp., Legionella spp., Lentibacillus spp,, Leptothrix spp.. Listeria spp., Lysinibacillus spp., Megasphaera spp., Maheta spp., Metabacterium spp., Methanobacterium spp., Microbacterium spp., Micrococcus spp., Moorella spp,, Moraxella spy,, Mycobacterium spp,, Mycoplasma spp., Natroniella spp.. Neisseria spp,, Oceanobacillus spp., Orenia spp., Ornithini bacillus spp., Oxalophagus spp., Oxobacter spp., Paenibacillus spp., Paraliobacillus spp., Pasteurella spp., Pediococcus spp., Pelospora spp., Pelotomaculum spp., Pemcillium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Piscibacillus spp., Planifiium spp., Pluralibacter spp., Pneumocystis spp., Pontibacillus spp., Porphyromonas spp., Prevotella spp., Propionibaclerium spp., Propionispora spp., Proteus spp.. Pseudomonas spp., Ralstonia spp., Rhizobium spp., Rhodococcus spp., Rickettsia spp., Rochalimaea spp,, Rothia spp., Saccharomyces spp., Salinibacillus spp., Salmonella spp., Salsuginihacillus spp., Seinonella spp., Serrano spp., Shewanella spp., Shigella spp., Shimazuella spp., Sinorhizobium spp., Spirillum spp., Sporacetigenium spp., Sporoanaerobacter spp., Sporobacter spp.. Sporobacterium spp., Sporohalobacter spp., Sporolactobacillus spp., Sporomusa spp., Sporosarcina spp., Sporotalea spp., Sporotomaculum spp., Staphylococcus spp., Stenotrophomonas spp., Stomatococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Syntrophomonas spp., Syntrophospora spp., Tenui bacillus spp., Tepidibacier spp., Terribacillus spp., Treponema, spp., Thalass abaci llus spp., Thermoacetogenium spp., Thermoaciinomyces spp., Thermoalkalibacillus spp., Thermoanaerobacter spp., Thermoanaeromonas spp,, Thermobacillus spp,, Thermoflavimicrohium spp., Thermovenabulum spp,, Thiobacillus spp., Thiothrix spp,, Trichophyton spp., Trichosporon spp., Tuberibacillus spp., Vibrio spp., Virgibacillus spp., Viridans spp., Vulcanobacillus spp., Wolbachia spp., and Yersinia spp. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material is a microbe selected from the group of: Acetobacter aurantius, Acidi thiobacillus thiooxidans, Acinetobacter baumannii, Actinomyces israelii. Agrobacterium radiobacter, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Anaplasma phagocytophilum , Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus, Arthrobacter crystallopoietes, Arthrohacter luteus, Aspergillus brasiliensis, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Aureobasidium pullulans, Azorhizobium caulinodans , Azotobacter vmelandii, Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus atrophaeus, Bacillus brevis. Bacillus cereus, Bacillus fusiformis, Bacillus licheniformis , Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mycoid.es. Bacillus stearolhermophilus, Bacillus suhtiiis. Bacillus ihuringiensis , Bacteroides jragilis, Bacteroides gingivalis, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella quintana, Beggiatoa alba, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Bordetella pertussis, Borrelia burgdorferi . Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis, Burkholder ia mallei, Burkholder ia pseudomallei, Burkholderia cepacia, Calymmatobacterium granulomatis, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter fetus, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter pylori, Candida albicans, Candida auris, Candida dubliniensis, Candida krusei, Candida glabrata, Candida lusitaniae, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Chlamydophila psiitaci, Cladosporium dadosporioides, Cladosporium resinae, Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium sporogenes, Clostridium tetani, Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Corynebacterium fusiforme, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Corynebacterium stationis, Coxiella burnetii, Cronobacter sakazakii, Cryptococcus neoformans, Desulfovibrio africanus, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, Desulfovibrio salixigens, Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Desulfotomaculum orienfts, Desulfotomaculum mgrijicans. Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Enter obacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus galllinarum, Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus maloratus, Escherichia coli, Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans, Francisella (ularensis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Gallionella ferruginea, Gardnerella vaginalis, Geobacillus stearolhermophilus, Haemophilus ducreyi, Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Haemophilus pertussis, Haemophilus vaginalis, Helicobacter pylori, Hormoconis resinae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus Metis, Legionella pneumophila, Leptothrix ochracea, Leptothrix discophora, Leptothrix cholodnii, Leptothrix lopholea, Leptothrix mobilis, Listeria monocytogenes, Methanobaclerium exlroquens. Microbacterium multiforme. Micrococcus luteus, Moraxella catarrhalis, Moraxella osloensis, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium diphtheriae, .Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium iepraemurium, Mycobacterium phlei, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium terrae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycoplasma fermenlans, Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma penetrans, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Mycoplasma mexican. Neisseria gonorrhoeas, Neisseria meningitidis, Paenibacillus glucanolyticus, Pasteurella multocida, PasteureUa tularensis, Penicillium chrysogenum, Pluralibacter gergoviae, Pneumocystis carinii, Pneumocystis muri.na, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, Ralstonia pickettii, Rhizobium leguminosarum, Rhizobium radiobacter, Rickettsia prowazekii , Rickettsia psittaci, Rickettsia quintana , Rickettsia nckettsii, Rickettsia trachomae, Rochalimaea henselae, Rochalimaea quintana, Rothia dentocariosa. Salmonella bongori, Salmonella carrau, Salmonella concord. Salmonella enterica, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella infantis, Salmonella newport,

Salmonella schwarzengrund, Salmonella fyphi, Salmonella typhimurium, Serratia marcescens, Shewanella oneidensis, Shewanella putrefaciens, Shigella dysenteriae. Shigella flexnen, Shigella sonnei, Sinorhizobium meliloti. Spirillum volutans, Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus hominis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Stomatococcus mucilaginous, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus avium, Streptococcus bovis, Streptococcus cricetus, Streptococcus faceium, Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus ferus. Streptococcus gallinarum, Streptococcus gordonii. Streptococcus laclis. Streptococcus mi tier, Streptococcus rnitis, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus rattus, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus sobrinus, Thiobadlbus concretivorus, ThiobaciUus thioparus, Treponema pallidum, Treponema denticola, Trichophyton interdigitale. Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichosporon asahii, Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio comma. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus, Viridans streptococci. Yersinia enter ocolitica, Yersinia pestis, and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, including drug-resistant strains thereof. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material is a microbe selected from the group of: Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCC® 19606™), Aspergillus hrasiliensis (ATCC® 16404™), Aspergillus niger (ATCC® 6275™), Aspergillus niger (ATCC® 16404™), Bordetel!a pertussis (ATCC® 12743™), Campylobacter jejuni (ATCC® 33291™), Campylobacter jejuni (ATCC® 29428™), Candida albicans (ATCC® 10231™), Clostridium difficile (ATCC® 43598™), Cronobacter sakazakii (ATCC® 12868™), Enterobacter aerogems (ATCC® 13048™), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC® 29212™), Escherichia call (ATCC® 10536™), Escherichia coli (ATCC® 11229™), Escherichia coli 0157417 (ATCC® 35150™), Haemophilus influenzae (ATCC® 10211™), Klebsiella oxytoca (ATCC® 13182™), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC® 4352™), Legionella pneumophila (ATCC® 33153™), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC® 19117™), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC® 19111™), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC® 7644™), Methiciilin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® BAA-1683™), Methiciilin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 33592™), Multi-drug Resistant Enterococcus faecium (ATCC® 51559™), Multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC® 51503™), Mycobacterium bovis (ATCC® 35743™), Mycobacterium terrae (ATCC® 15755™), Proteus mirabilis (ATCC® 9240™), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC® 15442™), Salmonella enter ica (ATCC® 10708™), Salmonella enterica (ATCC® 6539™), Serratia marcescens (ATCC ¹ ® 14756™), Shigella dysenteriae (ATCC® 11835™), Shigella flexneri (ATCC® 29508™), Shigella sonnei (ATCC® 11060 ^' ™), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 6538 ^' ™), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC® 12228 ^' ™), Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC® 6305™), Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC® 12384 ^' ™), Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC® 19615™), Trichophyton inierdigitale (ATCC® 9533™), Trichophyton mentagrophytes (ATCC® 9533™), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC® 51575™), Vibrio cholera (ATCC® 11623™), and Yersinia enterocolitica (ATCC® 23715™).

[114] In some embodiments, the viable microbial material is an enveloped virus or a non-enveloped virus. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material is a double- stranded virus or a single-stranded virus, in some embodiments, the viable microbial material is a virus belonging to the family of adenoviridae, asfarviridae, cireoviridae, hepadnaviridae, herpesviridae, iridoviridae, papillomavirus, papovaviridae, parvoviridae, poxviridae, arenaviridae, arteriviridae, astro viridae, birnavindae, bunyaviridae, caliciviridae, coronaviridae, filoviridae, flaviviridae, nodaviridae, orthomyxoviridae, paramyxovindae, picomaviridae, reoviridae, retroviridae, rhabdoviridae, togaviridae, or pneumoviridae. In some embodiments, the virus belongs to a genus selected from the group of: an ebolavirus, an influenza virus, a parainfluenza virus, an enterovirus (e.g., a rhinovirus), an orthopneumovirus, a metapneumovirus, a lent! virus, and a papillomavirus. In some embodiments, the virus is the Duck Hepatitis B vims, the Bovine Viral Diarrhea virus, or the Feline Ca!icivirus.

[115] Additional non-limiting examples of microbes and viruses that can he included in any of the methods or articles are provided herein. Additional microbes and viruses that can be included in any of the methods or articles described herein are known in the ait.

[116] in some embodiments of any of the compositions or methods described herein, the viable microbial material can be naturally occurring or genetically modified. Nonlimiting examples of the sources of viable microbial material in any of methods or articles provided herein include a laboratory collection and an environmental sample. In some embodiments, the viable microbial material is sourced from a preserved collection of reference microorganisms (e.g., the ATCC® Bacteriology' Collection). In some embodiments, the viable microbial material is isolated from an environmental sample (e.g., a clinical sample collected from a human subject (e.g., a wound of a human subject) or isolated from an environmental sample collected from a surface (e.g., a surface of an object in a hospital or a surface of an object in a manufacturing plant)). Other methods of collecting and isolating viable microbial material may be utilized.

[117] in some embodiments of any of the methods or articles described herein, the viable microbial material comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.5 logs (e.g., between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs, between 3.0 logs to 8.5 logs, between 3.0 logs to 8.0 logs, between 3.0 logs to 7.5 logs, between 3,0 logs to 7.0 logs, between 3.0 logs to 6.5 logs, between 3.0 logs to 6.0 logs, between 3,0 logs to 5.5 logs, between 3.0 logs to 5.0 logs, between 3.0 logs to 4.5 logs, between 3.0 logs to 4.0 logs, between 3.0 logs to 3.5 logs, between 3.5 logs to 9.5 logs between 3.5 logs to 9.0 logs, between 3.5 logs to 8.5 logs, between 3.5 logs to 8.0 logs, between 3.5 logs to 7.5 logs, between 3.5 logs to 7.0 logs, between 3.5 logs to 6.5 logs, between 3.5 logs to 6.0 logs, between 3.5 logs to 5.5 logs, between 3.5 logs to 5.0 logs, between 3.5 logs to 4.5 logs, between 3.5 logs to 4.0 logs, between 4.0 logs to 9.5 logs, between 4.0 logs to 9.0 logs, between 4.0 logs to 8.5 logs, between 4.0 logs to 8.0 logs, between 4.0 logs to 7.5 logs, between 4.0 logs to 7.0 logs, between 4.0 logs to 6.5 logs, between 4.0 logs to 6.0 logs, between 4.0 logs to 5.5 logs, between 4.0 logs to 5.0 logs, between 4.0 logs to 4.5 logs, between 4.5 logs to 9.5 logs, between 4.5 logs to 9.0 logs, between 4.5 logs to 8.5 logs, between 4.5 logs to 8.0 logs, between 4.5 logs to 7.5 logs, between 4.5 logs to 7.0 logs, between 4.5 logs to 6.5 logs, between 4.5 logs to 6.0 logs, between 4,5 logs to 5.5 logs, between 4.5 logs to 5.0 logs, between 5.0 logs to 9.5 logs, between 5,0 logs to 9.0 logs, between 5.0 logs to 8.5 logs, between 5.0 logs to 8.0 logs, between 5,0 logs to 7.5 logs, between 5.0 logs to 7.0 logs, between 5.0 logs to 6.5 logs, between 5.0 logs to 6.0 logs, between 5.0 logs to 5.5 logs, between 5.5 logs to 9.5 logs, between 5.5 logs to 9.0 logs, between 5.5 logs to 8.5 logs, between 5.5 logs to 8.0 logs, between 5.5 logs to 7.5 logs, between 5.5 logs to 7.0 logs, between 5.5 logs to 6.5 logs, between 5.5 logs to 6.0 logs, between 6.0 logs to 9.5 logs, between 6.0 logs to 9.0 logs, between 6.0 logs to 8.5 logs, between 6.0 logs to 8.0 logs, between 6.0 logs to 7.5 logs, between 6.0 logs to 7.0 logs, between 6.0 logs to 6.5 logs, between 6.5 logs to 9.5 logs, between 6.5 logs to 9.0 logs, between 6.5 logs to 8.5 logs, between 6.5 logs to 8.0 logs, between 6.5 logs to 7.5 logs, between 6,5 logs to 7.0 logs, between 7.0 logs to 9.5 logs, between 7.0 logs to 9.0 logs, between 7.0 logs to 8.5 logs, between 7.0 logs to 8.0 logs, between 7.0 logs to 7.5 logs, between 7.5 logs to 9.5 logs, between 7.5 logs to 9.0 logs, between 7.5 logs to 8.5 logs, between 7.5 logs to 8.0 logs, between 8.0 logs to 9.5 logs, between 8.0 logs to 9.0 logs, between 8.0 logs to 8.5 logs, between 8.5 logs to 9.5 logs, or between 8.5 logs to 9.0 logs) of viable microbial material.

[118] Methods for quantifying the amount of viable microbial material are known in the art.

[119] Substrates

[120] Non-limiting examples of non-water soluble substrates that can be included in any of the test articles are described below ⁷ .

[121] in some examples, the substrate is a disc, a rectangle, a sphere, a rod, a cylinder, a test tube, or a peg. In some examples, the substrate is a penieyiinder (e.g., a flat face penieyiinder or a beveled edge penieyiinder). In some examples, the substrate the surface of a container or reservoir. In some examples, a porous or non-porous substrate may be desirable in order to replicate a real w'orld application, e.g., various uses of disinfectants. Other substrates for any of the articles describe herein are contemplated. As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a specific substrate may be desirable for an organism or for an application.

[122] In any of the test articles described herein, the substrate can have various dimensions depending on its shape and features. Non-limiting examples of substrate material, shape, dimensions, and other features are described below.

[123] In some examples, the substrate comprises metal, metal alloy, glass, plastic, rubber (e.g., a natural rubber or a synthetic rubber), carpet, textile, or wood. In some examples, the substrate comprises stainless steel (e.g., 304 grade, 306 grade, 316L grade, 316 grade, or 416 grade stainless steel), titanium, titanium alloy, polypropylene, silica, silicone, Teflon®, polycarbonate, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, aluminum, anodized aluminum alloy, brass, nitrile rubber, silicone rubber, chlorosulfonated polyethylene synthetic rubber, cast iron, cobalt-chrome, granite, marble, quartz, Terrazzo tile, vinyl polymer, polyvinyl chloride, chlorinated polyvinyl chloride, epoxy, carbon steel, copper, ductile iron, ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber, borosilicate glass, ceramic (e.g., porcelain), hydroxyapatite, Lucitone™, nickel, nylon, polyether ether ketone, polystyrene, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyurethane, Viton®, polyethylene (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate glycol, polyethylene terephthalate, low density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, or ultra-high-molecular- weight polyethylene), methyl methacrylate, cement, sand, grout, paint, sealant, fiberglass, polyester, Lexan®, Plexiglas®, Kydex®, acrylic, or Aclar®. In other examples, the substrate comprises dextran, cellulose, or collagen, in other examples, the substrate comprises a polysaccharide or a disaccharide (e.g., glycosaminoglycan). In some embodiments, the substrate is a flexible material, e.g., a material with the ability to bend or compress without cracking. In some examples, the substrate is a rigid or non-flexible material, e.g., a material that is not bendable. Flexible and rigid, non-flexible materials may be utilized.

[124] in some examples, the substrate is a disc (e.g., a borosilicate glass disc, a stainless steel disc, or a disc comprising any of the exemplary materials provided herein), in some examples, the disc substrate can have a diameter of between about 5 mm and about 50 mm (e.g., between about 5 mm and about 45 mm, between about 5 mm and about 40 mm, between about 5 mm and about 35 mm, between about 5 mm and about 30 mm, between about 5 mm and about 25 ram, between about 5 mm and about 20 mm, between about 5 mm and about 15 mm, between about 5 mm and about 10 mm, between about 9 mm and about 15 mm, between about 9 mm and about 13 mm, between about 9 mm and about 11 mm, between about 10 mm and about 50 mm, between about 10 mm and about 40 rnm, between about 10 mm and about 30 mm, between about 10 mm and about 20 mm, between about 10 mm and about 15 mm, between about 12 mm and about 15 mm, between about 12 mm and about 14 mm, between about 12 mm and about 13 mm, between about 20 mm and about 50 mm, between about 20 mm and about 40 mm, between about 20 mm and about 30 mm, between about 20 mm and about 25 mm, between about 30 mm and about 50 mm, between about 30 mm and about 40 mm, between about 30 mm and about 35 mm, between about 40 mm and about 50 mm, between about 40 mm and about 45 mm, or between about 45 mm and about 50 mm). In some examples, the disc substrate can have a thickness of between about 0.1 rnm and about 10 mm (e.g., between about 0.1 mm and about 9 rang between about 0.1 nun and about 8 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 7 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 6 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 5 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 4 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 3 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 2 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 1 mm, between about 0.5 mm and about 1.5 mm, between about 0.5 mm and about 1.25 mm, between about 0.5 mm and about 1 mm, between about 0.5 mm and about 0.75 mm, between about 0.75 mm and about 1 mm, between about 0.75 mm and about 0.95 mm, between about 0.75 mm and about 0.9 mm, between about 0.75 mm and about 0.85 mm, between about 1 mm and about 2 mm, between about 2 rnm and about 3 mm, between about 3 rnm and about 4 mm, between about 3.5 mm and about 4 mm, between about 3.75 nun and about 3.85 mm, between about 4 mm and about 5 mm, between about 5 mm and about 6 mm, between about 6 mm and about 7 mm, between about 7 mm and about 8 mm, between about 8 mm and about 9 mm, or between about 9 mm and about 10 mm), in some embodiments of the articles described herein, the substrate is a borosilicate glass disc with a diameter of between about 12.5 mm and about 12.9 mm, and a thickness of between about 3.6 mm to about 4.0 mm. in other embodiments, the substrate is a stainless steel disc with a diameter of between about 9.8 rant and about 10.2 mm, and a thickness of between about 0.6 rant to about 1 mm. [125] in some examples, the substrate is a glass rectangle (e.g., a borosilicate glass cover slip or a borosilicate glass slide), in some examples, the substrate is a carpet rectangle, a stainless steel rectangle, a ceramic rectangle, or a wood rectangle. In some examples, the rectangle substrate can have a length and/or width of between about 2.5 mm and about 500 mm (e.g., between about 5 mm and about 400 mm, between about 5 mm and about 300 mm, between about 5 mm and about 200 mm, between about 5 mm and about 100 mm, between about 5 mm and about 50 mm, between about 5 mm and about 25 mm, between about 5 mm and about 15 mm, between about 10 mm and about 100 mm, between about 50 mm and about 300 mm, between about 50 mm and about 200 mm, between about 50 mm and about 150 mm, between about 100 mm and about 500 mm, between about 100 nun and about 250 mm, between about 100 mm and about 150 mm, between about 200 mm and about 500 mm, between about 200 mm and about 400 mm, between about 200 mm and about 300 mm, between about 300 mm and about 500 mm, between about 300 mm and about 400 mm, between about 400 mm and about 500 mm, between about 20 mm and about 100 mm, between about 20 mm and about 90 mm, between about 20 mm and about 80 mm, between about 20 mm and about 70 mm, between about between about 20 mm and about 60 mm, between about 20 mm and about 50 mm, between about 20 mm and about 40 mm, between about 20 mm and about 30 mm, between about 30 mm and about 100 mm, between about 30 mm and about 90 mm, between about 30 mm and about 80 mm, between about 30 mm and about 70 mm, between about 30 mm and about 60 mm, between about 30 mm and about 50 mm, between about 30 mm and about 40 mm, between about 40 mm and about 100 mm, between about 40 mm and about 90 mm, between about 40 mm and about 80 mm, between about 40 mm and about 70 mm, between about 40 mm and about 60 mm, between about 40 mm and about 50 mm, between about 50 mm and about 100 mm, between about 50 mm and about 90 mm, between about 50 mm and about 80 mm, between about 50 mm and about 70 mm, between about 50 mm and about 60 mm, between about 60 mm and about 100 min, between about 60 mm and about 90 mm, between about 60 mm and about 80 mm, between about 60 mm and about 70 mm, between about 70 mm and about 100 mm, between about 70 mm and about 90 mm, between about 70 mm and about 80 mm, between about 80 mm and about 100 mm, between about 80 mm and about 90 mm, or between about 90 mm and about 100 mm). In some examples, the rectangle substrate can have a thickness of between about 0.05 mm and about 10 mm (e.g., between about 0.05 mm and about 0.15 mm, between about 0.05 mm and about 0.1 mm, between about 0.08 mm and about 0.13 mm, between about 0.1 mm and about 0.2 rang between about 0.13 mm and about 0.17 mm, between about 0.16 mm and about 0.19 mm, between about 0.19 mm and about 0.25 mm, between about 0.25 mm and about 2 mm, between about 0,25 mm and about 1.75 mm, between about 0.25 mm and about 1.5 mm, between about 0.25 mm and about 1.25 mm, between about 0.25 mm and about 1 mm, between about 0.25 mm and about 0.75 mm, between about 0.25 mm and about 0.5 mm, between about 0.25 mm and about 0.35 mm, between about 0.35 mm and about 0.45 mm, between about 0.45 mm and about 0.55 mm, between about 0.5 mm and about 0.75 mm, between about 0.75 mm and about 1.5 mm, between about 0.75 mm and about 1.25 mm, between about 0.75 mm and about 1 mm, between about 0.8 mm and about 1.2 mm, between about 0.8 mm and about 1 mm, between about 0.9 mm and about 1.1 mm, between about 1 mm and about 1.5 mm, between about 1 mm and about 1.25 mm, between about 1 , 1 mm and about 1.3 mm, between about 1.5 mm and about 3 mm, between about 2 mm and about 3 mm, between about 3 mm and about 4 mm, between about 4 mm and about 5 mm, between about 5 mm and about 6 mm, between about 6 mm and about 7 mm, between about 7 mm and about 8 mm, between about 8 mm and about 9 mm, or between about 9 mm and about 10 mm). In some embodiments of the articles described herein, the substrate is a glass rectangle with a width of between about 23 mm and about 27 mm, a length of between about 73 mm and about 77 mm, and a thickness of between about 1.0 mm to about 1.2 mm. in other embodiments, the substrate is a glass rectangle with a width of between about 23 mm and about 27 mm, a length of between about 23 mm and about 27 mm, and a thickness of between about 0,4 mm to about 0.7 mm. in some embodiments of the articles described herein, the substrate is a glass rectangle with a width of between about 45 mm and about 55 mm, a length of between about 45 mm and about 55 mm, and a thickness of between about 1.0 mm to about 1.2 mm. In other embodiments, the substrate is a glass rectangle with a width of between about 45 mm and about 55 mm, a length of between about 45 mm and about 55 mm, and a thickness of between about 0.4 mm to about 0.7 mm. [ 126] in some examples, the substrate is a stainless steel (e.g., Type 304 stainless steel comprising at least 18%) chromium and 8%) nickel) peni cylinder. In other examples, the substrate is a porcelain penicylinder. In some examples, the pemcylinder has an outer diameter between about 5 mm and about 15 mm (e.g., between about 5 mm and about 13 mm, between about 5 mm and about 11 mm, between about 5 mm and about 9 mm, between about 5 mm and about 7 mm, between about 5 mm and about 6 mm, between about 6 mm and about 12 mm, between about 6 mm and about 10 mm, between about 6 mm and about

8 mm, between about 7 mm and about 15 mm, between about 7 mm and about 13 mm, between about 7 mm and about 11 mm, between about 7 mm and about 9 mm, between about 8 mm and about 12 mm, between about 8 mm and about 10 mm, between about 9 mm and about 15 mm, between about 9 mm and about 13 mm, between about 9 mm and about 11 mm, between about 10 mm and about 15 mm, between about 10 mm and about 12 mm, behveen about 12 mm and about 15 mm, or behveen about 13 mrn and about 15 mm). In some examples, the penicylinder has an inner diameter between about 3 mm and about 13 mm (e.g,, between about 3 mm and about 11 mm, between about 3 mm and about

9 mm, between about 3 mm and about 7 mm, between about 3 mm and about 5 mm, between about 4 mm and about 9 mm, between about 4 mm and about 7 mm, between about 4 mm and about 5 mm, between about 5 mm and about 9 mm, between about 5 mm and about 7 mm, between about 6 mm and about 9 mm, betw-een about 6 mm and about 8 mm, between about 7 mm and about 9 mm, between about 8 mm and about 10 mm, between about 9 mm and about 1 1 mm, between about 10 mm and about 12 mm, or between about 11 mm and about 13 mm). In some examples, the pemcylinder has a length between about 5 mm and about 15 mm (e.g. , between about 5 mm and about 13 mm, between about 5 mm and about 11 mm, between about 5 mm and about 9 mm, between about 5 mm and about 7 mm, between about 5 mm and about 6 mm, between about 6 mm and about 12 mm, between about 6 mm and about 10 mm, between about 6 mm and about 8 mm, between about 7 mm and about 15 mm, behveen about 7 mm and about 13 mm, between about 7 mm and about 11 mm, behveen about 7 mm and about 9 mm, between about 8 mm and about 12 rnm, behveen about 8 mm arid about 10 mm, behveen about 9 rnm and about 15 rang behveen about 9 mm and about 13 rnm, between about 9 mrn and about 11 mrn, between about 10 mm and about 15 mm, between about 10 mm and about 12 mm, between about 12 mm and about 15 mm. or between about 13 mm and about 15 mm). In some embodiments of the articles described herein, the substrate is a stainless steel peni cylinder with an outer diameter of between about 7 mm and about 9 mm, an inner diameter of between about 5 mm and about 7 mm, and a length of between about 9 mm to about 11 mm. In other embodiments, the substrate is a porcelain penicylinder with an outer diameter of between about 7 mm and about 9 mm, an inner diameter of between about 5 mm and about 7 mm, and a l ength of between about 9 mm to about 11 mm.

[127] In some embodiments of any of the methods or articles described herein, the substrate has a surface area between 10 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² (e.g., between 10 mnr to 9,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 6,000 mnr, between 10 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 10 mnr to 3,000 mnr, between 10 mm ² to 2,000 mm ² , between 10 mm' to 1,000 mm ² , between 10 mrn ² to 500 mm ² , between 10 mnr to 100 mnr, between 10 mrn ² to 50 mm ² , between 1,000 mnr to 10,000 mm ² , between 1 ,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mnr to 6,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 3,000 mnr ^’ , between 1,000 mm ² to 2,000 mnr, 1,000 mm ² to 1,500 mm ² , between 1,500 mm ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 1,500 mm ² to 2,500 mm ² , between 1,500 mm ² to 2,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mnr to 10,000 mnr, between 2,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 8,000 mnr, between 2,000 mm ² to 7,000 mnr, between 2,000 mnr to 6,000 mm', between 2,000 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm' to 4,000 mnr, between 2,000 nun ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 2,500 mm ² , between 2,500 mnr to 4,000 mnr, between 2,500 mm ² to 3,500 mm', between 2,500 mm ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 3,500 mm ² , between 3,500 mm ² to 5,000 mnr, between 3,500 mm ² to 4,500 mm ² , between 3,500 mm ² to 4,000 mnr, between 2,500 mm ² to 3,000 mnr, between 4,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 9,000 mnr, between 4,000 mnr to 8,000 mrn ² , between 4,000 mnr to 7,000 mrn ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 6,000 mnr, between 4,000 mm ² to 5,000 nun ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 4,500 mm ² , between 4,500 mm ² to 6,000 mnr, between 4,500 mnr to 5,500 mm ² , between 4,500 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 5,000 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 6,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 7,000 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 8,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 9,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , or between 9,500 mm ² to 10,000 ram ² ). [128] In some embodiments of any of the methods or articles described herein, the substrate has a flat side with a surface area between 10 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² (e.g,, between 10 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 2,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 1,000 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 500 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 100 mm ² , between 10 mm ² to 50 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 1 ,000 mm ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 1,000 mm ² to 2,000 mm ² , 1,000 mrn ² to 1,500 mm ² , between 1 ,500 mm ^z to 3,000 mm ² , between 1 ,500 mm ^z to 2,500 mm ² , between 1 ,500 mm ^z to 2,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 2,000 mm ² to 2,500 mm ² , between 2,500 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 2,500 mm ² to 3,500 mm ² , between 2,500 mm ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ^z , between 3,000 mm ² to 6,000 mrn ² , between 3,000 mrn ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 3,000 mm ² to 4,000 mrn ² , between 3,000 mrn ² to 3,500 mm ² , between 3,500 mm ² to 5,000 mm ^z , between 3,500 mm ² to 4,500 mm ² , between 3,500 mm ² to 4,000 mm ² , between 2,500 mm ² to 3,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 9,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 8,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 4,000 mm ² to 4,500 mm ² , between 4,500 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 4,500 mm ² to 5,500 mm ² , between 4,500 mm ² to 5,000 mm ² , between 5,000 mm ² to 6,000 mm ² , between 6,000 mm ² to 7,000 mm ² , between 7,000 mnr to 8,000 mm ² , between 8,000 mm ² to 9,000 mrn ² , between 9,000 mm ² to 10,000 mm ² , or between 9,500 mnr to 10,000 nan ² ). [129] Other examples of substrate material, shape, dimensions, and other features are contemplated. As can he appreciated by one skilled in the art, a certain substrate can be selected depending on the specific embodiment and application.

[130] Stabilizing Mixture

[131] Non-limiting examples of stabilizing agents that can be included in the stabilizing mixture m any of the methods or articles provided herein include: a sugar (e.g., a monosaccharide, a disaccharide, a reducing sugar, or a non-reducing sugar), a polyol, a polymer (e.g., an oligosaccharide, a polysaccharide, a cellulose-derivative, or a synthetic polymer), an antioxidant, an ammo acid, a surfactant, and a buffer. Surfactants can be present in any of the compositions of the disclosure, e.g., to stabilize and/or entrance the solubility of other constituents. Buffers can be included in any of the compositions of the disclosure, e.g., to stabilize other constituents and/or control pH.

[132] Non-limiting examples of sugars that can be included in any of the compositions provided herein include: glucose, fructose, xylose, arabinose, sorbose, mannose, rhanmose, galactose, trehalose, maltose, lactose, sucrose, melibiose, ma!tulose, iso-maltulose, and lactulose.

[133] Non-limiting examples of polymers that can be included in any of the compositions provided herein include: raffmose, stachyose, melezitose, mannotriose, maitodextrin, dextran, starch, inulin, ficolL alginate, chitosan, methylceilulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxyethyi cellulose, hypromellose, xanthan gum, guar gum, pectin, carrageen, galactomannan, gellan gum, cellulose acetate phthalate, carboxy- methyl-cellulose, a salt of alginic acid (e.g., sodium alginate), hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose, gum acacia, locust bean gum, hydroxyethyi cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylceilulose, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, gelatin (e.g., hydrolyzed gelatin and unhydrolyzed gelatin), and polyglycolic acid.

[134] Non-limiting examples of polyols that can be included in any of the compositions provided herein include: sorbitol, arabitoi, xylitoi, mannitol, eiythritoi, threitoi, and glycerol.

[135] Non-limiting examples of antioxidants that can he included in any of the compositions provided herein include: ascorbic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, a tocopherol, propyl gallate, tertiary butylhydroquinone, butylated hydroxy anisole, and butyl ated liydroxytoiuene.

[136] Non-limiting examples of ammo acids that can be included in any of the compositions provided herein include: glycine betaine, sodium glutamate, cysteine, cystine, histidine, and methionine.

[137] Non-limiting examples of buffers that can be included in any of the compositions provided herein include: a potassium phosphate (e.g., monopotassium phosphate), a sodium phosphate (e.g., monosodium phosphate and disodium phosphate), sodium acetate, sodium citrate, sodium succinate, histidine, imidazole, ammonium bicarbonate, a carbonate, [Tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino]propanesulfonic acid (TAPS), 2-(Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino)acetic acid (Bicine),

Tris(hydroxymethyi)aminomethane (Tris), 3-[N-Tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino]-2- hydroxypropanesulfonic acid (Tricine), 3-[N-Tris(hydroxyniethyl)methylamino]-2- hydroxypropanesulfonie acid (TAP SO), 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)- 1 -piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 2~[[i,3-dihydroxy~2~(hydroxymethyl)propan~2-yl]amino]ethanes ulfonie acid (TES), 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS), Piperazine-N,N'-bis(2- ethanesulfomc acid) (PIPES), Diniethylarsemc acid (Cacodylate), 2-(N- morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), and JV-cyclohexyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (CHES).

[138] Non-limiting examples of surfactants that can be included in any of the compositions provided herein include: a polysorbate (e.g., polysorbate 20, polysorbate 40, polysorbate 60, or polysorbate 80), a poloxamer (e.g., PLURONICS™), polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polyethylene glycol/polypropylene glycol block copolymers, polyethylene glycol alkyl ethers, polypropylene glycol alkyl ethers, and polyethylene glycol/polypropylene glycol ether block copolymers.

[139] Non-limiting examples of other stabilizing agents that can be included in any of the methods or articles provided herein include: milk (e.g., skimmed milk), liquid growth medium, and propylene glycol. Other stabilizing agents that can be included in any of the methods or articles are contemplated.

[140] The stabilizing mixture in any of the methods or articles described herein can comprise between about 0% to about 25% (e.g., between about 0,001% to about 20%, between about 0.5% to about 25%, between about 0.5% to about 20%, between about 0.5% to about 15%, between about 0.5%) to about 10%, between about 0.5%) to about 5%, between about 1% to about 25%, between about 1% to about 20%, between about 1% to about 15%, between about 1% to about 10%, between about 1% to about 5%, between about 1% to about 4%, between about 2% to about 25%, between about 2% to about 20%, between about 2% to about 15%, between about 2% to about 10%, between about 2% to about 5%, between about 2% to about 4%, between about 3% to about 25%, between about 3% to about 20%, between about 3 ⁽ ½ to about 15%, between about 3% to about 10%, between about 3% to about 5%, between about 4%o to about 25%, between about 4%o to about 20%, between about 4% to about 15%, between about 4% to about 10% ₎ , between about 4% to about 8%, between about 4% to about 5%, between about 1.5%) to about 25%, between about 1.5% to about 20%, between about 1.5% to about 15%, between about 1.5% to about 10%, between about 1.5% to about 5%, between about 2.5% to about 25%, between about 2.5% to about 20%, between about 2.5% to about 15%, between about 2.5% to about 10%, or between about 2.5% to about 5%) of a stabilizing agent (e.g., any of the exemplar _} ' stabilizing agents provided herein) by weight of the stabilizing mixture composition (e.g., w/w or w/v). In at least some instances, the stabilizing mixture included in any of the methods or articles provided herein comprises less than about 15% (e.g., less than about 12%, less than about 10%, less than about 9%, less than about 8%, less than about 7%, less than about 6% ₎ , less than about 5%, less than about 4.5 ⁽ ½, less than about 4%, less than about 3.5%, less than about 3%, less than about 2.5%, less than about 2%, less than about 1.5%, less than about 1%, or less than about 0.5%) of a stabilizing agent (e.g., any of the exemplary stabilizing agents described herein or known in the art) by weight of the composition (e.g., w/w or w/v).

[141] The stabilizing mixture in any of the methods or articles described herein can comprise between about 0.01 mg to about 1,000 mg (e.g., between about 0.01 mg to about 100 mg, between about 0.01 mg to about 12 mg, between about 0.01 mg to about 6 mg, between about 0.01 mg to about 1 mg, between about 0.05 mg to about 1 mg, between about 0.05 mg to about 4.5 mg, between about 0.05 mg to about 11 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 130 mg, between about 0.5 rng to about 640 mg, between about 0.5 rng to about 200 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 100 mg, between about 0,25 mg to about 80 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 60 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 40 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 20 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 10 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 5 rng, between about 0.25 rng to about 2,5 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 2 rng, between about 0.25 rng to about 1 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 10 mg, between about 0,5 mg to about 9 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 8 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 6 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 5 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 4 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 3 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 2 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 1 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 0.75 mg, between about 0.75 mg to about 1 mg, between about 1 mg to about 2 mg, between about 1.25 mg to about 1.75 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 12 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 8 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 1.5 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 60 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 4.5 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 11 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 130 rng, between about 0.5 mg to about 640 rng, between about 0.5 mg to about 200 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 2 mg, between about 0.5 mg to about 35 mg, between about 10 mg to about 30 mg, betw een about 10 mg to about 25 mg, between about 10 mg to about 20 mg, between about 10 mg to about 15 mg, between about 10 mg to about 12.5 mg, between about 10 mg to about 80 mg, between about 10 mg to about 70 mg, between about 10 mg to about 60 mg, between about 10 mg to about 50 mg, between about 10 mg to about 40 mg, between about 15 mg to about 25 mg, between about 17.5 mg to about 22.5 mg, between about 20 mg to about 30 mg, between about 20 mg to about 25 mg, between about 25 mg to about 45 mg, between about 25 mg to about 35 mg, between about 25 mg to about 30 mg, between about 30 mg to about 45 mg, between about 30 rng to about 40 mg, between about 30 mg to about 35 mg, between about 35 mg to about 40 mg, between about 45 mg to about 55 mg, between about 50 mg to about 100 mg, between about 50 mg to about 90 mg, between about 50 mg to about 80 mg, between about 50 mg to about 70 mg, between about 50 mg to about 60 mg, between about 50 mg to about 55 mg, between about 150 mg to about 300 mg, between about 150 mg to about 450 mg, between about 150 mg to about 250 mg, between about 150 mg to about 180 mg, between about 225 mg to about 500 mg, between about 225 rng to about 400 rng, between about 225 mg to about 300 rng, between about 600 mg to about 1 ,000 mg, between about 600 mg to about 900 mg, between about 20 mg to about 25 mg, between about 20 mg to about 40 mg, between about 20 mg to about 28 mg, between about 20 mg to about 37 mg, between about 750 mg to about 775 mg, between about 750 mg to about 825 mg, between about 800 mg to about 915 mg, between about 75 mg to about 105 mg, between about 75 mg to about 99 mg, between about 30 mg to about 60 mg, between about 30 mg to about 50 mg, between about 30 mg to about 40 mg, between about 4 mg to about 16 mg, between about 4 mg to about 12 mg, between about 4 mg to about 8 mg, between about 3 mg to about 9 mg, between about 3 mg to about 6 mg, between about 2 mg to about 6 mg, between about 2 mg to about 5 mg, between about 12 mg to about 15 mg, between about 12 mg to about 14 mg, between about 15 mg to about 20 mg, or between about 15 mg to about 18 mg) of a stabilizing agent (e.g., any of the exemplary stabilizing agents provided herein) per article or per cm ² .

[142] Residual Water Content

[143] Any of the methods or articles provided herein can comprise residual moisture content or residual water content (e.g., a measurable amount of water). Residual water content is the amount of water that remains in the thin microbial layer of the preserved antimicrobial test article. Similar to residual water content, residual moisture content includes not only the amount of remaining water but also other volatile substances that remain in the article’s thin microbial layer after preservation. The residual water and moisture content have a significant impact on the stability of any of the preserved antimicrobial test articles described herein. The presence of residual water content can provide conditions for some metabolic activity' to continue within the thin microbial layer, contributing to degradation following preservation and during storage, it may be desirable to have minimal residual water and moisture content.

[144] In some examples of the methods or articles described herein the thin microbial layer of the preserved antimicrobial test article can comprise between about 0% to about 25% (e.g., between about 0.001% to about 20%, between about 0.5% to about 25%, between about 0.5% to about 20%, between about 0.5% to about 15%, between about 0.5% to about 10%, between about 0.5% to about 5%, between about 1% to about 25%, between about 1 % to about 20%, between about 1% to about 15%, between about 1% to about 10%, between about 1% to about 5%, between about 1% to about 4%, between about 2% to about 25%, between about 2% to about 20%, between about 2% to about 15%, between about 2% to about 10%, between about 2% to about 5%, between about 2% to about 4%, between about 3% to about 25%, between about 3% to about 20%, between about 3% to about 15%, between about 3% to about 10%, between about 3% to about 5%, between about 4% to about 25%, between about 4% to about 20%, between about 4% to about 15%, between about 4% to about 10%, between about 4% to about 8%, between about 4% to about 5%, between about 1.5% to about 25%, between about 1.5% to about 20%, between about 1.5% to about 15%, between about 1.5% to about 10%, between about 1.5% to about 5%, between about 2.5% to about 25%, between about 2.5% to about 20%, between about 2.5% to about 15%, between about 2.5% to about 10%, or between about 2.5% to about 5% water) of residual water content or residual moisture content by weight (e.g., w/w). In at least some instances, the residual water content or residual moisture content of the thin microbial layer in any of the methods or articles provided herein is less than about 15% (e.g., less than about 12%, less than about 10%, less than about 9%, less than about 8%, less than about 7%, less than about 6%, less than about 5%, less than about 4.5%, less than about 4%, less than about 3.5%, less than about 3%, less than about 2.5%, less than about 2%, less than about 1.5%, less than about 1%, or less than about 0.5%) by weight (e.g., w/w). in some instances, the residual water content or residual moisture content of the thin microbial layer is less than about 5% by weight (e.g., w/w or w/v).

[ f 451 Any of the methods or articles described herein can comprise between about 0 mg to about 500 mg (e.g., between about 0.25 mg to about 500 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 400 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 300 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 200 rng, between about 0.25 mg to about 100 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 50 mg, between about 0.25 mg to about 25 mg, between about 5 mg to about 500 mg, between about 5 mg to about 400 mg, between about 5 mg to about 300 mg, between about 5 mg to about 200 mg, between about 5 mg to about 100 mg, between about 5 mg to about 50 mg, between about 5 mg to about 25 mg, between about 15 mg to about 500 mg, between about 15 mg to about 400 mg, between about 15 mg to about 300 mg, between about 15 mg to about 200 mg, between about 15 mg to about 100 mg, between about 15 mg to about 50 mg, between about 13 mg to about 25 mg, between about 50 mg to about 500 mg, between about 50 mg to about 400 mg, between about 50 mg to about 300 mg, between about 50 mg to about 250 mg, between about 50 mg to about 200 mg, between about 50 mg to about 150 mg, between about 50 mg to about 100 mg, between about 100 mg to about 500 mg, between about 100 mg to about 450 mg, between about 100 mg to about 400 mg, between about 100 mg to about 350 mg, between about 100 mg to about 300 mg, between about 100 mg to about 250 mg, between about 100 mg to about 200 mg, between about 100 mg to about 150 mg, between about 150 mg to about 500 mg, between about 150 mg to about 450 mg, between about 150 mg to about 400 mg, between about 150 mg to about 350 mg, between about 150 mg to about 300 mg, between about 150 mg to about 250 mg, between about 150 mg to about 200 mg, between about 200 mg to about 500 mg, between about 200 mg to about 450 mg, between about 200 mg to about 400 mg, between about 200 mg to about 350 mg, between about 200 mg to about 300 mg, between about 200 mg to about 250 mg, between about 250 mg to about 500 mg, between about 250 mg to about 450 mg, between about 250 mg to about 400 mg, between about 250 rng to about 350 mg, between about 250 mg to about 300 mg, between about 300 rng to about 500 rng, between about 300 mg to about 450 mg, between about 300 mg to about 400 mg, between about 300 mg to about 350 mg, between about 350 mg to about 500 mg, between about 350 mg to about 450 mg, between about 350 mg to about 400 nig, between about 400 mg to about 500 mg, or between about 400 mg to about 450 mg) of residual water content or residual moisture content per article or per cm ² . in some examples of any of the methods or articles described herein, the thin microbial layer can comprise less than 500 mg (e.g., less than 450 mg, less than 400 mg, less than 350 mg, less than 300 mg, less than 250 rng, less than 200 mg, less than 175 mg, less than 150 mg, less than 125 mg, less than 100 mg, less than 90 rng, less than 80 mg, less than 70 mg, less than 60 mg, less than 50 mg, less than 45 mg, less than 40 mg, less than 35 mg, less than 30 mg, less than 25 mg, less than 20 mg, less than 15 mg, less than 10 mg, less than 9 mg, less than 8 mg, less than 7 mg, less than 6 mg, less than 5 mg, less than 4 mg, less than 3 nig, less than 2 nig, or less than 1 mg) of residual water content or residual moisture content per article or per cm ² .

[146] Other methods for determining residual water content may include the Kail Fisher titration method (see, e.g., Krasucka et ai., Acta Pol. Pharm. 69: 1364-1367, 2012 and Reh et ah, Food Chem. 86: 457-464, 2004). Other methods for determining residual moisture content may include loss-on-drying or gravimetric methodology (see, e.g., May et al, Cryobiology 26: 277-284, 1989), and using near-infrared spectroscopy (see, e.g., Zheng et al., J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 46: 592-596, 2008).

[147] Any of the methods or articles provided herein can also be characterized by water activity', in some examples of the methods or articles described herein the article can exhibit a water activity' of less than about 0.9 Aw (e.g., less than about 0.85 Aw, less than about 0.8 Aw, less than about 0.75 Aw, less than about 0,7 Aw, less than about 0.65 Aw, less than about 0.6 Aw, less than about 0.55 Aw, less than about 0,5 Aw, less than about 0.45 Aw, less than about 0.4 Aw, less than about 0.35 Aw, less than about 0.3 Aw, less than about 0.25 Aw, less than about 0.2 Aw, less than about 0.15 Aw, less than about 0.1 Aw, or less than about 0.05 Aw). Methods for determining the water activity of a composition at a given temperature may include, e.g., using a resistive electrolytic hygrometer, a capacitance hygrometer, or a dew point hygrometer.

[148] Stability

[149] The stability' of the viable microbial material in any of the methods or preserved antimicrobial test articles provided herein can he described by a loss of viability over time. The loss of viability' of the viable microbial material in any of the articles described herein can be calculated on a logarithmic scale by subtracting the number of units (e.g., the number of log CPU per composition or per cm ² ) of the viable microbial material (e.g., any of the exemplary' viable microbial material described herein) in the thin microbial layer at a point in time (e.g., at about 30 days, at about 60 days, at about 90 days, at about 180 days, at about 365 days, or at about 730 days) from the number of units of the viable material material following preservation (e.g., within 12 hours of finishing the preservation process). The resulting number is the loss of viability of the viable microbial material over a period of time (e.g., over a period of about 30 days, over a period of about 60 days, over a period of about 90 days, over a period of about 180 days, over a period of about 365 days, or over a period of about 730 days). The stability' of a viable microbial material in the preserved antimicrobial test articles described herein can be further characterized by the temperature the article is stored at over a particular period of time for which the loss of viability is determined.

[150] The loss of viability of the viable microbial material in any of the articles described herein can be less than about 5.0 log (e.g., less than about 4.9 log, less than about 4.8 log, less than about 4.7 log, less than about 4.6 log, less than about 4.5 log, less than about 4.4 log, less than about 4.3 log, less than about 4.2 log, less than about 4.1 log, less than about 4 log, less than about 3.9 log, less than about 3.8 log, less than about 3.7 log, less than about 3.6 log, less than about 3.5 log, less than about 3.4 log, less than about 3.3 log, less than about 3,2 log, less than about 3.1 log, less than about 3 log, less than about

2.9 log, less than about 2.8 log, less than about 2,7 log, less than about 2.6 log, less than about 2.5 log, less than about 2.4 log, less than about 2.3 log, less than about 2.2 log, less than about 2.1 log, less than about 2 log, less than about 1.9 log, less than about 1.8 log, less than about 1.7 log, less than about 1.6 log, less than about 1.5 log, less than about 1.4 log, less than about 1.3 log, less than about 1.2 log, less than about 1.1 log, less than about 1 log, less than about 0.9 log, less than about 0.8 log, less than about 0.7 log, less than about 0.6 log, less than about 0.5 log, less than about 0.4 log, less than about 0.3 log, less than about 0.2 log, or less than about 0.1 log) per article or per cm ² over a period of at least about 30 days (e.g., at least about 35 days, at least about 60 days, at least about 90 days, at least about 120 days, at least about 150 days, at least about 180 days, at least about 210 days, at least about 240 days, at least about 270 days, at least about 300 days, at least about 365 days, or at least about 730 days) at a temperature between about TC to about TC (e.g., about 2°C, about 3°C, about 4°C, about 5°C, about 6°C, or about TC). In some embodiments, the loss of viability of the microbial material is less than about 3 log per composition or per cm ² over a period of about 180 days at a temperature of about 5 C In some embodiments, the loss of viability of the microbial material is less than about 1.0 log per composition or per cm ² over a period of about 180 days at a temperature of about 5°C. In some instances, the loss of viability of the microbial material in any of the methods or articles provided herein is less than 0.5 log per article or per cnr over a period of about 180 days at a temperature of about 5°C.

1151] In some embodiments, the loss of viability of the microbial material in any of the methods or articles described herein can be less than about 5 log (e.g., less than about

4.9 log, less than about 4.8 log, less than about 4.7 log, less than about 4.6 log, less than about 4.5 log, less than about 4.4 log, less than about 4.3 log, less than about 4.2 log, less than about 4.1 log, less than about 4 log, less than about 3.9 log, less than about 3.8 log, less than about 3.7 log, less than about 3.6 log, less than about 3.5 log, less than about 3.4 log, less than about 3.3 log, less than about 3.2 log, less than about 3.1 log, less than about 3 log, less than about 2.9 log, less than about 2.8 log, less than about 2.7 log, less than about 2,6 log, less than about 2.5 log, less than about 2.4 log, less than about 2.3 log, less than about 2,2 log, less than about 2.1 log, less than about 2 log, less than about 1.9 log, less than about 1.8 log, less than about 1.7 log, less than about 1,6 log, less than about 1.5 log, less than about 1.4 log, less than about 1.3 log, less than about 1.2 log, less than about 1.1 log, less than about 1 log, less than about 0,9 log, less than about 0.8 log, less than about 0.7 log, less than about 0.6 log, less than about 0.5 log, less than about 0.4 log, less than about 0.3 log, less than about 0.2 log, or less than about 0.1 log) per article or per cm ² over a period of at least about 30 days (e.g., at least about 35 days, at least about 60 days, at least about 90 days, at least about 120 days, at least about 150 days, at least about 180 days, at least about 210 days, at least about 240 days, at least about 270 days, at least about 300 days, at least about 365 days, or at least about 730 days) at a temperature between about 20°C to about 25 C (e.g., about 20°C, about 2I°C, about 22°C, about 23°C, about 24°C, or about 25°C). In some instances, the loss of viability of the microbial material m any of the methods or articles provided herein is less than 1.0 log per article or per cm ² over a period of about 90 days at a temperature between about 20 ^J C to about 25 °C.

[152] Methods for quantifying the amount of viable microbial material are known In the art.

[153] Methods of Manufacturing

[154] The present disclosure provides a method to manufacture a preserved antimicrobial test article (e.g., for use in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer). The present disclosure provides a method to manufacture a preserved antimicrobial test article that is surprisingly stable for a significant period of time (e.g., 90 days) and is capable of being used m an antimicrobial assay after having been stored for a significant amount of time (e.g., 90 days, 180 days, or 365 days). The present disclosure provides a method to manufacture a preserved antimicrobial test article that may perform similar to, indicative of, or the same as a freshly -prepared test article, even after having been stored for a significant amount of time. The method comprises suspending a concentrated pellet of viable microbial material (e.g., any of the viable microbial material described herein) in a predetermined amount of a solution comprising a stabilizing mixture (e.g., any of the stabilizing mixtures described herein) to create a suspension with a predetermined amount of viable microbial material per volume and agitating the suspension until the viable microbial material and stabilizing mixture are homogenously dispersed throughout the suspension. The method further comprises depositing a predetermined amount of the suspension onto a non- water soluble substrate to create a thin microbial layer comprising viable nnerobial material and a stabilizing mixture, and dehydrating the thin microbial layer (e.g,, to a residual water content of less than 5%). In some examples, the method further comprises sealing the dehydrated antimicrobial test article m a container. In some examples of the methods provided herein, the article comprises viable microbial material with a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C. In some examples, the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test sample/substance. In some examples of any of the methods of manufacturing described herein, the article is disposed within a primary container (e.g., a primary container 14 as shown in FIG. 3) and the primary container is sealed within a secondary container (e.g., a secondary container 16 as shown in FIG. 4) that has low permeability to moisture and oxygen. In some examples, the primary container, the secondary ⁷ container, or both are impermeable to moisture and oxygen. In some examples, a desiccant is disposed within the secondary' container, in some examples, an oxygen scavenger is disposed within the secondary _' container. In some examples, the concentrated pellet is prepared by centrifuging a suspension of viable microbial cells with a concentration between 1.0 x IQ ⁴ and 1 x IQ ⁹ per mL.

[155] in some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises a sugar. In some examples, the sugar is a non-reducing sugar. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture further comprises an antioxidant. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises a growth nutrient. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises a buffer. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises between 1% and 15% of a sugar, between 1% and 15% of an antioxidant, and one or both of a growth nutrient and a buffer. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises between 5% and 15% of a sugar, between 2% and 10% of an antioxidant, and one or both of a growth nutrient and a buffer. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture further comprises a soil load. In some examples, the soil load is between 1% to 15% by weight. In some examples, the soil load comprises an organic salt. In some examples, the soil load comprises bovine serum. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of between 6.4 and 8.4. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of between 6.9 and 7.9. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of between 7.2 and 7.6. In some examples, the stabilizing mixture comprises a pH of 7.4. In some examples, after resuspension the viable microbial material has a concentration between 1.0 x 10 ⁴ and 1 x ID ⁹ CPU per mL. In some examples, after resuspension the viable microbial material has been concentrated by a factor of between 2 and 10. in some examples, after resuspension the viable microbial material has been concentrated by a factor of between 4 and 10. In some examples, after resuspension the viable microbial material has been concentrated by a factor of between 4 and 6. In some examples, a volume of between 5 uL and 30 uL of the suspension is deposited onto the non-water soluble substrate to create the thin microbial layer. In some examples, the antimicrobial test article can be dehydrated using a process that comprises freezing and lyophilizmg. In some examples of any of the methods provided herein, the antimicrobial test article can be dehydrated using a process that includes air drying. In some examples, the article can be dehydrated using a process that includes an incubator or heated chamber. In some examples, the article can be dehydrated under pressure. In some examples, the article can be dehydrated using a process that includes a desiccator (e.g., a non-vacuum desiccator or a vacuum desiccator).

[156] Method of Evaluating Antimicrobial Efficacy

[157] The present disclosure provides a method to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample (e.g., a test substance or other item that is to be tested for antimicrobial efficacy). The present disclosure also provides a method to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of a disinfectant or a sanitizer. The method comprises using any suitable example embodiment of a preserved antimicrobial test article described herein with a test sample/substance suspected of antimicrobial efficacy. In some embodiments, method of evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a test sample/substance comprises removing a preserved antimicrobial test article from a sealed container, contacting the preserved antimicrobial test article with a predetermined amount of the test sample/substance without rehydrating the preserved microbial article and without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test sample/substance, maintaining contact between the antimicrobial test article and the test sample/substance for a predetermined test contact time, contacting the antimicrobial test article and the test sample/substance with a neutralizer after the test contact time, agitating the antimicrobial test article, and observing an indication of antimicrobial efficacy. In some examples, the preserved antimicrobial test article comprises a non-water soluble substrate, and a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material and a stabilizing mixture, in some examples, the thm microbial layer of the preserved antimicrobial test article comprises a residual water content of less than 5.0%). In some examples, the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 logs over at least 30 days at 5°C. In some examples, the article is sealed in a container. In some examples, the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (ii) without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test sample/substance, in some examples, the preserved antimicrobial test article is incubated at a predetermined temperature for a predetermined amount of time prior to contacting the preserved antimicrobial test article with the test sample/ substance.

[1581 Kits

[1591 Also included herein are kits that include at least one of any of the articles described herein, in some examples, a kit includes multiple (e.g., two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, twelve, eighteen, twenty-four, thirty, thirty-six, forty-eight, fifty- four, sixty, seventy, eighty, ninety, ninety -six, one-hundred, or more than one-hundred) articles (e.g., any of the articles described herein), in some examples, a kit includes an article comprising a microbial organism and a different article comprising a different microbial organism. In some examples of any of the kits, the article(s) are enclosed within a primary container. In some examples, more than one article is enclosed within a single primary' container. In some examples, one or more primary container(s) are then sealed within a secondary container (e.g., a moisture barrier bag or a foil bag) that has low permeability to moisture and oxygen, in some embodiments, the primary container has low permeability to moisture and/or oxygen. In some embodiments, the secondary container further comprises a desiccant (e.g., any of the exemplary desiccants provided here) or an oxygen scavenger (e.g., any of the exemplary oxygen scavengers provided here).

[160] Some examples of any of the kits provided herein further include a buffer, a dye, or a stain. Some examples further include materials and/or consumables (e.g. , a 50 mL conical tube) used to conduct an assay (e.g., an assay for measuring antimicrobial activity of a compound). Some examples include a nutrient media to support the growth of microorganisms, e.g., to plate and count colony forming units, e.g., after testing for antimicrobial activity. Some examples of any of the kits provided herein further include an antimicrobial substance (e.g., an antimicrobial drug or a disinfectant), e.g., to be used as a part of a control sample in an assay. Any of the kits provided herein can be used to determine the anti-microbial activity of a test sample/substance, e.g., that is formulated as a solution, a liquid, a towelette, a wipe, a spray, a powder, a gel, or a paste.

[161] In some examples, a kit for evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer comprises: a preserved antimicrobial test article comprising: a non-water soluble substrate, a thin microbial layer attached to the substrate comprising viable microbial material, a stabilizing mixture, and a residual water content of less than 5.0%, wherein the thin microbial layer comprises between 3.0 logs to 9.0 logs of viable microbial material, wherein the viable microbial material has a loss of viability of less than 0.5 log over at least 30 days at 4°C, wherein the article is sealed in a container, wherein the article is used in evaluating the antimicrobial efficacy of a hard surface disinfectant or sanitizer (i) directly from the preserved state without rehydration and (h) without detaching the layer comprising die viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with a test sample/substance. In some examples of any of the kits described herein, an article is disposed within a primary container and the primary container is sealed within a secondary container that has low permeability to moisture and oxygen. In some examples, the primary container, the secondary container, or both are impermeable to moisture and oxygen. In some examples, a desiccant is disposed within the secondary container. In some examples, an oxygen scavenger is disposed within the secondary container.

[162] Examples 1163] The disclosure may be further clarified by reference to the following Examples, which serve to exemplify some embodiments, and not to limit the disclosure in any way.

[164] Example 1 - Stability-’ of Preserved £ aureus Antimicrobial Test Articles with 10% Sucrose/6% Ascorbate over 3 Months

[165] Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 6538™) was grown in nutrient broth and in synthetic broth for 48 hours at 35°C. The cells were then concentrated in a stabilizing mixture comprising 10% w/v sucrose, 6% w/v ascorbate, and their respective broth medias. 10 uL of the each of the cell solutions comprising the stabilizing mixture were coated onto sterile 1” x G’ glass slides to create test articles. The test articles were then air dried at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for approximately 40 minutes or until the coated cell solution was substantially evaporated. Each set of test articles were then sealed into a moisture barrier package (aluminum mylar pouch) that also contained lOg silica desiccant and 500cc oxygen scavenger. The packaged test articles were then stored at room temperature for 3 months. Additional sets of the 10% sucrose, 6% ascorbate, and synthetic broth test articles were stored at 4°C and at 36°C. After 3 months, the preserved test articles were then removed from their respective sealed mylar pouch, the cells were recovered from the test articles and the colony forming units (CFUs) were enumerated using serial dilutions and trypticase soy agar (TSA) media. A 1 week data point was also collected for both formulations under 36°C storage conditions. The inoculated TSA plates were placed into a 35°C incubator for approximately 18 hours. The colony counts are shown below. Three replicates for each data point were collected. SD ^:::: standard deviation.

[166] Table 1. Preserved test articles stored at room temperature for 3 months (log 10

CPU/ test article)

[167] These results show that preserved test articles surprisingly had very little loss of viability after 3 months at room temperature. The log loss of the preserved test articles over 3 months was less than the standard deviation of the log CFU per test article at time zero.

[168] Table 2. Preserved test articles stored at various temperatures for 3 months (log 10 CFU/test article)

[169 j These results show that preserved test articles surprisingly had very little loss of viability after 3 months, even when stored at a highly elevated temperature (36°C) for the full 3 months.

[170] Table 3. Preserved test articles stored at 36°C for 1 week (log 10 CFU/test article)

[171] These results show that preserved test articles surprisingly had very little loss of viability after 1 week when stored at a highly elevated temperature (36°C).

[172] Example 2 - Stability of Preserved S. aureus. Antimicrobial Test Articles with 2% Sucrose over 1 Week

[173] Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 6538™) was grown in nutrient broth for 48 hours at 35°C. The cells were then concentrated in a stabilizing mixture comprising 2% w/V sucrose and nutrient broth. 10 uL of the ceil solution comprising the stabilizing mixture was coated onto sterile 1” x 1” glass slides to create test articles. The test articles were then air dried at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for approximately 40 minutes or until the coated cell solution was substantially evaporated. Each set of test articles were then sealed into a moisture barrier package (aluminum mylar pouch) that also contained lOg silica desiccant and 500cc oxygen scavenger. The packaged test articles were then stored at 23 °C and at 46°C for 1 week. At 1 day, 3 days, and 1 week the preserved test articles were removed from their respective sealed mylar pouch, the cells were recovered from the test articles and the colony forming units (CPUs) were enumerated using serial dilutions and try pti case soy agar (TSA) media. The inoculated TSA plates were placed into a 35°C incubator for approximately 18 hours. The colony counts are shown below. Three replicates for each data point were collected. SD = standard deviation.

[174] Table 4. Preserved test articles stored at various temperatures for 1 week

[175] These results show that preserved test articles surprisingly had very little loss of viability at room temperature (23°C) and at an extremely elevated temperature (46°C) over 1 week.

[176] Example 3 - Stability of Preserved K. pneumoniae Antimicrobial Test Articles with 2% Sucrose/5% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) over 6 Months

[177] Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC® 4352™) was grown in nutrient broth for 48 hours at 35°C. The cells were then concentrated in a stabilizing mixture comprising 2% w/v sucrose, 5% FBS, and nutrient broth. 10 uL of the cell solution comprising the stabilizing mixture was coated onto sterile F’ x 1” glass slides to create test articles. The test articles were then air dried at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for approximately 40 minutes or until the coated cell solution was substantially evaporated. Each set of test articles were then sealed into a moisture barrier package (aluminum mylar pouch) that also contained !Og silica desiccant and 500cc oxygen scavenger. Sets of packaged test articles were then stored at 4°C, 23°C, and 46°C for 6 months. At various time points the preserved test articles were removed from their respective sealed mylar pouch, the ceils were recovered from the test articles and the colony forming units (CPUs) were enumerated using serial dilutions and trypticase soy agar (TSA) media. The inoculated TSA plates w¾re placed into a 35°C incubator for approximately 18 hours. The colony counts are showm below. Three replicates for each data point were collected. SD = standard deviation.

[178] Table 5. Preserved test articles stored at various temperatures for 6 months

[179] These results show that preserved test articles surprisingly had very little loss of viability at refrigeration temperature (4°C) and room temperature (23°C) through 6 months, and at a highly elevated temperature (35°C) for at least 3 months,

[180] Example 4 - Evaluation of Sanitizer Testing Performance of Preserved Antimicrobial Test Articles Compared to Freshly-Prepared Antimicrobial Test Articles

[ 181] Tire performance of preserved Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial test articles in sanitizer efficacy testing was compared to freshly -prepared antimicrobial test articles. Three levels (low, moderate, high) for two exemplary antimicrobial products (NaOCl and CAVICIDE™) were evaluated. The testing was conducted by two analysts across multiple test dates.

[182] Preserved antimicrobial test articles were prepared by the following method. Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 6538™) was grown in nutrient broth for 48 hours at 35°C. The cells were then concentrated in a stabilizing mixture comprising 2% w/ ^’ v sucrose and nutrient broth. 10 uL of the cell solution comprising the stabilizing mixture was coated onto sterile G’ x 1” glass slides to create test articles. The test articles were then air dried at room temperature (approximately 23 ^C C) for approximately 40 minutes or until the coated cell solution was substantially evaporated. Each set of test articles were then sealed into a moisture barrier package (aluminum mylar pouch) that also contained lOg silica desiccant and 500cc oxygen scavenger. On each respective test day the preserved antimicrobial test articles were removed from their sealed mylar pouch and utilized in antimicrobial testing per ASTM El 153 - which included placing the preserved test article in a sterile vessel, contacting the preserved test article with the test sample without rehydrating the preserved antimicrobial article and without detaching the layer comprising the viable microbial material from the substrate prior to contact with the test sample, maintaining contact between the antimicrobial test article and the test sample for a predetermined test contact time and quantifying the log reduction due to the test sample. Freshly -prepared antimicrobial test articles were prepared and tested according to ASTM El 153. Results for both preserved and freshly-prepared test articles were analyzed/calculated according to ASTM El 153. Cav_l:120 = CAVICIDE™ diluted to 1:120. CavJ :30 = CAVICIDE™ diluted to 1 :30. CavJRTU = CAVICIDE™ ready-to-use concentration.

[183] Table 6, Positive control descriptive statistics comparing freshly-prepared test articles and preserved test articles

[184] A chart of the positive controls for Example 4 is depicted in FIG. 5 (Freshly- prepared = freshly-prepared test articles; Preserved = preserved test articles).

[185] The 95% confidence interval for the mean value (log 10 CFU/test article) of preserved test article positive controls minus the mean value (log 10 CFU/test article) for freshly-prepared test article positive controls was (-0.002, 0,314). This is well within the art’s accepted lower equivalence limit and upper equivalence limit of (-0.5, 0.5). These results show that preserved test article positive controls were statistically equivalent to freshly-prepared test article positive controls. The preserved test article positive controls had a lower standard deviation than freshly-prepared test article positive controls.

[186] Table 7. Testing data for preserved and freshly-prepared test articles

[187] The data is depicted graphically in FIGS. 6 (NaOCl test data for Example 4. LR = log reduction; Freshly-prepared = freshly-prepared test articles: Preserved = preserved test articles.) and 7 (CAViCIDE™ test data for Example 4. LR = log reduction; Freshly- prepared = freshly-prepared test articles; Preserved = preserved test articles.).

[188] These results show that preserved test articles surprisingly were not significantly different (p- value ^:::: 0.48) than freshly-prepared test articles in evaluating antimicrobial efficacy performance,

[189] It should be understood that this disclosure is, in many respects, only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of steps without exceeding the scope of the disclosure. Tins may include, to the extent that it is appropriate, the use of any of the features of one example embodiment being used in other embodiments. The disclosure's scope is, of course, defined in the language in which the appended claims are expressed.