A typical pyrolysis heater consists of one or more fireboxes comprising radiant heating sections together with one or more upper convection sections containing feed preheaters. The radiant heating section contains a plurality of radiant process coils suspended in the center plane of the firebox between two radiating walls. The passes of each coil are most often swaged up to gradually larger diameter tubes toward the outlet end. Usually the coils have a number of parallel smaller tubes at the inlet end and fewer larger tubes at the outlet end.

Vertically firing'burners located on the hearth or floor of the firebox are used as a heat source inside of many types of pyrolysis heaters. Inside of an ethylene cracking heater, identical hearth burners are spaced on the hearth along both of the long walls of each firebox to provide the high intensity heat release necessary for pyrolysis of the feedstock inside of the process coils. A specific burner design for a particular situation must provide a heat release rate as a function of elevation which is within an acceptable performance envelope. This assures that the process coils receive sufficient heat flux from top to bottom without developing hot spots which promote the formation of deposits inside of the process tubes and reduce the heater availability for production. In a typical pyrolysis heater in an ethylene plant, on the order of eight to ten hearth burners for light feedstocks and perhaps eighteen to twenty for heavy feedstocks are located along each of the refractory walls on the sides of the firebox with the process coil being suspended in

the center between the walls. The burners are all of a similar design and they fire upward along the walls at more or less the same rate.

This results in the inlet passes and the outlet passes of the process coils being heated at the same flux or heat release rate. Since the gases being treated in the process coils are hotter toward the outlet ends of the coils, these outlet ends are more susceptible to the formation of internal coke deposits. With the inlet and outlet ends of the coils being heated at the same rate, coking is more likely.

Further, with hotter process temperatures on the outlet passes and equivalent fluxes, the tube metal temperatures of the outlet passes are normally the highest. In typical radiant coils, the operation is limited by the maximum metal temperature since these expensive alloy tubes operate near their plastic flow limits.

Summary of the Invention An object of the invention is to heat the process coils of a pyrolysis heater more efficiently and in a manner which will increase the heat flux to the cooler inlet sections and decrease the heat flux to the hotter outlet sections. The object is to reduce the heat flux at the hotter outlet sections to reduce the tendency for coking while still maintaining the required total heat input for cracking. More specifically, the invention involves grouping the inlet sections of the coils together and grouping the outlet sections together and providing high output and low output burners. The burners are arranged and paired to generate a temperature field that is segregated into hotter and cooler zones properly aligned with the specific sections of the process coils. Even more specifically, the invention involves directing the flames from the burners to achieve the desired temperature zones.

Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a simplified vertical cross-section representation of a typical pyrolysis heater.

Figure 2 is a diagram of the typical flow pattern within a firebox of a pyrolysis heater having hearth burners.

Figure 3 is a horizontal cross section of the lower portion of a firebox of a prior art pyrolysis heater showing the hearth burners spaced on the hearth along the walls.

Figure 4A is a cross-section view of one of the burners of Figure 3 showing the primary and secondary fuel tips and the firing directions in the plane of the cross section.

Figure 4B is a face view of the burner of Figure 4A showing the firing direction of the secondary fuel tips in the plane parallel to the wall.

Figure 5 is a horizontal cross section of the lower portion of a firebox similar to Figure 3 but showing the burner arrangement of the present invention.

Figure 6A is a cross-section view of one of the burners of Figure 5 showing the primary and secondary fuel tips and the firing directions in the plane of the cross section.

Figure 6B is a face view of the burner of Figure 6A showing the firing direction of the primary and secondary fuel tips in the plane parallel to the wall.

Figure 7 is a graphical representation of the flow pattern of the flames from the burner arrangement of the present invention.

Figure 8A is gray-scale graphic representation of the radiation intensity distribution for a prior art pyrolysis heater employing a zoned-firing burner layout.

Figure 8B is a gray-scale graphic demonstration similar to Figure 7A but showing the radiation intensity for the present invention.

Figure 9 is a chart showing the ratio of the flux for the present invention to the flux of the prior art.

Description of the Prior Art and Preferred Embodiments of the Invention Before describing the details of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, a typical prior art pyrolysis heater will be described. Figure 1 shows a cross section of such a prior art heater.

This heater has a radiant heating zone 14 and a convection heating zone 16. Located in the convection heating zone 16 are the heat exchange surfaces 18 and 20 which in this case are illustrated for preheating the hydrocarbon feed 22. This zone may also contain heat exchange surface for producing steam. The preheated feed from the convection zone is fed at 24 to the heating coil generally designated 26 located in the radiant heating zone 14. The cracked product from the heating coil 26 exits at 30.

The radiant heating zone 14 comprises walls designated 34 and 36 and the floor or hearth 42. Mounted on the floor are the vertically firing hearth burners generally designated 46. These burners 46 usually comprise a burner tile 47 through which all of the combustion air is introduced vertically and a series of fuel tips 48 which are also directed into the airstream. The fuel tips 48 are outside of the burner tile 47 for firing secondary fuel but additional fuel tips are located inside of the burner tile, as will be described later, for firing primary fuel. Because of the slow diffusion mixing of the secondary fuel into the combustion zone, referred to as staged firing, the flame reaches its maximum temperature probably half way up the furnace height. In addition to the hearth burners, the wall burners 49 may be included. These are radiant-type burners designed to produce flat flame patterns which are spread across the walls to avoid flame impingement on the coil tubes.

Figure 2 illustrates the flow patterns inside the cracking heater indicating that the hearth burner plumes generate a double vortex inside the heater. Hot gases from the burners run up the walls while a downdraft along the cooler process coils 26 in the center splits at the bottom and feeds back into the burners. Driving forces include high-velocity fuel jets, infiltrated burner air streams and buoyancy.

This twin vortex pattern is well organized and efficient, because all of the hearth burners work in concert and fire essentially vertically with no horizontal component and interaction. This causes the individual burner plumes to be rapidly mixed with recirculated gas from the coils and makes the basic system somewhat insensitive to variations in the output of individual burners.

Figure 3 is a horizontal cross section of the lower portion of one half of a firebox showing a prior art zoned-firing burner layout in which some of the burners are normal heat output burners and others are high heat output burners. Three separate coils 50,52 and 54 are shown in cross section in this half of the firebox with the tubes 56 being the small inlet tubes, the tubes 58 being the large outlet tubes and the tubes 60 being the intermediate sized tubes between the inlet and outlet tubes. In this layout, in an attempt to heat the inlet tubes 56 more than the outlet tubes 58, the hearth burners 62 adjacent to the outlet tubes 58 are normal heat liberation burners with a normal firing rate while the burners 64 adjacent to the inlet tubes 56 are high heat liberation burners with a higher firing rate.

Figure 4A is a cross section of one of the burners 62 or 64 of Figure 3 while Figure 4B is a face view of the burner taken from the right of Figure 4A. The burner comprises the ceramic burner tile 47, secondary fuel tips 48 outside of burner tile 47 and the primary fuel tips 66 inside of the tile. The fuel tips comprise hollow spheres attached to fuel supply conduits with the fuel nozzle comprising a hole drilled or otherwise formed at the appropriate angle through the

wall of the sphere. As shown in Figures 4A and 4B, the primary fuel tips 66 are directed and fire vertically as indicated by the arrows 67.

The secondary fuel tips 48 are directed vertically in the plane of Figure 4B as shown by the arrows 49, but with a component toward the wall 34 as shown by the arrow 49 in the plane of Figure 4A to force the flame into the wall. The inclination toward the wall is preferably from 12 degrees to 16 degrees from vertical. High heat liberation burners spread out more than low heat liberation burners, so that from a certain elevation upwards the difference is small.

In order to increase the temperature control efficiency of the zoned-firing concept as illustrated in Figure 3, the present invention couples adjacent high heat liberation burners into pairs. The normal heat liberation burners 62 are unchanged. The layout for this paired- burner, zoned firing system is shown in Figures 5. This firebox contains the same arrangement of coils 50,52 and 54 and tubes 56, 58 and 60 as in Figure 3. It also contains the same type of normal heat liberation hearth burners 62 with these burners being adjacent to and in line with the portions of the coils containing the outlet tubes 58. In order to facilitate this placement of the normal heat liberation burners, the outlet tubes on one coil, such as coil 50, are located adjacent to the outlet tubes on the adjacent coil, such as coil 52.

In the present invention, the high heat liberation burners 68 differ from the high heat liberation burners 64 of Figure 3. The intent is to generate a temperature field that is segregated into hot and cool zones aligned with the specific sections of the process coils. This is achieved by including lateral components to the burner tips of these paired burners to merge the flames between the paired burners and track the flames up the wall. This lateral component is preferably from 16 degrees to 30 degrees from vertical. The cold air streams emerging from a pair of these burners are then diverted laterally outward toward the burners 62 and aligned with the outlet tubes 58.

As seen in Figure 5 and even more clearly in Figure 6B, the secondary fuel tips 72 of each of the high heat liberation burners 68 are inclined from the vertical in the direction of the adjacent high heat liberation burners 68 as indicated by the arrows 73. This introduces the lateral component to the flames from the high heat liberation burners causing the flames to merge. The primary fuel tips 70 preferably still fire vertically as shown by the arrows 71. The flow pattern of the flames from the burners is illustrated in Figure 7.

In this firing mode, the colder gas streams have a tendency to roll around toward the coil and back down to the floor sooner than the plumes generated by the paired high heat liberation burners. The hotter plume formed by the coalescing of the staged burner tips 72 of adjacent high heat liberation burners results in increased heat flux to the first, inlet passes of the coils. These hotter plumes reach higher in the firebox before rolling back around. This puts more high temperature gas against the inlet passes of the coils for a longer period of time and reduces the high temperature gas against the outlet passes. This is illustrated in Figures 8A and 8B which compare the radiation intensity of conventional zone firing in Figure 8A and paired burner zone firing in Figure 8B. For the purposes of clarity, only the inlet tubes 56 are shown in these two drawings. It can be seen that the overall radiation levels have increased in the areas of the inlet tubes and decreased in the areas of the outlet tubes for the present invention illustrated in Figure 8B as compared to the prior art in Figure 8A. At the same time, the colder plumes tend to flow out toward the center and enter the coil downflow zones near the outlet passes of the coil. A similar comparison of the temperature distribution across the unit at various levels also indicates a rather uniform distribution for the prior art whereas the temperatures for the present invention are significantly higher in the areas of the inlet coils than in the areas of the outlet coils. Figure 9 is a chart showing the

ratio of the flux for a paired burner arrangement to the flux of a standard zone firing arrangement for the various tubes of three coils in one half of a six coil unit. It can be seen that the first passes comprising inlet tubes 1 to 9,21 to 28 and 29 to 36 have over 3% more heat flux. More importantly, the later passes comprising tubes 10 to 19 and 37 to 42 have reduced heat fluxes (2-3% less) and would experience lower peak metal temperatures.

In practice, this allows the ethylene heater designer to increase the overall average flux to the paired zone fired coil since the flux is reduced to the outlet coils thus reducing the fouling and reducing the peak metal temperatures nominally experienced in the outlet coils.

By allowing for increased flux with the same maximum metal temperatures, either conversion or capacity or both can be increased.

Thus the overall expected increase in capacity or heat input from the invention is the sum of the relative flux differences or over 5% when operated at the same maximum metal temperature.