JPH08175331 | VEHICULAR ANTI-THEFT SYSTEM |
JP2007332705 | WIRELESS KEY SYSTEM |
JP4123363 | Remote control device for keyless entry |
TALBOT KEVIN TREVOR (GB)
GB2257552A | 1993-01-13 | |||
US4194201A | 1980-03-18 | |||
GB1595797A | 1981-08-19 | |||
DE3918052C1 | 1990-11-22 |
1. | A vehicle security system comprising a security device, a transmitter for transmitting command signals, the transmitter including code generator means operable to provide a code forming at least part of said transmitted signal, the code being automatically changeable at intervals, and a receiver which receives the transmitted signal and causes operation of the security device, the receiver including code generating means operable to provide a code associated with or related to the transmitted code to facilitate operation of the security device, the code in the receiver being automatically changeable at intervals substantially in synchronism with the timing of code changes in the transmitter, wherein one of the transmitter and receiver provides a tolerance which increases with time lapse to accommodate a gradual desynchronization between the timing of code changes over a period of time. |
2. | A system according to Claim 1 in which operation of the transmitter within range of the receiver will re synchronize the timing of code changes in the transmitter and receiver. |
3. | A system according to claim 1 or claim 2 in which means is provided for producing a resynchronizing signal for resynchronizing the coding in the transmitter and receiver at such time as synchronism has been lost. |
4. | A system according to Claim 3 in which the re synchronizing means is operated by the closing of a battery compartment cover on the transmitter. |
5. | A system according to any preceding Claim in which timer means is provided in each of the transmitter and receiver to provide timing accuracy common to the transmitter and receiver. |
6. | A system according to Claim 5 in which the timer means of the transmitter is a crystal clock or ceramic resonator. |
7. | A system according to Claim 5 or claim 6 in which the timer means of the receiver is a crystal clock or ceramic resonator. |
8. | A system according to any preceding Claim in which the code generator in the transmitter is a rolling code generator or an encryption device. |
9. | A system according to any preceding Claim in which the code generator in the receiver is a rolling code generator or an encryption device. |
10. | A system according to any preceding Claim in which the transmitter is of a hand held type. |
11. | A system according to any of Claims 1 to 10 in which the transmitter is a plugin module. |
12. | A system according to any of Claims 1 to 10 in which the transmitted signal includes a portion which provides code changes within the interval at determined times. |
13. | A system according to Claim 12 in which the portion provides changes in code at regular intervals. |
14. | A vehicle security system comprising a security device, a transmitter for transmitting command signals, the transmitter including code generator means operable to provide a code forming at least part of said transmitted signal, the code being automatically changeable at intervals, and a receiver which receives the transmitted signal and causes operation of the security device, the receiver including code generating means operable to provide a code associated with or related to the transmitted code to facilitate operation of the security device, the code in the receiver being automatically changeable at intervals substantially in synchronism with the timing of code changes in the transmitter, wherein the transmitter and receiver are arranged such that one of them can communicate to the other the length of said intervals to be used. |
15. | A system according to claim 14 wherein the length of said intervals varies in time. |
16. | A security system according to any foregoing claim wherein the security device comprises a door lock of the vehicle. |
17. | " A security system according to any of claims 1 to 15 wherein the security device comprises an engine immobilization system. |
18. | A vehicle security system constructed and arranged substantially as described herein with reference to Figs.3 to 7 of the accompanying drawings. |
The invention relates to vehicle security systems which
provide for the remote operation of a vehicle security
device.
The remote operation of vehicle door locks and engine
immobilization systems has gained popularity over the last
few years and is becoming available on an increasing number
of vehicles . A typical remote control arrangement for
locking and unlocking a vehicle door takes the form of a hand
held transmitter which operates a receiving device in the
vehicle. More recently, car thieves have been using
electronic devices (known as code grabbing devices) capable
of receiving a signal transmitted from a hand held
transmitter and recording the signal. The recorded signal
can subsequently be used to unlock the vehicle after the user
leaves an area where the vehicle is parked.
A basic lock/unlock system for a vehicle utilizes a single
fixed code 10 as shown in Fig.l which is transmitted both to
lock and unlock the vehicle. It has been found relatively
easy to receive and record such a code for subsequent
unlocking of the vehicle.
in a slightly more secure system shown in Fig.2, the transmitted signal includes a fixed code 11 and portion in the form of a lock/unlock bit or bits 12. However, once the
code 10 has been recorded by a code grabbing device, a thief
can change the lock command bit or bits 12 to an unlock
command and unlock the vehicle.
Accordingly systems have been designed in which the codes
stored in the transmitter and receiver change continually,
the transmitter and receiver being arranged to change at the
same time and in the same way to remain in synchronism. However it is a problem with such systems that the
transmitter and receiver can gradually drift out of
synchronism to such an extent that the transmitted signal is
not accepted by the receiver.
An object of the present invention is to provide a system in
which the gradual loss of synchronism between the stored
codes in the transmitter and receiver does not affect the
operation of the system.
According to the present invention there is provided a
vehicle security system including a security device, a
transmitter for transmitting command signals, the transmitter
including code generator means operable to provide a code
forming at least part of said transmitted signal, the code
being automatically changeable at intervals, and a receiver
which receives the transmitted signal and causes operation of
the security device, the receiver including code generating
means operable to provide a code associated with or related
to the transmitted code to facilitate operation of the
security device, the code in the receiver being automatically
changeable at intervals substantially in synchronism with the
timing of code changes in the transmitter, wherein one of the
transmitter and the receiver provides a tolerance which
increases with time lapse to accommodate a gradual de-
synchronization between the timing of code changes over a
period of time.
Preferably, operation of the transmitter within range of the
receiver will re-synchronize the timing of the code changes
in the transmitter and receiver. It is proposed to use a
clock such as a crystal clock in the transmitter and
preferably also in r.he receiver which would normally remain
in synchronism for several days following the last operation
of the transmitter. The clocks will provide timing accuracy
between the transmitter and receiver. However, the receiver
may be arranged to provide a tolerance which is effectively
zero at synchronism and which increases with time lapse
between transmitter operations. In that way, the
intelligence in the receiver enables it to open up a window
of allowable timing error in the synchronization of code
changes if the receiver has not received a signal from the
transmitter for a number of days or weeks.
If synchronism has been entirely lost, for example, due to
battery failure in the transmitter, means may be provided for
producing a re-synchronizing signal for bringing nhe coding
in the transmitter and receiver back into synchronism. It is
highly desirable that such a re-synchronizing signal is not
transmitted accidentally when, for example, leaving the
vehicle as the re-synchronizing signal could be of use to a
thief with a code grabbing device. To reduce the risk of
accidentally producing a re-synchronizing signal, the re-
synchronizing means may be operated by a battery compartment:
cover on the transmitter.
The code generator for the transmitter may be a roiling code
generator or encryption device and the same preferably
applies to the receiver.
If desired the transmitted signal may include a portion which
provides code changes within the interval at determined
times. Such a portion of the transmitted signal may provide
changes in code at regular intervals.
The present invention also provides a vehicle securrity
system comprising a security device, a transmitter for
transmitting command signals, the transmitter including code
generator means operable to provide a code forming at least
part of said transmitted signal, the code being automatically
changeable at intervals, and a receiver which receives the
transmitted signal and causes operation of the security
device, the receiver including code generating means operable
to provide a code associated with or related to the
transmitted code to facilitate operation of the security
device, the code in the receiver being automatically
changeable at intervals substantially in synchronism with the
timing of code changes in the transmitter, wherein the
transmitter and receiver are arranσed such that one of them
can communicate to the other the length of said intervals to
be used.
The communication of the length of the intervals may, for
example, take place on the first operation of the transmitter
in an initial pairing procedure.
Preferably the length of said intervals varies in time.
The present invention further provides a vehicle security
system including a system for remote operation according to
the invention.
A system for the remote operation of a lock in accordance
with the invention will now be described by way of example '
with reference to the remaining accompanying drawings in
which: -
Fig.3 shows a block diagram arrangement of a transmitter and
receiver in accordance with the invention
Fig.4 shows a transmitter/receiver arrangement for operating
the door of a vehicle in accordance with the present
invention,
Fig.5 shows a modified form of transmitted signal,
Fig.6 shows a time scale illustrating part of the modified
transmitted signal and
Fig.7. shows a signal used to communicate from the transmitter
to the receiver information subsequently used for generating
security codes.
A hand held transmitter 20 comprises a control logic 22
operated either by a lock button 23 or an unlock button 24.
The transmitter includes a crystal clock 25, a rolling code
generator 26 and the control logic and rolling code generator
provide inputs for a transmitter circuit 27.
A receiver 30 comprises a receiver circuit 32, a crystal
clock 33 a rolling code generator 34 and a control logic 35.
The receiver circuit 32, the clock 33, and the rolling code
generator 34 provide inputs for the control logic 35, which
compares the signals received from the receiver circuit 32
and the code generator 34 and provides outputs 36 for
operating vehicle door locks 37 if those signals match each
other.
At intervals e.g. every 10 seconds, the code generated by the
rolling code generator 26 in the transmitter 20 is changed.
Similarly, at the same intervals the code generated by the
rolling code generator 34 of the receiver is changed. The
clocks 25, 33, starting in synchronism, provide timing
accuracy common to the transmitter 20 and receiver 30 for the
transmitter and receiver code change operation. The signal transmitted by the transmitter 20 will incorporate the code
generated at that time and will either match or be otherwise
related to the code generated in the receiver at that time to
permit the control logic 35 to produce the output signals 36.
In the simplest form of the invention the intervals are
regular, and are of a length, e.g. 10 seconds, which is
permanently programmed into the transmitter and receiver.
However, in order to increase the security of the system it
can be made possible for the length of the intervals to be
used to be initially programmed into the transmitter, and to
be communicated to the receiver when they are first used
together as a pair. This allows the intervals to be of any
fixed length. Alternatively the length of each interval can
vary from the previous one in accordance with an algorithm,
the algorithm and a 'seed' first value being held in the
transmitter, and communicated to the receiver when they are
first used together as a pair. In a further alternative the
length of the intervals can cycle through a sequence of
different lengths, the sequence being programmed into the
transmitter and communicated to the receiver in the same way.
The communication from transmitter to receiver can be brought
about by including in the control logic in the transmitter
instructions to send the required information on the first
operation of the transmitter. A signal for achieving this is
shown in Figure 7. The first portion 60 of the signal is a
code which would be recognized by the receiver as an
instruction to pick up the following information and store it
for use in generating codes. The next portion 62 of the
signal includes a random sequence of interval lengths which
are to be cycled through by the transmitter and receiver.
The advantage of pairing up the transmitter and receiver in
this way is that each pair can have different values for the
seed intervals or different algorithms or sequences of
ι n
intervals without the need to coordinate the manufacture and
supply of the transmitters and receivers.
Because of the accuracy of the crystal clocks 25, 33 it is
envisaged that they will remain in synchronism for several
days. Nevertheless, each time the lock button 23 or unlock
button 24 is pressed, the clocks 25, 33 in the transmitter
and receiver will be re-synchronized.
If no signal is received from the transmitter 20 for a long
period of time there is a risk that the clocks 25, 33 will
move out of synchronism. Therefore, circuitry is included in
the control logic 35 of the receiver to enable the receiver
to open up a window of allowable timing error. This would
allow the door locks to be operated even if the codes in the
transmitter and receiver were up to a number of steps out of
synchronism, that number increasing with time from the last
transmitter operation. Therefore, the allowable error in
synchronization will increase with time from the last
lock/unlock signal of the transmitter. With such an
increasing window of allowable timing error, complete loss of
synchronization is unlikely to occur very often. However, if
a battery 40 in the transmitter 20 fails and is removed from
the transmitter, the re-closing of a battery cover 42 after
replacing the battery will cause a re-synchronization signal
to be generated by the control logic 22 and transmitted to
the receiver 30 which will cause complete re-synchronization
of the transmitter and receiver. By using the battery
compartment cover 42 in that way, there is little risk that a
user of the transmitter will accidentally transmit the re-
synchronization signal.
As mentioned above, the rolling codes will change in response
to the operation of the clocks 25, 33. An alteration in
rolling code requires the processing of an algorithm but a
change in code at, say, every 10 seconds can be achieved
within the system. However it is envisaged that an astute
thief could possibly grab the transmitted code and make use
of it in the 10 second period. To reduce the risk of that,
it is proposed that each signal 50 (Fig.5) includes not only
a rolling code 52 (and, if desired, fixed code bits such as
transmitter identification 14, a lock/unlock bit or bits 15
and even a vehicle identification 16) but also a code portion
53 which changes at intervals within the 10 second period P
(Fig.6) . As shown in Fig.6 the portion 50 changes eight
times in the ten second period P on a regular basis (or, if
desired a pseudo random basis e.g., 1, 3, 7, 2, 5 etc. within
interval P) giving a thief with a grabbing device virtually
no time in which to make use of the grabbed signal. This
will apply both to the transmitter 20 and the receiver 30.
Such an arrangement will help when re-synchronizing the
transmitter 20 and the receiver 30 as the point of re-
synchronization will be more accurately identified within the
main code change cycle or period P. Also with such an
arrangement re-synchronization could be achieved by, for
example, pressing one of the transmitter buttons 23, 24 a
number of times in quick succession which would be recognized
by the receiver 30 as a re-synchronizing signal structure.
A further advantage of the present invention is that pressing
of the transmitter buttons will have no effect on the content
of the rolling code transmitted as the code is changed by
operation of the clock 25 and not by the buttons 23, 24.
Therefore accidental operation of the lock/unlock buttons
will not take the transmitter out of synchronism with the
receiver.
Instead of using a rolling code in the transmitter and
receiver, the code to be transmitted can be in the form of an
encryption algorithm which effectively scrambles the content
of the transmitted signal which is then unscrambled in the
receiver. Information on public encryption codes is
available in text books for example Cryptography; A New
Dimension in Computer Data Security by Meyer, C and S. Matys
1982 New York, John Wiley &. Sons, Inc.
The term "security device" used herein embraces a lock,
alarm, vehicle immobilizes, latch release or similar security
device.
Next Patent: CONCENTRIC DRIVING BEARING FOR DRIVING TWO WINDSCREEN WIPER DRIVING RODS