CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application claims priority from US patent application no. 12/953,558 filed on November 24, 2010.

BACKGROUND

(a) Field

[0002] The subject matter disclosed generally relates to testing tools. More specifically, this description relates to interfaces between testers and devices having connectors.

(b) Related Prior Art

[0003] An electrical wiring harness typically comprises a bundle of individual connector wires of varying gauges, impedances and types, all arranged and distributed at. different locations within an installation, such as a transport vehicle. Such wiring harnesses are used to interconnect the various components and subassemblies located within the vehicles.

[0004] The number of possible electrical interconnections within a vehicle grows exponentially with the number of wires and various components and subassemblies located within the vehicles.

[0005] Electrical problems within a harness or an electrical sub-system of an installation (ex: transport vehicle) are incredibly hard to identify and locate, especially for already installed harnesses. Faults can occur from bad interconnections, faulty electrical component (such as computer hardware, resistance, coil, sensor) or a software programming bug. The electrical subsystem is a combination of those elements interconnected together, and any element must perform optimally for proper performance.

[0006] In the prior art, a typical method of testing an installed harness is by using a manual test equipment to ring one, many or all nodes of the harness under test, ringing being a term known in the art for doing a continuity test. . Unfortunately, such a method is inconvenient as it presents numerous drawbacks. Such a method requires that a plurality of operators be deployed at various connection points along the wiring harness, their locations being chosen in accordance with electrical schematics, and the operators communicating and coordinating testing procedures through walkie-talkies. With prior art methods, the operators have to ring cables, one at a time, which requires many operators for complex or multiple connections. It is likely that only specific connections will be tested based on the electrical schematic of the harness under test, leaving a large number of possible connections not being tested.

[0007] Another prior art method of testing a wiring harness involves connecting automated test equipment or components to the installed harness via interface cables and performing the testing. The difficulty that arises with this prior art technique is that of having at the time of the test an interface connection that on one side is connected to the test equipment, and on the other side has a mating connector that will permit to attach directly to the connector of the cable or equipment under test. This mating connector must have characteristics that will match to that of the connector of the cable or equipment under test: connector shell size, model, keyways, opposite sex male or female connectors, contacts size, model, opposite sex male or female, and others characteristics known to a person of the art. Currently, such interface connection must be prepared in advance of the test. The reality is that the user of the test equipment has to order the specific mating connectors, sometimes waiting days and weeks before a supplier can deliver them, and then incorporating them into an interface connection that will connect to the test equipment, first by manually connecting node by node all or part of the mating connector testing points, and secondly by programming the test equipment or mating interface with the characteristics of the mating connector.

[0008] It is known to the prior art that if the cable mate-in interface connection is not readily available at the time of the test, a user may prepare a temporary cable interface using clamps, terminal boards, connector contacts and other tools or devices connected to the test system generic interface connection. The difficulty from using such temporary cable interface is that it is a practice which is prone to errors and omissions and which does not allow for reliable analysis of the data recorded by the test equipment and it does not permit to record it precisely with the specification of the electrical schematics of the harness under test over time.

It is also known in the prior art that the cable mate-in interface must be programmed into a test program to allocate the sequence of the routing of the contact of the specific connector in relation to the connector of the test equipment. This practice requires time and testing to allow for reliable test procedures.

[0009] Thus, existing test equipment cannot be used to their full capacity when cable mating interface are not readily available at the time of the test, which would allow for performing testing on multiple wires at a time and allow for gathering complete and accurate information regarding the wires.

[0010] Electrical problems within various components and subassemblies are generally found using a multi-meter or other test equipment designed specifically for the component or subassembly to test; in any case, mating interfaces may also be required to carry out a full analysis of the nodes of the component or subassembly under test.

[0011] There exists therefore a need for a reliable assembly for interfacing an existing harness/equipment connector to a test module which can be automated and simplified to reduce time, cost efficient, reliable, not prone to human error and that provides adequate documentation for traceability.

SUMMARY

[0012] The subject matter disclosed generally relates to tools for testing wires, wiring harnesses, equipment or any combination of them that have specific electrical connectors to interconnect with them. More specifically, this description relates to interfaces between testers and the specific electrical connectors to which wires, wiring harness, equipment or any combination of them to be tested are hooked up, whether the testers are used for audit of their configuration when they are build or modified, or for their periodic maintenance or specific troubleshooting. For matter of simplicity, reference will only be made to harness/equipment connector whether the subject of the test are wire, wiring harness, equipment, or any combination thereof them in relation to an electrical sub-system.

[0013] According to an embodiment, there is provided a generic mate-in interface for enabling a connection between a test box unit and specific mate-in interfaces, each one of the specific mate-in interfaces having a unique specific mate-in interface ID, the specific mate-in interfaces for connecting to harness/equipment connectors, the generic mate-in interface comprising: a test box connector for connecting to the test box unit, the test box connector having a unique test box connector ID and contacts, a portion of the contacts being reserved for communicating the unique test box connector ID and an other portion of the contacts being reconfigurably assignable; upon connection of the test box connector to the test box unit, the unique test box connector ID is used in determining an assignment of the other portion of the contacts into generic level subsets; upon connection of at least one of the specific mate-in interfaces to the generic mate-in interface, the unique specific mate-in interface ID is used in determining an assignment of the contacts in at least one of the generic level subsets into specific mate-in level subsets.

[0014] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the generic mate-in interface above, wherein a portion of the contacts of the specific mate-in level subsets being reserved for communicating the unique specific mate-in interface ID and an other portion of the contacts of the specific mate-in level subsets being reconfigurably assignable and for use in testing at least one of the harness/equipment connectors.

[0015] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the generic mate-in interface above, wherein the specific mate-in interfaces each comprise an intermediate connector and, wherein the generic mate-in interface further comprises generic connectors which match respectively the intermediate connectors.

[0016] According to an embodiment, the generic mate-in interface above further comprises connection wires between at least some of the contacts of the test box connector and at least some of the contacts of each of the generic connectors.

[0017] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the generic mate-in interface above, wherein one intermediate connector has a contact configuration which is different from a contact configuration of another intermediate connector, and wherein the generic connectors each have a different contact configuration for connecting to a respective one of the intermediate connectors having a matching contact configuration.

[0018] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the generic mate-in interface above, wherein upon connection of the test box connector to the test box unit, the unique test box connector ID is used in consulting a database through the test box unit for the determining of the assignment of the other portion of the contacts into subsets.

[0019] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the generic mate-in interface above, wherein the test box connector further comprises a memory device for storing the unique test box connector ID.

[0020] According to another embodiment, there is provided a universal mate-in interface kit for enabling a connection between a test box unit and harness/equipment connectors, the kit comprising: a selection of at least two specific mate-in interfaces, each specific mate-in interfaces having, at one end, an intermediate connector connected, at an other end, to specific connectors for connecting to harness/equipment connectors, thereby providing a specific level one-to-many mate-in interface; and a generic mate-in interface having, at one end, at least two generic connectors each for connecting to a respective one of the intermediate connectors of the at least two specific mate-in interfaces, the generic mate-in interface having, at an other end, a test box connector for connecting to the test box unit, thereby providing a generic level one-to-many mate-in interface; wherein having two levels of one-to-many mate-in interfaces provides a greater number of specific connectors available for connecting to the harness/equipment connectors than a single level one-to-many mate-in interface.

[0021] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the universal mate-in interface kit above, wherein the test box connector comprises contacts and each of the at least two generic connectors comprise contacts, the kit further comprising connection wires between at least some of the contacts of the test box connector and at least some of the contacts of each of the at least two generic connectors.

[0022] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the universal mate-in interface kit above, wherein one intermediate connector has a contact configuration which is different from a contact configuration of another intermediate connector, and wherein the at least two generic connectors each have a different contact configuration for connecting to a respective one of the intermediate connectors having a matching contact configuration.

[0023] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the universal mate-in interface kit above, wherein the test box connector has a unique test box connector ID and contacts, a portion of the contacts being reserved for communicating the unique test box connector ID and an other portion of the contacts being reconfigurably assignable.

[0024] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the universal mate-in interface kit above, wherein upon connection of the test box connector to the test box unit, the unique test box connector ID is used in determining an assignment of the other portion of the contacts into subsets.

[0025] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the universal mate-in interface kit above, wherein each one of the specific mate-in interfaces has a unique specific mate-in interface ID and upon connection of at least one of the specific mate-in interfaces to the generic mate-in interface, the unique specific mate-in interface ID is used in determining an assignment of the contacts in one of the subsets into further subsets.

[0026] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the universal mate-in interface kit above, wherein the intermediate connector comprise a memory device for storing the unique specific mate-in interface ID.

[0027] According to an embodiment, there is described herein the universal mate-in interface kit above, wherein the test box connector further comprises a memory device for storing the unique test box connector ID.

[0028] According to yet another embodiment, there is provided a software- implemented method of reconfigurably assigning a portion of test contacts of a test box unit which is for testing equipment having a harness/equipment connector for connection to a specific mate-in interface, the method comprising: connecting a generic mate-in interface to the test box unit; connecting the specific mate-in interface to the generic mate-in interface; detecting, through the generic mate-in interface, a unique specific mate-in interface ID of the connected specific mate-in interface; determining, from the detected unique specific mate-in interface ID, an assignment of the portion of test contacts.

[0029] According to an embodiment wherein the assignment of the portion of test contacts is made into a specific mate-in level subset and the generic mate-in interface has a unique test box connector ID, the method further comprises: detecting the unique test box connector ID; and determining, from the detected unique test box connector ID, an assignment of the test contacts into generic level subsets wherein one of the generic level subsets comprises the specific mate-in level subset.

[0030] According to an embodiment, the method further comprises consulting a database through the test box unit for both the determining of the assignment of the portion of the test contacts into a specific mate-in level subset and the determining of the assignment of the test contacts into generic level subsets.

[0031] According to an embodiment, the method further comprises consulting a database through the test box unit for the determining of the assignment of the test contacts.

[0032] It should be noted that the inventive concepts described herein apply equally to electrical or optical applications. That is, all connectors can be electrical or optical connectors. Also all wires can be electrical wires or can also be optical fibers.

[0033] Features and advantages of the subject matter hereof will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description of selected embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying figures. As will be realized, the subject matter disclosed and claimed is capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the scope of the claims. Accordingly, the drawings and the description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive and the full scope of the subject matter is set forth in the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0034] Further features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:

[0035] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a conventional assembly for interfacing an existing harness/equipment connector of an installed wiring harness/equipment to a test module;

[0036] Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of an assembly for interfacing an existing harness connector to a test module, irv accordance with an embodiment;

[0037] Figure 3 is a block diagram of a test unit in accordance with an embodiment; [0038] Figure 4 is a flowchart of a method for detecting the appropriate test contacts in a test unit, when a specific connector is connected to a wiring harness or equipment for testing;

[0039] Figure 5 is an illustration of a data flow within the test unit at each step of the method of Figure 4;

[0040] Fig. 6 is a picture of a prior art specific mate-in interface;

[0041] Fig. 7 is a picture of a generic mate-in interface according to an embodiment; and

[0042] Fig. 8 is a picture of a hybrid mate-in interface according to an embodiment.

[0043] It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0044] The present document describes an assembly for connecting a test unit to a wiring harness or equipment or electrical sub-system to be tested (also referred to herein as a harness/equipment connector), and a method for testing using the assembly. The assembly may comprise a test box unit, a first level (generic level) generic harness connector assembly, and at least one specific second level (specific mate-in level) harness connector assembly. The generic harness connector assembly is for connection to the test box unit on one end, and to the at least one specific harness connectors assembly on the other end. The specific connectors are for testing different existing wiring harnesses or equipment. Each of the generic and specific harness connector assemblies has a specific unique identification (ID). The Information relating to the IDs of the connectors and the contact configuration of each connector is stored in a database of the test unit or test system for identifying the appropriate test contacts that should be used for testing. According to an embodiment, the test box unit is the test unit, but the test system can be controlled by a personal computer. [0045] According to an embodiment, the contacts comprise a pin and socket arrangement while in another embodiment it encompasses optical fiber contacts.

[0046] The ID for each connector may be permanently stored in a memory device on each connector. The ID may also be changeable by updating the information in the memory device. According to another embodiment, the ID may also be on a label on the connector or the ID may be etched on the connector. In this case, the ID must be read by the technician and entered in the interface to the database to obtain the information relative to the connector at issue.

[0047] Co-owned United States Patent Application No. 12/627620 filed on November 30, 2009 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes an assembly for interfacing an existing harness connector of an installed wiring harness/equipment to a test module. Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the assembly described in U.S. Patent Application No. 12/627620. As shown in Figure 1 , the assembly 20 comprises a specific mate-in interface 24 and a test box unit (TBU) 22. The specific mate-in interface 24 includes a TBU connector 26 on one end thereof for connecting to the TBU 22, and a number (n) of specific connectors 28-1 to 28-n for connecting to existing wiring harnesses/equipment that are to be tested (not shown). The TBU 22 connects between the TBU connector 26 of the specific mate-in interface 24 and a central test and management unit (not shown). In a test setting, a plurality of TBUs 22 with a specific mate-in interface 24 would be used to connect to different nodes in a wiring harness/equipment.

[0048] The number (n) of the specific connectors 28 increases with the number of contacts in the TBU 22. As new wiring harnesses/equipment are always being introduced in the market in cars, planes, houses, etc., new harness/equipment-specific mate-in interface 24 are needed which are able to connect to the new harnesses/equipment using new specific connectors 28. As the number of specific connectors 28 increases, the harness/equipment-specific mate-in interface 24 becomes heavy and hard to manage, and the cost thereof increases too. Furthermore, as the harness/equipment-specific mate-in interface 24 becomes full, new ones have to be build to accommodate new specific connectors 28. The management may become complex, often resulting in two specific connectors 28 required for the test being on different harness-specific mate-in interfaces 24.Therefore, there is a need for an assembly which is simple, provides flexibility in the types and quantities of connectors to which it can interface, and at the same time is more economic for interfacing an existing harness to a test module.

[0049] Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of an assembly (or universal mate-in interface kit) for interfacing an existing harness/equipment connector to a test module (aka "a TBU 42"), in accordance with an embodiment. As shown in Figure 2, the assembly 40 comprises a generic mate-in interface 44, and a plurality of specific mate-in interfaces 46-1 to 46-n. The generic mate-in interface 44 comprises a TBU connector 48 for connecting to the TBU 42 and a number (m) of generic connectors 50-1 to 50-m. Each of the specific mate-in interfaces 46 comprises an intermediate connector 52 for connecting to one of the generic connectors 50 at one end, and a plurality of specific connectors 54 for connecting to the existing harness/equipment that is to be tested (not shown).

[0050] In order to appreciate the concepts described herein, Figs. 6, 7 and 8 are provided. Fig. 6 is a picture of a prior art specific mate-in interface. Fig. 7 is a picture of a generic mate-in interface according to an embodiment and Fig. 8 is a picture of a hybrid mate-in interface according to an embodiment. This last embodiment is hybrid in that it has some generic connectors for connecting to intermediate connectors and some specific connectors for connecting to harness/equipment connectors.

[0051] In an embodiment, each generic connector 50 has a specific type e.g. type 1 , type 2, type m etc. and may be only be connected to a corresponding type of intermediate connectors 52. For instance, type 1 generic connector 50-1 may be connected to type 1 intermediate connector 52-1 , but not to type 2 intermediate connector 52-2. [0052] Each specific connector 54-x of specific mate-in interfaces 46-1 to 46-n is for connection to a specific connector of an existing harness/equipment (not shown). The specific connectors 54 do not have to be exclusive to one type of specific mate-in interface 46. In the embodiment shown in Figure 2, specific connectors 54-2 is included in specific mate-in interfaces 46-1 and 46-n, and specific connectors 54-3 is included in specific mate-in interfaces 46-1 and 46-2. In an embodiment, the specific connectors 54 are grouped on the basis of the likelihood of using them together. For instance, if a new helicopter includes new types of wiring harnesses which require connectors of the types 64 to 69 (not shown) and old harnesses which require connectors of the types 12 to 19, it is possible to mix and match connectors from the types 12 to 19 and 64 to 69 and provide these in one or more specific mate-in interfaces 46 and interchanged them at any time for a new configuration. The test system may have an auto- detect function that automatically reconfigures the test parameters.

[0053] In another embodiment, a generic mate-in interface 44 comprises both one or more generic connectors 50 and one or more specific connectors 54, in which case it is called a hybrid mate-in. In such an embodiment the generic mate-in interface 44 can be used for connecting to specific mate-in interfaces 46 through intermediate connectors 52 or used to connect directly to existing harnesses/equipment.

[0054] It is understood that while Fig. 2 only shows one generic mate-in interface 44, generic mate-in interfaces 44 of many can be made to adapt to different intermediate connectors 52 and hence various specific mate-in interfaces 46.

Contact Configuration

[0055] With the multitude of specific connectors 54, and the possibility of including the same type of specific connector 54 in more than one specific mate- in interface 46, a configuration system (not shown) is required which allows the TBU 42 to perform the testing of the same type of harness/equipment connector using different contacts of the TBU 42. In an embodiment, a number of the contacts are dedicated to identifying the type of the generic mate-in interface 44 and the type of the specific mate-in interfaces 46 used for connecting the TBU 42 to the existing harness.

[0056] In some circumstances, a technician will be testing a single specific connector on a wiring harness or equipment. Therefore, only the specific mate-in interface 46 having the specific connector 54 needed to connect to the specific connector on the wiring harness/equipment would be connected to the generic mate-in interface 44. In other circumstances, a technician may need many connectors at different locations on the infrastructure to be tested and he will need flexibility to structure the mate-in in the most efficient contact allocation for the use of his test unit. Therefore, he would use a combination of specific, generic and hybrid mate-ins to accommodate all of the connectors required at the proper locations, and the test system would reconfigure itself automatically by reading the ID as required.

[0057] Using the ID of generic mate-in interface 44, the assignment of the contacts for TBU connector 48 can be determined by looking up its contact assignment in a lookup table in a database. The ID of generic mate-in interface corresponds to the unique test box connector ID which is used in determining an assignment of a portion of the contacts into generic level subsets. Again, it is most probable that not all generic connectors 50 will be connected to a intermediate connector 52 at the same time. Knowing the contact assignment for TBU connector 48, the TBU 42 can scan the contacts assigned for ID purposes to identify which of the specific mate-in interfaces is connected. The unique specific mate-in interface ID is used in determining an assignment of the contacts in at least one of the generic level subsets into specific mate-in level subsets. The technician would then specify what test he wants to perform and the test unit would automatically know which contacts to use on TBU connector 48.

[0058] Again referring to Fig. 2 and using the contact numbers in brackets [ ], an example is given here of a possible contact assignment for a generic mate- in interface 44. In the case of a generic mate-in connector 44 comprising three generic connectors 50-1 , 50-2, and 50-m, and a TBU 42 including 100 contacts, it is possible to assign the contacts as follows:

- Contacts 1 and 2 for identifying the generic mate-in interface 44 and hence the assignment for the rest of the contacts, more specifically the layout of contacts 3-4, 27-28 and 59-60 to determine the specific type of the intermediate connectors 50- 1/52-1 to 50-m/52-m;

- Contacts 3 and 4 for identifying the specific mate-in interface

46-1 ;

- Contacts 5 to 26 for testing using generic connector 50-1 and intermediate connector 52-1. Therefore in the corresponding specific mate-in interface 46-1 the configuration of contacts may be as follows:

o Contacts 5 to 11 may be dedicated to specific connector

54-1 ; o Contacts 12 to 20 may be dedicated to specific connector

54-2; and o Contacts 21 to 26 may be dedicated to specific connector 54-3.

- Contacts 27 and 28 for identifying the specific mate-in interface

46-2;

- Contacts 29 to 58 for testing using generic connector 50-2 and intermediate connector 52-1. Therefore in the corresponding specific mate-in interface 46-2 the configuration of contacts may be as follows: o Contacts 29 to 38 may be dedicated to specific connector

54-4; o Contacts 39 to 44 may be dedicated to specific connector

54-3; and

Contacts 45 to 58 may be dedicated to specific connector 54-5.

- Contacts 59 and 60 for identifying the specific mate-in interface

46-n;

- Contacts 61 to 100 for testing using generic connector 50-m and intermediate connector 52-m. Therefore in the corresponding specific mate-in interface 46-n the configuration of contacts may be as follows: o Contacts 61 to 75 may be dedicated to specific connector

54-6; o Contacts 76 to 91 may be dedicated to specific connector

54-7; and o Contacts 92 to 100 may be dedicated to specific connector 54-2.

[0059] As seen, in the example described above, the same number of contacts is assigned to specific connectors having the same type. For instance, specific connector 54-2 is assigned 8 contacts (12 to 20) in specific mate-in interface 46-1 , and also 8 contacts (92 to 100) in specific mate-in interface 46-n. The same applies specific connector 54-3 in specific mate-in interfaces 46-1 and 46-2.

[0060] It should be noted that the example discussed above is for descriptive purposes only. The design is not limited to the details presented in this example. Several elements may be different than what is discussed in this example including but not limited to:

- The number and/or configuration of contacts in the TBU 42;

- The type and configuration of generic mate-in interface 44; - The number and model of generic connectors 50 in the generic mate-in interface 44;

- The model and configuration of contacts in each of connectors

48, 50, 52, and 54;

- The number of specific mate-in interfaces 46; and

- The number of specific connectors 54 in the specific mate-in interfaces 46.

[0061] Each of the specific connectors has a specific auto-calibration cap (not shown) that serves 3 purposes. The first purpose is to act as a protection against the elements (dust, grease, shock, etc,). The second purpose is to act as a loop circuit to ensure integrity of contacts. The third purpose is to act as a calibration tool for the measurements of resistance, impedance or TDR. This cap includes a small printed circuit board (or other form of medium) that permits a continuity test of all of the contacts of the specific connectors to verify their integrity with their contact layout and ground, as well as a measure of the configuration of the assembly of the mate-in assembly 40 to be considered (for example, removed in the case of resistance) in the measurement of the test subject.

Method of Testing

[0062] Configuration information relating to the number and classification of the contacts in each type of generic mate-in interface 44, and specific mate-in interfaces 46, is stored in a database of the central test and management unit 70 described along with Fig. 3 below in order for the central test and management unit 70 to determine the appropriate contacts for testing. In the example discussed above if the user is testing a wiring harness with specific connector 54- 3 of specific mate-in interface 46-2, the test unit needs to know that testing should be effected on contacts 39 to 44 of the test box connector 48 which are dedicated to specific mate-in interface 46-2. [0063] Figure 3 is a block diagram of a test unit and management unit 70 in accordance with an embodiment. The test unit and management unit 70 includes an input output module (I/O) 72 which is responsible for sending/receiving information with the TBU 42 by means of a wired and/or wireless connection 74, and outputting the test results on a user interface for display to the user either directly on TBU 42 or on an external interface (not shown). The test unit and management unit 70 comprises a database 76 which stores the configuration information of the contacts and the connectors, and a processor for performing the test using the information stored in the database.

[0064] Figure 4 is a flowchart of a method 100 for detecting and assigning the appropriate test contacts in a test unit, prior to starting the testing process. The method described herein can be embodied as a software application residing on TBU 42 or in the central test and management unit 70. Figure 5, is an illustration of a data flow within the test unit and management unit 70 at each step of the method 100.

[0065] At step 110, a mate-in interface is connected to the TBU. After connection of the mate-in interface to the TBU, the ID of the test box connector of the mate-in is detected (step 120) to determine the ID of the mate-in interface connected directly to the TBU 42. With step 120, it is possible to determine if the mate-in interface is a specific mate-in interface 24, or a generic or hybrid mate-in interface 44 that is connected to the TBU.

[0066] Each generic mate-in interface 44 has a specific ID. A list of the IDs along with the configuration information associated with each ID may be stored in the database 76. In the contact assignment exemplified above, step 120 may be performed by reading contacts 1 and 2 to determine the ID of the generic mate-in interface 44. Physically, each of the generic connectors 50-1 to 50-n on the generic mate-in interface 44 may be identified as A, B, C, D, etc. The technician will choose and connect the specific connectors 54 by selecting them in the type available from the intermediate connector 52 on any mate-in available, and note the assignment based on the ID and letter of the mating for test assignment. With step 120, the test system look-up table provides the configuration of the generic mate-in interface 44.

[0067] At step 130, at least one specific mate-in interface is connected to the generic mate-in interface. At step 140, the processor finds out the ID of specific mate-in interfaces 46 connected (if any) to the previously identified generic mate-in interface 44 (by reading contacts 3 and 4, 27 and 28, and 59 and 60 in this exemplary embodiment).

[0068] Assuming that specific mate-in interface 46-2 and that contacts 27 and 28 provide the ID for specific mate-in interface 46-2, the processor then looks up the list of specific connectors 54 associated with a type 2 specific mate- in interface 46-2 at step 140. Assuming that the specific connector 54 which will be used for testing is a type 3, the processor then moves to step 160 to look up the contact configuration in the database 76 to determine the test contacts associated with specific connector 54-3 when this specific connector is provided in a type 2 specific mate-in interface 46, which is connected to a type 2 generic connector 50 of a type A generic mate-in interface 44. Once the test contacts are determined the test unit may begin testing. In an embodiment, all of these steps are performed automatically.

[0069] Finally, a last step (step 170) is to validate the configuration and calibration of the assembly prior to initiating a test sequence.

[0070] With the configuration of the specific connectors 54 in relation to the test unit connector 48 completed and validated, and the automation process noted previously, an automated test program based on the specific connectors 54 used and their configuration as noted in the test system database can now be performed. This procedure eliminates the need for manual programming of test programs. For example, the technician would create and assign the name of the specific connectors 54 used for the test as specified in the wiring diagram of the electrical sub-system under test, and the test and management unit 70 would automatically test all contacts to ground of equipment under test, and then test all contacts of all harness/equipment connectors used against all other contacts of the harness/equipment connectors used for the test, and therefore to be able to create a list of connections for the electrical sub-system, and measure specific electrical characteristics of each node.

[0071] With regard to the size and weight, it should be noted that the length of a specific mate-in interface 46, may be in the order of few centimeters while the generic mate-in interface may be longer (one meter or more) to accommodate many specific connectors at a same location. Using the prior art system, if a technician needs three (3) specific connectors 54 which are on three (3) different specific mate-in interfaces which he has in stock, he will have to bring three specific mate-in interfaces with him to a test job. If each specific mate-in interface has nine (9) possible specific connectors 54, he would be bringing 27 specific connectors 54 to a job requiring only three specific mate-in connectors each having a hundred wire cable of more than a meter. This is very cumbersome. With the generic mate-in interface 44 proposed herein on the other hand, he would bring one or more generic mate-in interface 44 which can adapt to the one, two or three (at most in this example) short specific mate-in interfaces. Therefore, instead of carrying a plurality of heavy conventional specific mate-in interfaces 24 with many specific connectors 28 useless for his test, the technician may select the required specific mate-in interfaces 46 based on the specific connectors needed, and a single or very few corresponding generic mate-in interface 44 before going to testing site.

[0072] With regard to the costs and maintenance, the present embodiments allow the user to buy a reduced number of specific connectors that they need without having to pay for un-necessary connectors. For instance, if a certain user performs testing of a certain type of plane or car, the user has no use for the other connectors provided by default on a specific mate-in interface.

[0073] Furthermore, the cost for repairing/replacing a damaged generic or specific mate-in interface according to the present embodiments is way cheaper than having to replace or repair a conventional specific mate-in interface 24 with many of the specific connectors 28. [0074] While preferred embodiments have been described above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made without departing from this disclosure. Such modifications are considered as possible variants comprised in the scope of the disclosure.