The invention relates to a device for the detection of braid strand failure modes of processed braided wires, according to the pre-amble of claim 1. Furthermore, the invention relates to a method of detecting of braid strand failure modes of processed braided wires, according to the preamble of claim 12.

This application claims the benefit of priority to application CH070456/2021, titled "Segmentierter rotativer Schneidekopf fur rotativ arbeitende Kabelverarbeitungsvorrichtungen und Verfahren zur Entfernung einer Schirmfolie", filed on October 27, 2021, by Schleuniger AG, the content of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

As the quality requirements for braided (electrical or optical) cables, such as coax cables or braided twisted pair cables or braided optical cables, within for instance the automotive and the aviation and space industry become increasingly strict. The slightest damage to the (core) conductor, or the shielding braid, such as scratches or scoring, is considered a risk. For damages of such a kind in connection with the effects of vibrations or corrosion during use of the cable in its application can result in failure. To prevent such failure sources several suggestions have been made in the field of cable processing machines for detecting tool-conductor contact.

As an example, WO2014/147596A1 discloses a device for detecting the contact of a tool with an electrical conductor enclosed by an electrical insulation. The tool, made of an electrically conductive material, is arranged on an electrically conductive tool holder in such a way that a thin electrical insulation separates the tool and the holder. The tool, the tool holder, a coax cable to be processed, and an inductor form a high- quality LC oscillating circuit. An electronic circuit is arranged to excite the LC oscillating circuit, and to determine a characteristic oscillation parameter of the LC circuit. A change in the determined characteristic is indicative of a tool-conductor contact event.

As another example, W02012/015062A1 discloses a device for detecting the contact of a tool with an electrical conductor enclosed by an electrical insulation. The device has a signal analyser circuit for an impedance measurement via the tool, wherein an impedance change is indicative for a tool-conductor contact.

Tool-conductor contact in such cable processing machines, however, cannot be avoided completely, as conductor or shielding braids need to be cut, for instance for crimping of a connector to the end of the cable. Both the cable (core) conductor and the shielding braid need to be connected electrically to the connector for proper functioning of the latter. On the other hand, an electrical contact between the core conductor and the shielding braids shall be avoided.

A further source of cable failure can therefore be found in improper connection between the (core) conductor and/or the shielding braid on the one hand, and the connector on the other hand. As an example of a braided cable, a coax cable typically comprises (i) a core conductor; (ii) an inner insulator coated over the core conductor and typically made from Teflon; (iii) a shielding braid or braiding layer - usually made of electrically conductive copper strands - encapsulating the inner insulator; and (iv) an outer insulator, typically made from plastic material, forming the coax cable outer jacket. Before the connector can be applied to the coax cable, a front-end of the latter is first processed, typically by (a) removing a section of the outer insulator to expose the shielding braid; (b) scoring a cut along a traverse section of the shielding braid defining a front-end part and a back-end part; (c) cutting the braid strands along the cut and removing the cut strands of the shielding braid's front-end part to expose the inner insulator; (d) stripping a front-end part of the inner insulator to expose the core conductor; and (e) bending the shielding braid's back-end part backwards over the outer insulator.

Thus, as a first example leading to an improper connection between connector and braided cable, such as coax cable, a shielding braid strand is not properly cut (for instance due to blunt cutting blades) and may interfere with the core conductor. This may lead to an electrical short-cut once the connector is applied to the braided cable. As another example, one of the shielding braid strands is not properly bend backwards. Again, such a protruding braid strand may lead to an electrical short-cut once the connector is applied. Moreover, as a further example, while a braid strand is properly cut in step (b) above, it may be improperly removed in step (c), and as a consequence may stick to the exposed inner insulator.

The invention intends to detect at least one of the above-mentioned failure modes.

The objective of the invention is solved by the features of the independent claims. Advantageous further developments are disclosed in the figures, the specification of the figures and in the dependent claims.

According to an aspect of the invention, a cable processing station for use in a cable processing machine is provided comprising a test module and a gripper for positioning a braided cable, wherein the test module comprises a sensor, and the test module and the gripper are arranged such that the braided cable is engageable with the sensor. The test module is configured to determine a braid strand failure mode of the processed braided cable by detecting the presence of an improper positioned shielding braid strand through a change event of a signal provided by the sensor.

In the context of the invention, a "processed braided cable" is to be understood as a braided cable on which, prior to being presented to the test module for inspection, at least one of the following two process steps have been performed: (i) scoring a cut along a traverse section of the shielding braid and cutting the braid strands along the cut, and (ii) bending the shielding braid's back-end part backwards.

Advantageously, the change event identifies the presence of a braid strand in a testsegment of a freshly processed cable.

In an embodiment, the engageable arrangement enables a radial relative movement between the sensor and the braided cable towards a cable axis. In yet another embodiment, the engageable arrangement enables a longitudinal relative movement between the sensor and the braided cable along a cable axis. Advantageously, this allows to test the presence of a faulty shielding braid strand over an extended length in a test segment towards the end of a cut and stripped cable, the test segment corresponding to the part of the cable where the inner insulation extends beyond the shielding braid. In an embodiment, the longitudinal relative movement is enabled with a distance between the test electrode and the braided cable between 0.05 and 1.0 mm, preferably between 0.15 and 0.6 mm, more preferably between 0.3 and 0.4 mm. The distance is in particular defined relative to the surface of the cable's inner insulation. Advantageously, this allows for detecting a braid strand failure mode in which a braid strand still connected to the shielding braid protrudes forward over the test-segment towards the end of the coax cable.

In an embodiment, the test module is arranged to determine the braid strand failure mode over a predetermined length along the cable axis. Advantageously, the predetermined length corresponds to the length of the inner insulation extending beyond the cut shielding braid towards the cable end. Alternatively, the predetermined length may include the length the cable's core conductor extends beyond the inner insulation. In an embodiment, the predetermined length ranges from 0,5 mm to 5 mm, preferably form 1 mm to 3 mm.

In an embodiment, the presence of the improper positioned shielding braid strand is detected through a change event of an impedance in an electrical circuit arrangement connected to the sensor. Advantageously, neither the shielding braid nor the core conductor of the cable does not need to be electrically connected to electrical circuit arrangement

In an embodiment, the electrical circuit arrangement comprises a high-Q parallel resonance circuit, and wherein the presence of the improper positioned shielding braid strand is detected through a change event of a characteristic oscillating parameter of the parallel resonant circuit. Advantageously, the detection signal provided by the electrical circuit arrangement is barely influenced by the length of the cable, respectively of a faulty shielding braid strand, allowing a highly accurate quality control for a large variety of cable form factors.

In an embodiment, the characteristic oscillating parameter is a phase, an amplitude, or a frequency of the parallel resonant circuit. Advantageously, this allows designing relatively simple and reliable circuits whose detection method for detecting the presence of a faulty shielding braid strand is robust and quantitative. In an embodiment, the cable processing station further comprises a controller connected to the electrical circuit arrangement, wherein the controller is arranged to providing a control signal based on the occurrence of the change event. Advantageously, the cable processing station is further arranged to disregard a faulty processed braided cable from a process flow through the cable processing machine based on the control signal. The control signal can therefore be used to improve the quality of finalised cable products by selecting and disregarding faulty half-products from the process flow prior to finishing the cable with the application of, for instance a connector.

According to another aspect, the invention provides a method for determining a braid strand failure mode of a braided cable processed in a cable processing machine. Advantageously, the method comprises: (a) positioning the processed braided cable in a first processing station of the cable processing machine; (b) engaging a test module with the processed braided cable, the test module comprising a sensor for providing a sensor signal; (c) determining the presence of an improper positioned shielding braid strand through a change event of a signal provided by the sensor; and (d) identifying the processed braided cable as faulty in the case of a determined change event. In an embodiment, the method further comprises providing a control signal based on the occurrence of a change event, and using the control signal to disregard a faulty processed braised cable from a process flow through the cable processing machine.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides the use of a cutter and/or stripper blade of a cable processing station as a sensor for determining a braid strand failure mode of the processed braided cable by detecting the presence of an improper positioned shielding braid strand through a change event of a signal provided by the sensor. Advantageously, this allows (re-)using existing elements of a cable processing station for an additional task. In this case the test for the presence of faulty shielding braid strands. Further advantages, features and details of the invention will be apparent from the following description, in which embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the drawings.

The list of reference signs as well as the technical content of the patent claims and figures are part of the disclosure. The figures are described coherently and comprehensively. Identical reference signs indicate identical components, reference signs with different indices indicate functionally identical or similar components.

The figures show:

Fig. 1 a cable processing machine comprising a cable processing station according to the invention;

Fig. 2 a first cable processing station according to the invention, and a close-up view of a cutter block comprising a test module according to the invention;

Fig. 3 a second cable processing station for the processing machine;

Fig. 4 different braid strand failure modes: (A) a non-cut braid strand, (B) a protruding braid strand, and (C) a cut braid strand sticking to the inner insulator;

Fig. 5 shows a first and second embodiment of a sensor for use in a cable processing station according to the invention: (A) side view 1st embodiment; (B) side view 2nd embodiment; (C) front view 2nd embodiment;

Fig. 6 an electrical circuit arrangement for use with the sensor for use in a cable processing station according to the invention;

Fig. 7 a method for determining a braid strand failure mode of a braided cable processed in a cable processing machine according to the invention.

Fig. 1 schematically shows an example of a (rotational) cable processing machine 10 according to the invention having a (at least one) first cable processing station 100 and a (at least one) second processing station 200. The first cable processing station is arranged for cable cutting and testing of a coax cable 20. The second cable processing station is arranged for insulation stripping of the inner insulation and outer insulation of the coax cable, as well as for cutting (and bending) the coax cable's shielding braid. The cable processing machine further comprises the usual feeding, straightening, gripping, and swivelling modules for positioning the cable, respectively a cable end, in the cable processing stations.

The cable processing machine 10 is arranged to position a coax cable 20 (entering from the left in the figure as shown) in the first cable processing station 100 and cutting it to length using appropriate cutting tools. Subsequently, the swivelling module 30 swivels the cut coax cable end towards the second cable processing station 200, where - once positioned - a process head 220 is arranged for stripping the outer insulation 21 of a coax cable 20, for cutting and removing the shielding braid 22 over a defined length, and for cutting the dielectric (the inner insulator 23) to length, so that the core conductor 24 protrudes by a predetermined length (See Fig. 4).

The cable processing machine 10 may have multiple second processing stations 200, such as two second processing stations as shown. To support each of the second processing stations 200 associated swivelling modules 30 may be present. Such a configuration allows a cable 20 to be fed into the cable processing machine 10 over a predetermined length using a feeding module (not shown), and after straightening and gripping, to be cut in the first processing station 100. Each of the two cable ends resulting from the cut may subsequently be swivelled using an associated swivelling station 30 to an appropriate second processing station 200 for further processing.

Fig. 2 schematically shows the first cable processing station 100 according to the invention. The first cable processing station 100 may comprise a gripper (not shown) for aligning and fixing the cable, and a cutter module 110 comprising an upper cutter block 111 and a lower cutter block 112 for cutting cable 20 with cutter knives 113. The first processing station comprises a test module 115 for testing the quality of a processing step performed on the cable. Test module 115 may be integrated in cutter module 110. Preferably, test module(s) 115 replace(s) stripper knives classically integrated in cutter block 110. In a first operational step, cutter module 110 with its upper 111 and lower 112 cutter blocks engage for cutting cable 20 using cutter knives 113. During this step, test module 115 preferably is in a retracted position, such that test electrodes 121 of test module 115 are not engaged with cable 20. After the cable has been cut, cutter module 110 disengages, and swivelling module 30 subsequently swivels the cut coax cable end towards second cable processing station 200 for processing by process head 220.

Fig. 3 schematically shows the second cable processing station 200 for the processing machine 10 according to the invention. The second processing station 200 comprises an alignment module 210 for aligning and fixing cable 20, allowing the later to be processed in for instance an insulation stripping and braid cutting module 220. This module comprises a cutting head 215 with knives operated by a sliding shaft 216 for closing and opening the knives in a programmed fashion.

In a manner well known in the art, cable 20 is processed with cutting head 215 by

(a) removing a section of the outer insulation 21 to expose the shielding braid 22;

(b) scoring a cut along a traverse section of the shielding braid 22 defining a frontend part and a back-end part of the shielding braid; (c) cutting the braid strands 221 along the cut and removing the cut strands of the shielding braid's front-end part to expose the inner insulator 23; (d) stripping a front-end part of the inner insulator 23 to expose the core conductor 24; and optionally (e) bending the shielding braid's back-end part backwards over the outer insulator 21.

Testing the quality of a processing step performed on the cable is necessary as processing failures may occur. Due to - for instance - worn cutting or stripping blades or a misalignment of coax cable 20 in the second cable processing station 200, failure modes may occur. In order to check for one of the cable failure modes, the cable processing machine 10 may be arranged to swivel the cable end 20 back to the first cable processing station 100 for testing. For this purpose, the first cable processing station 100 comprises the testing module 115. In case the testing module detects at least one of the cable failure modes, the cable is considered to be faulty due to a stripping or braid cutting error, and is discarded, i.e. not processed further, and may be transported to a faulty cable collector. On the other hand, if no cable failure mode is detected, the coax cable is considered faultless, and the cable may be offered for further processing, for instance crimped with a contact part, in a next processing step. The faultless cable may be collected in a cable tray for good parts, or alternatively may be transported using appropriate feeding means known in the art to the next processing machine / station.

Fig. 4A-C schematical show a number of the cable failure modes. In particular it shows, as an example of a braided cable, a coax cable 20, having a cable axis 25, and comprising an outer insulator 21, a shielding braid 22, an inner insulator 23, and a core conductor 24. Fig. 4A schematically shows a first failure mode, in that a braid strand 221a is not completely cut and still electrically connected to the shielding braid. Fig. 4B schematically shows a second failure mode, in that one of the braid strands 221b is not completely bend backwards over the outer insulator 21, but still protrudes forward towards the end of the coax cable. Fig. 4C schematically shows a third failure mode, in that one of the braid strands 221c, while being cut completely from the shielding braid 22, sticks to the inner insulator 23. While test module 115 according to the invention can in principle detect any of the three cable failure modes mentioned, it is especially suited for detecting failure modes with braid strands 221a and 221b.

Fig. 5 schematically show a side view (A, B) and a front view (C) of embodiments of sensor 120 for use in test module 115 of the cable processing station according to the invention. Fig. 5A shows sensor 120 may comprise a sensor bracket 124 arranged to mount sensor 120 in testing module 115. Preferably, sensor 120 is movably mounted 126, 127 in testing module 115 for allowing sensor 120 to engage with cable 20 for conducting a test protocol, such as a braid strand failure mode test. The moveable mount 126, 127 of test module 115 also allows it to be positioned in a retracted position during the initial cutting of cable 20 by cutter module 110. Thus, sensor 120 and cable 20 may move 126 towards each other in a direction square to cable axis 25, as well as move 127 along each other in a direction along cable axis 25. Sensor 120 further comprises a first test electrode 121. Within sensor 120, electrode 121, is mounted electrically isolated from bracket 124 through appropriate insulation 123. As an example, sensor insulation 123 may be achieved by an eloxide layer on sensor bracket 24 made of aluminium. Each of electrode 121 and bracket 124 has an electrical connector 125 for connecting the electrode, respectively the bracket, to an electric circuit arrangement 130 configured to determine a braid strand failure mode of a processed braided cable 20. In an embodiment, test electrode 121 is shaped to at least partly encompass cable 20 when engaged. For this purpose, the test-end of electrode 121 is shaped to allow surrounding or encircling cable 20 at least partly. In one example, the test end of electrode 121 has a recess sized and shaped to allocate cable 20. In an embodiment the recess has a concave shape, such as a rectangular, a triangular, or preferably a round or (half) circular shape. Preferably, the size of the recess is dimensioned in accordance with the size of inner insulator 23 of cable 20, or dimensioned in accordance with the combined diameter of inner insulator 23 and shielding braid 22. For, it is test-segment 231, i.e. the cable end section previous stripped from shielding braid 22, on which a braid strand failure mode test is to be performed.

In an embodiment, test electrode 121 is exchangeably arranged within sensor 120 for allowing the sensor to be adapted to different sized cables. Alternatively, sensor 120 is exchangeably arranged in test module 115 for allowing the test module to be adapted to different sized cables by removing and assembling sensors with appropriate dimensioned test electrodes. Preferably, sensor 120 is adapted to be assembleable in a cable cutter module 110. In still another embodiment, cutter module 110, comprising test module 115, is exchangeably arranged for adapting cable processing station 100 to different sized cables. Advantageously, this improves the modular design of cable processing machine 10.

Fig. 5B shows another embodiment wherein sensor 120 comprises an upper 120a and a lower 120b sensor part. Each of the upper and lower sensor part may be arranged in accordance with one of the embodiments described in conjunction with Fig. 5A. The upper and lower sensor part may be connected to the same electrical circuit arrangement 130, or may be connected to different electrical circuit arrangements. The upper and lower sensor parts may separately, as well as jointly, engage with cable 20.

Fig. 5C shows in front view (cross-section A-A in Fig. 5B) an embodiment of sensor 120 in different stages of engagement with cable 20. Thus, after having been processed in cable processing station 200, swivelling module 30 brings cable 20 back to cutter module 110, respectively test module 115. In stage (a), cable 20 is positioned between the first 121a and second 121b sensor electrodes of the upper 120a, respectively lower 120b sensor parts, however sensor 120 has not yet been engaged with cable 20. At this stage the cable is being aligned and fixated within processing station 100 such that the cutter knives 113 (when cutter module 110 is completely closed) do not touch the cable's core conductor 24. In stages (b), (c), and (d), sensor 120 has been engaged with cable 20 such that at least part of the circumference of inner insulator 23 of cable 20 is encompassed. Preferably, a test electrode surrounds at least 120° of cable 20, preferably more than 140°, more preferable more than 160°. Moreover, in an engaged position the test electrodes 121a, 121b are brought to within a distance from inner insulator 23 equivalent to the thickness of a braid strand. Typically, depending on the cable type, braid strands have a thickness ranging from 0.05 mm to 0.5 mm. A typical value of the thickness of a braid stand is 0.157 mm, so that at an intersection of the wires the braid has a thickness of 0.314 mm. In (b), sensor 120 does not detect any shield braid strands 221a, 221b, 221c in the test-segment 231 of cable 20 to be tested, i.e. the free standing inner insulator 23. As a result, this cable is identified as faultless. In (c), sensor 120 detects with upper sensor part 120a a failure mode in that a shield braid strands 221a, 221b, 221c is present in the segment of cable 20 to be tested. In (d) sensor 120 detects with both the upper 120a and lower 120b sensor part the presence of a failure mode. In these later two cases, the cable is identified as faulty, and may subsequently be transported to a faulty cable collector.

Fig. 6 shows one embodiment of an electrical circuit arrangement 130 for use with the sensor 120 for use in a cable processing station 100 according to the invention. In this embodiment electrical circuit arrangement 130 forms a high-Q parallel resonant circuit, preferably with a Q-factor greater than 5. The resonant circuit is excited by oscillator 133, via resistance Rv and a parallel configuration of capacitance C4 and inductance L, at or close to its resonance frequency. The oscillator voltage is preferably sinusoidal. Capacitance C4 may for instance be in the form of a coax cable connected to test electrode 121 and sensor bracket 124. These later two elements form capacitance C2. CA an output capacitor of the electronics. The resonance frequency of the resonant circuit may be adjusted with an appropriate choice of the value of capacitance CA. The combination of capacitances C2, C4, and CA form effective capacitance CS of the parallel resonant circuit. The capacitor C6 represents the capacitance of cable 20 with respect to earth. Oscillator or frequency generator 133 may be controlled by a controller (not shown) so that the parallel resonant circuit oscillates at or near to (for instance just below) its resonant frequency when the sensor is disengaged from cable 20.

Upon engagement of sensor 120 with cable 20 within test-segment 231, capacitance C6 detunes the parallel resonant circuit due to the capacitance increase. The detuning may already occur with test electrode 121 still at a distance, for instance 0.1 mm, from cable 20, and in particular from a faulty braid strand 122a, 122b, 122c within test-segment 231. The detuning will be most pronounced when test electrode 121 contacts a faulty braid strand 122a, 122b, 122c.

Thus, engaging sensor 120 with cable 20 switches C6 in parallel to the effective capacitance CS of the parallel resonant circuit, increasing the total capacitance and detuning the LC circuit. As a consequence, the newly resulting resonant frequency is lower than the original resonant frequency. With the frequency of oscillator 133 unchanged, a phase shift arises between frequency generator signal U1 and resonant circuit signal U2. Moreover, new amplitude value of U2 is established due to the detuning. The phase shift may be converted by phase detector 137 to an analogue voltage U4. Alternatively, phase detector 137 may generate a digital logic signal S4, which for instance may indicate whether or not frequency generator signal U1 is operating faster than resonant circuit signal U2. U4, respectively S4 may be used as an input for the controller.

In an alternative embodiment, rather than detecting a phase shift, the parallel resonant circuit may be arranged to detect an amplitude change or a frequency change. Thus, electrical circuit arrangement 130 is arranged to detect a change event of an impedance in the circuit upon engagement of sensor 120 with cable 120, and in particular upon engagement of sensor 120 with a faulty shield braid strand within test segment 231. In an embodiment, the change event of the impedance corresponds with a change event of a characteristic oscillating parameter of a parallel resonant circuit, such as a phase, an amplitude, or a frequency of the parallel resonant circuit.

Alternative to the parallel resonant circuit described above, electrical circuit arrangement 130 may comprise a signal analyser circuit for an impedance measurement via sensor 120. As an example, an electrical signal, for instance a rectangular wave signal generated in an electrical signal generation circuit is transmitted via a current-limiting circuit to test electrode 121 of sensor 120. The electrical signal provided to test electrode 121 is led through a filter circuit for removing noise, and transmitted to a signal analyser circuit via a signal amplifier circuit for monitoring any minute change as sensor 120 engages cable 20 to be tested. A logic circuit determines whether a faulty shielding braid strand 122a, 122b, 122c is present with test segment 123 on the basis of the signal received by the signal analyser circuit, and a pre-set determination time obtained from a control circuit. The electrical signal may be sampled, for instance on the microsecond time scale. In case a faulty shielding braid strand is present within test segment 123, a pulse output is generated, and is detected by the signal analyser as a change in impedance due to the addition of the impedance caused by the faulty shield braid strand.

Fig. 7 schematically shows a method for determining a braid strand failure mode of a processed braided cable 20 in a cable processing station 100 according to the invention. It is to be understood that prior to being presented to test module 115 for inspection in the cable processing station, at least one of the following two process steps have been performed on braided cable 20: (i) scoring a cut along a traverse section of the shielding braid 22 and cutting the braid strands 221 along the cut, and (ii) bending the shielding braid's 221 back-end part backwards over the outer insulator 21. For instance, in one embodiment, cable 20 is cut in first processing station 100, comprising cable cutting assembly and test module 115. After being cut, cable 20 is swivelled to second processing station 200, where the freshly cut frontend is processed in an insulation stripping and braid cutting module 220. There, at least one of the above-mentioned process steps (i) and (ii) is performed. Afterwards, cable 20 is being presented to testing module 115 for performing a braid strand failure mode test.

In step (a) of the test method, processed braided cable 20 is being positioned and aligned in the cable processing station 100.

In step (b) of the method, test module 115 and processed braided cable 20 engage each other. In a first embodiment, the braided cable is fixedly positioned in a gripper of the cable processing station 100 and test module 115, respectively sensor 120, is moved towards the cable. In a second embodiment, the test module 115 is fixedly positioned in the cable processing station 100, while a gripper is controlled to move the cable towards sensor 120. In a third embodiment, both the gripper and the test module 115, respectively the sensor 120, may be controlled to enable the engagement.

In step (c) of the method, cable 20 is tested within test-segment 231 of the freshly cut and stripped cable end for the presence of shield braid strands 221a, 221b, 221c. The presence of a shield braid strand 221a, 221b, 221c within test-segment 231 is detected, with the aid of sensor 120 connected to an electrical circuit arrangement 130. Preferably, the presence of the improper positioned shield braid strand 221a, 221b, 221c within test-segment 231 is detected through a change event of an impedance in in an electrical circuit arrangement 130 connected to sensor 120.

In step (d) of the method, cable 20 is identified as faulty in case of a determined change event, whereas it is identified as flawless in case of the absence of a change event.

In optional step (e) of the method, electrical circuit arrangement 130 provides a control signal based on the occurrence of the short-circuit event. Preferably, the control signal is used to disregard a faulty processed braided cable from the process flow through the cable processing machine, and may be collected in a faulty cable collector. More preferably, the control signal is used to forward a faultless cable to a further processing station in the cable processing machine, or to collect a faultless cable in a cable tray for good parts, or alternatively may be transported using appropriate feeding means known in the art to the next processing machine / station.

As will be clear to the person skilled in the art, the embodiments and methods shown in the figures or described herein may, as part of the invention, also be combined and interchanged.

For instance, in an alternative embodiment, test module 115 may be positioned in the second cable processing station 200, rather than the first processing station 100.

As another example, rather than sensor 120 being movably mounted, cable 20 may be movably arranged in processing station 100, 200 to allow engagement with sensor 120. Thus cable 20 may be translated both in a direction at right angles to the cable axis 25, as well as in a direction along the able axis. Advantageously, a movement of the sensor along the axis cable towards the cable end may cause a faulty braid strand, for instance a cut braid strands 221c sticking to inner insulator 23, to be removed. Hence, such a method step allows improving the number of faultless cables produced by cabled processing machine 10. Alternatively, cable 20 may be retracted while test module 115 or sensor 120 is held in position, in order to induce the relative movement of the sensor along the axis cable towards the cable end. Alternatively, both cable 20 and test module 115 may be moved simultaneously.

In yet another example, the above described (relative) movement of cable 20 and test module 115 may be repeated several times for removing a faulty braid strand. During the repeated process, cable 20 and test module may be disengaged prior to (and while) inducing a relative motion away from the cable end (backward motion), and engage again prior to a forward motion (Z.e. towards the cable end).

In yet another example, sensor electrodes 121, 121a, 121b may be spring loaded. Advantageously, this allows compensation of any unevenness, or non-circular symmetry, of the shielding braid 22 and/or inner insulator 23. Moreover, it may allow compensation for a slightly "downwardly" bend cable end, even when cable 20 is gripped and fixated inside the first processing station 100. In an alternative embodiment, the engagement of cable 20 and sensor 120 may be performed in a two-step process in which in a first step the sensor electrodes 121a, 121b clamp the cable end at the naked inner insulator 23. Afterwards, in a second step, sensor 120 and cable 20 are moved relative to each other along the cable axis 25 for detecting a braid strand failure mode 221a, 221b, 221c. List of reference signs

10 Cable processing machine

20 Braided cable / coax cable

21 Outer insulator / insulation

22 Shielding braid

221a Failure Mode: Non-cut braid strand

221b Failure Mode: Protruding braid strand

221c Failure Mode: Cut braid strand

23 Inner insulator / insulation

231 Test segment of cable

24 Core conductor

25 Cable axis

30 Swivelling module

100 First cable processing station

110 Cutter module

111 Upper cutter block

112 Lower cutter block

113 Cutter knife

115 Test module

120 Sensor

120a Upper sensor part

120b Lower sensor part

121 Sensor electrode

121a First sensor electrode

121b Second sensor electrode

123 Sensor Insulation

124 Sensor bracket 125 Electrical connector

126 Radial movement

127 Longitudinal movement

130 Electrical circuit arrangement

133 Oscillator /Frequency generator

137 Phase detector

C2 Sensor capacitance

C4 Conductor capacitance

C6 Capacitance of cable 20 with respect to earth

CA Output capacitor

CS Effective capacitance

L Inductance

Rv Series resistor

U1 Oscillator / Frequency generator signal

U2 Resonant circuit signal

U4 Analogue signal proportional to phase shift

S4 Detection signal (e.g. phase position)

S5 Control signal for oscillator

200 Second cable processing station

210 Alignment module

215 Cutting head

216 Sliding shaft

220 Process head / Insulation stripping and braid cutting module