FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a method and apparatus for flexographic color printing and more particularly to a method and associated apparatus for implementing a method of wet trap printing also known as"wet trapping"in flexographic printing, using energy curable flexographic liquid inks.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Multicolor impressions printing processes typically require the sequential printing of a plurality of superposed single color ink layers. When high quality image reproduction is desired, it is important to avoid a previously applied ink layer transferring back to a subsequent impression unit. Such transfer typically results in cross-contamination of colors and consequent undesirable color rendition.

The art has addressed this problem in a number of different ways. The simplest way to prevent undesirable color contamination is to dry each applied ink layer prior to the application of a superposed next ink layer. While this method is effective it suffers a major disadvantage of requiring complete drying of the ink after applying each ink layer.

Drying takes time and energy to accomplish, and as a result, productivity is reduced and production costs increase.

In an effort to speed up the printing process, wet trapping was developed. Under the present invention, "wet trapping"is defined as a process whereby the ink layer deposited or applied at each inking station is not dried before the next ink layer is deposited thereover to produce a coloristic or visual effect. To implement wet trapping, it

is important that the tack characteristics of the superposed ink layers be manipulated so that they are different.

Wet trapping is not a serious problem in offset printing, because the viscosity of the inks used in offset printing ranges from 20,000 to 100,000 cps. Such high viscosity inks inherently exhibit a wide range of tack characteristics that can be used to effect wet trapping without the need to dry the ink layers between the inking stations.

In recent years, a form of printing that permits printing on various kinds of substrates, that vary from cardboard to polyethylene to metal, has become widely accepted. This printing method is known as flexography or flexographic printing.

Flexography employs a resilient printing plate having raised portions, which are coated with an ink and pressed against a substrate to transfer the ink to the substrate. In flexography, ink is transferred from a reservoir to the printing plate's raised surface through an intermediate transfer roll known in the art as an anilox roll. The anilox roll surface is covered by a plurality of tiny ink wells that fill with ink from the reservoir and transfer it to the flexographic printing plate. Obviously high quality printing requires that the flexographic printing plate surface be inked uniformly and consistently. This in turn requires that the anilox roll cells be small and that all of the anilox cells be filled each time with ink from the reservoir to substantially the same level.

Such requirement poses limitations on the fluidity or viscosity of the ink. A viscous ink will not be picked up as uniformly or consistently by the anilox roll and the flexographic printing plate surface will not be inked uniformly. The result has been that inks suitable for flexographic printing applications are liquid inks typically having viscosities under 2,000 cps, preferably less than 400 cps.

Current regulations regarding solvent emissions have resulted in the development of printing inks suitable for use in flexography that are energy curable. Such inks contain no solvent, and are fixed to the substrate not by drying but by curing via actinic radiation, such as ultraviolet light or electron beam. The tack of a flexographic liquid ink is very low and cannot be adequately measured with conventional instruments. Their viscosities typically range from about 30 to 50 cps. While such viscosity range results in superior flexographic printing, energy curable flexographic liquid inks for flexographic applications exhibit very low tack, cannot be tack rated, and need to be cured between inking stations to prevent back transfer and mixing from the printed ink on the substrate to the inking rolls of subsequent stations. Such inter-station curing is expensive, as it requires substantial equipment modification. Such curing is also undesirable from a manufacturing stand point, as it increases the time required between the deposition of a subsequent ink layer in order to allow for curing of the previously deposited ink layer, thereby slowing down the printing process.

Wet trapping has also been proposed in non energy curable flexographic printing based on the recognition that when depositing superposed multiple layers of ink, cross- contamination will not occur if each layer is deposited over a layer having a higher viscosity than the newly deposited layer. The highest viscosity layer traps, so to speak, the second layer without transferring the underlying layer back to the impression unit.

However, with the range of viscosities available for flexographic printing inks, it is impractical to implement wet trapping using constantly decreasing ink viscosities for each layer that are sufficiently different from each previously applied layer viscosity in order to effect wet trapping, particularly as the number of applied layers increases. In essence, one runs out of available ink viscosities to implement wet trapping.

United States Patent 5,690, 028 attempts to solve the above mentioned problem of limited available ink viscosity range by a method of wet trapping in a multicolor printing application using energy curable inks, particularly suited for a Central Impression Flexographic Press. According to the patent, the energy curable inks are heated before being applied to a substrate, and are applied to the substrate at a temperature that is higher than the previously applied ink layer. Because the temperature of the previously applied ink layer on the substrate is cooler than the heated ink to be applied or super imposed, the viscosity of the previously applied ink layer is lower than the viscosity of the applied ink.

This viscosity differential causes the lower viscosity ink to unilaterally transfer onto the higher viscosity ink and prevents both back trapping and ink blending.

While this method of wet trapping achieves the desired result, it requires substantial modification to any existing printing press equipment to provide for heating units in each inking station before the ink is applied to the substrate, moreover, as the number of stations increases, so must the ink temperature in the successive inking stations. Thus, it may be necessary to apply cooling to the substrate, or the printing speed may have to be reduced, in order to prevent having to increase the ink temperature to levels that may adversely affect its properties.

There is, therefore, still a need for a method to implement wet trapping when using energy curable flexographic liquid inks where little or no modification of existing printing press equipment is required, yet still permitting high speed throughput.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, there is provided a method for the flexographic printing of multiple superposed ink layers on a substrate using at least one energy curable

flexographic liquid ink and printing a second similar ink of a different color thereover without prior curing of the first printed energy curable ink.

The method for applying the multiple ink layers on a substrate to effectuate wet trapping comprises, in the following order: (a) applying onto a substrate at least one ink layer of an energy curable liquid ink having a viscosity of less than about 4000 cps and comprised of a non reactive diluent, said applied energy curable ink layer having a first viscosity; (b) evaporating at least a portion of the non-reactive diluent in the applied ink layer, thereby increasing the viscosity of the applied energy curable ink layer; (c) applying onto said substrate and said applied energy curable ink layer of increased viscosity, at least one layer of a non-energy curable liquid ink having a viscosity lower than the increased viscosity of said previously applied energy curable ink layer; and (d) fixing both ink layers onto said substrate.

According to this invention, there is provided a method for printing multiple ink layers on a substrate, comprising selecting a first and a second energy curable liquid flexographic inks, each containing a non-reactive diluent in an amount of less than 50 wt.

%, based on the weight of the diluent, each ink having a viscosity under 4,000 cps and preferably between about 30 and 70 cps, and sequentially applying the first and second energy curable liquid flexographic inks on a substrate to form first and second ink layers having superposed portions, wherein the second ink is applied after at least a portion of the non-reactive diluent in said first ink layer has been evaporated.

There is also provided according to this invention apparatus for sequentially applying multiple superposed ink layers on a substrate, at least one of the ink layers being an energy curable liquid ink containing a nonreactive diluent and having a viscosity under 4000 cps, in a way to practice wet trapping. The apparatus comprises : (a) a substrate path and a substrate drive for driving said substrate along said predetermined path; (b) a plurality of ink applying stations spaced along said predetermined path, said ink applying stations adapted to apply an ink comprised of a non- reactive diluent and having a viscosity less than 4000 cps onto said substrate; and (c) a control system for controlling said substrate transport along said path so that a first liquid ink layer, applied onto said substrate at one of said inking stations, increases in viscosity through evaporation of at least some of said diluent from said first ink layer to a viscosity higher than a viscosity of a second ink applied over said first ink layer in a subsequent inking station spaced from said first inking station, to a viscosity sufficient to wet-trap said second liquid ink as said substrate is transported between said inking stations.

According to the present invention the steps of sequentially printing ink layers may be repeated a number of times, using multiple sequential printings of energy curable inks, each time allowing at least a portion of the diluent in the printed layer to evaporate and thereby have its viscosity increase, before printing the next layer of ink.

Further, and in accordance with the present invention, the invention is also a process of increasing the viscosity of an ink layer on the substrate by allowing at least a

portion of the diluent in the printed energy curable ink layer to evaporate which process may be accelerated by the application of heat or by forcing a stream of air over the inked surface between subsequent ink applications.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 shows a flexographic printing press for wet trapping constructed according to the present invention. Figure 2 shows an alternate embodiment of an apparatus for wet trapping in accordance with this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The invention will next be described, where appropriate, with reference to the figures. Such figures are provided to facilitate an understanding of the invention, therefore, only such elements as are required for this understanding are illustrated and any equipment depicted is not drawn to scale nor is it intended to represent actual commercially used equipment.

The present invention relates to a novel process for wet trap printing of energy curable liquid flexographic inks in a flexographic printing environment, wherein the inks are preferably formulated, energy curable, aqueous, single phase, compositions, such as those of the type disclosed in co-pending Provisional U. S. Patent Application Serial Number 60/380081, filed May 6,2002, entitled"Waterbased Single Phase Energy Curable Compositions", the full content of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. Other, non-aqueous based compositions, having similar characteristics may also be used. In contrast to other flexographic inks, the aqueous energy curable flexographic liquid inks of the above-mentioned co-pending application tend to exhibit

minimal tack change as they dry, however, they nonetheless exhibit viscosity changes sufficient to effectuate wet trapping on a flexographic press, as discussed below.

These energy curable, single phase, flexographic liquid inks are either single-, ternary-or quaternary-compositions that contain a resin neutralizable by acid or base, and a non-reactive diluent, such as an organic solvent, water or a combination thereof.

The non-reactive diluent is used to control the viscosity of these inks.

The single phase compositions suitable for printing under this invention are energy curable. The term"energy curable composition", as used herein, is intended to mean compositions that are polymerizable or crosslinkable by the action of an energy source of actinic radiation, such as ultraviolet radiation (UV), radiation (EB), and the like.

As used herein"ultraviolet radiation"is intended to encompass radiation having a wavelength range from about 190 nm to about 500 nm, and preferably from about 200 nm to 420 nm. Actinic radiation of this type may be obtained from a variety of sources, e. g., mercury arc lamps, xenon arc lamps, fluorescent lamps, monochromatic laser sources, and the like. Electron beam radiation as used herein also is intended to encompass high- energy electrons, such as from electric discharge devices or electron beam devices typically operating at 70-200kV and emitting a radiation in a typical range of 1-4 mRad.

In one embodiment of ink compositions suitable for use in the present invention, the non-reactive diluent is water. However compositions containing other non-reactive diluents, such as alcohol and mixtures of water and alcohol may be used, or any other suitable diluent offering volatility sufficient to permit enough of the diluent to evaporate within a reasonable time between the application of consecutive ink layers so that the viscosity of each applied ink layer will increase sufficiently compared with the viscosity

of the newly applied ink layer so as to implement wet trapping of the newly printed layer thereby producing a coloristic or visual effect.

In practical terms, a water based energy curable ink composition is highly desirable, as its use complies with health and anti-pollution regulations that limit the amount of solvents permitted to escape in the environment. Therefore the present invention will be described using aqueous ink compositions, inasmuch as such compositions are the most likely to be used. Such limitation in the description of the invention is, however, not to be construed as limiting ; and radiant energy curable inks of similar ink viscosity profiles and comparable non-reactive diluent evaporation characteristics are considered within the scope of the present invention.

The method provided by the present invention for applying multiple, at least partly superposed, ink layers on a substrate, relies on the rapid and relatively significant change in the viscosity of an energy curable liquid flexographic ink (which may be a water-based ink containing a diluent, such as water), after it has been deposited as a layer onto a substrate. The substrate suitable for use in the present invention may contain previously applied layers. As for the ink layers applied under the present invention, each ink layer is deposited onto the substrate in an inking station. There are as many inking stations as there are individual inks used in printing the color image. At each inking station, the ink is transferred from an ink reservoir through an anilox roll to a flexographic printing plate, such as a Cyrel polymer printing plate produced by E. I. Dupont de Nemours and Company, Inc. The ink is then transferred from the printing plate onto a receiving substrate, such as for example a non-absorbent web or sheet of polyethylene film, or any other absorbent or non-absorbent substrate, which may be printed with a flexographic printing plate.

The initial viscosity of a flexographic liquid ink deposited onto the substrate is typically under 4000 cps, and preferably under 1200 cps, álthough ink viscosities of 2,000 cps may be used, depending on the particular printing application. As discussed earlier, low viscosity is preferred in order to achieve good ink transfer from the ink reservoir through the anilox roll to the printing plate surface.

Once the ink has been deposited onto the substrate, the non-reactive diluent begins to evaporate. The evaporation rate is a function of the non-reactive diluent selected, along with the ambient conditions of temperature, barometric pressure, and relative humidity. Evaporation is also assisted by therapid increase in surface area of the applied ink or coating layer and the use of increased air circulation over the ink layer applied to the substrate, which may include air which is blown over the substrate, and by the addition of heat, supplied either by heating the forced air stream blown over the substrate, or from infrared lamps and the like. Based on the type of printing ink selected, the removal of even a small amount of the non-reactive diluent will result in significant and suitable change in the ink viscosity of the deposited ink layer.

By the time the ink layer arrives at the next inking station, where another ink layer, typically of a different color, is deposited on the substrate and over at least portions, if not all, of the previously deposited ink layer, the ink viscosity of the deposited ink layer will have increased sufficiently to wet-trap that ink layer without back trapping the newly deposited ink, having a viscosity typically in the same range as that of the earlier deposited ink at the time of its deposition. Therefore, by selecting energy curable inks containing small amounts of a viscosity controlling non-reactive diluent, such as water, wet trapping of multiple ink layers can be implemented without the need to change ink

viscosity by, for example, heating the ink, chilling the substrate containing the ink layer, between inking stations, or curing the ink between inking stations.

According to the present invention, once all ink layers have been applied, a single curing step with a proper energy curing source is sufficient to fix all applied layers.

The present wet trapping process is not limited to the use of energy curable flexographic liquid inks, but may encompass the use of at least one ink layer of non- energy curable ink. For example, a layer of an energy curable flexographic liquid ink of the type disclosed above may be applied and the application of this layer to the substrate may be followed by the application of a layer of a non-energy curable liquid flexographic ink, this second layer having a viscosity that is less than the increased viscosity (through the evaporation of all or part of the diluent) of the first layer. Again, because of the viscosity differential, wet trapping may be implemented. If this second layer is the uppermost or last printed layer, all ink layers may be then be cured and dried via conventional drying means and methods, to simultaneously fix the deposited ink layers onto the substrate.

In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a number of energy curable and traditional ink layers may be inked in superposed fashion and still employ the wet- trapping technique of this invention. For example, as stated above, a first energy curable ink, having a first viscosity, may be applied as a first layer. A traditional ink layer, having a lower viscosity than the increased viscosity of the first ink layer, may then be applied over the increased viscosity layer at a subsequent inking station to form a second layer. A third layer may next be applied over the second layer using a second energy curable ink having a lower viscosity than the viscosity of the second layer. The viscosity of this layer will again increase as the non-reactive diluent evaporates before reaching the

next inking station. At the fourth inking station, a fourth layer may be applied over the third layer using yet another energy curable ink having a lower viscosity than the increased viscosity of the third layer. Drying of the conventional ink layer may be implemented if the conventional ink layer viscosity is so low that energy curable ink with lower viscosity is not available. Thus, it is possible to implement the process of the present invention in what may be referred to as a"hybrid"process, whereby only a certain number of ink layers are implemented by viscosity gradient wet-trapping according to this invention, and wherein certain other ink layers are dried or cured prior to the application of additional ink layers, using combinations of inks. Such hybrid process, however, while possible and within the scope of the present invention, is less efficient than a process wherein all applied layers are energy curable flexographic liquid ink layers.

Figure 1 shows an apparatus of the present invention. The apparatus 10 shown in this figure is similar to a central impression press which is a press often used by the flexographic printing industry to print multiple images comprising a plurality of ink layers having at least some superposed inked areas. Because the technology for building such apparatus is well known in the art, only those elements that have been incorporated in this apparatus to transform a standard central impression press into a flexographic printing press capable of carrying out wet trapping when applying superposed liquid ink layers are discussed.

As shown in Figure 1 the apparatus 10 includes a substrate supporting cylindrical drum 12 having an outer peripheral surface 14. Around the drum 12 peripheral surface 14, there are positioned a number of inking stations 18 spaced along the surface. While three such stations are illustrated, such number is for illustration purpose only and fewer

or more stations may be placed around the drum without detracting from the scope of this invention.

Each of the inking stations comprises an ink reservoir 20, an inking roll 22 and a printing plate holding roll 24. The inking roll is, preferably, an anilox roll and is placed so as to receive ink from the ink reservoir and transfer it to a printing plate mounted on the printing roll. The printing roll is positioned with respect to the drum 12 so that it applies an ink layer onto a web 16 carried by the drum 12 at a point of contact"A","B", and"C"respectively for each station illustrated. Inking stations such as described here are well known in the art and commonly used in central impression presses, therefore no further description is given herein except to state that such inking station must be capable of handling liquid inks having viscosities well below 4,000 cps.

An energy curing station 38 is preferably also placed along the web 16 path around the drum 12 at a position that is after the last inking station. Such curing stations are also well known in the art and also require no further description except to state that in selecting a curing station for use in accordance with the present invention, such station must have an energy output of the type required to cure the liquid inks used in practicing this invention.

The substrate supporting drum 12 is rotationally driven at a speed of rotations rpms, using a drive that may comprise belt 36 and pulleys 32 and 34 driven by a motor 30. Such drive permits changing the speed of rotation ca, for example, by changing the relative size of the pulleys 32 and 34, or by changing the rotational speed of pulley 32 driven by motor 30. The drive shown is for illustration rather than it being limiting, and other drives known in the art for altering the speed of rotation of drum 12 may be used

within the scope of this invention, including direct coupling of a variable speed motor to the drum, or connection of a driving motor to the drum through a gear box, andso on.

In accordance with the present invention, there is further provided to this apparatus a control system generally indicated by a central control 28, local controls 26, and a user interface 40. This control system is used to control the apparatus so that a first liquid ink layer applied onto the web 16 at the first inking station 18 at point"A"will have its viscosity increase through evaporation of at least some of the non-reactive diluent to a viscosity higher than the viscosity of a second ink to be applied over it at the subsequent inking station 18'at point"B"to a viscosity that is sufficient to wet trap the second liquid ink.

The control system may achieve this result in any one of a plurality of ways. In the simplest manner, inking stations 18,18'and 18"are all fixed in position around drum 12 at certain angular spacing, ûl, 02 etc. The control system in this case adjusts the speed of rotation o of the drum as a function of the time required for the desired viscosity change through evaporation in a layer coated at point"A", so that the layer coated at point"A"arrives at point"B"with a viscosity sufficiently high to wet trap the ink layer applied thereover at point"B".

The required time is a function of the desired viscosity change, which is a function of : the type of liquid ink used in the two inking stations, the thickness of the layer coated at the first inking station, and the ambient environmental conditions, which affect evaporation. It can be determined experimentally for different inks and applied ink layer thickness. Preferably this data is derived prior to beginning a printing job and is available to the operator of the apparatus.

The data may be stored in an electronic memory (included in block 28), which is part of the control system and is indexed to the type of ink used in each inking station and the thickness of the ink layer to be applied at each inking station. Thus, an operator can readily access rotational speed information simply by inputting to the control system, through an interface 40, the type of ink and ink layer thickness to be applied at inking stations 18 and 18'.

When more than two inking stations are used, as is most likely the case in actual commercial printing, such control system may be programmed to compute an average speed for the drum 12 which will transport the web between stations 18, 18' 18"etc. at the required time for the ink layers to achieve the requisite evaporation necessary to produce the proper viscosity increase to effect wet trapping at all inking stations.

The control system may also comprise moveable inking stations, which can be moved along the web transport path on the drum surface, thereby changing the angular spacing Ot, 2 etc. between stations. Such change may be done manually or may be provided automatically using individual position drives 26 on each inking station as part of the control system.

The control system may also include both a variable speed drive and a variable position drive, so that both the spacing of the inking stations and the speed of rotation eJ of the drum can be adjustable to satisfy the requirement that the viscosity of each deposited ink layer increases sufficiently through evaporation to a point where such ink layer wet-traps a subsequent ink layer deposited thereover.

The control system in such arrangement, may contain viscosity change data stored in a memory. This data is indexed in a manner that provides spacing and speed of rotation information to an operator following entry of the ink type and the intended

thickness of the applied layer for a printing job. This may be readily achieved using a programmed Central Processing Unit or"CPU", an input device such as a keyboard, a memory and a display device, as is well known in the art. In an alternative control system, the CPU may control directly both the rotational speed of the drum and the positioning mechanism of the ink stations using, for example, the positioning drives 26 associated with the inking stations, based on the input data regarding the inks and layer thickness to be used.

Optionally, elements 42 that assist the evaporation of the non-reactive diluent may be placed between inking stations. Such elements may be heating elements or air blowing elements or combinations thereof, and do not include the usual solvent recovery equipment typical of the prior art inter-stage dryers. Contrary to the prior art's required use of inter-station drying elements, these elements are contemplated for optional use with this invention and may be employed to facilitate an accelerated evaporation process so as to increase the applied ink layer viscosity as the layer is transported between inking stations. Since such elements, when present, require space, consume energy and tend to heat the drum surface it is preferred to run the process without such elements. As a result, equipment built in accordance with this invention allows a construction where the diameter of the drum equipped with a certain amount of printing stations can be reduced and the amount of printing stations around a drum having a specific diameter can be increased. Also, the drum does not require a special drum cooling system, as is typical of central impression cylinder presses of the prior art which it superficially resembles. An equipment built in accordance with the present invention would also allow the change of the drum construction material from the typically metal or metal alloy material to, for

example, a polymer composite or mold and thereby significantly reducing the weight and cost of the central impression cylinder drum.

Equipment according to the present invention need not be similar to the central impression press as shown in Figure 1, but, as shown in Figure 2, this invention may be practiced with in-line type press comprising a number of ink applying presses or inking stations 44, each comprising a substrate support or back-up roll 46 connected to a drive 48, and a printing plate mounting roll 50, which rotates in contact with the substrate surface. An ink transfer roll 52, such as an anilox roll is used to transfer ink from an ink reservoir 54 to a printing plate mounted on the mounting roll 50.

The substrate is guided through a plurality of web guiding rollers 56,58 along a path 60 that drives the substrate sequentially and serially through any number of inking stations 44 of the type described. The guiding rollers may include web guiding rollers 56 that are, preferably, non-contacting web-turning rollers, such as air bars. Such non- contacting rollers or air bars are well known in the art and need no further description.

See for example U. S. Patent No. 5,640, 784 describing a non-contact flotation web guide/dryer.

As described earlier in connection with Figure 1 the printing apparatus of Figure 2 also includes a control system 62, which again may be used to change the substrate transport speed so that the substrate arrives at the different ink applying stations 44,44', and 44"after a sufficient time has elapsed following the application of an ink layer for enough of the non-reactive diluent in the applied ink layer to have evaporated so that the applied ink layer viscosity has increased sufficiently to trap the next applied inklayer as the substrate arrives at points A, B and C. As discussed in connection with Figure 1, the speed may be changed by use of variable speed motors driving the web transport, or by a

change in gear ratios in the web drive. The speed may be accomplished manually or automatically and is preferably based on predetermined tables showing the relationship between viscosity change as a function of coating thickness, type of ink used, and, optionally, ambient conditions.

Again as described in the case of the apparatus illustrated in Figure 1, the control system 62 may comprise a way to alter the path length between stations. This may be achieved by provision for manually adjusting the distance that the substrate travels between inking stations, as for example, by raising roller 58, or by moving the inking stations further apart. Roller 58 may be raised automatically by the control system through a piston 68 or other similar method. Alternatively, the inking stations may be moveably supported on a guide frame, not illustrated, and be able to slide along the substrate path. Such mechanical arrangements are well known in the art.

In practice using either the apparatus of Figure 1 or 2, a substrate web is driven past the numerous ink applying stations. Prior to beginning the ink applying process, the operator determines the time required for each applied ink layer viscosity to increase to the desired trapping level after that layer is applied onto the substrate and before the next layer is applied thereover. The operator will determine this time on the basis of viscosity change data for each ink under the ambient conditions during ink application. This is best done using predetermined data tables, which may be printed lists or information stored in the control system memory, when such memory is'available.

Following selection of the delay time between layer applications, the operator will set the drive speed or the station spacing or both to obtain the needed delay time for the applied ink layer viscosity to rise sufficiently (via evaporation of the non-reactive diluent) to effectuate wet trapping. When a CPU and memory containing the component and

viscosity profile data for the inks used are available, the control system may set the proper speed and/or station spacing automatically upon operator input of the types of ink used and the ambient conditions.

Both the apparatus of Figure 1 and 2 may include an ink fixing station 70 following the last ink applying station where energy is applied to the energy curable ink layers to fix the layers onto the substrate as an integral part thereof Depending on the nature of the energy curable inks the fixing station uses an actinic radiation source such as ultra violet (UV) light, an electron beam (EB), or other appropriate actinic radiation t source.

The following examples illustrate the invention. The examples use multiple colors (yellow, red, blue, black and white) of energy curable, water based flexographic inks printed on a non-porous substrates such as polyethylene (e. g. PE, HDPE, LDPE), polypropylene (e. g. PP, OPP, BOPP), polystyrene (e. g. PS, OPS, BOPS), polyamid (e. g.

Nylon@), polyvinylchloride (e. g. PVC) or polyetheylenetrephthalate (PET) film using a conventional Central Impression Flexographic Press without inter-station drying or curing. All percentages, unless otherwise noted, are weight percentages based on the total weight of the ink composition.

Example 1 The press used was a six color wide web Central Impression Flexographic Printing press for solvent based inks made by Kidder Inc. , equipped with a enclosed chamber doctor blade pumping system, and a Fusion 200-600 watt/inch UV H-bulb curing station. The print stations on the press are located around a central cylinder. The spacing of the print stations around the central cylinder is as follows: Distance between Station 1 and 2,24. 9 inch;

Between Stations 2 and 3 28.9 inch; Between Stations 3 and 4 36.3 inch; Between Stations 4 and 5 28.9 inch and Between Stations 5 and 6 24.9 inch.

The distance between the last inking station and the curing unit was about 12 feet.

The print stations were set up with wet trapping energy curable inks. For printing plates, solid Dupont Cyrel'2'photopolymer flexographic plates were used. Chamber doctor blades and anilox rollers with varying lines per inch counts were also used. In this example, inking station 1 was not used. Inking station 2 contained a yellow ink of the following composition: 12.5 % yellow pigment (Permanent Yellow GDR, manufactured by Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) 30.6 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin manufactured by Sun Chemical Co. , Inc. , Fort Lee, NJ, resin 924-1069, and described in WO 99/19369) 6. 3 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090, manufactured by Avecia) 0.3 % silicone defoamer (Byk 019, manufactured by Byk-Chemie) 26.2 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (available under the trade name Laromer 8765, manufactured by BASF Corporation) 2.2 % water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610, manufactured by Sartomer Corporation) 5. 0 % photoinitiator (available under the trade name Irgacure 500, manufactured by Ciba Specialty Additives) 1. 1 % silicone flow additive (available under the trade name DC 57, manufactured by Dow Coming) and 16. 0 % water Inking station 3 was not used. Inking station 4 contained a blue ink of the following composition: 15.0 % blue pigment (available under the trade name Sunfast 249-1290,

manufactured by Sun Chemical Co. , Fort Lee, NJ) 30.4 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin 924-1069, manufactured by Sun Chemical Co.) 0.5 % ammonia (27-30 % conc. in water) 6.3 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090, manufactured by Avecia) 0.3 % silicone defoamer (Byk 019, manufactured by Byk-Chemie) 26.1 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (available under the trade name Laromer 8765, manufactured by BASF Corporation) 2.1 % water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610, manufactured by Sartomer Corporation) 5. 0 % photoinitiator (available under the trade name Irgacure 500, manufactured by Ciba Specialty Additives) 1. 1 % silicone flow additive (available under the trade name DC 57, manufactured by Dow Corning) and 13.5 % water Inking station 5 contained a black ink of the following composition: 15. 0 % carbon black pigment (Printex 35, manufactured by Degussa) 30.4 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin 924-1069, manufactured by Sun Chemical Co.) 0.5 % ammonia (27-30 % conc. in water) 6.3 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090, manufactured by Avecia) 0.3 % silicone defoamer (Byk 019, manufactured by Byk-Chemie) 26.1 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (available under the trade name Laromer 8765, manufactured by BASF Corporation) 2.1 % water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610, manufactured by Sartomer Corporation) 5.0 % photoinitiator (available under the trade name Irgacure 500, manufactured by Ciba Specialty Additives) 1.1 % silicone flow additive (available under the trade name DC 57, manufactured by Dow Coming) and 13. 5 % water

Finally, inking station 6 contained a white ink of the following composition: 33.8 % white pigment (Tioxide R-HD6X, manufactured by Tioxide Corporation) 9.0 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin 924-1069, manufactured by Sun Chemical Co.) 0.3 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090, manufactured by Avecia) 0.3 % silicone defoamer (Byk 019, manufactured by Byk-Chemie) 26.1 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (available under the trade name Laromer 8765, manufactured by BASF Corporation) and 30.5 % water Inking stations 2,4, and 5 were equipped with 800 line per inch anilox roller and the printing plates used were DuPonta3'Cyrels photopolymer flexographic plates. The plates had a test image containing color areas in varying densities, solid plate trap areas and an image. Inking station 6 was equipped with a 360 lines per inch anilox roller and a solid printing Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plate. The solid plate was covering and trapping the entire test plate as described for the other stations.

Wet trapping was performed on low-density transparent polyethylene film. Trapping and cure were tested at different line speeds so as to vary viscosity change due to evaporation of the solvent, water. Further tests are discussed later regarding moisture content of the ink and this viscosity changes. On press, the trapped colors were checked visually, the cure by test of finger dryness, the back trapping visually by controlling the back pumped ink for tinting. After the trial, the inks were examined. They were found with no tinting.

The inks in the image and trapping print areas perfectly wet-trapped over each other without back trapping. The image showed the desired design and the trapping colors showed the desired shade and intensity. The ink cured completely at all tested cure conditions for all single colors, white and in the trapped areas. The maximum line speed

tested was 1000 fpm, which exemplifies a wet-trap speed of 0.1245s between two stations (Inking stations 5 and 6).

The printed and cured inks were afterwards tested for SWOP color density and for chromaticity diagram values (D652/L*, a*, b* mode) with an X-Rites Press Check. All colors printed with high density. The trapped colors also showed the desired trap color densities. This indicates that the transfer of all colors on each other and white as backing color is sufficient. No backtracking or tinting has been observed in any of the colors or white.

Additional tests in the form of industry standard alcohol and water rub tests, as well as industry standard tape release adhesion tests, were conducted. The prints passed all adhesion tests in all print areas. The resistance properties were dependent on the cure condition, but generally rated as good.

Example 2 Using the same equipment as in Example 1, the second inking station was loaded with a yellow ink of the following composition: 13.30 % yellow pigment (Permanent Yellow GDR) 12.07 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin 924-1069) 6.65 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090) 0.27% silicone defoamer (Byk 019) 0.53 % ammonia (30% conc. in water) 7.65% water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610) 38.55 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Laromer 8765) 4.0 % photoinitiator (Irgacure 500) 1.10 % silicone flow additive (DC 57) and 15. 68 % water.

Inking station 5 was loaded with a blue ink of the following composition: 15.96 % blue pigment (Sunfast 249-1290) 10.92 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin 924-1069) 6. 65 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090) 0.27% silicone defoamer (Byk 019) 0.53 % ammonia (30% conc. in water) 7.42 % water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610) 38. 32 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Laromer 8765) 5.0 % photoinitiator (Irgacure 500) 1.1 % silicone flow additive (DC 57) and 14.63 % water.

The inking stations were equipped with 550 lines per inch anilox roller and DuPont@ Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plates were used. The prints had solid plate, areas of 4.5 inch by 7 inch and with a trapping area of 2 inch by 6 inch. The substrate was low-density transparent polyethylene film. Trapping and curing were tested at different line speeds. On press, the trapped color was checked visually, the cure by test of finger dryness, the back trapping visually by controlling the back pumped ink for tinting.

After the trial, the inks were examined. They were found to be perfectly wet trapped over each other without back trapping and with color intensity according to the transfer at given speeds. The ink cured completely at all tested cure conditions on the blue, yellow and the trapped green print area. The maximum line speed tested was 1000 fpm the lowest UV dose rate was 200watt per inch at 300 fpm line speed.

Example 3 Using the same inks, substrate and equipment as in Example 2, the colors were reversed so that the blue ink was in inking station 2 and the yellow ink in inking station 5.

Each inking station was equipped with 550 lines per inch anilox roller and DuPontO Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plates were used. The prints had solid plate areas of 4.5 inch by 7 inch and with a trapping area of 2 inch by 6 inch. The trapping was tested as

described in Example 2. There was no visual color difference in thetrapped area, (green).

The above described chromaticity values taken with the X-Rite Press Check confirmed this result. The values were within the error of the measurement. This indicates that the transfer of yellow ink on blue ink is as sufficient as it is vice versa, and no backtracking or tinting has been observed.

Example 4 The press used was a six color narrow web Central Impression Flexographic Printing press for conventional UV inks made by Ko-Pack Inc. , equipped with a reverse angle chamber doctor blade system, a lamination nip using station number 6 for the UV adhesive, and a Fusion 200-700 watt/inch UV H-bulb curing station. The print stations on the press are located around a central cylinder.

The print stations were set up with wet trapping energy curable inks. For printing plates, solid Dupont Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plates were used. Chamber doctor blades and anilox rollers with varying lines per inch counts were also used. In this example, inking station 1 was not used. Inking station 2,4 and 5 contained inks of the same composition as described in example 1. Station 3 contained a red ink of the following composition: 13.95 % red pigment (Sun 235-3438) 12.07 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin 9241069) 6.65 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090) 0.27% silicone defoamer (Byk 019) 0.53 % ammonia (30% conc. in water) 7. 65% water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610) 37.95 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Laromer 8765) 4.0 % photoinitiator (Irgacure 500) 1. 10 % silicone flow additive (DC 57) and

15. 68 % water.

Inking stations 2,4, and 5 were equipped with 800 line per inch anilox roller Inking station 3 was equipped with a 700 line per inch anilox roller. All stations used DuPont Cyrel photopolymer flexographic printing plates. The plates had a test image containing color areas in varying densities, solid plate trap areas and an image. The available interstation curing lamps were shut off with the exception of the last curing lamp after station 6 to allow the wet trapping process and single cure at the end. All prints performed were tested up to maximum press speed of 500 fpm.

In this test wet trapping was performed on various substrates such as: Trespaphan Adicional LWH 33 opaque OPP NOW Pack clear shrinkable OPS TEKRA Valeron 003 PP/Rubber blend Mobil Label Lyte 66LL344 opaque coated face stock BOPP Plastic suppliers Polyflex 0530 CLR clear PS/Rubber bled Kloeckner Pentaplast Pentaclear PVC BX-KPETE321200 Trepaphan A-Z1 clear OPP Example 5 Using the same equipment and inks as in Example 4 and substrate 7, the printing station 1 was equipped with the same ink then used for inking station 6 in Example 1. The station was equipped with a 600 line anilox roller and a solid DuPont Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plate. As a result a high quality, non disturbed, non distorted, or washed out image was wet trapped and printed on to a solid layer of white. The print was conducted with maximum press speed of 500fpm.

Example 6 Using the same equipment and inks then in example 4 and substrate 1, the printing station 6 was equipped with a energy curable coating (SunCure LE GAKFV0440563, manufactured by SunChemical Corp. ), a 500 line per inch anilox roller and a solid DuPont Cyrels photopolymer flexographic plate. The coating was applied onto the printed image without additional drying or curing of the ink. As a result a high quality non disturbed, non distorted washed out or bleeding image was wet trapped and printed on a non porous substrate and a inline wet trapped coating layer was applied.

Example 7 Using the same equipment and inks then in example 4 and substrate 1, the printing station 6 was equipped with a energy curable adhesive (SunCure UV Laminationg Adhesive RCKFV0487525, manufactured by SunChemical Corp. ), a 500 line per inch anilox roller and a solid DuPont Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plate.

The lamination station was equipped with substrate. After the image was printed the lamination coating was applied on top of the printed image without drying or curing of the ink. The clear lamination substrate was put onto the wet lamination coating and ink and the laminated sandwich was cured with one W lamp at the end. As a result a high quality non-disturbed, non-distorted, washed out, or bleeding image was wet trapped and printed on a non porous substrate and a inline laminated Example 8 The following test examples illustrate the moisture content change of the ink and thus the change in viscosity due to evaporation of the solvent, water. The examples use the colors

yellow and blue of energy curable, water based flexographic inks printed on a non-porous substrate polyethylene film using a conventional Chestnut Flexographic Press without inter-station drying or curing. All inks were printed at a constant 150 fpm and cured with a Fusion Aetek Ultra Pack lamp with 400 w/"maximum output, at 100%. A calibrated Kett handheld near infra red moisture mete KJT-100 was placed in focus in various positions on the substrate, at 1", 4. 5" and 10"from the print nip. The moisture content and the calculated evaporation rates assumed that the cured ink value equals 0% moisture content. The full moisture content of the ink could not be recorded as the ink travels the distance between the doctor blade and the anilox to the plate to the print nip to where the first measurement was taken at 1"from the print nip. The moisture data was internally recorded by taking an average of all readings over two seconds, where every position had ten readings recorded over a time period of 100 seconds and averaged. Further, the standard deviation was reported.

Test 1 Yellow ink of the following composition was used on Inking Station 1: 12.5 % yellow pigment (Permanent Yellow GDR, manufactured by Clariant Corporation) 30.6 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin manufactured by Sun Chemical Co. , Inc. , Fort Lee, NJ, resin 924-1069, and described in WO 99/19369) 6.3 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090, manufactured by Avecia) 0.3 % silicone defoamer (Byk 019, manufactured by Byk-Chemie) 26.2 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (available under the trade name Laromer 8765, manufactured by BASF Corporation) 2.2 % water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610, manufactured by Sartomer Corporation) 5.0 % photoinitiator (available under the trade name Irgacure 500, manufactured

by Ciba Specialty Additives) 1.1 % silicone flow additive (available under the trade name DC 57, manufactured by Dow Coming) and 16. 0 % water The inking station was equipped with 300 lines per inch anilox roller and continuous solid DuPont@ Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plates were used. The substrate was clear polyethylene film. The relative humidity was 46.3% with a web temperature of 22. 7C +/-0.2C and a printed ink temperature of 22. 6C +/-0. 1C, and RT 22.7.

The relative moisture number at 1"from the print nip was 189.9 +/-10.7. The relative moisture number at 4. 5" from the print nip was 108. 2 +/-10. 3. The relative moisture number at 10"from the print nip was 101.1 +/-8. 3. There was reported an average evaporation rate of 0.38% per ms or 44.7% +/-0.3% of the remaining water between readings at 1"and 4. 5" from the print nip. There was reported an average evaporation rate of 0.036% per ms or 7.0% +/-0.7% of the remaining water between readings at 4. 5" and 10"from the print nip.

Test 2 Yellow ink of the following composition was used on Inking Station 1: 12.5 % yellow pigment (Permanent Yellow GDR, manufactured by Clariant Corporation) 30.6 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin manufactured by Sun Chemical Co. , Inc. , Fort Lee, NJ, resin 924-1069, and described in WO 99/19369) 6.3 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090, manufactured by Avecia) 0. 3 % silicone defoamer (Byk 019, manufactured by Byk-Chemie) 26.2 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (available under the trade name Laromer 8765, manufactured by BASF Corporation)

2.2 % water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610, manufactured by Sartomer Corporation) 5. 0 % photoinitiator (available under the trade name Irgacure 500, manufactured by Ciba Specialty Additives) 1.1 % silicone flow additive (available under the trade name DC 57, manufactured by Dow Coming) and 16.0 % water The inking station was equipped with 400 lines per inch anilox roller and continuous solid DuPont Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plates were used. The substrate was opaque polyethylene film. The relative humidity was 469% with a web temperature of 23. 2C +/-0. 4C and a printed ink temperature of 23. 1C +/-04C, and RT 23.

The relative moisture number at 1"from the print nip was 217.4 +/-5. 7. The relative moisture number at 4. 5" from the print nip was 201.7 +/-7.1. The relative moisture number at 10"from the print nip was 188.9 +/-5. 1. There was reported an average evaporation rate of 0.05% per ms or 5. 9% +/-0. 7% of the remaining water between readings at 1"and 4. 5" from the print nip. There was reported an average evaporation rate of 0.028% per ms or 5. 1% +/-0. 7% of the remaining water between readings at 4. 5" and 10"from the print nip.

Test 3 Blue ink of the following composition was used on Inking Station 1: 15.0 % blue pigment (available under the trade name Sunfast 249-1290, manufactured by Sun Chemical Co. , Fort Lee, NJ) 30. 4 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated resin (resin 924-1069, manufactured by Sun Chemical Co.) 0.5 % ammonia (27-30 % conc. in water) 6.3 % hyperdispersant (Solspers 41090, manufactured by Avecia)

0.3 % silicone defoamer (Byk 019, manufactured by Byk-Chemie) 26.1 % water-soluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (available under the trade name Laromer 8765, manufactured by BASF Corporation) 2.1 % water-insoluble, ethylenically unsaturated oligomer (Sartomer SR 610, manufactured by Sartomer Corporation) 5.0 % photoinitiator (available under the trade name Irgacure 500, manufactured by Ciba Specialty Additives) 1.1 % silicone flow additive (available under the trade name DC 57, manufactured by Dow Coming) and 13.5 % water The inking station was equipped with 300 lines per inch anilox roller and continuous solid DuPont@ Cyrel photopolymer flexographic plates were used. The substrate was clear polyethylene film. The relative humidity was 44.2% with a web temperature of 23. 0C +/-0. 1C and a printed ink temperature of 22. 6C +/-0. 1C, and RT 22.8. Readings in Test 3 were made at only two points-1"from the print nip and 4.5" from the print nip The relative moisture number at 1"from the print nip was 110.0 +/-11. 5. The relative moisture number at 4. 5" from the print nip was 70.0 +/-8.2. There was reported an average evaporation rate of 0.20% per ms or 23. 3% +/-2.8% of the remaining water between readings at 1"and 4. 5" from the print nip.

Those having the benefit of this disclosure may implement numerous variations and combinations such as different inks and the addition of drying and of curing stations between inking stations. Such alternatives or variations are to be construed as being within the scope of the invention.