PROCESS FOR THE STEREOSELECTIVE REDUCTION OF

STEROID ENELACTAMS

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is concerned with a novel process for the stereoselective reduction of enelactams. The process is particularly useful for the reduction of Δ-5 steroidal enelactams.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The principal mediator of androgenic activity in some target organs, e.g., the prostate, is 5α-dihydrotestosterone ("DHT"), formed locally in the target organ by the action of 5α- reductase, which converts testosterone to DHT. Certain undesirable physiological manifestations, such as acne vulgaris, seborrhea, female hirsutism, androgenic alopecia (also called androgenetic alopecia) which includes female and male pattern baldness, and benign prostatic hyperplasia, are the result of hyperandrogenic stimulation caused by an excessive accumulation of testosterone ("T") or similar androgenic hormones in the metabolic system. Inhibitors of 5α-reductase will serve to prevent or lessen symptoms of hyperandrogenic stimulation in these organs. See especially United States Patent Nos. 4,377,584, issued March 22, 1983, and 4,760,071 , issued July 26, 1988, both assigned to Merck & Co., Inc. It is now known that a second 5α- reductase isozyme exists, which interacts with skin tissues, especially in scalp tissues. See, e.g., G. Harris, et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 89, pp. 10787-10791 (Nov. 1992). The isozyme that principally interacts in skin tissues is conventionally designated as 5 -reductase 1 (or 5α-reductase type 1), while the isozyme that principally interacts within the prostatic tissues is designated as 5oc-reductase 2 (or 5α-reductase type 2).

The reduction of Δ-5 steroidal alkenes to the corresponding saturated compounds is an important step in the synthesis of steroid end-products useful as 5 -reductase inhibitors. Platinum, palladium/carbon, and noble metals such as nickel have been previously used as catalysts in the reduction of Δ- 5 steroidal enelactams to preferentially yield the corresponding 5α- steroid. The degree of selectivity varies according to the particular steroidal enelactam being reduced. The best selectivity achieved using these catalysts to reduce 4,7β-dimethyl-4-aza-cholest-5-ene- 3-one and its 4-NH analog is about 100:1 of α:β product. Because the resulting α/β mixture can be purified only with great difficulty, it was desirable to develop a reduction process exhibiting greater selectivity for the α-reduction product. Furthermore, none of the previously described reductions, catalytic or otherwise, offered any way to selectively direct hydrogenation to obtain the 5β reduction products which are also useful as 5α-reductase inhibitors.

The instant invention provides an improved method for stereoselective reduction of certain Δ-5 steroidal enelactams. In the case of 4,7 β-dimethyl-4 aza-cholest-5-ene-3-one, process parameters can be adjusted to preferentially yield the α-reduction product over the β-reduction product in a ratio of about 500: 1. The α-reduction product of 7β-methyl-4 aza-cholest-5-ene-3-one is selectively formed over the β-reduction product in a ratio of about 264: 1. Alternatively, the process parameters can be varied to selectively yield the β-reduction product of 4,7 β-dimethyl-4 aza- cholest-5-ene-3-one and its 4-NH analog over the α-reduction products by ratios of about 60 :1 and 90:1 respectively.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The novel process of this invention involves the reduction of certain Δ-5 steroidal alkenes to selectively produce either the 5α or 5β reduction products. Particularly, this invention involves reduction of Δ-5 steroidal alkenes using a rhodium based catalyst in the presence of hydrogen to selectively yield 5α steroids

or alternatively reduction of Δ-5 steroidal alkenes in an ionizing medium with a trialkylsilane to selectively yield 5β steroids. This novel process can be exemplified in the following embodiment.

wherein R is selected from H and C1-C5 alkyl, R is selected from Cl-5 alkyl and phenyl, and Z is

The α-reduction product corresponding to Formula II and the β-reduction product corresponding to Formula ID are useful as 5α-reductase inhibitors or as intermediates in the preparation of 5α-reductase inhibitors. 5α-reductase inhibitors are useful in the treatment of hyperandrogenic disorders such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, acne vulgaris, seborrhea, female hirsutism, androgenic alopecia (androgenetic alopecia), including male pattern baldness, and the prevention and treatment of prostatic carcinoma.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The novel process of this invention allows for greater stereoselective control than previously possible over the reduction of Δ-5 steroid enelactams. Reduction of Δ-5 steroidal enelactams to 5α-steroidal lactams using platinum, palladium/carbon, and noble metals such as nickel catalysts is described in United States Patent No. 5,237, 064, issued August 17, 1993. The degree of selectivity varies according to the particular steroidal enelactam being reduced. The best selectivity achieved using these catalysts to reduce 4,7 β- dimethyl-4 aza-cholest-5-ene-3-one and its 4-NH analog is about 100:1 of α:β product. Because the resulting α/β mixture can be purified only with great difficulty, it was desirable to develop a reduction process exhibiting greater selectivity for the α-reduction product. The process of the present invention leads to stereoselective α/β ratio at least twice that of the prior reductions.

Acidic hydride reductions of various fused ring alkenes have been reported in which one stereoisomer product predominates depending on the nature of the alkene substrate. Bulky silanes have been used to provide high selectivity in the reduction of a non heteroatom stabilized alkene (octahydronaphthalene to decahydro-naphthalene), with the β product predominating. See Doyle, M.P., McOsker, CC, J. Org. Chem..43(4), 693-696 (1978). Acidic hydride reduction of ene-

lactams, however, has been reported to reduce ene-lactam with the 5α- product predominating. See, e.g., Rasmusson, et aL, J. Med. Chem.. 27, 1690 (1984); Rasmusson, et ah, J. Med. Chem.. 29, 2298 (1986 : Jones, et al.. J. Med. Chem.. 36. 421 ( 1993); Cannon, et al., Synthesis. 494 (1986); and Murahashi, et al., J. Org. Chem.. 2521 (1992). The process of the present invention offers a way to selectively obtain the 5β-reduction products of Δ-5 steroid enelactams by exploiting the surprising discovery that, contrary to published reports, ionic reductions of enelactams favor β face selectivity.

In one embodiment of this invention, a Δ-5 steroidal enelactam is dissolved in solvent and treated with H2 in the presence of a rhodium-based catalyst selected from Rh/Al2θ3 (5%) or Rh/C (5%) to preferentially obtain the α-reduction product.

In exemplifications of this invention where Rh/C (5%) is employed as the catalyst, the solvent used is a -6 alcohol, such as methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, etc. In particular, the preferred solvent in the Rh/C catalyzed system is ethanol. When using RI1/AI2O3 (5%) as the catalyst, the solvent is a Ci-4 alkanoic acid, such as formic, acetic, propionic, or butyric acid. In particular, the preferred solvent in the RI1/AI2O3 catalyzed system is acetic acid.

Those skilled in the art are familiar with the use of catalytic amounts of reaction catalysts and will appreciate that the amount of catalyst that can be used may vary with the scale of the reaction. Generally, the amount of rhodium based catalyst used in the process of the present invention is adjusted so that the weight of rhodium present in the reaction mixture represents between 5- 100% and preferably between 10-20 % of the weight of the Δ-5 steroid alkene starting material. In particular, a weight of rhodium corresponding to about 20% of the Δ-5 steroid alkene starting material weight is preferred.

The catalytic reduction is preferably run at a H2 pressure of 40 psi, but pressure may be increased to as much as 250 psi in order to reduce the reaction time.

The rhodium catalyzed reduction can be optimally run between about 20-30°C and may be conveniently run at room temperatures within this range. Temperatures above this range will adversely affect the selectivity of reduction and it is most preferable to maintain the reaction at the lower temperatures within this range. A second embodiment of the present invention involves refluxing a Δ-5 steroidal enelactam in an ionizing medium such as trifluoroacetic acid with a trialkylsilane to preferentially yield the 5β-azasteroid product. Trialkylsilanes usable in the process of the present invention have the formula (R^SiH in which each alkyl group represented by R2 may be independently selected from Cl-6 alkyl and phenyl. In particular, trifluoroacetic acid is the preferred ionizing medium with di-t-butylmethylsilane and tri-t-butylsilane being the preferred trialkylsilanes usable in this embodiment of the invention. The process of the present invention is useful for the stereoselective reduction of Δ-5 steroidal enelactams. The process is particularly useful for the steroidal reduction of Δ-5 steroidal enelactams of formula I:

(I) wherein:

R is selected from H and C l -C5 alkyl; Rl is selected from Cl -5 alkyl and phenyl,

and Z is selected from

The oxidation reaction is not affected by the substituent at the 16- or 17-position of the steroid, and thus "A" can be any synthetically feasible substituent. The flexibility and broad applicability of the instant process is demonstrated by the fact that it is not limited by the choice of substituent at the 16- and 17-positions of the steroidal starting material. Representative examples of "A" include but are not limited to: -H; keto (=0); protected hydroxy, e.g. dimethyl-t-butyl silyloxy, trimethylsilyloxy, tri-ethylsilyloxy, tri-isopropylsilyloxy, triphenyl silyloxy ; acetate; hydroxy; carboxy, protected amino, e.g. acetylamino; amino; Cl-10 alkyl, e.g. methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, 1 ,5-dimethylhexyl, 6-methylhept-2-yl cholestanyl 17-side chain, pregnane or stigmasterol 17-side chain; substituted or unsubstututed Cl - 10 alkenyl, e.g. phenylmethylene, chlorophenylmethylene, ethoxycarbonylphenylmethylene, carboxyphenylmethylene, (((1,1- dimethylethyl) amino) carbonyl)phenylmethylene, trimethoxyphenyl methylene, methoxyphenylmethylene, methylsulfonylphenylmethylene, biphenylmethylene, nitrophenylmethylene, aminophenylmethylene, acetylaminophenylmethylene, pivaloylaminophenylmethylene, phenoxyphenylmethylene, 2-imidazolyl methylene, 2- thiazolylmethylene; aryl substituted Cl -10 alkyl, e.g. omega- phenylpropyl, l -(chlorophenoxy)ethyl; aryl, e.g. phenyl, pyridinyl and pyrimidinyl; substituted aryl, e.g. phenyl, pyridinyl and pyrimidinyl substituted with one to three substituents independently selected from:

(1) -H,

(2) -OH, (3) -CH3,

(4) -OCH3,

(5) -S(0)n-CH3, wherein n is selected from 0, 1 , and 2,

(6) -CF3,

(7) halo, (8) -CHO,

(9) CN, and

(10) -NHR7, wherein R? is selected from:

-H, -Cl-8 alkyl, -Cl-6 alkylcarbonyl, -Cl-6 alkylsulfonyl, and -Cl-6 alkoxycarbonyl, aryl carbamoyi substituted Cl -10 alkyl, e.g. 2-(4-pyridinyl- carbamoyl)ethyl; Cl-lθalkylcarbonyl, e.g. isobutylcarbonyl; arylcarbonyl, e.g. phenylcarbonyl; ether-substituted Ci-ioalkyl, e.g. 1 - methoxy-ethyl, 1 -ethoxy-ethyl; keto-substituted Cl-lθalkyl, e.g. 1-keto- ethyl, ketomethyl, 1 -ketopropyl, and ketobutyl; heteroaryl-substituted Cl-10 alkyl, e.g. omega-(4-pyridyl)-butyl; carboxylic esters, e.g. Cl-10 alkylcarboxylic esters such as carbomethoxy and carboethoxy; carboxamides, e.g. Cl -10 alkylcarboxamides or aralkylcarboxamides such as NJM-diisopropyl carboxamide, N-t-butyl _. carboxamide, N- (hydroxyphenyl) carboxamide, N-phenylcarboxamide, N-(aminophenyl) carboxamide, N -(carbomethoxy )phenyl carboxamide, N-

(methoxycarboxy) phenyl carboxamide, N-acetamidophenyl-N-acetyl- carboxamide, N-acetamidophenyl-carboxamide, N-pivalamidophenyl carboxamide, N-isobutyramidophenyl carboxamide, N-(methyl),N- (diphenylmethyl) carboxamide, and N-(diphenylmethyl)-carboxamide; carbamates such as Cl-10 alkylcarbamates, especially t-butylcarbamate and isopropyl carbamate; substituted or unsubstituted anilide derivatives, e.g. N-substituted-phenyl-carboxamides wherein the phenyl may be substituted with 1 to 2 substituents selected from ethyl, methyl, trifluoromethyl or halo (F, Cl, Br, I); Cl-l0alkanoyloxyCl -2alkyl, e.g. acetyloxymethyl, trimethylacetyloxy methyl, and (2- ethylhexanoyloxy)methyl; ureas, e.g. Ci-io alkylcarbonylamino ureas such as t-butylcarbonylamino urea; Cl-10 alkylureido Cθ-5 alkyl, e.g., N-t-butylureidomethyl, N-n-propylureidomethyl, N-n-octylureidomethyl, N-isopropylureido, allylureido; substituted or unsubstituted arylureidoCo-

5 alkyl, e.g., N-(ethylphenyl) ureidomethyl, N-(chlorophenyl) ureidomethyl, N-phenylureidomethyl, N-(dichlorophenyl) ureidomethyl, N-naphth-2-yl)ureidomethyl, N-thiazol-2-ylureidomethyl, N-thien-2- ylmethylureidomethyl, N-(fluorophenyl)ureido, N- (methoxyphenyl)ureido, and 2-(ethoxyphenyl)ureidomethyl; Cl -10 alkylcarbonylamino, e.g. t-butylcarbonylamino; alkanoylamidoalkyl, e.g. trimethylacetamidomethyl, carbomethoxyoctanoylamidomethyl, (isobutylphenyl)propionamidomethyl, 8-carboxyoctanoylamidomethyl, bromohexanoylamidomethyl, hydroxydodecanoyl amidomethyl, 4- nitrophenylprionamidomethyl, isopropylthioacetamidomethyl, benzyloxyacetamidomethyl, carbomethoxyacetamidomethyl, tripheny lprionamidomethy 1 , cyclohexy lacetamidomethy 1 , methylcyclohexane carboxamidomethyl, (3-hydroxy-4,4,4- trichlorobutyramido)methyl, and phenylthio-acetamidomethyl; thioether, e.g. Cl -8 alkylthio, phenylthio, and Cl -g alkylthio substituted with phenyl; ethers, e.g. n-butyloxy, ethylene ketal; substituted and unsubstituted aryl ethers such as thiophenoxy, biphenyloxy, (3- pyridyl)oxy, chlorophenyloxy, methylphenyloxy, phenyloxy, methylsulfonylphenyloxy, pyrimidinyloxy; and the like. Procedures for synthesizing compounds of structural formula (I) with various substituents at the 16- and 17- position are known in the art. The desired substitution at the 16- or 17- position may be effected before conducting the stereoselective reduction of the present invention, or alternatively, some other substituent, such as hydroxyl or protected hydroxyl may be present at the 16 or 17- substituent during the stereoselective reduction of the present invention, and subsequent to the reduction, the desired substitution may be effected on the D ring of the azasteroid.

Procedures for making ether and thioether substituents in the 17-position are described in U.S. Patent 5,091 ,534, and PCT Publications WO 93/23041 and WO 93/23040 . 17-Anilide derivatives are described, for example, in PCT publication WO 94/07861 and EP O 663 924, and unsubstituted, monosubstituted or disubstituted amide derivatives in the 17-position are described in PCT publications WO 93/23038, WO

93/23051 , WO 93/23420, and U.S. Patents 4,220,775; 4,760,071 ; 4,845,104; 5,237,067; 5,091 ,380; 5,061 ,801 ; 5,215,894. 17-oxo- derivatives are described in U.S. Patents 4,220,775; 4,377,584 and 17- hydroxy derivatives are described in U.S. Patents 4,220,775; 4,377,584 . Cyano derivatives at position 17 are described in U.S. Patent 4,220,775 and 17-tetrazolyl analogs are described in U.S. Patent 4,220,775 . 17- arylalkylcarbonyloxy alkyl derivatives, 17-cycloalkylarylcarbonyloxy alkyl derivatives, and 17-benzoyloxyalkyl derivatives are described in U.S. Patent 4,377,584. 17-acyl, substituted or unsubstituted derivatives are described in U.S. Patents 5,049,562; 5,138,063; 5,151 ,429; 5,237,061 ; 5,120,742; 5,162,332; 5,061 ,802; 5,098,908; 5,196,41 1 ; 5,075,450; 5,061,803; 5,324,734 ; 17-thiobenzoyl are described in U.S. Patent 5,151 ,430 ; and 17- polyaroyl derivatives are described in U.S. Patent 5,162,322. Particular 17-alkyl derivatives, either substituted or unsubstituted, are described in PCT publications WO 93/23050, WO 93/23419, WO 93/23051 and WO95/00147 and 17-urea, thiourea, carbamate and thiocarbamate derivatives are described in PCT publications WO 93/23048; and 95/12398.

Procedures for substituting at position 16 with: lower alkyl is described in PCT publication 93/23039, and U.S. Patents 5,049,562; 5,138,063; 5,278,159; and 4,377,584 , and hydroxyl is described in U.S. Patents 5,278,159 and 4,377,584. Procedures for further substitution at position 17 are described in: PCT publication WO 95/11254.

Procedures for the formation of a 7-β bond are described in U.S. Patent 5,237,064.

The term "alkyl" includes both straight and branched chain alkyl groups, and unless otherwise specified "aryl" includes phenyl, pyridinyl and pyrimidinyl.

Hydroxy and amino protecting groups are known to those of ordinary skill in the art, and any such groups may be used. For example, acetate, benzoate, ether and silyl protecting groups are suitable hydroxy protecting groups. Standard silyl protecting groups have the general formula -Si(Xa)3, wherein each Xa group is independently an alkyl or aryl group, and include, e.g. trimethylsilyl, tri-ethylsilyl, tri-i-propylsilyl,

triphenylsilyl as well as t-butyl-di-(Xb)-silyl where Xb is methyl, ethyl, isopropyl or phenyl (Ph). Standard amino protecting groups have the general formula -C(0)-Xc, wherein Xc is alkyl, aryl, O-alkyl or O-aryl, and include, e.g. N-t-butoxycarbonyl. See also Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, T. W. Green et al. (John Wiley and Sons, 1991) for descriptions of protecting groups.

One class of the process of the present invention comprises the reduction of a Δ-5 steroidal enelactams of formula I:

(I) wherein: Z is

R is selected from H and C l -5 alkyl;

Rl is selected from Cl-5 alkyl and phenyl; and A is any synthetically feasible substituent.

In a sub-class of this class of the invention, A is selected from carboxy 1 and hydroxyl. In a preferred embodiment of this subclass, R is selected from H and methyl and R 1 is methyl. In yet another sub-class of this class of the invention,

R is selected from H and methyl, R* is methyl, and A is Cl-10 alkyl. In a preferred embodiment of this subclass, A is 6- methylhept-2-yl.

Another class of the process of the present invention comprises the reduction of a Δ-5 steroidal enelactams of formula I:

(I) wherein: Z is

R is selected from H and Cl-5 alkyl; R l is selected from Cl-5 alkyl and phenyl; and A is any synthetically feasible substituent.

In a sub-class of this class of the invention, A is selected from keto, hydroxyl, and protected hydroxyl. In a preferred embodiment of this subclass, R is selected from H and methyl and Rl is methyl.

In yet another sub-class of this class of the invention, A is selected from ether and aryl ether. In a preferred embodiment of this subclass, R is selected from H and methyl. Most preferably, R 1 is methyl. Compounds of formula I are useful for making 7β-methyl substituted 4-azasteroid compounds, and particularly those which are inhibitors of 5α-reductase. Examples of such compounds include but are not limited to those disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,377,584 and 4,760,071 ; WO 93/23419; WO 93/23420; and WO 95/1 1254. More

particularly, compounds that can be made from an intermediate of formula I in which Z is

and A is 6-methylhept-2-yl include those of general Formula IV:

IV

Synthesis of enelactams of formula I is described in U.S. Patent No. 5,237,064. An exemplary synthetic scheme showing how to make enelactams of formula I and their subsequent reduction to compounds of formula π, compounds 8 and 9, is as follows:

REACTION SCHEME I

Grignard addition

N-methylation

The starting materials for the process generally are the 3-acetoxy-androst-5-enes which are known and available in the art.

As shown in the above Reaction Scheme, the "Alk" substituent can be introduced onto the B ring of the 4-aza steroid

generally by the application of an organometallic carbonyl addition reaction, e.g., the Grignard reaction in which the 7-carbonyl group can be reacted with the Grignard reagent containing "Alk" as the R radical in RMgX. The Grignard reaction conditions are conventional and include the use of, e.g., methyl, allyl or cycloalkyl magnesium chloride, ethyl magnesium bromide, cyclopropyl magnesium bromide, and the like. Preferably, the Grignard reagent is used with Ceθ3. Usable dry solvents include, e.g., tetrahydrofuran (THF), diethyl ether, dimethoxyethane, and di-n-butyl ether. The reaction is conducted under dry conditions generally in the temperature range of 0°C to 40°C. Generally, the reaction requires about 6 to 24 hours for completion. Other organometallic carbonyl addition reactions can be used in this step, such as those utilizing lithium and zinc organometallic reagents which are known in the art. "Alk" is Cl-5 alkyl or phenyl, preferably methyl, ethyl, butyl or phenyl.

The adduct 3. is then oxidized with e.g., aluminum isopropoxide and cyclohexanone (Oppenauer oxidation conditions) in, e.g., refluxing toluene solvent to produce the 7-substituted-4,6- dien-3-one 4. Other reagents which can be used are, e.g., aluminum ethoxide or aluminum t-butoxide. Other solvents which can be used include, e.g., methylethylketone (MEK) and xylene. The temperature is generally in the range of about 60 to 120°C, and the reaction is carried out under anhydrous conditions and generally requires about 2 to 24 hours for completion.

The dien-3-one 4 is next converted to the 4-ene 5 by treatment with Pd on carbon, DBU (1 ,8- diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undecene-7, and cyclohexene in a solvent such as ethanol. The A Ring is next cleaved by treatment with, e.g., potassium permanganate, sodium periodate in, e.g., t-butylalcohol at 80°C to produce the corresponding seco-acid 6. Other oxidation reagents which can be used include ruthenium tetraoxide and ozone. Other solvents which can be used are: CH3CN, CCI4,

methanol (MeOH) and CH2CI2. The reaction generally requires about 2 to 4 hours to proceed to completion.

The seco-acid in a C2-4 alkanoic acid such as acetic acid (HOAc) is treated with ammonium acetate at about 15-30°C followed by warming to reflux for about 2 to 4 hours. After cooling to about 50-70°C, water is added and the mixture seeded to cause crystallization of the ene-lactam 7.

Hydrogenation of the ene-lactam to selectively obtain the 5α or 5 β-reduction product is accomplished described above and in the examples that follow.

If an N-alkyl compound of formula II is desired, lactam 8 may be N-alkylated as illustrated in Example 2. Alternatively, an N-alkylated enelactam of formula I prepared according to the methods outlined in U.S. Patent No. 5,237,064, may be directly reduced by the process of this invention as illustrated in Example 3.

Both the 4-N-alkyl and the 4-NH enelactams are unstable in air and the solvent should be degassed prior to dissolving the enelactam and subsequent reduction. In the case of the 4-NH enelactam, an amount of BHT (butylated hydroxy toluene) corresponding to 0.2% of the starting material should also be added to the solvent before dissolving the enelactam.

Representative experimental procedures utilizing the novel process are detailed below. These procedures are exemplary only and should not be construed as being limitations on the novel process of this invention.

EXAMPLE 1

Preparation of 7β-methyl-4-aza-5α-cholestan-3-one

Step 1 :

C ₂₉ H ₄₆ O ₃ MW=442.7

Materials Amt Mole MW Cholesteryl acetate 78.1 g 0.173 428.7

(95% Aldrich) t-BuOOH 189 g 1.46 90.12

(70wt%, Aldrich) Na2Wθ4-2H2θ 3.3 g 0.010 329.9

RuCl3-xH2θ 0.24 g 0.001 16 207.43

Sodium metasilicate 0.315 g 0.00258 122.06 (Na2Siθ3) Sulfuric acid 0.45 mL 0.0081 98.08

(d=1.84g/mL, 18M)

Sodium sulfite (Na2Sθ3) 39 g 0.309 126.04

heptane 300 mL

MEK (methyl ethyl ketone) 550 mL

water 460 mL

In a 2000 mL 3-necked flask was added sodium tungstate dihydrate (3.3 g), sodium metasilicate (0.315 g) and 70 mL water and stirred until homogeneous. The solution was neutralized (pH = 6-7) with concentrated sulfuric acid (0.45 mL). A 4°C exotherm was noted for the addition of acid. Ruthenium trichloride hydrate (240 mg) was added and the mixture stirred for 10 min. Cholesteryl acetate (78.1 g) and heptane (300 mL) were added to the catalyst mixture. The stirring rate was 225-275 rpm with an overhead paddle stirrer.

70% t-BuOOH (189 g) was added over 5- 10 min. An internal temperature of 15-20°C was maintained by cooling with a water bath. The temperature of the batch began to rise slowly after an induction period of 5-15 min. The reaction was stirred until less than 1.5 wt% of s.m. (starting material) and less than 2% of the 7- hydroxy cholesteryl acetate intermediate remained, about 20-24 hrs. The reaction was monitored with a YMC basic column, 90: 10 acetonitrile: water, flow rate=1.5 mL/min, UV detection at 200 nm. Retention times: tR cholesteryl acetate=17.0 min, tR 7-keto cholesteryl acetate=7.8 min, tR enedione 4.5 min, tR 7-hydroperoxides, 7-ols intermediates=6.8, 6.9, 7.0, 8.2 min. Later eluting impurities at 18 and 19 min are the 7-t-BuOO- cholesteryl acetates.

To the reaction mixture was added 550 mL MEK, 390 mL water, and 39 g sodium sulfite. The mixture was heated to 70°C until the enedione impurity was gone, about 3 hrs. The

reaction mixture cooled, then was transferred to a separatory funnel and the aqueous layer cut and then the organic layer washed with 100 mL 1 % brine. The MEK and t-BuOH were then removed by an azeotropic distillation with heptane (800 mL heptane added after an initial concentration to 300 mL) until less than 0.7% combined MEK and t-BuOH remained as assayed by GC (gas chromatography).

The heptane was checked for MEK and tBuOH levels by GC using an HP-5 column at 35 °C with a 0.5 mL flow rate. tR MEK =4.9 min, tR tBuOH=5.3 min, tR heptane=7.7 min. The volume was adjusted to 350 mL, cooled to -5°C and filtered, washing twice with 150 mL 0°C heptane. After drying, the product was obtained as an off-white solid. Melting point (m.p.): 155-157°C.NMR (iH, 300MHz, CDCI3): 5.70 (s, 1H), 4.7 (m, 1 H), 2.5-0.8 (m, 43 H), 0.6 (s, 3H).

Step 2:

C ₂₈ H ₄₈ O2 MW=416

Materials Amt Mole MW

7-keto-cholesteryl acetate (95% pure) 60 g (as is) 0.13 442

Methyl magnesium chloride (3.0M) 160 mL 0.48

CeCl3 (anhydrous) 16.6 g 0.068 245

THF (KF=50 μg/mL) 300 mL

Citric acid 1 15 g 0.60 192 water 500 mL toluene 600 mL sat'd NaHCθ3 240 mL

Anhydrous cerium chloride ( 16.6 g) was stirred as a slurry in THF ( 150 mL) at 20°C under N2 for 2h. After two hours a sample of the slurry was removed and showed fine needles under a microscope. To the slurry was added the Grignard reagent (160 mL) and the resulting light purple mixture was aged for 30 minutes.

To the cooled mixture (20°C) was added the ketone (60 g at 95% purity, 57 g by assay) in THF (150 mL) over 50 minutes while allowing the mixture to exotherm to 30°C Addition of the ketone to the Grignard reagent was exothermic, the exotherm was controlled by the rate of addition. The ketone solution in THF should be warmed to 30°C to ensure complete dissolution, prior to adding it to the Grignard reagent.

The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC (high pressure liquid chromatography). A 0.5 mL sample was added to 10 mL of 0.1N HO Ac and then diluted to 50 mL with CH3CN. HPLC conditions [Zorbax® phenyl column, CH3CN, water, phosphoric acid; 75:25:0.1 gradient elution to 90: 10:0.1 at 18 minutes, flow=1.5 mL/min, UV detection at 200 nm]. Retention times, 3,7-diol tR=5.6 and 5.9 min, starting ketone tR=10.9 min, intermediate 7-OH, 3-0 Ac tR=9.8 and 10.8 min.).

Once complete, the reaction was quenched by adding it to a 0°C mixture of citric acid solution (1 15 g in 300 mL of water) and toluene (300 mL). The quench was exothermic.

(NOTE: The rate of addition should be carefully controlled to maintain an internal temperature below 10°C)

The two phase mixture was stirred for 30 minutes and allowed to stand for 10-15 minutes for an adequate phase separation. The pH of the aqueous layer was ca. 2. The organic phase was separated, washed with water (200 mL, pH=3 after washing) and saturated NaHCθ3 solution (240 mL, pH=8 after washing). This afforded 750 mL of an organic layer which contained 66 mg/mL of diol. The batch was concentrated to 300 mL in vacuo ( 100-

200 mm), diluted to 600 mL with toluene and re- concentrated to 360 mL. The solvent switch to toluene was considered complete when the G.C. area% of THF was <2% of the toluene area%. (NOTE: The first 200 mL of the distillation has a tendency to foam at low pressures. Once this phase is complete, the vacuum should be brought down to 100 mm. The distillation temperature slowly rises from 20°C to ca. 45°C as the solvent switch to toluene nears completion.)

Samples of the distillate were assayed for residual THF using G.C. A sample of ca. 0.1 mL was diluted to 1 mL with methanol. G.C. conditions: [HP-5 column (25 M, 0.32 μm ID) using a heated block injector, 35°C isothermal, flow=0.5 mL/min], MeOH tR=5.5 min, THF tR=6.2 min, toluene tR=10.1 min. The final assay was performed using a sample from the batch. The organic layer contained 134.4 mg/mL of diols.

(NOTE: The KF of the batch should be below 100 μg/mL before proceeding with the next step.)

Step 3: Oppenauer Oxidation

C ₂₈ H ₄₈ 0 ₂ MW =416

Materials Amt MMole MW

7-methyl-7-hydroxy-cholesterol 30.2 g 72.6 416

2-butanone (d=0.805, KF=480 μg/mL) 126 mL 1404 72.1 1

Aluminum isopropoxide 18.9 g 93

204.25

3N HC1 120 mL

5 % NaCl solution 120 mL

Cone. HCl 3.5 mL 42

D.I. water 60 mL

Saturated NaHCθ3 60 mL

To the toluene solution of the diol (256 mL, 1 1 mg/mL) was added 2-butanone (126 mL) and aluminum isopropoxide (18.9 g). The solution was heated to reflux (92°C) under nitrogen. The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC.

The batch was assayed for 2-butanone content by G.C prior to adding the aluminum isopropoxide. A sample of ca. 0.1 mL was diluted to 1 mL with MeOH. G.C. conditions [HP-5 column (25m, 0.32 μm ID) using a heated block injector at 250°C, column temp at 35°C isothermal, flow=0.5 mL/min] 2-butanone tR=6.1 min, MeOH tR=5.5 min, toluene tR=10.1 min. The KF of the starting mixture was 70 μg/mL.

A 0.1 mL sample of the reaction mixture was quenched into 0.1N HO Ac solution (2-3 mL) and then diluted to 10 mL with CH3CN in a volumetric flask. HPLC conditions [25cm Zorbax® Phenyl column; CH3CN:H2θ with 0.1 % phosphoric acid: 75:25 gradient elution to 90: 10 at 18 min, hold 90: 10 until 22 min; flow=l .5 mL/min, UV detection at 210 nm.] Starting diols tR=5.4, 5.8 min, intermediate Δ-4 eneone tR=6.4 min, dieneone tR= 12.1 min.

The reaction was considered complete when the level of starting diol was <3 area% (8 hours). Once complete the batch was cooled to 15-20°C and quenched with 3N HCl (120 mL). The two phase mixture was stirred for 20 min, and then allowed to settle. The lower aqueous layer was removed and the organic layer was washed with 5% NaCl (120 mL). The batch was concentrated in vacuo to one half volume (40-60°C at 150 mm). The distillation removed excess 2-butanone from the batch. The level of 2- butanone in the final batch was <2% of the toluene (using G.C.) and the KF was 60 μg/mL.

The toluene solution was treated with cone. HCl (3.5 mL) at 25°C, under N2- The reaction was assayed by HPLC until the intermediate tertiary alcohol was completely converted to dieneone (about 1 h). The solution was washed with D.I. water (60 mL) and saturated NaHC03 (60 mL). The pH of the bicarbonate wash was 8.5. (NOTE: The decomposition reaction will turn black if run for longer than 8 hours.) The resulting red solution (128 mL) contained 202 mg/mL of dienone.

Step 4: Transfer Hydrogenation

^28^420 MW=398

Materials Amt MMole MW

Dieneone (toluene solution) 31.5 g 79.5 396.7

5% Palladium on carbon (dry) 4.5 g

Cyclohexene (d=0.811) 120 mL 1.18 mole 82.15

1 ,8 diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene

(DBU) 0.63 mL 4.2 152.2

Absolute ethanol 495 mL

3N HCl 150 mL half saturated NaHC03 100 mL

Solka Floe™ diatomaceous earth

Hexanes 250 mL t-butanol 175 mL

The toluene solution of the dieneone (150 mL at 214.6 mg/mL) was diluted with ethanol (120 mL) and cyclohexene (120 mL) and DBU (0.62 mL). To the mixture was added 5% palladium on carbon (9.0 g of 50% water wet). The mixture was degassed using vacuum/nitrogen purges (3x). The slurry was then heated to reflux (reflux temperature=72°C). The reaction was monitored by HPLC

A 2 mL sample of the reaction mixture was filtered through Solka Floe™ diatomaceous earth. The filtrate (0.1 mL) was diluted to 10 mL with CH3CN and analyzed by HPLC: 25 cm Zorbax® phenyl column; acetonitrile/water containing 0.1 % phosphoric acid: gradient elution from 75:25 to 90: 10

CH3CN: water in 18 min, hold 90: 10 until 22 min; flow=1.5 mL/min; UV detection at 200 nm.

Dienone tR=12.1 min, Δ-4 enone tR=13.2 min, Δ-5 enone tR=14.1 min, over-reduced ketone tR=14.4 min, ethyl enol ether tR=20.9 min. The over-reduced ketone should be assayed at 192 nm.

The reaction was considered complete when the dieneone level was <2 A% and the Δ-5 enone level was 5% (about 10 hours). When the reaction was complete the mixture was cooled to ambient temperature. The palladium was removed by filtration through Solka Floe™ diatomaceous earth and the filter cake was washed with ethanol (150 mL).

The batch contained 51 mg/mL of enone. (NOTE: Prolonged reaction times should be avoided since over-reduction can occur. If the starting material has been consumed and the level of Δ-5 enone is >5% after 10 hours, then the palladium should be filtered, and the isomerization completed without catalyst present.)

The solution was concentrated under reduced pressure (75 mm) to a volume of approximately 150 mL. The batch was diluted with ethanol (225 mL) and re-concentrated to 150 mL.

The solvent switch to ethanol was considered complete when the toluene level was <2% of the ethanol by G.C, and there was no detectable cyclohexene. (NOTE: Removal of cyclohexene is important since it reacts in the subsequent oxidative cleavage step and unproductively consumes periodate.) A 0.1 mL sample was diluted to 1 mL with ethanol for the cyclohexene assay (and 1,1,1 trichloro-ethane for the toluene assay). G.C. conditions [HP-5 (25M x 0.32 μm ID), using a heated block injector at 250°C, column temp at 35°C isothermal, flow=0.5 mL/min] ethanol

tR=5.6 min, cyclohexene tR=7.7 min, trichloroethane tR=7.7 min, toluene tR=10.2 min. The presence of cyclohexene is also detectable by lH NMR (CDCI3) of the solution: cyclohexene vinyl protons at δ=5.64 ppm, eneone vinyl proton at δ=5.69 ppm.

The concentrate was diluted with hexanes (250 mL) and 3N HCl (150 mL). The two phase mixture was warmed to 40°C until enol ether hydrolysis was complete. The layers were separated and the organic layer was washed with half saturated sodium bicarbonate (100 mL). The hexane phase had a volume of 291 mL, contained less than 5% ethanol by volume and assayed for 92 mg/mL of enone.

The solution was concentrated to 100 mL under reduced pressure (100 mm/15°C). The batch was diluted with t- butanol (175 mL) and re-concentrated to 100 mL (100 mm/40°C). The batch contained 260 mg/mL of the desired 7-β-methyl enone.

Step 5: Oxidative Cleavage

C ₂₇ H ₄₆ 0 ₃ MW=418

Materials Amt Mol MW

7-β-Methylcholest-4-ene-3-one 300 g 0.75 398

t-Butanol (d=0.786) 6.6 L

Sodium carbonate 159 g 1.5 106

Sodium periodate 1550 g 7.2 213.9

Potassium permanganate 1 1. l g 0.07 158

D. I. Water 14.2 L

Diatomite 50 g

Ethyl acetate (d=0.902) 2.6 L

Heptane (d=0.684) 5.0 L cone. Hydrochloric acid 250 mL

5% Aqueous NaCl 2.5 L

Acetic acid (d= 1.049) 9.0 L

In a 5L roundbottom flask was charged D.I. water (4.93 L), sodium periodate (1.55 Kg) and potassium permanganate (1 1.1 g). The slurry was stirred at 65°C for 30 minutes to obtain complete solution.

To a solution of the enone (300 g) in t-butanol (4.60 L) was added a solution of sodium carbonate (159 g) in water (2.3 L). The two phase mixture was warmed to 65°C The enone should be toluene, ethanol and cyclohexene free. (NOTE:

Concentration of enone in organic layer is about 56 mgL-1.) The sodium periodate solution was added to the enone solution over 3h with rapid stirring, maintaining the reaction temperature at 65°C The slurry was aged at 65°C for 2h. The periodate solution was added via a heated addition funnel.

Carbon dioxide gas was evolved during the reaction. A slow addition ensures controlled gas evolution. No exotherm was detected during addition. During the addition a purple/brown slurry was formed. The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC. A 2 mL sample of the reaction mixture was cooled to 15°C and filtered. The filtrate (0.1 mL) was diluted to 10 mL with water/CH3CN (1 :3). HPLC conditions [YMC Basic 25cm x 4.6mm, CH3CN,

0.0 IM H3PO4; 90: 10 isocratic flow=1.5 mL/min, UV detection at 200 nm]; enone tR=l 1.5 min, seco-acid tR=5.5 min.

The reaction was considered complete when the starting enone was <0.5mg/mL. Water (3.0L) was added and the slurry heated to reflux for 2h to decompose any remaining KMnθ4 (color change from purple to brown) and to dissolve most of the solids precipitated on the vessel walls. The resultant slurry was cooled to 15°C and filtered through dicalite (50 g). The vessel and cake were washed with t-butanol/water (1 :2, 6.0L). The filter cake was assayed for seco acid by dissolving 200-400 mg of cake with 50 mL water and 50 mL acetonitrile then filtering into the sample vial through diatomite to remove the small amount of orange manganese solids. The filtrates (pH=9.0-10.5) were extracted with heptane (5.0L). Ethyl acetate (2.6 L) was added to the aqueous mixture and the pH adjusted to 2.5+0.3 by the addition of cone. HCl (250 mL). The aqueous layer was removed.

The organic layer was washed with 5% aqueous brine (2 x 1.2 L). The ethyl acetate solution was concentrated (150 mm.Hg, 30°C) to approx 10% volume. Acetic acid (7.4 L) was added and the residual ethyl acetate removed by concentration (100 mm.Hg, 60°C) to <1% by volume (<0.5 area% by HPLC). The final volume was adjusted to 5.0 L by addition of acetic acid. Ethyl acetate removal was monitored by HPLC using the conditions above except the flow rate was 0.5 mL min-1 and UV detection at 210 nm. Ethyl acetate tR=7.4 min, acetic acid tR=6.9 min. The acetic acid solution was used directly in the following step (ene-lactam formation).

Step 6: NH-Enelactam Formation

Materials Amt Mole MW

Seco-acid 265 g 0.634 418

Ammonium Acetate 488 g 6.33 77.1

2,6-di-t-butyl-4- methylphenol (BHT) 5.3 g 0.024 220

D.I. Water 565 mL

Acetic acid 833 mL

To a solution of seco-acid in acetic acid (265 g in 5.3 L) obtained in the previous step was added BHT (5.3 g) and ammonium acetate (488 g) at 20°C The slurry was warmed to a gentle reflux under a nitrogen atmosphere for 3h. Complete solution was obtained at 30°C The internal temperature was 120°C at reflux. Color changed from yellow to dark red/brown. Use of reduced amounts of acetic acid results in oiling of the product at the crystallization stage.

The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC. HPLC conditions [SB Phenyl, CH3CN, 0.0 I M H3PO4; isocratic 80:20 for 30 min, flow=1.5 mL/min, UV detection at 190/200 nm] Retention times: ene-lactam tR=9.4 min, seco acid tR=5.3 min. UV detection was at 190 nm for reaction progress and 200 nm for s.m. and product assay. The reaction was considered complete when <0.05 A% seco acid remained, about 3-4 hrs.

The reaction mixture was cooled to 60°C and water (398 mL) added over 15 min. (NOTE: Addition of exactly 7.5% v/v water to the acetic acid solution is important.) The solution was allowed to cool to 50°C and seeded with ene-lactam ( 1.0 g). Crystallization occurred at 50°C The slurry obtained was aged at 50°C for lh and then cooled to 0-2°C over 2h.

The slurry was filtered and the light tan solid washed with 5 : 1 acetic acid/water ( 1.0 L).

Step 7: NH-Enelactam Recrystallization

Materials Amt Mole

MW Enelactam 20 g 0.041

400 D.I. Water 17 mL

Acetic acid 133 mL

BHT 0.20 g 0.00091

220

To 20 g at 83 wt% enelactam was added 100 mL acetic acid which contained 200 mg of BHT. The slurry was warmed to 60°C under a nitrogen atmosphere to achieve dissolution, then cooled to 50°C A charge of 10 mL water was then added. The mixture was then cooled to 5°C over 1.5 hrs, aged for one hour and then the solid filtered off. (NOTE: The solution at 50°C should have started crystallizing before cooling to 5°C) The solution Kf after BHT addition was about 0.2-0.4% w/w.

The mother liquor amounts were monitored by HPLC. HPLC conditions [SB Phenyl, CH3CN, 0.0 I M H3PO4; isocratic 80:20 for 30 min, flow=l .5 mL/min, UV detection at 200 nm] Retention times: ene-lactam tR=9.4 min. Sample 100 μL and dilute to 10 mL with acetonitrile.

The slurry was filtered and the light tan solid washed with 5: 1 acetic acid/water (40 mL) at 5°C M.p. solvate is 1 12- 1 15°C Pure m.p. is 175- 178°C, softens at 162°C

Step 8: N-H Enelactam Reduction

C ₂₇ H ₄₇ I NO MW=401 .6

Materials Amount Mol MW

Enelactam 1.02 g .0026 339.<

Ethanol(punctilious) 100 mL

BHT 2 mg

5% Rhodium on carbon 200 mg .097mmol 103

BHT (2 mg) was dissolved in degassed ethanol (100 mL) and the solution degassed with nitrogen purge. The enelactam and 5% Rhodium on carbon (200 mg) were added and the slurry degassed for a further 30 minutes with stirring. The resultant slurry placed under 250 psi of hydrogen in a stirred autoclave maintained at 30° C The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC. HPLC conditions [Zorbax® Phenyl, MeOH, H2O; 90: 10 isocratic, flow=1.0 mL/min, UV detection at 210 nm] ene-lactam tR= min, 5-α lactam tR=12.4 min, 5-β lactam tR= 15.0 min.

After 24 hours the mixture was removed from the hydrogenator and the catalyst filtered off. Analysis of the solution

by HPLC shows a 1 :264 mixture of 5-β : 5-α product. The solution was concentrated to give the product as a white solid (m.p. 188-190°C, 90% yield), 300 MHz NMR (H!CDCl3) : 5.96(lH,brs), 3.05(lH,dd,J=12.3,3.5hz), 2.38(2H,m), 2.0(1 H,m), 1.75(3H,m), 1.60-0.7(34H,m), 0.67(3H.s); (C 13 CDCI3) 172.2, 59.6, 56.8, 55. 3, 52.0, 44.1 , 42.6, 40.1 , 39.5, 37.9, 36.2, 35.7, 35.2, 35.1 , 33.6, 28.7, 28.6, 28.0, 27.8, 23.9, 23.0, 22.8, 22.6, 21.8, 18.9, 12.5, 1 1.5.

If an N-alkyl compound of formula II is desired, lactam .8 may be N-alkylated as illustrated by Example 2 shown below.

EXAMPLE 2

Methylation of 7β-methyl-4-aza-5α-cholestan-3-one

C ₂₇ H ₄₇ NO MW = 401.6

IV-a

C ₂₈ H ₄₉ NO MW = 415.7

Materials Amount Mol MW N-H Lactam 3.0 Kg 7.47 401.6 Methyl chloride 453 g 8.96 50.5 KOH/Alumina[l : l] 3.0 Kg 22.8 56 BnMe3NCl 150 g 0.81 185.7

Toluene (d=0.867) 14.0 L

A 5 gallon autoclave was charged with a slurry of lactam (3.0 Kg), BnMe3NCl (150 g) and potassium hydroxide on alumina ( 1 : 1 , 3.0 Kg) in toluene ( 12L) at room temperature.

Methyl chloride (453 g) was introduced at 20°C with slow stirring.

The slurry was heated to 65°C with slow stirring and aged for lh. An exotherm at 52°C of about 3°C was noted as a spike on the temperature recorder.

The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC. HPLC conditions [Zorbax® SB phenyl, CH3CN, 0.0 IM H3PO4; 90: 10 isocratic, flow=1.5 mL/min, UV detection at 200 nm] lactam tR=12.4 min, IV-a tR= 15.0 min. 25 μL Sample of toluene layer was diluted to 2 mL with acetonitrile. The reaction was monitored until complete conversion was obtained (>99.95%). The reaction was complete in <60 min at 60°C

The reaction mixture was cooled to 20°C and purged with nitrogen (4X) to remove any excess MeCl. The toluene solution was filtered through Solka Floe™ diatomaceous earth (100 g) and the vessel and cake washed with toluene (2 L). The combined filtrates were concentrated at 100 mm. Hg and 20-30°C to a residual oil. The oil should be homogeneous in heptane (10 mLg-1) without any cloudiness.

The oil was assayed for toluene by G.C. oven temp 35°C isothermal. The product (100 mg) was dissolved in methanol (0.5 mL) and 1 μL injected. Toluene tR=4.4 min, methanol tR=2.7min.

The oil was kept under vacuum until the solvent level was <2%. The oil was poured into a glass tray and seeded with IV- a (1.25 g) and allowed to stand in vacuo (20 mm.Hg) overnight. The resulting solid was cut into blocks and broken up in a WARING blender containing 2°C water (10 L) to a particle size of <50 μm. The slurry was filtered, washed with water (5.0 L) and dried in a nitrogen stream overnight. Yield of product = 3.0 kg, 97%.

The process of the present invention can also be used to directly reduce an N-alkylated enelactam of formula I as illustrated by Example 3.

EXAMPLE 3

Preparation of 4.7β-dimethyl-4-aza-5α-cholestan-3-one

C ₂₈ H ₄₉ NO MW=415

Materials Amount Mol MW

Enelactam 1900.0 g 4.75 399.64

Ethanol(punctilious) 22 L

5% Rhodium on carbon 380 g 0.18 103

Hydrogen 250 psi

Celite 100 g

Hexane 4.0 L

Enelactam (1900.0 g) was dissolved in ethanol (8.0 L) and the solution degassed with nitrogen purge for 18h. 5% Rhodium on carbon (380 g) was added and the slurry degassed for a further 30 minutes with stirring. The resultant slurry was charged to a 5 gallon stirred autoclave. A further charge of degassed ethanol (4.0 L) was used to rinse the starting material and catalyst into the autoclave. The

hydrogenation was performed at 30°C and 250 psi hydrogen pressure for 18h. Typically <4% ene-lactam remains after 18h.

The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC, [YMC-basic , CH3CN, 0.1 M H3PO4; 1.5 mL/min, λ= 210 nm]. Retention times: Enelactam 16.1 min, trans-lactam 13.8 min, cis- lactam 13.1 min, 7-des methyl trans-lactam 12.4 min. Samples for HPLC analysis were removed without introducing oxygen into the system.

The hydrogenation mixture was filtered through Celite (100 g). Ethanol (8.0L) was used to rinse the autoclave and wash the cake. The Celite was washed with ethanol (2000 mL).

The combined colorless filtrate was concentrated to residue at 75mm. Hexane (4.0 L) was added, concentrated to residue and assayed for product. Analysis of the solution by HPLC shows a 1 :500 mixture of 5-β : 5-α product. The assay yield was 98%. The crude product contained unreacted ene-lactam (1.8%), 7-des methyl trans-lactam (<0.1 %) and cis-lactam (<0.2%). The hydrogenation also produced 0.07% over-reduced product which lacks the lactam carbonyl oxygen. The resulting oil was chromatographed on silica gel

(17 kg, 230-400 mesh) eluting with 1 :3 v/v ethyl acetate : hexane (100L) followed by 3: 1 v/v ethyl acetate : hexane (140L). The fractions containing the 5 α/β products were combined and concentrated under vacuum. The resultant oil was seeded with 5α product (l .Og) and allowed to crystallize over 5 days. The resulting solid was ground in a mortar and pestle to give 4,7β- dimethyl-4-aza-5α-cholestan-3-one (1.53Kg) as a white, low melting crystalline solid, m.p. 58-62°C, 300 MHz ^] H NMR (H ICDCI3) : 3.02(1H, dd, J=12.7, 3.6), 2.92(3H, s), 2.43(2H, m), 2.01 (1H, dt, J=12.3, 3.2), 1.92(1 H, dt, J=12.7, 4.0), 1.89- 1.70(3H,m), 1.58(lH, m), 1.52( lH,m), 1.41-0.96(17H, m), 1.05(3H, d, J=6.3), 0.92(3H, d, J=6.3), 0.87(3H, d, J=6.7), 0.86(3H, d, J=6.7), 0.84(3H, s), 0.81 (1H, m), 0.68(3H, s), 75 MHz 1 c NMR (C1 CDC13) : 170.6, 64.7, 56.8, 55.2, 52.6, 44.0, 41.7,

40.1, 39.5, 36.1 , 35.9, 35.8, 35.7, 33.1 , 29.1 , 28.6, 28.0, 27.7, 23.8,

23.2, 22.8, 22.5, 21.7, 18.8, 12.6, 12.4.

EXAMPLE 4

Preparation of 7β-methyl-4-aza-5β-cholestan-3-one

C ₂₇ H ₄₇ NO MW=401.6

Materials Amount Mol MW

Enelactam 333 mg 0.83 mmol 399.6

Trifluoroacetic acid 3 mL

Di-t-butylmethylsilane 260 mg

To 333 mg of enelactam (0.83 mmol) in 3 mL of trifluoroacetic acid was added 260 mg di-t-butylmethylsilane (1.64 mmol) and the mixture heated to reflux for about 2 hours until no enelactam remains. The mixture was cooled, concentrated to an oil, dissolved in hexane and washed with water twice.

Analysis of the mixture by HPLC showed a 90: 1 ratio of 5-β : 5-α product. Chromatography on silica using ethyl acetate gave the product as a white solid (m.p. 90-94°C, 87% yield).

As in preparation of the α-reduction product, the process of this invention can be used to produce 5β- reduction products of N-H enelactams which can be subsequently N- alkylated as in Example 2 or to directly reduce N-alkylated enelactams as in Example 3.

EXAMPLE 5

Preparation of 4.7β-dimethyl-4-aza-5β-16β-hydroxy-androst-3- one

Materials Amt. mmole MW

Enelactam (100 wt%) 2.0 g 6.3 317.5

TFA 20 mL

Me(tBu)2SiH 5 g 31.5 158

EtOH 20 mL

KOH 1.76 g 31.5 56

To the enelactam alcohol (2.0 g, 6.3 mmol) in TFA (20 mL) was added Me(tBu)2SiH and heated to 60-70 °C until less than 1 % remained.

The reaction was monitored by HPLC YMC-ODS-H80, CH3CN: 0.01 % H3PO4: gradient elution from 60:40 to 90: 10 in 15 minutes, flow=1.5 mL/min, UV detection at 210 nm. Enelactam- 16-β- OH Rχ=8.4 min, lactam- 16-β-OH Rτ=3.7 min, lactam- 16-α-OH Rτ=3.9 min intermediate trifluoroacetate, Rτ=15.6 min.

The reaction mixture was cooled to RT and concentrated in vacuo. The oil was dissolved in 20 mL ethanol and 1 M KOH (31 mL) added. The mixture was heated to 50 °C and aged until the trifluoroacetate was gone. After cooling to RT, 50 mL toluene was added and the layers separated. HPLC assay shows a 1 :30 ratio of 5-α : 5-β reduction isomers. The toluene layer was washed 2x 50 mL water and then solvent switched to acetonitrile (10 mL), cooled to 0 °C and filtered off a white solid. 300 MHz iH NMR(CDCl3): 4.35 (1H, m), 3.0 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 2.8 Hz), 2.90 (3H, s), 2.4 (IH, br s), 2.3 (2H, m), 0.90-1.75(m, 25H). 75 MHz 13c NMR (CDCI3): 171 ,1 , 71.7, 64.9, 54.2, 50.7, 42.7, 41.3, 41.2, 40.2, 39.1 , 34.6, 33.9, 31.7, 31.4, 31.0, 28.4, 22.2, 21.7, 21.4, 19.1.

EXAMPLE 6

Preparation of 7β-methyl-4-aza-5β-16β-phenoxy-androst-3-one

Starting with the enelactam above, the title compound is prepared according to the procedures of Example 4.

EXAMPLE 7

Preparation of 4.7β-dimethyl-4-aza-5β-16β-hvdroxy-androst-3- one (Rhodium Hydrogenation

Materials Amt. mmole MW

Enelactam (100 wt%) 1.150g 3.62 317.46

5% Rh/C 0.640 g

95% Ethanol 17mL

Solka Floe™ diatomaceous earth 5 g

DI water 30mL

The enelactam alcohol (1.15g) was dissolved in 95% ethanol (12 mL) and degassed with a nitrogen purge for 15 min. To this solution was added of 5wt% Rh/C (0.64 g) and the slurry transferred to a stirred autoclave using 2.5mL additional EtOH as a rinse. The mixture was placed under 40 psi hydrogen and heated to 30°C for 4 h and then heated to 50°C until <0.01 % starting material remained.

The reaction was monitored by HPLC. SB phenyl CH3CN: 0.01% H3PO4: gradient elution from 45:55 for 10 min then gradient elution to 90: 10 in 15 minutes, flow= 1.5 mL/min, UV detection at 210. Enelactam- 16-β-OH Rτ=8.4 min, 5-b-lactam-16 β-OH Rτ=3.7 min, 5-a-lactam-16- α-OH 3.9 min.

The batch was removed from the autoclave and cycled through a pad of Solka Floe™ diatomaceous earth until the rhodium was removed.

An additional 15 mL of ethanol was used to wash the product from the filter cake. The combined filtrates were then re-filtered through a 0.2 μm in-line filter and concentrated to about 5 mL ethanol. HPLC assay shows a 250: 1 ratio of 5-α : 5-β reduction isomers. Water was slowly added until the cloud point was reached (20 mL), seeded with 10 mg lactam and aged 20 min. The slurry was then cooled to 0°C and filtered. The product was obtained as a white solid. The filtrate and washes contains 3% of product.

300 MHz iH NMR(CDCl3): 4.35 (IH, m), 3.0 (I H, dd, J = 8.5, 3.2 Hz), 2.89 (3H, s), 2.4-2.2 (2H, m), 0.90-1.75(m, 25H).

75 MHz 1 c NMR (CDC13): 170.9, 71.8, 64.8, 53.9, 52.7, 50.6, 41.7, 41.5, 40.7, 39.2, 36.0, 35.54, 35.50, 32.9, 29.3, 29.0, 22.9, 21.4, 19.5, 12.6.

EXAMPLE 8

Preparation of 4.7β-dimethyl-4-aza-5β- 16β-phenoxy-androst-3- one

Starting with the 16-phenoxy-4,7b-dimethyl-4-aza- androst-5-en-3-one above and following the procedures of Example 4, the title compound is prepared.

EXAMPLE 9

According to the procedures outlined in Examples 1 8, the following compounds of structural formula below are prepared from the corresponding ene-lactam.

Compound R Rl

30 H H OH

31 Me H OH

32 Me Me OMe

33 H Me (-CH(CH3)2)

EXAMPLE 10

According to the procedures outlined in Examples 1 8, the following compounds of structural formula below are prepared from the corresponding ene-lactams

Compound R Rl

40 H H OH

0

41 H Me O-CNHPh

42 Me Me -OMe

EXAMPLE 1 1

According to the procedures outlined in Examples 1 • 8, the following compounds of structural formula below are prepared from the corresponding ene-lactams

Compound R R l A

50 H Me -CH(CH )2

51 H Me -OH

52 Me Me -OMe

53 Me Me -OAc

54 H Me -C02H

EXAMPLE 12

According to the procedures outlined in Examples 1 • 8, the following compounds of structural formula below are prepared from the corresponding ene-lactams

Compound R Rl

0

62 H Me O-CNHPh

-0-CH ₃

63 H Me

While the foregoing specification teaches the principles of the present invention, with examples provided for the purpose of illustration, it will be understood that the practice of the invention encompasses all of the usual variations, adaptations, and

modifi cations, as come within the scope of the following claims and its equivalents.